Jungwon Goguryeo headstone.

 In 1979, a monument built during the Goguryeo period was discovered in Ipseok-ri, Jungwon, Chungcheongbuk-do. It is not known whether it was a monument built while pioneering the border or simply a monument built by the king after hunting or going on a pilgrimage, but the fact that Goguryeo's monument was found here meant that Goguryeo's influence remained this far. Although this monument must have been built by King Jangsu (413-491), many views were made in the process of reading letters worn out by Pungsang. The private academia organized academic conferences for related professors. The core of the question is when this monument was built. Of course, there were no letters that could be clues to solve this problem, so the problem became even more mysterious. However, Dr. Doo-gye Lee Byung-do, a big adult in the private academia at the time, analyzed the monument and claimed that it was built in the 4th year of Geonheung (475). Do young scholars ask about the argument? Dugye replied, "I was so indifferent that I appeared in my dream," and the juniors who joined me said, "I have to learn this academic tenacity." This is not a guest story that came and went from private places, but a fact that was published in academic journals after being presented at the conference.   In historical academia, the school that connects Doo-gye and him is called the positivist school. The proposition that characterizes positivism is that science is the only valid knowledge, and only facts are possible objects of knowledge. Therefore, positivism rejects the existence of any force or entity beyond the laws confirmed by facts or science and rejects research methods that are not reduced by any metaphysics or scientific method. What we are truly sad and concerned about in this case (p. 59-60 of "Positivist Historian" and "What is Historian" is that the 83-year-old Doo-gye, once lost his intelligence and made such a mistake, could not stop them, so it was published in our journal. Young scholars at the meeting were not thrilled to hear Doo-gye's remarks and recorded them. Rather, it was right to know and cover it up with their own stories. Why did the Korean historical community, which criticized the crowd who challenged their views so passionately under the name of "Japanese private school," make such a terrible mistake in this section?