In the early 1970s, amid the trend of East-West detents, we first proposed the Red Cross talks to start dialogue between the two Koreas, but of course, the "Spring of Panmunjeom" did not last long. However, President Park Chung-hee made an offer to North Korea on inter-Korean relations at a congratulatory speech every August 15. And this tradition continued to the 5th and 6th contributions and the civil government. This is not because of North Korea, but because inter-Korean relations needed to improve in order to protect our economy and get the people out of the fear of war. However, until the mid-1990s, North Korea was also defensive, so it was not easy to find a point of contact between the two Koreas. With the Kim Dae Jung government's inter-Korean summit and the revitalization of inter-Korean exchanges and cooperation, at least the general public felt much less security anxiety. However, is it a service pair? As the desired improvement in inter-Korean relations became a reality, the "South-South conflict" began to emerge.Criticism such as "It is a pro-North Korean regime that sides with and spreads with North Korea," "It is an anti-U.S. regime that confronts the U.S.," and "Korea-U.S. relations are deteriorating because of inter-Korean relations." has not subsided even after the Roh Moo Hyun administration. Basically, it can be said that it is the foot of Cold War logic, black and white logic, or the consciousness of respect for the United States, but some things need to be pointed out for healthy discussions on unification and national self-reliance diplomacy in the future. First, if mechanical reciprocity is not applied without pressure on North Korea, is it pro-North Korea and spreading? It was proved in the process of forming the European Union (EU) that dialogue, exchange, cooperation, travel, and support are the powerful methodologies for peace settlement and integration between competitive and hostile countries. Inter-Korean economic cooperation and support for North Korea are not meant to be anti-North Korea, but not pro-North Korea. It is a way to correct reality on the basis of acknowledging reality. Other than this method, is there a trick to improve inter-Korean relations and unify peacefully? Second, shouldn't you criticize the United States for being rough with diplomacy, but say it hurts when you're sick? If the opponent seems to be listening to our argument, don't you have no choice but to speak loudly? What if we define even the question raised out of desperation to prevent nuclear catastrophe as "confrontation" or "anti-American" within us? The United States has helped us a lot and is still an ally, but the United States and our national interests cannot be the same. When the US policy is against us, we should say it is disadvantageous and do our best to persuade the US. Why do you do diplomacy? In Korea-Japan relations, it is self-conflict and subjugation to draw the line between pro-American and anti-American in Korea-U.S. relations, while ordering "talking what to say" and maximizing national interests regardless of pro-Japanese and anti-Japanese relations. Third, improving inter-Korean relations is a way to make peace. Korea-U.S. relations have a great economic significance, but they are basically a means of "protecting peace." However, 'protecting peace' alone cannot promise 'peace in an active sense' or unification. Therefore, until the national goal of peace and unification is achieved, inter-Korean relations and Korea-U.S. relations should be properly balanced and utilized, not tilted to either side. In short, Korea-U.S. relations are not an end, but a means. Now is the time to abandon the black-and-white logic of anti-North Korea or pro-North Korea and anti-American relations. Although this is not even the Cold War era, the problem on the Korean Peninsula cannot be solved by approaching it with black and white logic like children or ideological cross-disciplinary arguments. In the future, we should abandon the sense of "cow" that we feel relieved only when we catch anyone's pants, analyze the situation "from my country's point of view" and lead the situation according to the national tax of the country preparing for the $20,000 era. It is also our responsibility to further change North Korea and improve inter-Korean relations, and it is our job to make neighboring countries cooperate with our unification. I can't leave this to another country, but there's no way another country will do it. Of course, since the realistically important country is the United States, it is necessary to cooperate closely with the United States, but to cooperate at the level of beauty, not at the level of Sungmi, and to dexterate diplomacy that appropriately utilizes related countries at that time. To this end, we must remove the sense of periphery in our hearts. Korea is a considerably larger country than self-assessment. In December 1970, German Prime Minister Billy Brandt knelt down in front of a Jewish memorial in Warsaw, Poland, in December 1970. Gatoran collective detention center locked up by the Nazi regime before executing Jews.In early 1943, the Jews of Ghetto revolted against the Nazi army. Fifty-six,000 Jewish victims were killed in a four-month-long fight or arrested and sent to camps. In 1975, Germany enacted a special law and established the Georg Eckert International Textbook Research Institute.Succession and expansion of private research institutes by historian Eckert, who had already led joint research on history textbooks between Germany and France in the 1950s. Since then, the institute has conducted joint research on history textbooks with Poland and Israel, another victims of World War II, respectively. On January 27, 1995, a ceremony was held to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz Camp. This also symbolized the German people's victory over the Nazi regime. The German government officially designated January 27 as a day to remember past mistakes. In 2000, Germany launched the 'Memory, Responsibility and Future' Foundation.It is an institution in which the state compensates individuals who were taken to the Nazis during World War II and forced labor. Earlier, Germany paid 25 billion marks to Israel as state compensation and 15 billion marks to Nazi victims and their bereaved families separately. On May 8, 2005, a large sculpture appeared at Brandenburg Square in Berlin, Germany's No. 1 political district. It is a monument dedicated to all 6 million Jews slaughtered not only in Germany but also across Europe. This day marks the 60th anniversary of Germany's defeat in World War II. After World War II, Germany thoroughly reflected on the Nazi regime's errors at the national level. As seen in the name of the compensation agency, they know that they must "remember" and "responsible" the past to promise a "future." Therefore, there is no conflict between Germany and neighboring war victims over "true apology," textbook distortion, and forced labor compensation." German President Horst Köller, who visited the Israeli parliament on the 2nd, reportedly showed tears while delivering a speech of penance.It is a German tear that has been constantly reflecting on the past for 60 years, and the hearts of the Germans are united.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기