Short and foolish opinions about Dangun.

 There are so many people who get so excited that it's weird to hear "national," "cookies," or "Japanese."There was a time when Sohae also had a war of words for more than 300 ppl even though he knew that it was useless for the legendary Jungbba Chen's writing. As written in the ripple below, history can be resentful or angry over the results, but I believe it should be cool and objective in the process. Yesterday and today's topic seems to have been "Dangun," so I think it's first to express Sohae's position and view on it. 1. Was Dangun Joseon founded in 2333 B.C.? The answer to "Sohae" is "It's not true because the evidence is weak". I'll probably explain it in detail, but if I say it seriously, I think I forced it in to keep up with them. 2. Is Dangun a real person? I can answer two things about this.First of all, if Dangun refers to an individual, it will be "No," but if it is a title referring to a ruler or ruler like Maripgan or Isageum, Sohae's answer will be "Yes." Myth... Especially the founding myth, it is believed that it contains or metaphorically certain sincerity. When Jumong crossed Umli Daesu, the turtle did not build a bridge, but it is not too much to judge that he was helped by a specific force or group. In the same vein, Dangun mythology is also from the sky...In other words, the conflict and integration process between conquering forces from outside and indigenous groups worshiping bears and tigers.And I believe it implies convergence through marriage.Since it was a time when there was no text, it was judged that the form was refined as it was passed down through the mouth of Xiamen or the ruler. 3. Then, when was Dangun Joseon born? The first trace of Joseon seen from the platform appears on the Gyeongjunggap section of the temple.Of course, it's not about the founding of Joseon, but roughly saying, "If we pay a high price, we will bring goods from far away Joseon..."I recognized the existence of Joseon in this kind of conversation.Around the 8th century B.C. Another evidence would be the stone mound of a river in Yoseo's women's university.It is about the 10th century B.C., and I don't know if it has a burial piece or a bone itself, but the tombstone itself is at least different from China, so it could be another trace of Dangun Joseon. In the case of setting the founding date of Dangun Joseon around the 25th century BC, the Bronze Age civilization on the lower level is replaced by that of Dangun Joseon, which can be both positive and negative. First of all, the decisive rebuttal to the view that the Bronze Age civilization below the lower point is that it does not match the time when Sanyong and Dongho can first appear in the librarian and confirm their existence. As for the short memory of Sohae, Sanyong and Dongho were also the first to appear in fraud, and the culture of the lower reaches was a civilization that existed between approximately 2500 and 1500 BC. If Joseon was first confirmed in the 8th century BC and eliminated from the lower-level culture, Sanyong and Dongho should also be eliminated for the same reason. And the Bronze Age civilization on the lower floor of the lower part of the lower point barely confirms, "Oh, you used the Bronze Age here!" There is a huge difference in quality and quantity from the Bronze Age relics in Jungwon hundreds of years later. In addition, it is impossible to confirm whether the people who used this Bronze Age were nomads, farmers, or even multiple ethnicities. In this state, it is also a problem to just confirm Joseon, but I think there is also a bigger problem to eliminate it. History believes that individual subjectivity and thoughts are easy to intervene in.For example, with the bronze button from the lower floor of Hagajeom, some people think it is a bronze button decorated with leather shoes, and others think it is just a bronze button. Both of them could be correct or both of them could be wrong.The real problem is that the idea of not acknowledging the other person is involved. Personally, I hope that a bronze flag with the name Dangun or Daebu will be found.After that, if there is a writer who says Dangun was not a real person, I will tie my mouth. 4. In conclusion, Dangun believes that he will be a proud ancestor to some, a superstition to cut off the head of others, and that his existence itself becomes suspicious to others. I don't know if you agree emotionally to make a hasty judgment, but I'm going to think deeply about the rest. 5. And... In the end, I wanted to say this.As mentioned above, history can be viewed from various perspectives.In the end, I don't think all Hae-ja who are looking at autumn sunlight, high sun, and eagles can get out of that category. There were times when Sohae-hae's tone was uncomfortable or cheeky, and in many parts, especially when it comes to looking at the people, there are extreme differences, but I don't intend to be angry or angry about my wrong thoughts. If you want to refute or respond to the other person's thoughts, either logically refute them or if you talk with your own knowledge, it's enough.I think people who are not capable of doing such things eventually make personal attacks on individuals or get bored with a few short words. If it's a personal experience, it's not only once or twice that I burst into anger while watching the Samguk Sagi.In particular, there was a time when I threw books while looking at the war records between Goguryeo and the party, which I posted separately last time.Now I vaguely know why it had to be recorded like that and how to filter it out. In the end, I think the reason why it became noisy yesterday and today was because of some people's opposition and disturbance that Dangun was the product of inferiority toward China.What can be said for sure is that Dangun can be opposed to being the product of inferiority with China, but personally, I think the continental trilateral theory is an expression of inferiority with the continent. What's more worrisome is that if we can't find out or prove when and how we migrated to the mainland after claiming that there were three kingdoms on the continent, we'll be truly ancestors-free frees.So far, I've seen many people spitting and talking about the existence of three kingdoms on the continent, but no one has clearly talked about when they came over to the Hanryukdo Island.Personally, I believe that the theory of the Continental Three Kingdoms is to help the northeastern process of the Jjangkae. And one of the principles I personally established while arguing over posting on the Internet was not to show that I was old.