2022년 3월 18일 금요일

The Foundation of European History and Culture - Our Misunderstanding of Christianity

 --- There is a part where Roman Catholicism is divided into Eastern and Western churches ---. Let me express my view on this part.     Originally, Christianity began largely as Christianity and non-Christian Christianity in the Roman sphere. The Christian religion that we accepted was born under the influence of Western Europe, the United States, and Russia, so I don't think it's the only Christian origin. Jesus was born in what is now Palestine and Israel, a Roman province, but his followers did not only go to Rome, but also to other neighboring countries. Of course, he continued to preach in the area where his followers moved and formed a certain amount of power. However, most of them are not well known now. However, it is now distributed in a small number in Central Asia, including Central Asia, Africa, and Iran. And Christians in Rome are not the only ones who have representation. That's why Catholicism was not divided into Eastern and Western Roman churches, but it was originally a different parish. Old Christianity, called the Old Church, was not well known as Catholicism simply because Roman Catholicism was the original capital of Rome and the only parish not conquered by the Islamic forces. In addition, Rome is both a national name and a city name, so it is very confusing. The five most representative dioceses in Rome are Rome, Constantinople (Vizantium->Constantinopol->Istanbul), Alexandria, Antihoc, and Jerusalem. Except for Rome, all other parish centers are conquered by Islamic forces. That's why Catholicism, the religious name of the Roman parish, pretends to have legitimacy. Rome was divided into East and West Rome, and certainly the five great dioceses developed into different Krst factions. However, while the West was unified into Roman Catholicism, the East was strong in Constantinople (because it was the capital of East Rome), which was called the Orthodox Church, but it also recognized to some extent the power of the other three dioceseses.      While the Eastern Roman Empire enjoyed its heyday, such as occupying Rome, the capital of the Western Roman Empire, it gradually weakened and lost Jerusalem, Antihawk, and Alexandria due to the invasion of Islamic forces. At this time, Christian forces in this area maintain their own existence or migrate to other nearby areas, merging or affecting the existing non-Roman Christian religion. As far as we know, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church and the Neristrian School were formed or developed around this period. Syrian Orthodox, Armenian and Georgian factions will also appear. The Eastern Roman Empire quickly expanded its territory into what is now Turkey and the Balkans. However, it lasts for a long time even though it is called the Byzantine Empire (the Roman Empire, for example, the Holy Roman Empire, because of the ill will of the West Roman Empire). Now the Balkans and the various Christian denominations in Turkey are the branches of the Constantinople Church. After that, the Byzantine Empire was occupied by the Ottoman Turks in Constantinople, the capital, and the old empire disappeared into history. The Ottoman Turks changed Constantinople to Istanbul and made it their new capital. This area has become a new center of Islam since then. However, the Ottoman Turks adopt a policy of recognizing some limited autonomy and maintenance without destroying Christianity. At this time, many leaders, such as descendants of the Byzantine Empire and scholars, fled to what is now Russia, Bulgaria, Greece, and Italy.   It is the basis for going to the region to establish a national system and establishing the concept of religion. It is also the basis of the famous Renaissance in Italy. It will be divided into Russian Orthodox Church, Greek Orthodox Church, Bulgarian Orthodox Church, and Serbian Orthodox Church. In common, the influence of the Eastern Roman Church is that there are many Orthodox churches. In these Orthodox countries, Christmas is not December 25th, which means that many religious interpretations differ from Catholicism and its branch, Protean. Most of them, including the Slavic lineage of the Balkans, are Orthodox, although Romania remains influenced by Roman Catholicism in these Balkans. Romania has a strong connection with Rome to the extent that it claims to be a descendant of Rome from the name of the country. Of course, it is in the form of Romanian orthodoxy, but it is very different from Slavic countries and Greece, which believe in many other religions. And Slavic Poland is Catholic. Then, most of the other Balkan areas were occupied by the Muslim forces of Ottoman Turks, and only Russia maintained the size and existence of the Orthodox Church. That's why the Russian Orthodox Church took the lead in the Orthodox Church. Some scholars recognize the legitimacy of the Eastern Roman Empire->Visantin Empire->Russia->Russia->In a sense, Russia is a spiritual enemy of the Eastern Roman Empire. That's why the Orthodox Church, especially the Russian Orthodox Church, hates Islam and is hostile. for he destroyed his own home, of course. And I don't get along very well with Catholicism.   Russia will also force the annexation of neighboring Slavic areas, including Ukraine, centered on Kiev, and other non-Catholic Christian countries, so Slavic and other ethnic Orthodox countries are largely hostile to Islam, but hate Russia according to ethnic nationalism. These examples are also evident in examples of Kafkaz Christian countries independent of the former Soviet Union, such as Georgia, Armenia, and Ukraine. What I would like to emphasize is that Christianity was not differentiated from Roman Catholicism. Of course, the division of Eastern and Western churches also started with diocese of different backgrounds. The American Protestant-Christianism, the Protestant Protestant Protestantism that is currently influencing our country, seems to have greatly distorted the fundamental understanding of Christianity and religion and the understanding of European countries. Therefore, knowing this background would help and benefit not only Western Europe, but also Eastern Europe, Russia, and the newly independent European countries. In other words, I hope it will help us form our own European perspective. There may also be some mistakes. However, I don't think it's too much to look at the big context from the overall perspective.

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기