2022년 2월 17일 목요일

General Park Jeonghee's mistake.

 [Fresian Park Jae-han/Reporter] During the negotiations of the Korea-Japan agreement signed in 1965, the minutes of the Korea-Japan agreement's "5th preliminary meeting" were released for the first time, containing that the South Korean government demanded government-level compensation. The minutes were obtained directly from Japan while the government is avoiding the disclosure of the extreme, signaling a stir in the future.      "The government embezzled compensation to be paid to victims" The Pacific War's Free Family Association held a press conference at the National Assembly on the morning of the 17th (Chairman Yang Soon-im) with Woori Party's Jang Bok-sim and lawyer Jang Yoo-sik of the Participatory Solidarity.      "The Japanese government proposed individual compensation, but the Korean government demanded collective compensation at the government level," the bereaved family said. "However, the government received compensation at the government level and put the money into economic development such as Pohang Steel and Gyeongbu Expressway construction."      According to the 12th minutes of the General Claim Subcommittee held in the conference room of the Japanese Foreign Ministry on April 28, 1961, the Japanese side proposed a private claim, while the Korean side demanded government-level compensation. Similar conversations followed at the 13th meeting of the General Claims Subcommittee held at the same venue on May 10, 1961.      The minutes specifically record the fact that the Korean government refused to offer direct compensation for Japanese victims and chose to receive compensation from the state. However, Park Chung-hee's military regime signed an economic agreement on the issue of people's claims in return for $500 million from Japan on June 22, 1965.      The bereaved family said, "Park Jung-hee's military regime prioritized economic development, including the construction of Pohang Steel and Gyeongbu Expressway, and only limited compensation for 8,000 soldiers and military deaths during the Yushin regime."      Jang Yoo-sik, a lawyer for the Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, said, "The Japanese government has expressed its intention to fully compensate for individual claims," adding, "However, the Korean government has virtually intercepted individual property rights." In terms of criminal law, he criticized it as an embezzlement government that clearly embezzled it.      "The 6th meeting minutes will be released soon" Immediately disclosing the data of the ▲ Korea-Japan Agreement by the bereaved family. The ▲ state investigation revealed the truth of the exploitation of victims of the Korea-Japan talks and demanded the government to make an official apology to the victims and prepare damage measures ▲ enacting an implementation bill on victims of the Pacific War ▲.      Subsequently, the bereaved family's full disclosure of the documents on the ▲ Korea-Japan talks and an official apology to the victims of the Pacific War ▲ The anti-humanitarian state cannot enter the world leadership without resolution. Immediately suspending the entry of the UN Security Council into the board of directors ▲ The Japanese National Assembly demanded the Japanese government to establish a Korean problem-solving organization for victims of the Pacific War.      The bereaved family's association did not elaborate on the details of the acquisition, saying, "We have obtained not only the 5th meeting minutes but also the 6th meeting minutes from a university in Japan and obtained the 6th from Korea."      The following is the relevant part of the 12th and 13th minutes of the General Claim Subcommittee.      The 12th Meeting Minutes: Short-term April 28, 4294 10:30-12: 20:00 Japanese Foreign Ministry Meeting Room Participants: Lee Chun-sang, Chung Il-young, Hong Seung-hee, Hong Yoon-seop, Kim Jung-hoon, Lee Soo-woo, Oshida, Kasuda, Kaguda, Kaguda, Kaguda,I think there is also a way to solve it with, but what do you think about this?      Korea: There may be many solutions, but we think that the claim proposed here should be resolved prior to the restoration of the National Assembly.      Japan: In accordance with the claims, Japan has solved many previous assets individually in resolving relations with foreign countries. Of course, it is an opportunity for negotiations between governments, but there is also a way to open the way for private authority by this method.      Korea: For us, we want to solve it before returning to the National Assembly.      The 13th minutes of the meeting: 10:30-12:20 p.m. on May 10, 4294 Short-term Participants: Lee Sang-deok, Lee Chun-sang, Moon Chul-soon, Jung Il-young, Hong Seung-hee, Hong Yoon-seop, Kim Jung-hoon, Lee Soo-woo, CEO of Japan, Osida, Uraibeda.      Korea side: It does not include.      Japan: What is the damage to the prisoners caused by the war?      South Korea: As mentioned before, it is to demand compensation for all prisoners, including survivors, injured, dead, missing, and military personnel.      (Important) Korean side: It means compensation for the mental and physical pain of the detainee caused by compulsory mobilization of other citizens.      Japan: There are various problems, but when conscripted, it was once conscripted as a Japanese, so is it a request for the same arc as the one paid to the Japanese at the time?      Korea: We are demanding from a new perspective. It is said that he was conscripted as a Japanese at the time, but we don't think so. Japanese people would have worked for Japan, but we were forced to mobilize. I hope you can correct this mindset.      Japan side: Do you mean compensation for individual victims?      Korea: We charge as a country. We will take measures against individuals in Korea.      Japan: Korea is also taking considerable measures against these people and their majesty, and is Korea willing to conduct specific investigations as much as possible against Korean victims?      Korea: Of course, I can think of such a thing, but I don't think it has a direct relationship with this meeting. I think compensation for victims is of the nature to be taken in Korea.      Japan: This subcommittee is in confirming facts and legal relations. It is understandable that Korea considers on a new basis, but it is not understandable that it is not an individual base. I think I could have paid if I had originally gone through formal procedures. It was also mentioned in the previous meeting that we are willing to pay outstanding payments at any time. In short, our position believes that unpaid money must go into our hands.      South Korea: I understand the outstanding payment, but in terms of compensation, it is quite compensated for the injuries of Japanese deaths. (Simplified) Japan: I think it will be certain to pay on a private basis using the Japanese Wonho Act. The Japanese side feels responsible and is sorry for not taking lower measures against the victim, and is especially sorry for the failure to take action against the injured, missing, dead, or their families.      Korea side: We will pay it by our own hands as a domestic measure. Isn't it unnecessary for Japan to pay?      Japan: Some of the conscripted people are injured, some dead, and some of the injured, but can't they cover up and pay without knowing this? If there is a public sentiment between Japan and Korea, it will be this problem, and I think it is better to pay on a personal basis to promote mutual understanding and to appease the public sentiment.      Korea: It's a matter of how to pay compensation, and we're going to take action as our domestic problem, and this problem has a problem with the number of people or amount, but we'll make the payment by ourselves anyway. Park Jaehan/Reporter

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기

There is no Jesus in Israel

 the relationship between Judaism and Jesus Kim Jong-chul, a documentary director, quotes from the book "There Is No Jesus in Israel,...