Come to think of it, I think the Byzantine Empire and Korea are similar

 These days, I feel that the Byzantine Empire and our country (the people)?I'm finding out that has a similar history. As you know, the Byzantine Empire is a country that spans Europe and Asia.Although the capital is geographically good for the region (because of Constantinople), you know that the Byzantine Empire was frequently visited by European and Asian peoples, right? We are also in a position to benefit from trade and commercial interests due to the regional conditions of the peninsula, but (China-Japan brokerage trade alone makes a lot of money).The most representative case is Baekje, Unified Silla, and Goryeo?) Thanks to that, you know that it is a tragic history of being dog-tourism by mainlanders and islanders, right? Doesn't he look like John Na? The Byzantines had the Balkan-Anatolian lineWe had a line of defense represented by the North-South Korean War in the Joseon Dynasty... ...and both countries had a brilliant history of war. (One man was a great empire for 1,000 years, was decisively mercenaryized by Turks, ruled for 400 years, helped, helped, and managed to live in Western Europe. There was a time when Han was the king of Northeast Asia during the Goguryeo period, and Baekje used to indirectly colonize the island country. During the Joseon Dynasty, they were back-tourism, continentalists were sightseeing, sown, pure blood was wiped out, 300 years later, they were completely taken over by the island nation, ruled for 35 years, and women were dragged to Japanese Military Sexual Slavery. Now it has become a country that is busy looking at neighboring countries due to the division of the two Koreas...) and the crisis situation of the country is quite similar. During Heraklius, the entire empire was dog-tourismed by Persia = Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. Saracen's Great Invasion of the Byzantine Empire, Siege of Constantinople = Goguryeo's defense centered on a sit-in against the Sui army. Justinian's foreign expedition = Gwanggaeto the Great's Battle of Manzikert = This can be compared to the Battle of Yongin during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. The war with Bulgars = Hundreds of years of dog-watching by the Fourth Cross = Goryeo was dog-tourism by the Mongols. (Of course, there was a slight difference in the process, but one was weak after 50 years of development, and the other ended up as if it were two hands and son-in-law.)Especially the fact that younger brothers were more incompetent than older brothers. = Alexius VI - the ones who will sell their country. Basilius II = Gwanggaeto the Great - King Sejong = Constantine Monomacus - Cultural Monarch Justinian = Yeon Gaesomun - Great-looking Belisarius = Lee Soon-shin - Cheon Jae-jang. Other than that, there are a lot of similar guys... The three-line summary of the golden ceiling disappeared and the mosaic was painted with plaster, and the important buildings were demolished during the Japanese colonial period, and Gyeongbokgung Palace, where only Geunjeongjeon stands, is pathetic. The short clip shows the emperor who crushed 645,000 troops with 150,000 troops

humanism for a combative national spirit

 humanism for a combative national spirit 

1. If you really want to accomplish something, you must be more sincere than anything else. To be true means to know exactly what you are doing and what you mean, not to deceive yourself, and to be thoroughly wary of these things, whether they are white lies, myths, or any delusions that are out of reality, and to love only the truth. Many people say they know what they are doing. However, most of them are actually not sure what they mean by what they do. For example, when you hear environmental protection propaganda saying, "Don't throw trash recklessly on the street, make sure to put it in a trash can, it nods that it is a good thing, but when you turn around, you throw away your snacks or food waste recklessly. When they point out something like this, they don't care about it and say it like it's annoying. Why, then, did they not act in accordance with their actions, considering that environmental propaganda was right? The first reason is that they themselves do not know the real reason for accepting environmental propaganda. They don't see it as a matter of urgency to themselves in that bottom of their hearts. It's bad to destroy the environment. You can only understand this information in your head, but you can protect the environment in many places! He cries out for environmental protection, but it is because he has not experienced the harmful effects of environmental protection himself. The second reason, the reason why I feel that the argument is certain even though I have not experienced it, is that I think I don't need to know such things in detail in my mind, and at the same time, I think I do, too. If you think it's not the case, it means that you're out of the group because of a sense of alienation. In the end, if everyone thinks so, of course, the group's argument is right in order not to deviate from the group. Their characteristics like this can never find the truth. Because, as you know, they have a strong collective nature, and if they act with different thoughts, they stand out and there is a kind of repression that necessarily leads to repression. Therefore, they have no choice but to be swayed by groups with a small number of powers. A small number of power groups, who are aware of their characteristics of not being able to create their own creative expressions because they try to belong to a group, make them more foolish, create things they like to achieve their own interests, and instill false concepts. It is the so-called popular culture, media, and religion that created this. Don't be swayed by them. They are not interested in making a society more combative than it is now, even if they think about leading the public. In particular, even though our national spirit is almost devastated and the future is so unstable. All of these causes came from the public themselves. Until now, the public has created, supported, and swayed leaders to realize their desires, but the future must create a society of people who are collective and have the nature of expressing individual creative thinking. In order to create such a society, we need a hero who can break down the false concepts created by influential groups and leaders, be prepared to break away from the group, and deliver the truth to the public. This hero is an unprecedented human being who deviates from the dichotomous structural concept of good and evil, God and religion. 2. (1) Distribute historical books to libraries across the country. (2) An organization will be established and the organization will carry out a movement to protect historical sites. (3) Promote the importance of history and the importance of national spirit.

Korea doesn't have to be afraid of Japan.

 In discussing a nation-to-state war, it is important to compare the power difference between the two countries, but first of all, it seems in order to discuss the "reasons for the war" underlying it. In other words, there should be a discussion about "why are you going to war?" first. The United States did not go to war with small African countries, but during World War II, it fought direct wars with Germany and Japan, and fought proxy wars with the former Soviet Union in Afghanistan and Vietnam. This is because war does not occur when there is a difference in power, but occurs when the answer to the question "Why are you fighting a war?" is given. Historically, most wars have occurred because they are "economic" of the "strong." In other words, the answer to "Why are you going to war?" is "Because the strong are hungry." In the 1980s, the Japanese economy was in a happy dilemma over whether to overtake the U.S. or not. Among the world's top 10 companies, Japanese companies accounted for seven to eight, and Japanese companies ranked first to fourth in terms of sales. (Now, only Toyota Motor Corporation ranks 10th.) In the early 1990s, Japan was shocked by the collapse of the bubble and has since passed the "lost decade" and is now passing the "lost fifteen." The economic bubble is closely related to overheating. In the 1980s, Japan invested in real estate and stocks with huge dollars earned from all over the world. As with most goods, in particular real estate, "value recognized by others" becomes the price. Even apartments made of the same cement and rebar differ greatly in prices between apartments built in Tokyo and those built in rural areas. One day, all of a sudden, the value of real estate in Tokyo disappeared. There was neither an earthquake nor a war, but real estate prices in Tokyo plunged by up to 1/20. Most companies or individuals engaged in economic activities by taking out loans as collateral for the real estate. The fall in collateral value quickly left the bank with huge bad assets. He lent 1 billion won as collateral for 2 billion won in real estate, but the real estate he held as collateral fell to 100 million won overnight. As the valuation of real estate, which accounts for a significant portion of the asset value of companies' books, plunged, the accounting asset value of companies also became a "bubble." Naturally, the aftermath was bound to spread to the stock market. (This is out of the question, but the reason why we are forced to suffer a long-term recession is that the Korean economy is also based on real estate. When they brought in dollars from difficult times and distributed them to the people, the people bought land and bought them at random. When we were in trouble, most of the dollars earned from the sound of Gongdol and Gongsoon are melted into the ground of Seoul. A large circle was drawn on the land of the city of Seoul, and the rule was set, "From now on, the land of this original plan is gold." People have believed in the rule and traded the "gold" at a high price. One day, when the rule is broken, the precious values that we earned from selling blood and that we wanted to keep until we sold our pride are also blown away. The rule is neither a law nor its common "custom." It's not compulsory to protect.) China is growing at such a terrifying pace that it is said that it will soon overtake the United States after the Cold War. We also feel a sense of crisis over China's overtaking, but it is nothing compared to Japan's sense of crisis. Japan's feelings have already gone beyond the stage of "a sense of crisis." (On top of that, the tsunami of Samsung Electronics is hitting Japan.) With the collapse of Japan's bubble economy, the world is now at the center of a recession. This global recession was caused by a global oversupply. In other words, it should be said that the global oversupply phenomenon accumulated, causing the bubble collapse in Japan. In other words, technology that makes fast and a lot develops day by day, but demand cannot keep up with the pace. Until just a few decades ago, goods were sold as long as companies made them, but from some point on, companies risked their lives in competition, and creating a trend to promote and encourage consumption was the only way to survive. Now, it has reached an era where consumers want to buy automatic cleaning robots by pouring huge amounts of money into automatic cleaning robots that used to appear in science fiction. Looking at the PDP market, there is not much demand for 40 inches, but factories are producing 102 inches. Products produced by companies were not sold, piled up in inventory, and disposed of. In terms of added value, the world has burned down enormous added value for decades. They burn expensive oil to make things that are not for sale. On a global scale, for decades... The current global recession is caused by the accumulation of this phenomenon for decades. Therefore, any stimulus policy at the national level is useless. Venture boom and Internet boom in the late 1990s are all optical illusions. In the future, there will be many optical illusions that seem to revive the global economy. (Bio-related to stem cells, robots, etc.) But they are all bubbles. Companies have to keep going back, so they have to make things, and they have to spend a lot more on technology development than they do on things they don't sell today to make things of the future. However, if future predictions are wrong, expensive oil will be burned again to make things that are not sold. In the midst of this, Japan is the world's No. 1 foreign exchange holder, and its reserves are increasing. Rather than having a large net added value held by Japan, there is a problem with the wrong (distorted) tendency of the dollar flow to flow only to Japan. Japan's leading companies seem to have declined more than in the past, but Japan's potential remains in the world. In other words, the competitiveness of small and medium-sized Japanese companies is world-class. During the recession, only competitive products survive, and Japanese products do. This creates an abnormal flow of dollars into Japan. The problem is that the dollar (value-added) will flow into Japan, but it will not flow out. Even if Japan wants to release dollars, it cannot. If there is demand, we will release dollars and import raw materials to make more goods. Unless there is demand, there is no way for the dollar to be released. More precisely, it does not provide an opportunity for the dollar flowing into Japan to flow out normally. The difficulties of these Japanese companies appear as the difficulties of American companies. In other words, the parts that American companies are worried about are the same as Japanese companies, and the intensity of their worries is greater for American companies. Methods to overcome the global recession caused by this oversupply are largely divided into ways to increase demand and reduce supply. The method of increasing demand has already reached its limit worldwide. It hit huge commercials, seduced consumers, and made them drink two or three bottles of Coca-Cola, which had been drinking a bottle, and shortened the cell phone exchange cycle to several months. It has reached the stage of seducing and persuading consumers that it is time to buy an automatic cleaning robot from science fiction. As you can see from the household debt rates of major countries, consumers around the world have already consumed several years' worth of consumption earlier. The only thing left is to reduce supply. There is no choice but to forcibly remove the supply capacity of countries that supply a certain amount to the global economy through the method of war. War reduces the supply capacity of the affected country and creates large-scale demand that the provoking country needs right now, not future demand such as automatic cleaning robots. As explained above, the requirement for a war that will become a "global recession breakthrough" must first be the "war of Japan." - Dollar exhaustion and dollar distortion in the No. 1 foreign exchange holder. Second, Japan's war target must be a country with a certain supply capacity to the world economy. - To effectively eliminate supply capacity to the global economy. Third, Japan's target of war should be a country that cannot hurt Japan. Fourth, Japan's war target must be a country with a certain scale or more and that can withstand it for a certain period of time. - It should not be an aspect of elimination of supply capacity, but a country where the Japanese dollar can be added value and effectively permeated into Japan. Japan cannot release its own dollars and make other countries do good things. The United States is the only country that can take the initiative in implementing and managing these "global recession breakthrough measures," and Korea is the only country subject to war. Only Korea is a country that meets all four of the above conditions. The third important of the four conditions is the ability to hit Japan. This is achievable depending on the efforts of the war-torn countries and occupies the largest proportion of the requirements for war execution. Therefore, for the United States, which needs a "global recession breakthrough" as much as Japan, it should prevent Korea from cultivating its ability to hit Japan. In fact, the U.S. is effectively preventing South Korea from cultivating its ability to hit Japan. This is the war between South Korea and Japan from our point of view. We think that if the Korean Peninsula is invaded, the surrounding powers will rush in like dog days. It's not at all wrong. It is correct if Russia, China, and North Korea invade South Korea, or the United States, Japan, and South Korea invade North Korea. However, Japan's invasion of South Korea or China's invasion of North Korea is simply a "conflict between them." It is not included in the "sensitive Korean Peninsula issue" we know. For Russia and China, it is strategically advantageous for Japan, which is weaker than the world's strongest U.S., to be stationed in South Korea. In other words, the "strategic danger" that the world's strongest U.S. has never been stationed in South Korea for 50 years is unlikely to occur because Japan is stationed in South Korea. The same is true of China's invasion of North Korea. For example, even if a million Chinese troops gather near the armistice line, the United States cannot attack North Korea or China first. Only then can the U.S. enter South Korea's territory by pushing down the ceasefire line, and the fact that a million Chinese troops have gathered on the ceasefire line cannot lead to war first. Also, suppose that Russian troops have been stationed in North Korea for the past 50 years.

Now suppose that the Russian army will step down and the Chinese army will take its place. Is this a serious case for us? For Japan and the United States, is the "replacement act" of changing from Russian troops to Chinese troops in North Korea not something to stand by? In addition, the Korea-Japan war brings war specials to China and Russia. (Japan laid the foundation for today's war as a special feature of the Korean War.) The logic that China and Russia are forces capable of preventing the expansion of the United States has already faded. If the logic is correct, China and Russia should have prevented the expansion of the United States in Iraq, a repository of oil, worth dozens of times as much as South Korea. In addition, what we can put forward is the size of our economy. Simply put, Korea's economic size in the global economy is considerable, so if we fail, the global economy will become difficult. Currently, Korea is a country that contributes 250 billion dollars in exports and 200 billion dollars in imports to the global economy. Exports may be important from our point of view, but in a world of oversupply, some countries' exports are visible to others. In terms of imports, most of the goods Korea imports are raw materials or intermediate goods. In other words, most of the goods imported by Korea are imported to be processed and exported from Korea. If Korea fails, other countries import and produce as much as Korea imported. In a world of oversupply, there are many factory lines resting. If Samsung Electronics fails, Sony and Motorola's resting production line will run. What is left now is purely what Korea consumes, and the final consumer goods to eat and use. To put it a little exaggeratedly, 1.3 billion Chinese people can consume more than a year's worth of food in Korea if they starve for just one meal. The effect of creating demand for the global economy caused by the removal of Korea is more than offsetting such net imports of Korea. Now, from Japan's point of view, war does not happen suddenly one day. It happens gradually. The Japanese people's tendency to move to the right is the most basic requirement for war. Now, Japan just needs to keep pace with the speed of power growth. War is similar in nature to fire. Flints, flints, and firewood are needed to make a fire. Japan's act of touching Dokdo is like turning on a flint. But you can't start a fire just by lighting a flint. Therefore, it is necessary to ignite the fire. The spark can be provided by South Korea or by Japan. If South Korea is "outraged" by Japan's invasion of Dokdo and sinks a Japanese warship, the spark will be provided by South Korea. In fact, Korea and Japan have similar historical experiences related to "Fireworks," such as the "Unyangho Incident." If the U.S. were able to invade Iraq without the September 11 terrorist attacks, Japan would have given 72 hours to demand the return of Dokdo and forcefully occupy Dokdo within the deadline. If South Korea does not take any action in this process, that is, if it does not provide a torch, it must take the trouble that Japan has to provide. Therefore, after Japan's occupation of Dokdo, large-scale terrorist attacks against Japanese, such as the September 11 attacks, will occur in Korea, and Korea will be pointed out as the culprit. The 120 million Japanese, now known for their strong unity, cannot be controlled. The bow has already left the demonstration, and there is only one way to proceed. At this time, the ability to strike Japan other than nuclear weapons is useless. Even if a few missiles are dropped on the mainland of Japan, it will only fuel hostility among Japanese people. Japan overcame the Great Kobe Earthquake and survived the ruins of World War II, becoming the world's second-largest economy. The current economic situation in Japan is the same as having been in several wars. The Japanese can be "fully prepared" for war. I haven't eaten for that long. What the Japanese need right now is neither a golden fishing ground around Dokdo, nor a hydrecht (fish, hydrecht, enough in Japan's sea, which is 100 times larger than ours). What the Japanese need right now is a "decisive" opportunity to stop China from chasing and break the cycle of a recession that has been holding Japan back for 15 years. Now even South Korea is attacking Japan with the "Samsung Electronics tsunami." It's crazy and crazy for Japan.) Japan has used all the "peaceful" methods for 15 years to revive its economy. All that remains is a "non-peaceful" approach. Now, from the perspective of the United States, we are also arguing, but South Korea is a strategic point of the United States. Conversely, the United States only needs the "land" of South Korea. I don't need the smelly yellow people living in it. For the United States, there is no reason to spend the same money as the Cold War era on South Korea, which has no oil. For the United States, South Korea is just a necessary land to protect Japan. Therefore, it is effective for the United States to let Japan dominate South Korea. In fact, the U.S. is reducing the number of U.S. troops stationed in Korea and strengthening U.S. forces in Japan. Japan itself is in a hurry to revise the law to support the reinforcement of U.S. forces in Japan. In other words, instead of leaving South Korea to Japan, the U.S. forces in Japan will be strengthened to prevent Japan from betraying South Korea, and Japan will be allowed to point a knife at its neck. In other words, the U.S. should transfer its control over South Korea to Japan. In other words, South Korea is at the forefront of security in Northeast Asia for the United States, but it is unimaginable that Japan will not hand over South Korea while entrusting Japan with security in Northeast Asia. What the United States wants is to hand over its current status in South Korea to Japan. For example, the status of the USFK, which is guaranteed by wartime operational rights and SOFA, will be inherited to Japan. In other words, Japan has South Korea's wartime operational control, and the Japanese military occupies the U.S. military base in Korea. However, the United States is well aware that such succession is "absolutely impossible" to be "peaceful." In addition, South Korea expresses its willingness to self-defense and take back wartime operational control from the United States within 10 years. This will of Korea means the same to the United States as "loss of control at strategic points." Therefore, using the conflict (Dokdo) between Korea and Japan, the "Korea-Japan War" is induced, and according to the result, the status of the USFK is transferred to the Japanese military through a "legal(?) procedure. In this process, the U.S. can break the will to independence (i.e., attempts to lose U.S. control) rising from its strategic point of "colonial Korea," which is a very important issue for South Korea. Since Korea has not had wartime operational rights since the Korean War, it seems that it does not know the purpose of wartime operational rights, but in fact, wartime operational rights play a more effective role in peacetime than wartime. The Korea-Japan war, premised on this article, is a territorial dispute triggered by the Dokdo issue. Therefore, in addition to the reasons described above, it is difficult for China and Russia to intervene in the Korea-Japan war. It's not like the Japanese government's slogan or ideology, as it was during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. There is no justification to intervene. However, if China or Russia has signed a mutual defense treaty with South Korea, the story will be different. However, wartime operational rights are essential to signing this mutual defense treaty. In other words, the mutual defense treaty between countries is a treaty concluded based on "war." Therefore, governments without wartime operational rights cannot conclude mutual defense treaties with foreign countries. In a 1:1 war between South Korea and Japan without the U.S., the U.S. wartime command itself is meaningless if a war breaks out. In other words, once the Korea-Japan War breaks out without the United States, there is no South Korean soldier who will not listen to the order of the president, who is the commander-in-chief. However, it is impossible to suddenly sign a mutual defense treaty with China or Russia independently, just as South Korea made a surprise show before the war. Even if China and Russia want to accept such a proposal, they cannot accept it. (The Mutual Defense Treaty concluded with the government without full authority at the beginning of the war is invalid and has no legal effect. Therefore, if the Korean War is imminent, South Korea must regain its wartime operational control before the war breaks out, and the U.S. and Japan must not return it. Some argue that if the United States allows Japan to dominate South Korea, Japan will grow further and threaten the United States. If the U.S. had not let Japan grow, it would not have allowed it to grow as it does today, nor would it have condoned Japan's ongoing rearmament. Did the U.S. allow Japan, the world's second-largest powerhouse, to rearm itself in the name of not knowing that Japan is scarier than North Korea and preparing for a handful of North Korea? Also, while China and Russia are still alive, can Japan grow up and betray the United States after taking South Korea with the approval of the United States? In other words, Japan should fight China, Russia and the United States. In other words, even if the United States gives up South Korea to Japan, Japan cannot "betray." If Japan betrays the United States, it will be after Japan kneels on China and Russia with the U.S. on its back. Rather, the U.S. wants such a victory. China and Russia were handled by Japan, and the United States only had to deal with Japan... Lee Kun-hee controls Samsung Electronics with a small stake and controls the entire Samsung Group. Lee Kun-hee controls only the parent company and the parent company controls the entire Samsung Group.

This governance structure is "essential" for large organizations. The United States is now big enough to feel the need for such indirect control. What the U.S. should do is to control South Korea's ability to strike against Japan until Japan is ready for war. In order to bring Japan into the ring, the U.S. must tie South Korea's hands and feet and break its Achilles' heel. Only then will Japan come up to the ring with confidence. (It's something to do as a promotor.) The United States will take a neutral stance in the event of a war between South Korea and Japan, and the USFK will be converted to a UN peacekeeping force with the approval of the United Nations. During the war, the United States pretended to be a dove peacekeeping force, and after the war, as always, became a kind-hearted Uncle Tom, supporting South Korea and practically dominating South Korea. In Northeast Asia, including South Korea, anti-Japanese sentiment increases and anti-American sentiment decreases. After handing over South Korea to Japan, the influence of the United States in South Korea does not decrease, but rather increases. The time when the United States began planning the "Korea-Japan War" as a single idea is estimated to be the time when the regime was transferred from Chun Doo-hwan to Roh Tae-woo. Until Chun Doo-hwan, the United States had the "right to appoint" to the president of the Republic of Korea. Until then, the president of the Republic of Korea was able to "maintain the presidency" only after being nominated by the United States or approved by the United States. However, with the June Democratic Uprising and Roh Tae-woo's June 9 declaration, the president of the Republic of Korea was decided by direct election of the people. For the United States, not only did it lose the right to select the highest power in Korea, but the introduction of the direct presidential system in South Korea raised the possibility that the United States could lose control in South Korea, a strategic hub in Northeast Asia. The United States would have needed countermeasures against the risk of losing control of South Korea. So how can we eliminate the danger? In similar cases, the method that the United States enjoyed using was to support anti-government forces to overthrow the regime. However, it was difficult for South Korea to have armed anti-government forces in South Korea. However, it was impossible to overthrow the South Korean government using North Korea. In the end, there would have been only a way to overthrow the South Korean government by using Japan as a way of war. In order for this method to work, South Korea should not have nuclear weapons. The United States, which has watched India and Pakistan's cases and Park Tong's attempts to develop nuclear weapons, had to block all possibilities for South Korea to develop nuclear weapons. Eventually, in 1991, Roh Tae-woo made a "declaration of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" under pressure from the United States. For the United States, the risk of losing control in strategic positions defending North Korea, China and Russia is greater than that of the North Korean nuclear issue. Japan's invasion of South Korea is a war that brings only losses to the United States and Japan. In other words, the U.S. and Japan will lose money without such a war. Finally, from North Korea's point of view, North Korea's nuclear weapons, to be exact, were needed for the justification for Japan to develop the power to invade South Korea. In fact, North Korea's nuclear weapons contributed decisively to Japan's rearmament and constitutional amendments (future-type but almost certain), and China and Russia provided an unstoppable justification for Japan's armament. North Korea risked its life as a means of self-defense to maintain its "state." Just because South Korea is invaded by Japan, North Korea cannot try to use its nuclear power or participate in the war. The most important reason is that North Korea knows that the South-North alliance cannot beat Japan (Japan with more power than it is now), and that action undermines the cause of its own nuclear possession as a means of self-defense. Above all, North Korea has no ability to carry out war. In other words, one's own nose is three. When most Koreans thought there would be no Japanese invasion, Yi Sun-shin accepted it as a fait accompli, and was so afraid of Japan that he jumped up with a cold sweat while sleeping. Crucially, Yi Sun-shin was afraid of Japan, so he was able to strengthen the navy by enduring so much opposition and pain. Because I was afraid of Japan, I was able to endure any pain that I had to prepare for the Japanese invasion. As can be seen from Yi Sun-shin's case, in order to win, at least not to lose, you must first fear the enemy in the preparatory stage. Do we have a "fear of Japan"? Is "feeling afraid of Japan" "pro-Japanese, anti-ethnic"? True courage is a flower that overcomes the fear of death and blooms.

Personal opinion of historical club members - Kim Doo-han and Kim Jwa-jin

 Kim Doo-han is an "anti-communist fighter," and many of his so-called terrorism in the so-called "liberation space" is thought to have been cruel, ruthless, and unjustly killed. The same was true of the left, and since the left and right were in the process of fighting a war anyway... I don't think you can speak ill of soldiers who have killed many enemies in war.   However, I think the pre-liberation activities are pathetic. When I was a child, I would have used my fellow beggars as a punishment, and exploited them. He became a gangster when he became an adult and enjoyed the blood of merchants.   In addition, his relationship with the Japanese police is so good that he would not have been dragged into the draft, but it is amazing to be distorted like some "anti-Japanese fighter" or independence activist even though he took the lead in cooperation.   In short, Kim Doo-han did not "transform from an anti-Japanese collaborator to a right-wing terrorist" as distorted in dramas, but "continuously upgraded from a gangster bully to a right-wing terrorist to a politician later." [[Kim Doo-han and Kim Jwa-jin] No one knows the relationship between Kim Doo-han and Kim Jwa-jin. Maybe not only Kim Doo-han but also Kim Jwa-jin doesn't know. Kim Doohan's argument is... <One day, General Kim Jwa-jin met with his comrades on a hill near Seoul. Then, he became chased by Il-kyung, and he fled over the wall while fighting for a moment in a noble's neighborhood in Sajik-dong, which was the house of a court court court, and the court lady had a daughter. The room where General Kim Jwa-jin entered was the daughter's room. So the incident took place, and he suddenly left and said, "If you give birth to a son, you call it Duhan, and if you give birth to a daughter, you call it Duok." So he was born in the Andong Kim clan.> The first question here...They want you to believe that General Kim Jwa-jin, who I respect, went around the world and picked and ate a girl... - - Believe it or not, then I think, has araseo their decision. Kim also have the court lady who ...Court lady's daughter, mother that I don't know who. Later, father of General Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese colleague were reported to have visited such equivocation that the way you tell me the truth ... 10 years, he was wanted by the people pushed and ... It's like a friend telling me that a woman who met at Itaewon Night 10 years ago and counted one-night stands now gave birth to my son, and she's dead and she's being punished at Seoul Station... and she wants me to find it and tell you this... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And ... about gimduwan the Battle of Qingshanli's memoir was going on in 1920 and 1930 called his 7 years old, 1925, when General Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese soldiers died at age 10, 1928, which is called ... It is General Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese soldiers died during the colonial period already in the newspaper despite ...Kim Doo-han is liberation after the fact that the Communist Party who killed General Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese soldiers gave by right-wing terrorist groups back rub a set of materials and the right-wing campaign she figures claim to have ... General Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese soldiers died that he hadn't even know that he was right after liberation or that there is no interest in general left in which rationalization for the "It is cowardly excuse" for the Kim Doo-han's lip ... relations with Kim Jwa-jin defeated Japanese soldiers believe it or not is only -------- araseo their decision. Dool Kim Yong-ok is also a screenwriter for the movie "The Son of the General," which director Lim Kwon-taek dealt with Kim Doo-han's life, and the conclusion was made after writing the scenario "The Son of the General." He is an orphan who don't know parents who grew up in personality. A beggar named leader that he climbed down and act like a beggar to Seoul at the age of ten future and get caught by the leg under (Cheonggyecheon) and you grew up in a den. But Kim was naturally talent by excellent ssamkkun. The ssamjil is a pure experiential skill that does not learn any Japanese martial arts or traditional Korean martial arts, but Kim Doo-han's superiority in ironing than punching suggests that his ssamjil has an unconscious continuity with the traditional Korean taekkyeon. He moved.If you do that, you float as high as a person's height and yell at the other person's mouth with your foot. In other words, the process of becoming a gangster boss who won the Jongno area from a beggar under the Jangchagudari Bridge was completely unrelated to the fiction that he was Kim Jwa-jin's son, and Kim Doo-han himself could not be aware of the genealogy, and he was the loser of the fist world. Professor Han Hong-gu reported that Kim Doo-hwan is suspected of discrediting himself because he is so gullible, but Kim Jwa-jin was killed in 1930 by Dong-A Ilbo, a direct newspaper report that Kim's son lives near Seoul. Later, it was noted that an article was published about a parasite named Kim Gye-wol living in Kaesong, not Seoul, and a 12-year-old boy named Kim Doo-han living with his maternal grandmother, who is Kim Jang-gun's Seo-ja. Professor Han diagnosed that the reason why Kim Doo-han made a story that could appear in a martial arts movie and dressed up Kim Ok-kyun as a grandfather was because he wanted to hide that his mother was a parasite, and argued that Kim Doo-han was the son of General Kim Jwa-jin. Of course, whether Kim Doo-han, who is said to have appeared in the Dong-A Ilbo, and Kim Doo-han, whom we know, are the same person...Make your own judgment.

Personal opinion of historical club members - Hitler's "My Struggle" - German version of Baekbeom's Journal

 Hitler had three deadly enemies, the Jews, the Slavs, and Maximism, in the German version of "My Struggle" (Source: YES24, Sinabrlo = 2005-01-09). Hitler's father died at the age of 13 and his mother at the age of 18. Having dreamed of becoming a painter, he eventually failed to achieve his dream and jumped into the livelihood front. After World War I broke out, Hitler enlisted as a volunteer and served for six years. Fighting on the front line, he was taken to the rear for treatment due to several injuries, but when he came to the rear supplementary battalion, the secretariat was all occupied by Jews and the secretaries were almost Jewish. They were rolling a pen in the back. The Jewish-controlled media began to criticize the war day after day, and as the war came to an end, the munitions factories went on strike, and the workers who led the strike were reddened by the Marxism advocated by the Jews. What did Hitler think when he retreated without bullets and watched his comrades die? Although it has emerged as an emerging power, the world has already decided on landowners, and the war has been fought to prevent the Slavicization of neighboring Austria from becoming a Slavic country. The Russian Revolution, which happened just in time, had to focus only on the western front, and even though 1 million people were killed and 4 million injured, they lost the war. In a war fought for Germanic pride, Jews sent Germanic youth to the rear, instead of holding guns, and Jews who took control of the media benefited from the military business. It is concluded that these parasitic opportunists, who are only interested in their own interests, lost the war. After the war, Hitler became the seventh member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. His speech, which benchmarked the merits of communism's propaganda style and devoted himself to the state enough to receive the first-degree Iron Cross award for martial arts, was not harsh. After becoming the party's supreme leader with excellent speech skills and his German Workers' Party became the first party, Hitler became president in 1933. In addition, Jews and Slav Bolsheviks, the enemies of the iron world of Buldaecheon Stream, will start the task of drying seeds on Earth, respectively. It is very affectionate to see through the eyes of Hitler, a young man who loved his country, how much he loved his people and hated Jews, Russia, and Communists. What is really surprising is that the reality we are facing is not much different from this. Stock exchanges mired in international finance and the national economy in the midst of it. Opportunists scratch dirty money with money and land games, and the media defend their friends they used to eat together and make the people fight on their own. This is exactly what young Hitler, who was the only thing he could do for his country to carry a gun for his country, was on the other side of the globe 80 years ago. In this chaotic situation, Hitler establishes a firm belief for the German people, shaken enough to carry out all the things he had written 20 years ago. The result was very terrible, but it gives many implications to us who are confused about what to do and how to live for the country and the people. The part about propaganda and the media is so gemlike that the entire text should be underlined. A Germanic young man who thought only of his people wrote the German version of Baekbeom's diary in prison.

Kim Gu and Hitler have different definitions, although they are far-fetched.

The world's perception of Korean history, especially Westerners.

 There are not many Westerners who are interested in Korean history, but it is not easy to do proper research or study because there are few books or materials even if there are few.   Most of them are old or written by someone who was studying Japanese history or Chinese history, so there is bound to be a distorted view.  In this situation, many foreigners believe that Korea has been a subsidiary of China for generations, that the annexation of Korea and Japan is legal, and that the Ministry of Imra and Japan is strictly true.   Furthermore, Japan is now the world's second-largest economy and the only Asian power to compete with the Western world since the Russo-Japanese and Pacific wars.  In the eyes of Westerners, unlike other helpless Asian countries, Japan is strong and somewhat similar to itself.   The problem is that historians also had that thought, so they fell into the prejudice that Japan would have been successful from a long time ago, ignoring most of the influence on Japanese civilization in China and Korea and achieving a unique civilization.  Needless to say, China, where Toyinbi is represented, has been a great country since ancient times and is still a great country. From the perspective of foreigners, it can be said that East Asia itself.  Most neighboring countries paid tribute and were culturally influenced, and the conquering dynasties of immigrants were established several times, but except for Mongolia, all of them eventually assimilated and extinguished, so I think China is a world with India rather than a country.  Naturally, most historical events are related to China, and historical materials and relics are the most abundant, so scholars who study Asia have no choice but to be the most studied field.   Under such circumstances, even if Korea has a much higher international status and is enthusiastically supporting Korean history research, the distortion of Korean history from the perspective of China and Japan will not disappear for the time being.   In the case of Sohae, I am interested in ancient weapons and war history, so if you look at foreign books, Turk, Mongolia, and India are expressed in detail.  It is natural that there was a lot of contact with the Western world and research was active.  China and Japan are relatively weak, but that doesn't mean they're serious.  It's dark when you come to Korea.  There are many mistakes even in the eyes of outsiders like Sohae, and there are many cases where the contents to be clearly recorded are omitted.  The reason why Yi Sun-shin and Turtle Ship come out relatively often is that they defeated Japan, a great samurai country.   It is difficult to catch up with Japan and China in terms of national status and favorable feelings of foreigners.  I think the government and private academia, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, should reflect on themselves, and we should also avoid making useless emotional disputes over the authenticity of Handan meat and colonial modernization.

Private Opinion of History Club Members - Reasons for Germany's defeat

 Above all, the biggest reason for Germany's defeat in World War II was the rigid command system, and all matters were handled only through Hitler.   Even with the new weapon, Hitler didn't refer to the expert's opinion and handled it at his disposal. By the way, I could have just used it as a fighter, but he asked me to replace it with a bomber. It's crazy. Honestly, how fast will the initial jet come? But if you put a heavy bomb on top of that, the speed is no different from that of a regular propeller.   It was during the Normandy landings, and even then, the command system delayed time.   If they had recognized the situation a little faster and moved, they might have been able to end the Allies on the coast. It's a little similar, but the German scientific community was far ahead of the Allies at the time, but it wasn't organized. It was a complete mess.   The rigid command system created a fantastic combination. And one factor was the huge lag in intelligence and intelligence, and it was unreasonable to force the expansion of the front. I put it up here because I thought something historical would be closer.

The personal opinion of members of the historical club - The personal opinion of Imra Japan.

 I don't think I can question why the country was on par with Silla.Everyone knows that Silla was originally a weak country. (In the case of Baekje, we need another discussion, so I'll give up.) However, the claim that the Japanese ruled Gaya is unreliable. If Lalala Haet's claim that "I don't think the Imlail headquarters of the Japanese secretary is the same as the government office in the Japanese residential area in Gaya, Sohai can agree. It can also be admitted in its own way that the Japanese government had a certain level of influence on the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time. However, it is difficult to accept if the influence at this time is said to be taken from a superior position, that is, influence through direct or indirect rule. The reason for this is that the remains of Japanese relics currently found were proved to refer to the residence of Japanese, especially quite high-ranking people at the time, but it is thought to be far from the sovereignty of the southern end of the Korean Peninsula claimed by the far right. If the Japanese controlled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time, there should be appropriate archaeological excavations (e.g., relics found in heavy rain guns), but there is no such thing.   Therefore, I think the substance of what is called "Imlail Headquarters" was similar to the Silla Dynasty established in Tang Dynasty Tang. Of course, it doesn't mean that the relationship between the party and Silla is a relationship between Gaya and why. Personally, I don't think it's right for Korea to deny itself and for Japan to flow into a confrontation of claims that Japan had dominated Korea since ancient times. As Lalala also mentioned, the Japanese scribe is a librarian mixed with exaggeration and distortion. I think that correcting the distorted perception of Japan and the distorted perception of Korea by Koreans is the core of Imlail's discussion. The perspective of ancient Japan that Koreans generally think of would be correct if it were expressed as "civilized." But I don't think it's a very easy country to see through ancient librarians. I mean, the word "civilization" doesn't fit in. There may be some differences in the degree of development, but I think it is difficult to say that there are many differences. Of course, I think the situation is a little different in the case of the Silla Dynasty. Since Silla began to dominate the maritime trade zone, why have you had some difficulties, and I think Silla developed a little faster in that situation. However, I think it is a country that has no difference from Silla in the 4th to 6th centuries. In some ways, there are many aspects of Silla's weakness. And I think some Japanese claim that Korea has been a popular land since ancient times is also unreliable. The colonial claims that appeared only in the Japanese colonial era are too much to prove. I think it is right to interpret this in terms of maintaining close relations with the Gaya region. This interpretation is possible, and if this is accepted as true through other studies, the confrontation of who was better will disappear as it is now. Rather, it will be possible to recognize that Korea and Japan have formed a close relationship since ancient times through Imra Japan. War was a common thing at the time.

Personal opinion of members of the history club - Kim Yu-shin and Kim Chun-chu, two scammers.

 From the Unified Daedong River to Yeongheungman Bay, where there were more lost land than the land obtained by sleeping with the two scammers of history... How can we call this unification? When it comes to territorial expansion, a significant portion of Goguryeo and Baekje's history was distorted by the unification without nutrition, and the country's development was biased only to one side of Gyeongju, the capital of Silla, so balanced regional development was not achieved properly. Goguryeo is said to have difficulty in finding data in North Korea, but Baekje's culture and history were almost unknown because of Silla (Gyeongsang-do), and even the previous governments were not interested in it. It was a gallery, but Baekje also had an investigation. You will know that the developed culture had a tremendous impact on Japan, and even in the Goryeo Dynasty, Silla's Shekki forged up to 10 trillion of King Taejo's Hunyo, and even today, I hope to reevaluate the two scammers who twisted the history of the Ulsan Dynasty.

Personal opinion of members of the history club - tanks, aircraft, submarines, fighter jets, etc.

 I think the best is the battleship. There are some Hae-ja who say, "Shoot the Western sailboat in the 17th and 8th centuries," but the dream is that the very sun is over the moon. Unfortunately, all of Korea's "Baegwangmuho Lake like the Hangang River cruise ship" was purchased at a rip-off in Japan in 1900. I saw it at the War Memorial. He's a giga leader. Perhaps when the British Navy was the best, France handed out some business cards............. At the order of the German emperor in 1897, the German Navy's augmentation measures began under Admiral Tyrpitz. From this time until the end of World War I in 1918, Britain and Germany entered a tremendous naval competition. It is very similar to the nuclear weapons manufacturing competition of the US Soviet Union in the late 20th century. He pretended to be one of them... ...we'll make it too... ...what's so foolish is that the German Navy finally maintains its "second place in the world," half of the British Navy. In 1916, only a draw at the Battle of Eutland and after the war, he was buried under the order of the Allied Forces and eventually became a "navy-free country." In other words, Germany ruined Germany, which had to focus only on the war against France and Russia. I never knew that the Russo-Japanese War was the first battleship match. After World War I, Germany and Russia, lost countries, had no navy, and the rest of the powers, the U.S., Britain, Japan, France, Italy, set the ratio at 5 to 5 to 3 to 1.5 to 1.5. No, you're the strongest Japanese equivalent to Miyoung. But soon Germany and the Soviet Union resurrected, rebuilt the navy, and defeated in World War II (Yamato downfall in 1942, Musashi downfall in 1944, the world's largest warships), and most of the victorious US and Britain abandon warships. What a waste! Then, with the US Soviet Union at the center, nuclear aircraft (15 ships?) and nuclear submarine (200 ships?) fleet... ... England and France 1/10 in size. No rest of the country. I don't like the latest this year.................................. 19th century battleships before World War II are the best. The West and Japan are the main pillars (although there are battleships once imported by the Qing Dynasty from Germany). Lost in the Sino-Japanese War:) It's very unfortunate that we can't even get close to Korea. Summary of warships [battleship] Warships that were the main force of maritime forces until World War II. Text ↑ Cheongjin Port Missouri / Efforts to prevent communication between North Korea and China in a Cheongjin close to China during the Korean War. By equipping a number of large artillery and defending the ship with thick gloves, it showed the greatest attack and defense power in the artillery battle, and became the main force of the fleet along with the cruiser and served as the ruler of the sea. In addition, the battleship was also the largest warship except for aircraft carriers. Therefore, from the late 19th century, the quality and number of battleships held by each country soon became a symbol of national power and had a great influence on international politics and diplomacy, but the development of aircraft suddenly reduced its practical value during World War II, eventually handing over its central position to aircraft carriers. In particular, after the war, due to the rapid development of missiles, aircraft, and electronic weapons, it was completely useless, making it almost impossible to see. The predecessor of the battleship can be said to be an ironclad that began to be built in the late 19th century. This warship was mainly promoted as a steam engine, and not only did it arm the string with thick armor, but it also replaced its position with a battle ship that had been the center of the fleet until then by equiping powerful ships. The first glove box was a French groal launched in 1859, which was covered with a 10-centimeter-thick deck on a 5,600-ton wooden hull and equipped with 30 16-centimeter guns. In addition, the British cavalry warrior, which was introduced the following year, was a 9,000-ton steel box with a thickness of 11cm and 38 20cm guns, making it the origin of battleships and glove cruisers. After that, a glove box equipped with an orbiting main turret appeared on the centerline of the hull, and the hull became large, and the drainage of 10,000 tons became common, and the booms almost disappeared. Dingyuan and Ajeonan, which were the main ships of the Qing Dynasty fleet during the Sino-Japanese War, were typical medium-sized armored ships built in Germany. In 1895, the British glove box Mujestic (14,900 tons, 18kn, 4 30cm guns, 12 15cm guns) was equipped with a modern form of battleship, and after that, it was called a battleship or battleship in each country. Meanwhile, the quality of the gloves was further improved, and instead of reducing the 40–43cm diameter main gun to 30cm, a 15cm bubble was installed to enhance the foam. However, in the first-ever Russo-Japanese war, battleships equipped with Daegu police guns proved to exert decisive power in the naval battle, and this lesson proved that Britain built the battleship Dreadnought in 1905. The battleship was 17,900 tons, 21 kn, eliminating the package, and was equipped with 10 single-diameter ships of 30 cm, and the value of the battleship until now was extinguished at once with the advent of the battleship. After that, this type of battleship was called No-ho-ham, and battleships equipped with main guns over 34cm were called super-no-level battleships, and the curtain of the Daeham Geopo era rose. Around the same time as Dreadnote (1909), England called the Invincible, a large armored ship that combines the artillery and cruiser speed of warships, a cruiser, and it served as a cruiser, leading to World War I. At the end of Daejeon, battleships were called high-speed battleships because they had both the speed of the cruiser and the battleship's battle power, and a drainage of 40,000 tons and a diameter of about 40cm of the main gun appeared. Under the 1921-1922 Washington Treaty, the five major naval departments of the United States, Britain, France, Japan, and Italy stopped building ships under construction, limiting battleships to 35,000 tons of drainage and 40 cm of main guns, ending the era of anti-ship giants. After that, in 1934, due to Germany's military expenditure, several countries began to build new battleships again, and in Japan, the world's largest Yamato (9 main guns of 64,000 tons, 27 kn, 45-46cm) type battleships were built. All the new battleships built at this time can be called high-speed battleships, but they can be roughly classified into two again. In other words, one is a medium-sized ship with a speed of 32 to 33 kn, such as the Alaska-type large cruiser (26,000 tons, 9 30cm guns) and the German Sharnhorst-type battleship (31,800 tons, 9 28cm guns), and the other is a Yamato-type battleship. After World War II, until the 1960s, most battleships were discarded, and only one of the four Iowa-type ships in the United States (45,000 tons, 31kn, 40cm guns) was used for coastal artillery in the Vietnam War.

Personal opinion of members of the history club - Why women are not interested in history or country.

 Originally, humans were designed to be optimized for a mobile hunting group of about 20. And to prevent incest, women were exchanged with other groups. Women are instinctively designed to adapt easily to other groups and men are also designed to accept women from other groups easily. Therefore, women instinctively easily accept heterogeneous cultures or customs. It also has the characteristic of easily removing the characteristics of the existing group. As a result, women are not very interested in other concepts of groups such as country or history. The only thing they are interested in is meeting a man who will raise their child well. On the contrary, men are designed to protect their own groups. Of course, outsiders are not allowed. The few mobile hunting groups had difficulty surviving, and group cooperation was essential. Therefore, human men are instinctively born with the concept of a group in their head. This is because the survival of the group is directly related to its own survival. Men's instinct for such a group of hunter-gatherers evolves more abstractly and broadly as human society grows. Not only the state, but also the family, alumni, family, etc. Those are abstract and ambiguous things, but what is men's instinct remains unchanged. The present humans appeared on Earth and 3,000 generations have passed. It is right to see that there is little to be called evolution. There is little difference between the human being who is complaining in front of the PC, the person who was hunting with a spear, or the body or brain. In the hunting era, men would have cried when their colleagues died while hunting. However, women would not have cried unless their child was injured or killed. It's the same now. Men risk their lives on concepts such as national or national history, and women are not interested in such things.

Personal opinion of a member of the History Club - Where did the Goguryeo people go?

 Basically, the root of Goguryeo is the group that maintained life through hunting. It's a living cushion created by the barren environment of Manchuria. Of course, meteorologically, the climate zone at the time Goguryeo appeared in Manchuria was warmer than it is now, but I understand that agriculture is too much to be activated. Goguryeo people could never have given up hunting to make up for the lack of grain.   Goguryeo continued to fight wars for nearly 200 years before its collapse. There will be countless large-scale wars, including the attack on the Korean Peninsula and the Sudang War. If such a fierce war breaks out, of course, the average life expectancy of contemporary men will drop sharply. At the end of World War II, Germany recruited boys who couldn't even graduate from high school and drove them to the battlefield with only a rifle.   Goguryeo cannot be an exception. No, considering the characteristics of ancient society, if a cornered aristocratic group could walk, a boy under the age of 10 would have been sent to the battlefield. If you look at civil war Africa, you can see this well. Of course, he may have voluntarily headed to the battlefield with a strong patriotism. The point of being frozen is that many men, who were only boys at the time, would have been mobilized as soldiers due to the urgent battlefield situation. I think this is natural given Goguryeo's diplomacy in the Sudangjeon to accept nearby nomads as an alliance.   If so, as you know, Goguryeo did not only win one-sidedly against the allowance. Even the war between Eulji Mundeok and Yang Man-chun, called great victories, has a history of tens of thousands of Goguryeo troops lightly melting down into the Jungwon-gun in the early days of the war. This kind of exhaustion of troops would have eventually dealt a fatal blow to Goguryeo's demographic structure. If it had been shared over hundreds of years, it would have passed relatively without much difficulty, but unfortunately, Goguryeo fought too many large-scale wars in over 200 years. Considering that the demographic structure of Joseon changed due to the influence of the rebellion in the Joseon Dynasty, the wounds that Goguryeo had to endure would be beyond imagination.   Men's consumption in these battlefields is bound to ultimately drive Goguryeo's economic production activities to extremes. Otherwise, the shortage of men to engage in agriculture in insufficient grain conditions is fatal to exacerbating the food shortage. Men account for an absolute proportion of production activities that have been hunted or agriculture. Ironically, even if the proportion of women was much higher than now, the difference in production due to the difference between men and women cannot be filled.   However, we cannot exclude soldiers to increase production activities that are insufficient. Due to the collision of the worldview, Goguryeo had to have a certain number of military power unconditionally, and the absolute amount was hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands.   Eventually, Goguryeo would have always suffered from food shortages for more than 200 years before its collapse. Then there's a problem here. In the end, someone should not eat due to insufficient food and who will starve? You can also think of sharing it in the 12th generation, but this is still the case of rich upper class people, and the vast majority of the general public must eventually starve. In the end, the people chosen here are bound to be the elderly and the weak. Men who will be mobilized for food production and troops cannot help but eat. Eventually, the elderly and women starve. Hunger is also a big problem for older people, but starving women causes a very big problem. Men can always be in the ranks of population growth if they are fed a few days full, but women are different. Once a woman's body collapses, it is not easy to recover.   If we think that the hardships of women who have to give birth have continued for nearly 200 years, the population of Goguryeo during the end of the year will have declined very sharply, contrary to our guess.   In addition, in addition to the unfortunate food situation, as Pyongyang fell and the central body of the central government disappeared, Goguryeo immediately collapsed another core.   It's the distribution system. It may be thought that the lack of food but the system of providing support in places that are difficult to afford may have caused the collapse of the distribution system at the same time as the fall of Pyongyang, forcing places that lack food to just die. You have no choice but to move forward with vegetative muscle skin.      If the above three food production overlaps with the departure of men, the exclusion of women from food distribution, and the blocking of distribution due to the fall of Pyongyang, the population decline will inevitably be faster than just a plane falling.   In the end, I think that the number of Goguryeo people was already extreme at the time of collapse, not at the same level as in a fantasy novel.      In addition, I believe that Goguryeo's collapse was already at the end of its destruction at the time of attack after the recommendation beyond the issues of public diplomacy, diplomatic issues on the Korean Peninsula, dictatorship of Yeon Gaemun, and its successors. However, Dang and Silla only killed Goguryeo just before asa.

The fiction of the theory of national spirit.

 Arrival in the national and cultural-cultural directions As with all policies, cultural policy can only be correctly established based on a deep understanding of culture. However, a deep understanding of culture can never be easily achieved. Here, I would like to examine whether today's cultural direction is aiming for the right direction or vice versa. Of course, as the title already says, my view on this issue is very critical. I hope that my critical views will not be accepted as tentative. For this reason, I tried to outline not only the conclusion, but also his argument as far as the paper allows. Culture is originally a common property of mankind. There is no nationality attached to it, nor can there be nationality attached to it. Even if you try to attach nationality, it is completely meaningless for a culture in which vested rights cannot be exercised or rights such as patents or monopolies cannot be established. In other words, culture is not a monopoly of the people by military or political power, but it is an open report that only those who need and understand its value, regardless of their origin or source, can become masters. Therefore, when we say that we are cultural citizens, we do not use the nationality, genealogy, or uniqueness of the culture they enjoy as a standard. The only criterion can be the amount of cultural all-out power that can contribute to their national welfare. Despite this obvious reason, in Korea today, the worship of the uniqueness of culture and the purity of culture, which have already faded like a myth of the times, is gaining new vitality, and the nationalistic tendency to reject foreign culture as a culture without nationality is rapidly emerging. However, it should be noted that the exclusivity and closure of culture are always the barrenness of culture and the conclusion of cultural suicide. In this sense, we should be very wary of the nationalistic trend that has been strengthened in recent years, and hurry to review and criticize the core of national culture theory and unique culture theory, which form the roots of these arrived cultural directions. This is the most urgent task facing Korean cultural people, and it must be done before it is too late. This is because it is already becoming one 'other'. The genealogy of national culture If we pray for the expression commonly used these days, it is said that in Korea, the morality of the people falls to the ground and the culture without nationality is lush like weeds, and the consumer culture is overflowing. First of all, it is noteworthy that such a diagnosis of our cultural status is extremely contrasting between the political and economic circles that have provided stability and prosperity in its pessimistic color. However, as far as we know, similar dark cultural diagnoses have been repeated for decades, and nothing has been serious. If such a superficial cultural diagnosis, which is neither core nor rambling, was lowered by ordinary politicians who do not use cultural literacy as a basic quality or intellectually inexperienced college freshmen, it would not be a problem. However, the problem is that such a level of cultural diagnosis has been repeated countless times in the mouths of those who have monopolized the leadership position at the forefront of the Korean cultural community. Until today, they have only expressed sentimental deploration of the cultural crisis, but have never presented the results of a minimum serious cultural analysis, and have never presented any efforts to understand the cause. In other words, in this land, only the conclusion of the cultural crisis has been repeated without even a rudimentary cultural theory. Of course, among these, there is one point they put forward in agreement. In other words, the only cause of the cultural crisis is that the national spirit has fallen to the ground, and therefore, of course, the only countermeasure against this is to promote and promote the national spirit. I do not have the ability to discriminate whether today's cultural situation reflects the decline or fall of the national spirit or represents its slow or rapid rise. But before that, the first thing that matters to me is what the clear content and attributes of the national spirit they always present as self-evident. Explaining this problem was one of the long-standing homework for me. In fact, for those in their 4s and 50s and older today, the term national spirit must have been familiar for many years. In addition, little is unfamiliar with the ideas, expressions, and propaganda methods of national spirit theory that are spreading around us these days. This is because we have heard countless lectures on the national spirit since childhood in our teens and 20s under the Japanese colonial rule and have experienced numerous movements to inspire it. First, the Japanese imperialism was busy emphasizing that the national spirit of the Japanese people was the best spirit unprecedented in the world, and therefore persuaded us that we should be assimilated under their control. In response, our leaders responded that the Korean people have a unique national spirit that is better than the national spirit of Japan, so they have the right and obligation to become independent outside the Japanese colonial rule. It is no exaggeration to say that we grew up in the fight between the Korean national spirit and the Japanese national spirit. In the midst of the ideal of imitation of the Japanese national spirit theory, we soon came to think that we graduated from this subject in our own way. This is because despite so much effort and persuasion, I couldn't understand what the Japanese people put forward, that is, what the content of the Japanese national spirit was, so I couldn't understand at all what was unique and what made it the best spirit in the world. However, in the future, I was able to realize again that I was extremely insufficient in understanding this problem. The reason for this was that there was a great senior in this field behind the Japanese who claimed to be the rider of national spirit theory, that is, the Germans were the founder of the genealogy of national spirit theory. According to Julian Bangda, the Germans began to expand political battles between countries into national and cultural fights and invent a new weapon called national spirit theory, and the exact time was 1813. It is also said that the reason why cultural people began to consciously say that the birth of their cultural activities was the expression of the national spirit originated from German wrestling and Schlegel. Of course, it is not necessary to even point out that the background of this idea was German romanticism based on the worship of personality. In this way, Germany, the motherland of the theory of national spirit, produced numerous writers who revered and promoted it, and finally, the best completion came to Tritzke, famous as a progenitor of Prussian militarism. In recent years, I couldn't help but feel a kind of emotion as I read representative works of the Japanese culture community in the late Japanese colonial period and reaffirmed that their ethnic spirit theory was a class that copied German seniors. I don't want to doubt the good will of today's national and culturalists in Korea. Not a few of them will be owners of simple feelings, and they will also be filled with patriotism's loyalty. What we must pledge here, however, is to review the ideas and expressions of their discussions, the form of propaganda and movement, the content and tone of the slogan and declaration, and the historical genealogy of the theory of national spirit. This is because if they discover that they have an ominous ideological genealogy and so amazing friendship that left a thrilling cultural destruction and national sin in modern history while they are unconscious, they will have to liquidate it as soon as possible. Conditions to be made for the analysis and review of blind retro cultural contents, effective plans for cultural construction, or prior to this are the correct understanding of the basic principles of cultural formation. According to the general view of historians, higher culture can only be achieved on the basis of higher religion. However, we can supplement this and say as follows. In other words, higher culture can only be formed with one ideological system at its core that can be revered as a higher religion or a state of faith. In other words, culture is the product of the dedication of members of society dedicated to the core ideology like this, and has a brilliant radiance according to their martyrdom beliefs and joys. We will be able to examine the above logic through the cultural inheritance of Buddhist culture or Confucian culture that appeared in our past history. Next, the above cultural ideology is specifically embodied as the grand goal of the society, that is, ideology, and from this, it is necessarily accompanied by a orientation that admires the golden age. In this way, when the golden age to realize a culture ideal society is set in the future, it has a future-oriented attitude, and when it finds this model in a specific era of past history, it takes a retro attitude. As described above, retro is a prerequisite for inevitable reasons in order for it to become legitimate, and there must be a certain order, that is, a specific object and time. If the ideal cultural ideology we are aiming for today must be Buddhist, the best golden age of Buddhist culture in our history will be retro, and at this time, all the heritage of Buddhist culture 1,000 years ago will appear as objects of our new reverence with sacred halo.

In addition, if the cultural ideology we will pursue must be a Confucian ideology, even the fragmentary heritage left by Confucian culture will be the object of our infinite impression. The mental energy of cultural creation in the retro era is of this nature. For this reason, despite the great dangers involved in Croce's so-called Nostalgia description of history, this case alone can be justified. However, in our case today, what on earth can be said to be the justifiable basis and what can we say is the aim of disorder, infinite nostalgia? Why should we feel so deeply moved by all the relics of the past era, even the humble traces of all the customs. Retro, which forces the unconditional reverence and attachment of all ancestors from Paleolithic to modern times, is nothing more than a waste of schizophrenic intelligence and emotions, and is merely a lamentable example of wrong retro and blind retro. Nevertheless, today's pseudo-cultural people are constantly spreading the illusion of retro while hatching on the policy line, promoting only the blind tendency of the people to appeal. Changes and developments that are more important than origin may be said to be the ideology of retrofit as that of our national spirit. And as some scholars have argued so far, it may be said that the uniqueness of our national spirit can be found in the virtues of courtesy, respect for integrity, and peace-loving. However, they have never heard a convincing explanation of why the universal ideals and virtues of mankind like this can be unique to our people. The basis of courtesy can only be established based on respect for the individual personality and human rights of each human being. In addition, the basis of cleanliness can be established only based on not only aesthetic tendencies but also on the cleanliness of hygiene and social spirit. If there are people who have outpaced us in this respect today, the logic that they have imitated the unique spirit of our people must be established. Above all, the academic basis itself for drawing such a conclusion is ambiguous. For them, several verses of Chinese history from thousands of years ago and a few mythical interpretations at the level of hypotheses at which arguments are extremely suspicious are all treated as undoubtedly conclusive data. Therefore, without correct criticism of the validity of the data, only the revelatory conclusions are drawn through ambiguous methods, not the Iyo linguistic method. We cannot establish an altar of the people on this basis. If they try to demand the return of the people to the spiritual object they put forward, they will have to present a theology or philosophical system for this. Here, they will have to present a clearer content of the national spirit as well as the logic of its implementation. In this way, the conventional way of thinking, such as the national spirit falling to the ground or having to be aware of it to promote it, must be cleared up. If the national spirit is the spirit of support that carries out our history forever, why can it fall to the ground so easily? Isn't it a self-contradictory or self-deprecatory expression? If our national spirit fell to the ground, what caused it to be drawn from? If, as many people say, it is the result of Japanese invasion, our national spirit can be so powerless that we cannot even counter them? Also, if it was the result of our unconsciousness, why are we not aware of it? Why has this level of logic been neglected to this day for us, which is less than Clovis' intelligence, who is said to have converted to Christianity just because German natural gods are ineffective in combat? Another method commonly used by ethnic psychologists is to argue that all of the outstanding achievements and characters in history achieved by the people are the realization of the national spirit. In this case, the content of the national spirit is bound to be more ambiguous, and in the end, a competitive exhibition of the national spirit between each citizen is bound to emerge. The Soviet Union demonstrated extraordinary enthusiasm for this competition in 1930, leading to the discovery of major inventions and inventions of modern science as well as even major sports events of sports as the creation of their own people. It has also been vivid in our memories that such results only led to world cynicism. For example, just because Plato and Aristotle were Greeks, no one considered today's Greek philosophical qualities to be exceptional, and just because Copernicus was Polish does not prove the Polish's outstanding astronomical qualities. Above all, even the Egyptians, who formed the foundation of human civilization ahead of other peoples, have long been eliminated from the ranks of cultural peoples today. What is more important in history is not the origin, but the process of change and development. For this reason, the historian Mark Block pointed out that excessive obsession with origin is one of the ills of historians. On the illusion of unique culture, we have looked at one of the contradictions of wrong national culture theory. However, it is only one of the twin children born by the false national culture theory. We will have to review again their another stronghold, the theory of unique culture. Originally, the inherent worship stems from artistic admiration for the individuality. For this reason, the historic phrase "personality transcends adjectives" has been repeatedly cited. If it is only driven by an artistic impression of what is considered individual, there cannot be a lower problem. However, the problem arises from concluding that what seems to be unique is inherent and furthermore, concluding that it is the best. This is because it inevitably intervenes with the function of philosophy of determining the origin of uniqueness and the function of determining the value of history. First of all, the conclusion that one culture is the best and therefore the most valuable is possible only by comparison with other cultures. However, since native culturalists are people who take advantage of their tendency to avoid reason and logic, the point they can find in the end is the area of unconditional chop-and-absolute giving up logic. From this, the word "absolutely excellent because it is mine" is born as a slogan they believe in. This is what is representative of cultural selfishness. Next, even in the question of determining uniqueness, there can be no way they can find but to avoid it from academics. Therefore, they have a habit of fleeing into a fantasy world that cannot be traced historically, a world of myths, or a world of art that has passed logical analysis. It would be sufficient for us to recall here that the origin of Nazi German national theory was the illusion of the Ancient German Hero, and that the central base of Japanese culturalists was the mythical world. Originally, a luxurious culture that can be named in history is the product of vigorous cultural exchange and must have a complex character. Therefore, if you try to find something unique in its origin, you have no choice but to retrospect to the primitive era when you can assume the complete closure of social life. The uniqueness or purity of a culture refers to the low-gradeity of the culture, even if such a thing can be admitted, and it can never be an honorable mark. It cannot be denied that there are factors that reflect regional, geographic, and endemic characteristics within the realm of culture as well as cultural violence named "patriot." However, when it comes to high-end culture, such factors are not a core part of it, but only a part added and added to it, and are typically just a product outside the culture. In other words, it can be said that the folklore parts of the festival's format, attire, and food are all such things. However, no one thinks that the specificity of the festival format, attire, and food can determine the superiority and inferiority of culture. However, it can be said that language is the subject that can require a more careful review of us here. However, the first reason why language has always occupied a large proportion of ethnic culture theory is that it can be the most useful criterion for distinguishing ethnicity. In other words, compared to standards such as lineage and national boundaries that have been commonly used in the past, the probable utility of language as a national classification criterion is very large. Therefore, since these problems are unique languages, they must be excellent or protect the purity of the language.It cannot be confused with the question of whether or not. Like other cultural fields, language can be enriched or developed only under exchange and mutual influence. If we were to regain the inherent pure state of our language, it is necessary to think about how far we should go back. In writing, it will be no different from calling for the primitiveization of language. Everyone wants to show off their language's excellence and sometimes boasts it. An Italian writer boasted Italian and explained that the reason is that it is the language they only use. On the other hand, French is a world-speaking language, so it is low- This is just one of the silly laughter of the past. However, in our case today, it is not necessarily just a laugh. As seen above, the theory of unique culture is only one fiction that ignores the nature of culture and history, and the worship of uniqueness is only one paradox. Nevertheless, why have the nation's leading scholars, who are so extreme in honoring academic accuracy, consistently given up their studies and expressed only the meaning of Gong-soon in front of the theory of unique culture? In this regard, I can present a serious reason. In other words, it is because these native culturalists are threatening to brand "non-patriotic" or "rebellion" for those who occupy the "patriotic" position and refuse to follow them.

This was one of the successful plots they devised, and through this, they were able to effectively dominate the cultural world of this country. But now we should no longer watch this cultural violence. Patriotism, which cannot be monopolized by the powerful, argues that true patriotism can only be exercised based on a firm understanding and belief in its own culture and spirit. However, patriotism is originally the most primitive human feeling that has nothing to do with its own cultural consciousness. It is not other than self-sacrificing feet of love for the local and compatriots. Since human existence has been dependent on the existence of basic groups since the primitive era, sacrificial dedication to the existence and defense of groups is one of the most essential attributes of humans. We cannot love only when our parents and brothers are culturally superior. No matter how poor our country is, no matter how our compatriots ignore it, our patriotism is triggered for its protection. For this reason, patriotism is nothing other than the national expression of simple tribal love. In other words, the expression is natural, and cultural values or unique consciousness are not essential premises. We can fully explain these principles through numerous historical examples. Our ancestors have an extreme sense of respect for Chinese culture, but have always defended the country with passionate patriotism against their invasion. Our existence today is the result of the holy patriotism of unnamed ancestors who do not know what the national spirit is and what their own culture is. The ancient Romans conquered Greek culture by showing patriotism that surpassed the Greeks. In addition, Americans, who inherited the culture of the British, showed passionate patriotism and fought against them and became independent. Who can conclude that the American Indian tribe is not true or strong compared to the patriotism of Americans? In this sense, the self-righteous and exclusive prayers of some cultures who try to monopolize patriotism along with the powerful by linking it with the theory of unique culture around us today are unacceptable. We are now at the time to decide whether to establish our cultural center on the basis of universal reason or on the basis of selfish emotions. Historian Trevellian boasts that in the first part of "British History", the British were able to mix the blood of various ethnic groups through the historical process, so they had excellent qualities. In addition, even Meineke, who inherited the ideological genealogy of personality worship, criticized the "empty intention to show the superiority of the national spirit," saying that this intention only leads to "the cynicism of the vitamin people." National independence and pride are not found in the source of cultural uniqueness. We will have to firmly establish it on a more solid basis, that is, on the dignity of moral equality that mankind shares. For decades after the liberation of Hoizingha's responsibility for words-choice, we have claimed to be the cultural people of this country and have also claimed to be scholars. However, retrospectively, we have never even presented a single distinct cultural experience. In other words, our past footprints are nothing other than representing poverty of knowledge, poverty of philosophy, and poverty of historical perspective. Nevertheless, some established cultures of today's land are tirelessly busy forming organizations, putting up new signs, engrossing in partisan fights and struggle for position, and adoring political power and finance. Their recent banner has become more pronounced in that it promotes ethnic things, that is, Korean things. Thus, "Korean democracy," "Korean culture," and "Korean way of thinking" are becoming the subject of their passionate worship. They have already come to argue that the contents of textbooks ranging from elementary school to college courses should be filled with these Korean things. In other words, they are launching a major transformation movement across national culture and national education. However, will these efforts be successful? Will they be able to rationalize all the sources of absurdity under the current circumstances with Korean specificity? Will they be able to persuade that individual values take precedence over universal values and individual judgments take precedence over universal judgments? In 1935, looking at the dark historical catastrophe approaching the verge of Hoising Dutch history, he said his feelings as follows. The era of heavy mental pressure we are experiencing is easier for the elderly to endure than for young people. The elderly know that they only need to drag out a little more of the pressure of the times. …… Their fear and anxiety are alleviated by the approach of death. Their hope, trust, and motivation and courage for their actions are put into the hands of young people who have to live further in the future. It is these young people who are responsible for judgment, choice, and activities. In the humble attitude of Hoizingha, who is called the largest cultural history of the 20th century after Burkhardt, today's older Korean cultural generations will have to feel a lot and learn a lot. We have already reached the point where we have to organize our hopes to the minimum and leave the noble responsibility of future cultural construction to the next generation. We should not give them their intellectual poverty and lethargy. We should no longer cloud their way forward, and we will have to try to be a fistful manure only for them. We must ask them to humbly learn the cultural ideology of advanced people who realized this welfare because the ideal that our people should continue to pursue is the realization of more freedom, more equality, and more wealth. Perhaps some people will criticize my feelings as unpatriotic appreciation of pseudo-cultural people without nationality. However, I recommend them to openly observe the case of Japan, which has already grown into a world power. This is because the social and cultural competencies they possess today are not the power of the unique culture of the Japanese people, but the power of Western civilization they have revered and consumed for a hundred years. There is no law that their hundred years should be our hundred years. Also, even if it is a hundred years, the pen scene is only a moment of history. We don't have to worry about the cultural problems facing today's advanced people ahead of ours. This is because history has imposed corresponding tasks on mankind according to each period, and mankind has solved these problems in its own way.

About Prince Hodong and Princess Nangrang.

 The background of the times seems to be that the orangcae, called the Han Dynasty, occupied Nakrangguk, the old land of Goguryeo, and Goguryeo was reunified again, but in the article, Nakrangguk seems to be a gentle country that lasted 300 years. However, if Prince Hodong begs, it is expressed that the people are naked and exploited because they are occupied by orangk Prince Hodong was a very outstanding general in Goguryeo, a very outstanding figure, and was admired by women across the country and is the most likely prince in the future. But that stepmother... Anyway, the king's wife was a tax-saving man, who had a severe crush on Prince Hodong, and one day, when the prince refused, he framed the prince, hiding his identity and fleeing to the neighboring country of Nakrang. Even there, he was always thinking of occupying Nakrangguk because of his strong loyalty to his home country. However, there was a mysterious drum called Jamyeonggo in Nakrangguk, which is a state-of-the-art system drum that automatically rings when there is an invasion of the country. Prince Hodong was always researching to tear this drum, and there was Princess Nakrang, a beautiful woman, who was as famous as Jamyeonggo in Nakrangguk. The two fell in love at first sight, but Princess Nakrang loved each other more severely, and perhaps the two had affection for each other without knowing the wealth king. Prince Hodong used Princess Nakrang to tear the Jamyeonggo, and just around the time the two tried to escape from the Nakrangguk, he was in danger of dying because he was caught by a general who came to marry Princess Nakrang in Orancae. In this gap, I tried to tear the alarm and escape from Princess Nakrang, but the princess who went to tear the alarm had a key. ) The princess was imprisoned and managed to escape only the prince, and the soldiers who were rescuing the prince died because they collapsed while tearing up their alarm with a dagger. Let's skip the middle part. Prince Hodong eventually took over Nakrangguk and sought a princess, but the king of Nakrang, who was betrayed by his daughter, killed his daughter and committed suicide, so Prince Hodong couldn't keep his promise to live on the cliff. It's a very sad story. But... The question is... It can be seen that Prince Hodong is not a soldier, but a great enemy as the body of a prince who will become king in the future of an enemy country. Why was the alarm quietly saying that such a person had been living as a soldier in the court for a long time, not just crossing the front line? Also... Why was Jamyeonggo quiet even though his subordinates invaded the palace to save his life when the prince was in danger of dying? And why did the prince make the princess suffer from the dangerous task of tearing the alarm? He's strong and athletic. If he draws a few times, it'll be easy. There seems to be a lot of shortcomings in the story.

I wonder if China and North Korea, not South and North Korea, will reunify.

 I don't even want to think about it, but if Goguryeo and Balhae are completely incorporated into Chinese history, the slogan of reunification between the two Koreas may turn into an embarrassing story at that time. Why do you think so? In China, the North Korean region and Manchuria were still the former Goguryeo land. Baekje also belongs to Chinese history as a Goguryeo lineage. Therefore, South Korea can only claim the right to connect to the old Silla territory. That's the argument. No matter how much we shout national unification, Goguryeo and Balhae are Chinese history, and North Korea, a side of Chinese history, may return to its original history, or return to Chinese history, rather than reunification. The United Nations recognizes the two Koreas as separate independent states, so if North Korea's Kim Jong-il regime collapses, we have no authority to exert influence on the North Korean region, share the same language, text, and culture, and no matter how divided Joseon is... If it was Chinese territory and history in the past, the justification of reunification between China and North Korea, not the unification of the two Koreas, could be more convincing. Therefore, the distortion of Goguryeo history and Balhae history in China is usually not a serious problem. We're literally staring at the roof of a dog chasing a chicken. In the old saying, Minsik-oriented...There is a saying that the person who feeds becomes the owner. China does not spare various support to North Korea and is already economically supporting and investing in North Korea with the Korean-Chinese as a brother-in-law of the same communist region, do you think it will be transferred to South Korea, where they are enemies? That's possible, but that's possible. I would like to tell you that the simple idea that it would naturally return to us from the fact that it was divided into two in Joseon in the past and became each country is an idea that could be hit on the back of our heads. For China, Goguryeo and Balhae's incorporation into Chinese history has become a great profit, and it is truly a treasure ball that is worth investing all kinds of sincerity and money that can never be lost. We shout unification, but China can also shout unification. Goguryeo and Balhae must return to Chinese history. North Korea, a descendant of Goguryeo, returns to China. The North Korean people were a branch of the Chinese in terms of historical circumstances. Let's end the long wandering and unify again, North Korea...  The roots of the South Korean people are in Silla. They have never extended their power beyond the central and southern parts of the Korean Peninsula since history, and are poor and dirty tribes who have long lived as colonial slaves as subordinates of other countries. Why are they discussing homogeneity with the South Korean people who have lived such a servile and humiliating history? Come back. Come back to China and achieve unification.' The North Korean people are the same people as the great Chinese. China wants to shout like this now, and even now, it prepares and prepares a justification and basis for proudly shouting sovereignty over North Korea to the world, works behind the scenes, and promotes it to the world hard. At times like this, it is the historians who will stand up clearly. It would be a good thing to major in history, be smart in Chinese, and be fluent in Chinese, but... No matter how good the tool is, it should be useful.Even if you have good tools and tools, you always wipe them and what's the point of grease? It needs to be useful. Where should I use it? Country and nation... It should be used for the country and people. In a world where the world is a global village and broadcasts wars on the other side of the world in real time, there are people who say that it doesn't fit in, whether it's a nation, a narrow nationalism, or a nationalism. But those who don't have my own country, who don't have my own house, have no choice but to become vagrants as before and now, and become miserable colonists who earn money from others' feet. Above all, you have to have mine so that you can pretend to others and proudly enter the world. In that sense, the country and nation are the most fundamental and most fundamental things to hold in the deepest pocket. What's the point of knowing, interpreting, and keeping Chinese history in your head even though you're losing it to others? You do what's right for a person who puts a spear and a knife on me.Is it only the result of you bowing your head and welcoming me?  Historians have their own tools for the nation and people. Bring in the bandits and robbers who come in, whether it's a knife or a spear. In other words, please use your weapons for your country and people. Please take the lead in regaining the history of Goguryeo's Balhae before the North Korean region is taken away and even the palm-sized island country is taken away from the United States or China or Japan. Even if there was Hansagun, it was definitely not the Korean Peninsula. How do you agree with their claim that the Hansa army was on the Korean Peninsula? Empowering and accepting the fiction of Hansagun itself is disarmed... It's disarming yourself. If so, unification is done by China and North Korea, and the task of unification between South and North Korea is no longer justified.