Samhan and Mahan's location.

Before I post something, there are a few things I want to say. One of the reasons why I read books and post them on the web is to learn. No matter how many books I read, getting a lot of information efficiently is also unreasonable for ordinary people like me.We don't have time;; It would be much more efficient to get information that Hae-Hit knows on the web through posts or ripples.As Confucius said...I said I don't know, but I know what I know. I said that I know right away. ;;; Here, as the ripple that Hae-Hat left in my post, my knowledge and knowledge become clear.You can learn things you don't know. Isn't it good?^^;;; Even so, I won't say "Yes, yes" here and there.;; First, I'll post the information that I want to keep...Posts or ripples (low-quality malicious comments) against it will be stretched to the end.;;;; From an actor's point of view, I'm not saying that I'm going to insist on something that's not mine;;;;; I'm just learning.I feel like I'm talking too much.;;; Anyway, I think I'll post it until the Joseon Dynasty, so I look forward to your kind cooperation.;;; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is because most ancient countries, led by Gojoseon, have been interpreted to reduce their meaning, while Samhan Bay has been exaggerated. According to the current conventional wisdom, Samhan is a common name for Mahan, Jinhan, and Byeonhan, which were formed in the central and southern parts of the Korean Peninsula before the Three Kingdoms Period of Korean history. The oldest records of Samhan are "Three Kingdoms" Wiseo-dongjeon, and "Huhanseo" Dongjeon and "Jinseo" Saajeon are reconstructions of the contents of "Three Kingdoms." Where did Samhan come from? [Hanseo] The Joseon War records that Gojoseon blocked the tribute of the Jinguk to the Han Dynasty as the reason for the war, and there is a theory that Samhan developed in the Jinguk mentioned here. [Hu Han-seo] records that all three Han developed from this Jin-guk, but [The Three Kingdoms] states that Jin Jin-man developed from the Jin-guk and the rest migrated from other countries.According to the Korean group before the East, Samhan is a political group of 78 countries, including 54 Mahan countries, 12 Jinhan countries, and 12 Byeonhan countries. The reason why Samhan is a big discussion is that it is a common belief that Silla, Baekje, and Gaya are developed countries in these small countries. Existing conventional wisdom believes that Samhan survived from the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC to the 3rd century AD. According to this, until around the age of 3 AD, the southern part of the Korean Peninsula is separated from small countries, and Baekje is only one small country in Mahan located in Gyeonggi, Chungcheong, and Jeolla, while Silla and Gaya are only one small country in Jinhan and Byeonhan located in Gyeongsang-do. Since the Japanese colonial era, these arguments have become a problem because if this theory is followed, the initial record of the Three Kingdoms Fraud will inevitably be denied. As is well known, Silla, Goguryeo, and Baekje were founded around the 1st century BC, respectively, and the Samguk Yusa records that Gaya was founded in the 1st century BC. The Three Kingdoms Sagi also shows that Silla, Goguryeo, and Baekje have been engaged in a war of conquest against neighboring countries since their founding. But unlike this, [The Three Kingdoms]Matters related to Samhan recorded in [Huhanseo] and others say that until the 3rd century, dozens of small countries were in parallel in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. Among these old records, the logic of abandoning the Three Kingdoms Fraud and adopting Chinese records is the so-called "Three Kingdoms Fraud Early Record Discrimination" and this is a common theory in academia. (*FYI), in 1997 in Sinchang-dong, Gwangju, an accessory of a wagon believed to be carried by the ruling class. It turned out that the record that Mahan people did not know how to ride cows or horses before Dongijeon in the Three Kingdoms was wrong. According to this conventional theory, Baekje, one of the 54 Mahan countries, develops into an ancient country only during the mid-to-late 3rd century, and Silla, one of the 12 rich countries, develops into an ancient country only during the late 4th to early 5th century. And Gaya, one of the 12 changed countries, did not develop into an ancient country. (*FYI) Pungnaptoseong Fortress was built around 200 AD at the latest, and this shows that Baekje emerged as a clear ancient country around 200 AD at the latest. Therefore, the existing conventional wisdom that Baekje became an ancient state during the mid to late 3rd century during the reign of King Goi became inevitable to be revised.)Explaining that Samhan usually existed from the 2nd century BC to the 3rd century AD, the initial record of the Three Kingdoms Fraud that Baekje and Silla existed before and after BC was inevitably denied. This is because in order for Mahan, Jinhan, and Byeonhan, which consist of dozens of small countries, to exist in the central and southern parts of the Korean Peninsula until around the 3rd century AD, Baekje and Silla must be only one of dozens of small countries until this period.The horse of the Three Kingdoms is also a horse that has been ascended because it fits the relics excavated in this record.Meanwhile, the reason why Japanese historians abandoned the Three Kingdoms Fraud, the Three Kingdoms, and the Three Kingdoms Fraud was to save the Imna headquarters. In order for a powerful Imna Japan to exist in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula, there should not be a powerful ancient country called Baekje, Silla, Gaya, in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. In other words, in order for Imna Japan to live, Silla, Baekje, and Gaya had to become one of 78 small countries. However, after liberation, the Korean academic community denied the Ministry of Imna and Japan, but Samhan acknowledged it, resulting in a contradictory logic of "the distrust of the early records of the trilateral fraud."   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Among them, it is as important as the location of Nakrangguk and Nakrangguk to deny Mahan's location. The theory that Mahan's current location is in Gyeonggi, Chungcheong, and Jeolla provinces needs a fundamental review. Mahan Group quoted Choi Chi-won as saying, "Mahan is Goguryeo and Jinhan is Silla," but Ilyeon added in the comment, "People say Mahan is Baekje now, but this is wrong," adding that Choi Chi-won's perception of "Mahan = Goguryeo" is correct. However, Lee Byung-do, a person of 1,000 years later than them, pointed out that Choi Chi-won and Il-yeon saw it wrong together. This has become a common belief. Even in the Joseon Dynasty, there were views that the location of Mahan was not considered to be the southwestern part of the Korean Peninsula. In other words, in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty, Han Baek-gyeom named Mahan as Gyeonggi, Chungcheong, and Jeolla regions, and Jinhan and Byeonhan as Gyeongsang-do regions. Since then, some scholars in the late Joseon Dynasty have followed this theory and used the area where King Jun fled with left and right courtiers as the basis of the Samhan traditional theory connecting Giza Joseon and Mahan, Iksan Geummamun. Of course, later historians may recognize the facts more accurately than those of the time. However, it is difficult to say that Choi Chi-won, a world-renowned scholar at the end of Silla, lacked common sense of historical geography to the extent that he did not know Mahan's location. (*Before Hae-Hit says this is not my subjective judgment) Read the text to the end and you'll see how I'm making this argument.^^) The reason why Choi Chi-won's perception of "Mahan = Goguryeo" is important is that Mahan's location is also located, but it is closely related to the river area of Gojoseon. In the group Huhanseo, it is recorded that "In the past, King Jun of Joseon lost to Wiman, attacked Mahan via the sea with thousands of remaining groups of his own, and defeated Mahan, and became King Han himself." "The Three Kingdoms" also writes, "(King Jun) ran away with his guards and courtiers and lived in the Hanui area via the sea, calling himself Hanwang." The expression of coming to Mahan via the sea requires a more rigorous interpretation.If the center of Gojoseon was near Pyongyang when King Jun was ousted by Wiman, King Jun does not have to say it through the sea. This is because if you retreat from Pyongyang, you will use land routes, not the sea. This should be seen as meaning that the center of Wimanjoseon, which was taken by King Jun, is not Pyongyang, but Liaodong or Yoseo. In this case, does Choi Chi-won's explanation of "Ma Han = Goguryeo" have considerable persuasive power? This is because it is reasonable to interpret that King Jun did not retreat from Pyongyang to the south, but from the Liaodong or Yoseo areas to the Goguryeo area in the future through sea routes. (From what I found out here, I'm sorry, but hae's opinion is...)I found that it's kind of weak.If the Han River retreated from Pyongyang...It is much faster to ride the river inland than to go to the sea and go down by boat. It can also be proved by the records of the Three Kingdoms Fraud that Mahan was not south of the Hangang River. In 1969, King Taejo of Goguryeo said, "When King Buyeo surrounded Hyeondo Castle with 10,000 Mahan and Yemaek, King Buyeo led 20,000 soldiers to fight with Han's soldiers and defeated Agun (Goguryo, Mahan, and Yemaek) together." At this time, according to the conventional wisdom, it does not make sense for Mahan, who is located in the southern part of the Hangang River, to attack the fluctuation. Kim Bu-sik wrote this record and expressed the question, "Han collapsed in the 27th year of King Onjo of Baekje, and now he has done military action with King Goguryeo, so did it revive again after the collapse?" Kim Bu-sik also did not easily understand the record that Mahan attacked Buyeo with Goguryeo.However, considering that articles with the same content are visible in the Goguryeo group, Mahan's attack on Yodong County along with Goguryeo should be acknowledged as true. There is no reason not to believe not only the domestic record of Three Kingdoms Fraud, but also the record of China's record of Huhanseo. This is only an example of how wrong Samhansa has been described without awareness of the problem. The historical narrative attitude that denies all of the early records of Three Kingdoms Fraud, considering it as gold and jade, is unscientific and non-historical without adding that its roots are in colonial history.