Distorted, inflated, or faded battles.

 1. The Battle of Drepana is a very faded battle.Rome won Carthage several times and blocked Carthage's port, but Carthage's transport ship leisurely broke through the blockade.In broad daylight, Rome, hurt by its pride, siege Drepana Port.However, Rome was defeated as the left and right sides of the sloppy siege were torn.They fought with 120 ships each, but as many as 93 ships were destroyed in Rome. Conclusion: However, the trend has not changed even after winning this big.Because there was no naval battle for the next seven years.The damage to Carthage I suffered before was so severe that I can't believe it's fading even after a great victory. 2. Battle of Manzikert is a very ridiculous battle.The beginning was the occupation of the land of Turk in the Byzantine region and the Turk side also launched an attack.The Byzantine emperor returned the occupied land and asked for Manzikert taken by Turk.(The important thing is that the land that the Byzantine took is a Byzantine village that was taken away by the Turks;;) But the Turks reject it.Eventually, Romanus IV attacks, and Romanus divides the soldiers.What's ridiculous is Romanus' illusion.Romanus misunderstood that Turk's troops were deployed only to the east and that the troops were similar in size to the Byzantine.Contrary to expectations, Turk was in the south and the number was 70,000.In the end, Manzikert was removed, but the other divided troops were scattered, and eventually, they faced the Turks head-on, but eventually lost and captured themselves. Conclusion: However, Turk could not take Manzikert away even after winning.It can be said that the only thing that changed after the war was the emperor. (Romanus loses the throne to Huijadukas.))It's not really a battle to change the fate of the Byzantine.Actually, the loss of troops themselves was small loss.With the wind running away... 3. The battle between England and the invincible fleet This battle is a really bad puff.For now, Britain succeeds in scattering the display with ships lit by the invincible fleet.The problem was that the Calverine gun had a lower hit rate than expected and its destructive power was worse than the Cannon gun. But there was a real ambush, so it was a storm.Of course, even the storm did not cause much damage.However, he just gave up landing and made Spain reorganize it.But there was something that the Spaniards couldn't properly measure in unfamiliar seas, so dissuasion of Mexico.As errors continue to accumulate, we arrived in Ireland.The exhausted Spanish took the course again, but it was back in its place. Conclusion: It was a ridiculous battle (?I can't believe the strength of the Gulf of Mexico and the storm is so big. 4. The Battle of Gauga Mela is a very exaggerated battle.First of all, the Persian troops of 25-320,000 are just a combination of combat forces + supply troops, and other miscellaneous forces, and in fact, it is said to be about 130,000 (about 10,000 cavalry).In addition, studies have already taken all major resource lines away and show that it is a force that has been hurriedly attracted.The enemy is truly elite soldiers.You can look at the Gaugamela battle drawing that Jeon Investor posted not too.In fact, Darius' impatience and escape were the cause of the Persian defeat in a state that was almost equal (or Alexander's glass). Conclusion: Valencia did not have an overwhelming advantage.Of course, balls such as Alexander, who induced impatience and attacked his opponent, or Parmenion, who has endured for a long time, need not be demeaning at all.Without them, Macedonia, which was relatively disadvantageous in the war of consumption, was likely to have lost.Personally, Philippos, who allowed Macedonia to create this powerful capability, seems to be greater.With the chopsticks made by Phillipos, Alexander is like eating beans.