Perhaps it is the land reform of the Rhee Syngman regime in South Korea in 1949 after liberation and the land reform of North Korea at the same time. I wonder if this is the end of the old aristocracy. Even in the Japanese colonial era, the landowners of the great land were maintained. (Of course, there are noble people who couldn't join the cultivation of noblemen such as the fall of the late Joseon Dynasty and fought for independence.) As far as I know, even countries like Italy, which lost World War II and became democracies, were disbanded only during this time. led by the United States In other words, even countries such as Germany, Italy, and Japan, except for the United States and Britain, which have a long history of democracy, did great land aristocrats coexist with industrial capitalists until World War II. Not to mention the less developed Western countries such as Spain and Greece, but Latin America until recently. Russia's cultivated land nobles have very strong power. It flew to Hankyu in 1917 due to the Communist Revolution, and China also had the Communist Revolution in 1949. Looking at this, I don't think it's too late in Korea. Of course, there is a huge difference in the size of the economy. We were dead without land. Industrial capital is almost zero. Of course, there is a difference between the land reform and the communist revolution in capitalist countries. It's the same number of people who buy it for money and take it away as if they were beating it up... ...so those who went to Vietnam have a deep grudge against the Reds... ...but much more than in Japan. Syngman Rhee's land reform is the driving force behind the Korean War to protecting the identity of the Republic of Korea. Since then, the foundation of capitalist development, the activists of the 1980s have been weak... ...North Korea is right.... Taking away existing power at once... ...that's a little... ...that's right, paid-in distribution. The poor should strive separately. Real estate speculation in the 1970s and 1980s (Lee Heon-jae also fell recently). Roh Tae-woo's concept of land disclosure in the early 1990s, which calmed Chun Doo-hwan's wife, Lee Soon-ja, when she was a general's wife, is also a change in economic power. The "land disclosure concept" and "financial real-name system" were once symbols of economic justice. During the Great Labor Struggle in 87-9 years, the normal treatment of manual workers also changed significantly. The change in Korea's "money power" is said to be the biggest along with the economic development of the development dictatorship... ...all within the capitalist framework, that is, the inheritance of wealth is guaranteed. Currently, the younger generation, the older generation, are saying that they have to give up their power at all... ...but I don't know. ==========================================================Purongle. In the case of North Korea, it borrowed the Soviet Union's collective farm construction method, or (as a pre-stage of collective farm construction in the mid-1950s) to confiscate all the land held by landlords free of charge (as if forcibly confiscated) and distributed it to farmers. Of course, it was calculated that in this case, most of the farmers (of course, farmers accounted for most of the total industrial population at the time) would favor and support the North Korean regime, namely the Kim Il-sung regime. To what extent, there was a rebellion of tenant farmers in South Korea to reform the land in a North Korean way at that time, and many people even answered that North Korea was better than South Korea at the time of the poll. --* (FYI, my grandfather had some land when he was in North Korea, so he fled to South Korea suffering from land reform.) However, in South Korea, landlords with more than a certain amount of land bought from the state (paid confiscation) and distributed it to tenant farmers every year. In a way, it is ideal than North Korea's (Honestly, there were more farmers in South Korea than in North Korea), and the recent Russian political professor, A.V."Truths and Riddles of the Korean War" written by Torkunov tells the landowners to avoid land reform in South Korea (that is, the amount of money given by the state will be obvious-that is, to the people of the redevelopment area today... I heard that there was a situation in which the land was forced to be sold to tenant farmers. Of course, tenant farmers have no ability to buy land, and when I said, "Then don't farm at all!" I heard that there was even a situation in which farmland was deliberately turned into wasteland. So it is said that there was a food shortage in South Korea at that time (of course, we need to do more research on this...) Anyway, it's one of the most important things in modern and contemporary history... In the meantime, it seems that it has not received much attention. This opportunity should be taken to investigate and define more clearly. Contents Source: Directly created. The biggest difference in land reform between North Korea and South Korea since 1945 is generally known to have nationalized land and distributed it to farmers free of charge, rather than confiscated it for a fee. North Korea nationalized 100% of the land, abolished the land registration system, and made transactions for land illegal. Therefore, in these communist countries, land transactions have become completely impossible, and even now in North Korea, there is no land transaction between civilians even though land is leased from the state. This is because all land is state-owned in any case, so there is no need for a registration system. At this time, all registration documents issued during the Japanese colonial period were recovered, and if an individual had them, they were driven into reactionaries and criminally punished. At that time, most of the North Koreans who fled to South Korea brought registered documents, which were proof of land ownership issued during the Japanese colonial period, but they were illegal in North Korea and came to South Korea because they were afraid of criminal punishment. Many of these people still have registration documents issued during the Japanese colonial period. The abolition of the land registration system in North Korea will not be possible to restore the registration system for land in North Korea after the reunification of the two Koreas in the future. Therefore, all land in North Korea has no choice but to start from nationalization and restore the registration system through the process of the state's payment of each land. In the Soviet Union and Eastern satellite countries, nationalization measures were taken for land after the socialist communist revolution, and both countries recognized the land registration system, including the Soviet Union and East Germany. In other words, in the case of East Germany, private land of about 500,000 pyeong was excluded from nationalization, and the previous land registration system was maintained, while land transactions were illegal and could not be traded as self-owned land. After the reunification of East and West Germany, the land ownership rights that West Germans had before East Germany in the past could be succeeded as they were after the unification. However, while nationalizing the land, North Korea abolished the registration system of land owned by the Japanese colonial rule, for example, in Goseong-gun, Gangwon-do, where all land registration documents were discarded during the North Korean government. Therefore, the difference in land reform between the two Koreas can be seen as the biggest difference in the land registration system.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기