Is Korea's response to Dokdo slyly?

 Korea's response to Dokdo is sly ========================================================= FYI, I am one of the people who have interest and affection for Dokdo enough to submit a thesis on Dokdo in my university graduation thesis, and it is frustrating to see people like you who have affection for Dokdo but do not understand Korea's Dokdo policy. Therefore, I would like to talk about how effective and appropriate Korea's Dokdo policy is. I talk a lot about Dokdo with a Japanese friend I'm close to, but he rather says Korea's Dokdo policy is "too sneaky." Now, let's solve them one by one. What do you think is the way for Korea to be recognized by the international community that Dokdo belongs to us? Do you think it would be okay if we just insist that it is ours and threaten Japan as if we were willing to go to war? Do you believe that our country can win a war against Japan, and even a naval war? Unfortunately, the only way we can really make Dokdo our "authorized land" is to win by trial at the International Court of Justice. And the most important thing when trying in the International Court of Justice is who has been "real possession" for so long, not historical issues or strength. Korea has already owned Dokdo for 50 years, and it is necessary to maintain it as a "real estate" rather than a "disputed area" for as long as possible before it is presented to the judicial court. Therefore, the Korean government is trying not to respond to Japan's provocations and not to make them an issue. If the Korean government becomes angry at Japan's provocations and turns Dokdo into a "controversial area," the 50-year-old tower will be in vain. And it is advantageous to delay the introduction to the International Court of Justice as much as possible to increase the "real ownership period" at the time of the introduction. I can guarantee that 100 years of real ownership will be 100% our land. In addition, I personally evaluate that this policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was the best option that Korea, an internationally weak country, could choose as a consistent policy before Park Chung-hee. Another thing I'd like to talk about is what you misunderstand. The fact that Dokdo is protected by riot police, not by marines...Some people are misunderstanding. The Japanese are rather unhappy with this. Police protecting means "inside" rather than "outside." Which country in the world sends non-military police to places that are not on their land... ...FYI, there are no soldiers on most of the small islands in the south or west coast of Seoul, but there are police. It is said that the Marine Corps should go because it is a border area, but the police will protect the border with the enemy country, that is, the island in the border area unless it is the same place as Baengnyeongdo Island. In other words, the police's protection also means "natural Korean land" that does not need to be disputed. I'm explaining it because it's unfortunate that Koreans misunderstand the judgments that are so wise and wise that they seem angry to the Japanese. For your information, the Korean government's avoidance of detailed explanations like mine actually means to prevent "issue" as much as possible. People who don't know the hidden meaning of this, and who don't even know if it's for the Japanese, keep trying to "issue" ... I feel regretful. Under the current circumstances, if Dokdo becomes a "controversial area" and is presented to the International Court of Justice, the probability of winning is very low. A wise general chooses a time and place in his favor and fights a war. Do you know what Japan wants now? I hope Dokdo will become known worldwide as a "territorial dispute" area. That's how you can file a lawsuit in the International Court of Justice. However, now we are telling the world that Dokdo has become Japanese territory and that it is a territorial dispute zone. It means that Japan is steadily helping us. If the International Court of Justice judges, will our country win? I'm sorry, but I'm not. Currently, one of the 15 judges of the International Court of Justice is Japanese, and Japan supports most of its operating expenses. And lobby is the best country in the world. Even if the truth is in Korea, the outcome of the trial is unpredictable. This is why the government is not able to respond strongly to the Dokdo issue. Of course it's an excuse... For your information, can I tell you one more thing? If Japan legally incorporates Dokdo into Japanese territory... Many of the islands that Japan illegally occupied during the Pacific War were legally incorporated into Japanese territory for the same reason as Dokdo... If you think Japan is only looking at the fishing grounds on the east coast and being cursed at, you are mistaken. Japan will continue to make absurd remarks about Dokdo. Except for Dokdo, we can occupy many islands along the Pacific coast. The more we do that, the more we have to be calm. You shouldn't let your emotions leak false information before you know it well. Dokdo is Korea's territory today and will continue to be Korea's territory!    In the Ddanji Daily,