2022년 3월 10일 목요일

Japanese naval tactics during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592.

 It can be said that it is a traditional Japanese naval tactic rather than a naval tactic during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592.For convenience, I will use naval tactics during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. In fact, during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, Japanese naval forces were often incorporated into regular soldiers rather than official naval forces. It is famous that most of Japan's famous naval generals at the time were originally pirates. The basic naval tactic of the Japanese Navy, which is based on Japanese pirates, is "登肉薄戰述述," a tactic in which they invade each other's ships and engage in a hundred warship. This can be said to be the basic tactic of all naval battles, regardless of East or West, until firearms became common. In fact, it can be said that Japan has never properly engaged in naval battles under the direct control of Daimyo, not Japanese pirates, during the national era. During the Warring States period, the basic mission of the Japanese Navy was limited to simple military support and transportation of troops. Then, in the battle of Ishiyama in Nobunagawa Morigawa Oda, tactics by a painter as rain were introduced, but...Since then, the basic tactics of the Japanese Navy have continued to be used. On the other hand, after the self-production of artillery at the end of the Goryeo Dynasty, the Joseon Navy's long-distance battle with artillery and archers on board was established as a basic tactic. In fact, before the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, Joseon had never recognized that they were stronger than Japan.(Of course, there was a variable called Admiral Yi Sun-shin) So Joseon was always reluctant to fight against Japan, and rather thought of tactics to give up the battle and fight on land. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that Panokseon, a rare battleship, was born in the process of enlargeing the military ship to give Japan time to try dorsal six-packed tactics. In the early days of the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, Adake, a classmate of Panokseon, was only a flagboat in the Japanese naval forces, but Sekibune or Kobaya, whose main focus was much smaller, was the main line in battle. Compared to them, Panokseon is simply a castle floating on the water. The introduction got longer...To the point... As others said, the naval battle at the time was not aimed at defeating enemy ships, but at killing enemy fighters and losing enemy combat power. For the Japanese naval force, which specializes in dorsal six-star tactics, rather than sinking enemy ships with fire arrows or artillery, the role of cover shooting until our ships reached the enemy ship was sufficient. Therefore, the issue of the squad's continuous power would not have been a big problem because overpowering shots by all-in-one shots were more important than the three-stage firing. And in terms of killing power, the mystery of rifle(?) has faded a lot these days, but within the effective range, most of the armor could penetrate, so it had its own effect on the killing of life, not the crushing of ships. And there's no gun in particularly...There is not only one type, but there were various guns depending on the view, so it is hard to say that the power is weak. Many people question why the Japanese Navy did not install the artillery in earnest, but I understand that there is currently no answer. It makes sense to say that it was due to a defect in the Japanese ship itself, and Yi Sun-shin and the Joseon Dynasty were very concerned about Japan's strong ship and mounting firearms, but in reality, they did not. At that time, the Japanese speculated that it was because they liked light and fast ships and hated slow and dull things.Actually... If you don't want to die, it'll be a matter of fact if you don't like it or not.Japan did not have a cannon on its ship. To estimate a few things... First of all, it can be said that during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, Japan had little concept of overpowering the control of the sea, actively fighting the Joseon Navy and annihilating the opponent by naval battle. Even in Hideyoshi's initial operational order, the Navy's primary goal was to transport troops safely and there was no countermeasure against the Joseon Navy. Then, when Yi Sun-shin lost consecutive games, he tried to mobilize the naval forces to chase away the annoying Joseon naval forces, but after failing, he gave up the naval battle itself and focused on securing a supply route between Tsushima and Busan. Therefore, in the first place, the Japanese naval force was not a naval force specializing in naval battles, but rather a unique naval force of the Japanese Warring States period, which is close to a military carrier, so it was not necessary to enlarge the armament. Second, however, it was considered that Yi Sun-shin was more influenced by the individual than the Joseon Navy itself. Therefore, Japan had the Joseon Dynasty remove Yi Sun-shin by leaking meticulous anti-Japanese and reverse information to remove Yi Sun-shin during the reinforcement talks. Third... Japan may have thought that the cause of its defeat was not because of the firearms equipped by the Joseon army, but because the ship was small, they could not properly implement their specialties, such as dorsal gourd tactics. This can be estimated from Japan's focus on producing large-scale Adake during the strengthening talks and ceasefire while focusing on developing new naval technologies. Due to Japan's efforts (?), it succeeded in destroying the Joseon Navy with a one-to-one siege tactic by a supply offensive along with a night surprise attack in the wake of Won Gyun's fleet during the Japanese Invasion of Korea. This is an estimate of the reason why Japan did not install naval tactics and Hwapo during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, which was roughly summarized above. (The picture is Panokseon, the main ship of the Joseon army) Additionally...The purpose of the Turtle Ship is...As others have said, it can be seen as a charging line. According to the records of the Nanjung Diary, if the enemy is large, it appears several times that the turtle ship was charged first.

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기

There is no Jesus in Israel

 the relationship between Judaism and Jesus Kim Jong-chul, a documentary director, quotes from the book "There Is No Jesus in Israel,...