North Korea was not liquidated by Japanese imperialism, but by Sovietization.

 There are several great fictional myths in our Republic of Korea. In North Korea, the only thing is that the liquidation of Japanese imperialism has been thoroughly carried out, and the other is that the Republic of Korea has not been able to liquidate Japanese imperialism, and finally, the third thing is that the national spirit has not been established in our Republic of Korea. That's what so-called intellectuals in our society, the media, and professors' society and politicians say so. No one is denying this. So, what is the basis for these stories to be used? In conclusion, this is not the case. None of these myths fit. I asked who was typically condemned by the thorough liquidation of Japanese imperialism that North Korea had done for years. I haven't seen a single person responding to that yet. If the remnants of the Japanese colonial rule were so thoroughly cleared, shouldn't even a few representative people be mentioned? Even if it is not grand, shouldn't there be laws, trial records, or at least the results of the People's Court? It is natural that such evidence or records cannot be presented as to who calls North Korea an example of the liquidation of Japan. This is because there was no Japanese liquidation at all and there was no crime of pro-Japanese condemnation. There was only communism in North Korea. Nevertheless, it is our reality that everyone speaks and accepts North Korea as if it were an example of Japanese liquidation. Also, that way, I became considered intellectual and ethnic.   To be clear, from 1946 to 1948, that is, before preparing for the Korean War, it was none other than the Lenin-Stalin Soviet communist and the struggle to stop the founding of the Republic of Korea. And those who opposed nationalization, who took away property in the process, and those who contributed to the founding of the Republic of Korea were sacrificed by the justification and logic of pro-Japanese punishment or national traitor liquidation. Pro-Japanese punishment or national traitor liquidation existed as a justification for the liquidation of opposing forces. Therefore, the Kim Il-sung group of the Stalin army mentioned Cho Man-sik, Kim Gu, and Rhee Syng-man as representative figures of national rebellion and pro-Japanese in the name of liquidation of pro-Japanese remnants. They drove Rhee Syng-man and Kim Gu to national rebels, and in particular, Kim Gu focused on criticism, calling him the incarnation of "murder, arson, and hawk" until he participated in the 1948 "Banquet of Representatives of the Social Organization of the North and South Korean Joseon." In addition, Cho Man-sik of the Democratic Party of Korea was referred to as a pro-Japanese and a symbol of national traitor. In other words, the liquidation work carried out in North Korea under the name of pro-Japanese or national rebellion was not a single liquidation, but a class struggle, and was only a repression and punishment of Stalin's Soviet troops and forces against Kim Il-sung. At the same time, it was an operation to castrate forces against communism through the Soviet Union's concept of trusteeship and to suppress resistance to looting, rape, and violent acts committed by Soviet troops. In North Korea, all those who resisted such communism were pro-Japanese. Now that I say it, most of the people who collapsed under the name of pro-Japanese at that time are not pro-Japanese, but anti-Stalin and anti-Kim Il-sung fighters. It was an anti-communist and anti-totalist movement to reveal that the way for the people to go to communism was the way for the people to collapse. Since they were not pro-Japanese, but anti-Kim Il-sung fighters, the issue of punishing North Korea's "proud" pro-Japanese offenders has not been mentioned anywhere, such as "Chosun Warriors" (1958) and "Hyundai Joseon History" (1983). It has not revealed any specific facts except that the Japanese settlement was thoroughly carried out. In fact, according to documents from the former Soviet Union, North Korea killed 3,171 political prisoners for committing anti-democratic reaction before the Korean War and 2,082 in the process of suppressing the anti-Soviet and anti-Stalin movements. However, the pro-Japanese problem is that only 131 people were sentenced to prison without specific data.   In other words, North Korea suppressed and punished all forces that were mounting in the process of achieving the communistization of Stalin, the Soviet country, and called it the liquidation of Japanese imperialism, not the communist Soviet Union. There was only a case in which factories and companies were taken away without laws or regulations, and the label "pro-Japanese" was indiscriminately labeled in the name of taking away land. That is all. Despite what and why the Republic of Korea, not even an invader, should liquidate, the Republic of Korea, which has the most severe demand for liquidation in the past, is looking for an example in North Korea's "Japanese liquidation." It is a new version of the Soviet movement and a new version of the Juche ideological left-wing movement.   What and why should the Republic of Korea, who is neither the perpetrator nor the invader, liquidate? Moreover, 60 years have passed since liberation, what and how should we liquidate it? It seems that it is still insufficient even though it has made countless liquidations in the meantime, saying that it is the liquidation of the military government, the liquidation of the five balls, and the "establishment of history." In addition, it seems that it is still insufficient even after making a fuss that it will build a new country, saying it is "New Korea Construction" and "Second Foundation."   Can Korea be a war criminal country that committed a war of aggression? I don't think so. Rather, it is a country that has been invaded and has suffered millions of sacrifices and terrible damage. Then is Korea an imperialist country? That's not it either. It is a country that has suffered the humiliation and difficulties of being colonized, mobilized for war, and deprived of national sovereignty. Or did the Republic of Korea drive the people to communist totalitarianism and ruin the country and people? No. Rather, it is a country that has endured and endured the provocations and threats of communism. Regardless of who on earth lives by selling "Cheongsan," Korea does not have a history to liquidate. It is what neighboring countries should do if they have to liquidate. First of all, the Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il systems, which maintain anti-ethnic and anti-human regimes, will be the subject of liquidation. In addition, Russia and China would deserve to liquidate, even though they failed to drive the people to the counter-historical path of communism. And Japan, the person who invaded neighboring countries and made them an imperial colony, deserves to liquidate them. The perpetrator's country, the war criminal state, and the anti-ethnic regime are moving alive and blue, so why should the victim, South Korea, make a fuss about liquidation?   Are you trying to make the Republic of Korea a country created by opportunistic forces and defeat justice by starting with the president again to make that fuss? Is that why the greatest historical scammers are in a hurry, such as appointing a person who has cursed Korea and shouted, "Korea is a country created by national rebels," as the director of the Korea Independence Hall? And is it even to go to the most failed evil system in world history like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, where "ethnic regularity" moves alive by doing "Japanese liquidation" so thoroughly? Who is insulting the Republic of Korea? What on earth should we liquidate? Like the expression "Miracle of the Han River" or "Rising Dragon", are we denying the success of the globally recognized Republic of Korea, admitting that the previous one was wrong, and going on the path of failure from now on? Or is it a history to reflect on and liquidate failure to go to communism like neighboring countries, to start an invasion war, and to create colonies? Obviously, the Republic of Korea is not a country that has created a history to liquidate, even though it has created and built a proud history that shines in world history. The target and dagger of historical liquidation misplaced the bungee index. It is only something that should be aimed at not us, but the Kim Il-sung system or other neighboring countries. Rather, those countries should properly clean up their history and emulate the Republic of Korea.     Still, despite the threat of communism and quasi-warring situations such as the April 3rd riots and the women's-first rebellion, the Republic of Korea created and held a trial for pro-Japanese liquidation, arrested 559 and indicted 221 to terminate the trial of 38. If we had settled pro-Japanese, we would have done it properly. In the Nuremberg trial, a war criminal trial against Germany, a war criminal state that caused World War II, only 22 key officials were indicted. Only 23 people were indicted in the Tokyo War Criminal Trials against Japan, which is another war criminal state and created numerous invasion wars and colonial empires. Are we supposed to have killed thousands and tens of thousands of people, the affected countries, when only 20 key players are put on trial? Until when do you want me to clean up? Modern history should no longer allow those who play without knowing what the logic and rhythm of the pseudo-religious group with Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il, and the pseudo-religious group are subject to liquidation but audit. Obviously, if there should be history liquidation, it should be done by the Kim Jong-il group and all other countries around it. Korea is a successful country that protected the country against the Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il groups, protected liberal democracy and market economy against the former Soviet Union and former Chinese communism, and showed the world's best growth after World War II. It is not liquidation, but rather a medal to those who lived in the era, a thank-you resolution to commemorate their sacrifices, and record the history of repaying the sacrifices and advance the history.