Western scholars never think that the West has fallen behind the East. From ancient times to modern times, the East has always lagged behind the West, and Chinese science and technology is also looking for its origins in the West.

 Western scholars never think that the West has fallen behind the East. From ancient times to modern times, the East has always lagged behind the West, and Chinese science and technology is also looking for its origins in the West. In order to prove this proposition, the following steps will be required. First, we need a definition of "Western scholars." Therefore, we need to define the West first. Narrowly, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Northern Europe, Northern Europe, Small Asia, Middle East, North Africa, and then the definition of "students" is needed. Did you get a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD? Should self-taught people be admitted? Should only historians acknowledge this? Or should it include scholars who study science, politics, society, economy, etc.? We also need a definition of what "Oriental" is. The East is a narrow region of Asia Minor+Palestinian+Mesopotamia+Arabia+Egypt, and if it expands a little, China/India/Central Asia will be added, and Northeast/Southeast Asia will be added. And we have to think about when ancient times begin and when modern times are, and whether we can put "ancient East" and "modern East" in the same category... (can we put the Middle East, China, and India into one world...) It's the same thing.) We have to think about what can be defined as the origin of science and technology... You have to think about what it means to be behind and ahead... Finally, if you write all of that specifically on the questionnaire and then ask "all Western scholars" to see if it really is, you will be able to determine black and white.

In the West, there are karma from the imperialist era, but the Japanese and Chinese tyranny is too hideous.