The recent Korean history books he sees also lack mention of Gaya. I hear that many research results have accumulated over the past 20 years, but I also feel that researchers and their influence, which are absolutely lacking, have not crossed the barrier to the Korean historical community. According to today's news, 85 people majored in Silla history, 34 researchers in Baekje history, and 14 researchers in Goguryeo history in Korean history. What about Kiyasa Temple? It seems that we still don't think of Gaya as our ancient history. It seems that they are willing to think only as a small federation. Research in various countries (?) such as Dongye, Okje, Buyeo, etc., Balhae, Gaya, etc., and Gojoseon...Other fields are terrible, but these fields are really terrible. ================================================================================ [The Immortal Empire, Gaya] Intentional deletion from the Four Kingdoms Fraud of the Ancient States "Gaya" [Busan Ilbo 2004-09-10 13:03] # Gyeongnam people, "We are Gaya people".
△ Choi In-ho = Gayasa Temple is still missing in Korean history. When I saw the papers that I was reviewing the data this time, it seemed like a stationary book of a stranger. There are many stories, but they are subjective, different, and seem to have something to take, but they seem very dangerous. It felt like a legendary dragon that was clearly there but had no substance. At first glance, I felt like I was on the tail of a dragon without substance.
△ Kim Tae-sik = Baekje is the center of Buyeo and Silla is the center of Gyeongju, so the historical consciousness remains with Godo as a strong center. However, Gaya remains not a city, but a sense of "I am a descendant of Gaya" throughout Gyeongsangnam- It's a very unusual thing. They say that the love for Gaya spreads throughout Gyeongnam.
△ Choi In-ho = It's a very good thing. Gyeongju and Buyeo are called historical elevations, but when I entered Busan, I saw the phrase "Welcome to Busan, the city of culture." The phrase, City of Culture, is with the Busan International Film Festival in mind, and I would rather say Busan and Gimhae as the City of History. As an altitude that conceived Gaya, the fourth empire. I want to awaken my geographical awareness and pride. That's why I want to write a Gayasa novel.
The Nakdonggang River, where △ Kim Tae-sik = Gaya was located, is amazing. It was one of the three major rivers in ancient history. The Nakdonggang River was a window of ancient history related to Japanese culture, the Daedong River was close to the Chinese culture, and the Hangang River was a region encompassing China and Japan. According to the records, there were various small countries in the form of 12 countries, 6 Gaya countries, and 22 countries that had changed in the Nakdonggang River basin. It means that there was a state and a king earlier. Even before Silla is still ripe.
△ Shin Kyung-cheol = Archaeologically, Silla had no cultural identity until the 4th century. However, the Gaya area in the downstream area of the Nakdonggang River was different. In this area, the idea of "we should go" was widespread while sharing languages. As far as I can tell, this area has been the center of Korean iron culture since the end of the 4th century B.C. At that time, the stoneware suddenly disappears. It was replaced by iron. Of course, the ironware was reprocessed and used, and a bronze machine was used as a burial item in the tomb. Being in control of iron was another center of East Asian civilization at the time. That led to Gaya, the Iron Kingdom. Gaya would have compiled its own history book. Samguksagi compiled by Kim Bu-sik was originally supposed to be Saguksagi, but Gayabongi, which should contain Gaya's history, was intentionally removed. # Silla got rid of Gaya.
△ Kim Tae-sik = "Gayabongi" part would have been omitted by Silla. Silla came to have the idea of unifying Samhan, which encompasses Goguryeo Baekje Silla around the 7th century. Samhan was viewed throughout the Korean Peninsula. However, Samhan was originally a concept referring to the south of the Han River, excluding Goguryeo north and south of the Hangang River. Initially, Gaya was in the concept of Samhan. It was replaced by Goguryeo. Silla did not recognize Gaya's distinction, considering Gaya as its own, because it merged Gaya (562) 98 years earlier than Baekje (660). It was made into the formal form of ancient Korean history and continued to the Samguk Sagi written by Kim Bu-sik of Goryeo, a descendant of Silla. However, at the end of the Goryeo Dynasty, Ilyeon managed to mention Gaya along with the selection of Gojoseon in Samguk Yusa, which means the rest of the world. In Joseon, awareness of Gaya took place after the Seven Years' War (Imjin Japanese Invasion). During the war, the righteous army, which occurred especially often in the old Gaya area, converged into the North Korean regime (the only regime in the history of the pre-Joseon period where Gyeongnam people took power) and planted awareness of Gaya history. Since then, it has led to the Four Kingdoms Period View of Dongsa Gangmok and Jibong Yuseol in historical books. However, the sprout was devastatedly cut by the Japanese. Gaya has been reduced to "Imna," which belongs to Japan, not to four countries. The era of the four countries missed the opportunity to settle down like that.
△ Choi In-ho = 20 years ago, while writing the Lost Kingdom about Baekje, he discovered that Japan was Baekje-oriented. However, Japan in the 4th and 5th centuries, before Baekje influenced it, found it difficult to speak without Gaya. For example, Emperor Indeok, Empress Shingong of Japan's Clerk, is difficult to explain without Gaya. Gaya was the head of Japanese history. I'm going to infer the fourth empire where Gaya and Japan are mixed. Such an idea led to the thrill of seeing the excavation of the tomb of Daeseong-dong, Gimhae, the remains of Geumgwan Gaya. In Gaya ruins, a large number of Japanese relics such as barrel-type synchronous wave motors came out. It's not just it. As Queen Gwanggaeto proves, Gaya and Japan were mixed at the time of King Gwanggaeto. It's quite controversial, but it even makes it possible to think that Gaya and why were not destined communities, that is, one empire. # Gaya and Japan are one destiny community.
There are various nuances to being a △ Shin Kyung-cheol = destiny community, but it is too much to say that it is an empire. In order for Gaya and Japan to become one empire, a common ideology, or archaeologically, a form of a common ritual, that is, a tomb style, must be premised. However, the tomb styles of Gaya and Japanese ancient times in the 4th and 5th centuries are different. Gaya was inwardly oriented as a wooden tomb, while Japan was outwardly oriented as a forward and backward tomb. But it's not irrelevant at all, it's close. That's subtle. In general, it is said that the Chinese Southern Dynasty, Baekje, Gaya, and Japan form one line, and the Chinese Northern Dynasty, Goguryeo, and Silla form another line. In that context, Gaya and Japan are definitely very close, and even more, Gaya's advanced iron age culture has led to the Japanese ancient times, which are our Three Kingdoms period. In other words, the history of Japan has changed due to Gaya's iron. In detail, the 4th and 5th centuries were the era of transformation from the ancient times of Japan, and the transition from the Kyushu regime in the northern part to the Yamato regime in Kinki in Osaka. The Yamato regime seems to have been formed by ironware, that is, taking control of Gaya's iron import route. It's not just it. Gaya and Why in the 4th and 5th centuries should be noted. Gaya airlifted advanced iron to Japan, but Japanese residents came to Gaya in person and settled down as Japanese Gaya people. In addition, Gaya seems to have brought in Japanese mercenaries when it was urgent. The evidence is that Japanese earthenware (Haziki, 師師) used by ordinary people came from Gimhae, Busan. Returning to the epitaph of King Gwanggaeto mentioned by Choi, if Gaya and Japan were in such a relationship at the time, Gaya could be called just as a minor being on the periphery without complicated distinction from Goguryeo's eyes.
△ Kim Tae-sik = Gaya was not a centralized system, but an exchange-oriented system. At that time, Japan's Yamato regime, for example, was a consumer-centered force as a consumer of Gaya, and Gaya could be further strengthened because it had its consumer destination. That way, Gaya was closely related to Japan in a superior position. That's where Gaya and Why are mixed. According to the record of "Three Kingdoms Fraud," "Gayabonki" is missing, but Gaya appears a lot. However, "Three Kingdoms Fraud" describes Gaya and Japan a lot, and sometimes Gaya is described as why. For example, in a record that Japan invaded Silla through the East Sea, the reason is Japan, but in some cases it could be Gaya. The "why" of the Samguksagi also meant that it was an uncivilized tribe. There is a record that Japanese raiders invaded Hwanghae Island before and after King Gwanggaeto in the Goguryeo book of the Three Kingdoms Fraud. It must have been Baekje. From Goguryeo's point of view, Baekje was the country of enemies who killed his grandfather (King Gogukwon). Goguryeo would have wanted to ignore Baekje. At that time, Baekje would have equipped Gaya and Japanese mercenaries, but Goguryeo expressed them as "why" in a lump of contempt. It is a variety of uses of "why," and Baekje Gaya makes you feel a line leading to Japan.
According to a paper by △ Choi In-ho △ Shin, the ancient tombs in Daeseong-dong, Gimhae, disappeared in the 5th century. And it is said that the main force of Daeseong-dong moved to Japan and led to Japan's transformation. I infer that the ancient tombs in Daeseong-dong, which moved to Japan, may be related to Empress Shin Gong-hu, 15-year-old Emperor Ngsin, and 16-year-old Emperor Indeok. It is highly likely that they were probably the rulers of the Gaya line. It is impossible for them, who were Gaya, to be able to become rulers without Gaya and Japan as a common destiny. The fact that Gaya and Japan were co-destinators and could have been united kingdoms seems to open up a lot of unknowns. Of course, it is in line with Egami Namio's theory of horseback riding that the northern horseback riding people came to the southern part of the Korean Peninsula and crossed to Japan, but if we supplement the theory of horseback riding in detail, there will be a lot to take. # Gaya is treated as a child in both Korea and Japan.
△ Shin Kyung-chul = You need to read the emotions of Japan. Currently, Japan is Baekje-oriented and despises Gaya. The Japanese are looking for Baekje's ancient Buyeo as if it were a place similar to the "country," the center of Asuka culture. On the other hand, Gaya only highlighted the place where it conquered, saying it was Imna, but did not illuminate it as the origin of Japanese history and culture. Gaya is treated as a child in both Korea and Japan.
△ Kim Tae-sik = Gaya definitely existed until the 5th century. However, it seems that it has not existed since the middle of the 6th century when it was merged with Silla. There can't be such an absurd thing. Scholars' writings and words are usually difficult, but I hope this novel will serve as an opportunity for Gayasa to come closer in terms of language and life.
△ Choi In-ho = I feel that history is not silent. I heard the silence in the Seongdong Ancient Tombs. Writing is scary and painful, but I believe that if I write hard, many spirits and residents of Gaya will help me. In that belief, I feel that 'Gaya is now trying to speak'.
Organizing = Reporter Choi Hakrim.
