Korean history must be reborn.

 As modern science, historical science has the basic task of removing myths inherited from ancient times and filling the place as an objective cause and effect of facts. Nevertheless, Korea's national history seems to be getting deeper and deeper.This is not only the crisis of national history, but also the crisis of Korean intelligence and learning, and furthermore, it is the historical source of a deep and large trap that is unlikely to easily escape from Korean society today. As is well known, the affection that the Republic of Korea showed in national history and the investment it invested in were special.Nevertheless, the state affairs criticize and deny his supporters. It is by no means natural that the traditional view of civilization of our ancestors, which existed only 100 years ago, is denied.It was the result of violent domination and coercive education by imperialism over the 20th century.At first, it was dominated and educated by Japan, a small empire in East Asia, and later by America, a great empire in the world. More precisely, it was the process of mating and fusion of two different civilizations.Just because you are of mixed race, you don't have to be ashamed or try to hide the secret of your birth.I believe that every civilization develops into such a mixed race. Regardless of the new and old, the basic premise of nationalist history is that Koreans or "our ancestors" have lived as a single nation since history as a community of blood ties, regions, cultures, destiny, and history. However, strictly speaking, the proposition itself that Koreans have been a single people as a single historical community since history belongs to a myth that cannot be proved. In the first half of the 20th century, Japanese colonial rule induced the establishment of such a myth as its confrontation. After liberation, the national state accepted and developed its myth as its own national history. As long as it is based on such myths, it is no wonder that we find a strong moral tendency that can be said to be religious in nationalist history, regardless of the new and old. The great confusion that surrounds today's Korean society carries a sense of crisis that it may not be possible to enter an advanced society without some new type of system being devised. What are the basic principles of the new system? What systems and norms does it require of us? The crisis facing Korean society feels more serious than the traps that middle-income countries with around $10,000 have passed to enter developed countries because nationalism is a collective passion that no one can easily control.Community averageism promoted by nationalism is not only a source of political populism, but also amplifies class conflict over distribution more than necessary. If it is a culture that does not cause much criticism or resistance even if its neighbors are called "forced thieves" or "evil incarnations," it is better not to expect good international cooperation or market integration from the beginning. As science, civilization and comparative history do not exist in national history. The fact that such a gap in intelligence is being filled with the discourse of mythical people is the source of the crisis facing the Republic of Korea.Therefore, national history must be disbanded and reborn as 'Korean history'.

the millennium AD world about A.D 1000

  It is a unique historical and cultural book that vividly reproduces the world of 1000 A.D., 1,000 years ago. 1,000 years ago, Europe's role in the world was somewhat insignificant, and each region of the world formed its own and diverse cultures. This book dates back 1,000 years to the past and examines the history before the birth of a different world and a Western-centered worldview. In other words, if the 20th century was a cruel era marked by uniform globalization centered on the West, the era of the 1000th century A.D. was a pluralistic world in which various and original cultures blossomed. This book reproduces the scenery of A.D. 1000 in detail through thorough historical research and long-term interdisciplinary research. And through this, we can discover the virtues of the past and develop an eye for the future. Here is the heart of this book. The time view, cultural transfer, agricultural culture, urban and urban people, communication and trade are all developed according to five perspectives, and rich visual materials are included to help understand. In particular, the book's attitude to restore the dark ages of 1,000 years ago as objectively as possible casts a clue to the recent distortion of history, such as the distortion of Goguryeo history and the liquidation of the past. [Provided as a lib] Introduced by Jieun. Franz Josef Bruckgemeyer Franz.Jeff Bruckgemeyer PhD in Philosophy and Medicine. From 1995 to 1998, he taught modern history, technology history, and environmental history at Hanover University, and now serves as a professor of economic history and social history at Freiburg University. Among the history of the 19th and 20th centuries, he has published many papers, especially on social and economic history, and has recently devoted himself to the study of environmental history. He also organized exhibitions related to life history several times. His books include Chernobyl, 26 April 1986 (1998) and Saxony-Anhaltian History (Co-author, 1998) and People of 1000 Years of Clerk (Co-author, 2002). Wolfgang Schenklun has been a professor of medieval art history at Martin Luther University in Halle-Bidenberg since 1995. He published many papers on medieval architecture and sculpture, especially church architecture and monastery architecture and cathedral sculpture. The main areas of research currently being conducted are Italian medieval murals and paintings, and the history and context of medieval art acceptance. His books include "The Cathedral of Lance" (Co-author, 1988) "St. Francesco of Asia, Special Civil Society of Ancient Greece" (1991) "The History of Michaelstein Monastery, Protecting Music and Art" (1996) and "Architecture of the Dominican Order (2000).   The first attempt to shed light on the year 1000 A.D. Table of Contents Header 서기 Europe's efforts to check the future through the past, the product prologue 서기 1000 A.D., and Asia was the center of the world Ⅰ. Time view 시간을 Time observation, measurement, and management Millennium God's time a thousand years ago and human time cycle time and linear time crisis and misfortune time are separate. The dysfunction of time brought about by the invention of the time clock between astronomy and mathematics and religion, which organized time Ⅱ. Culture Transfer 역사와 Record and convey history and culture Add the power of letters: Record the world 1,000 years ago of "straight" brush and "curved" brush in the history of denial and distortion Ⅲ Artistic abundance of 1000 A.D. The government protects farmers to collect taxes on production, which is neither heavenly nor respected, and maya's decline caused by land abuse and population growth. City, city, rural, trade, urban, and urban, which were as diverse as today's Manhattan metropolitan city, strengthened by the development of urban economic currency, the center of politics, religion, military, and culture. Asia-led internationalization movement, fantasies and misunderstandings about foreigners, intercontinental trade network gems, raw materials to slaves, currency, social integration, and multilateral trade. The world's landscape reorganized by war, conquest, and looting over the past thousand years ====================================================================================================== This is a good book to refer to. It also shows how uncivilized the West was at that time... In the case of Japan for 1000 years...Heiankyo is the only city with more than 5,000 people... (not more than 5,000 people in Daijafu) Even though it was a savage society...Compared to the West at that time, it was a tremendous civilization... Especially... The extent to which England was 1,000 years ago... Compared to the Yayoi period in Japan...Rather, it was more savage.(In the case of a commoner's residence...More than a blood transfusion hut...It's more savage...Completely... Neolithic dwellings...) Even their palaces...More than the ancient 궁 palace of the thatched palace...It was more uncivilized, so... (The palace is a single-story wooden building.)About 2-3 buildings) You know how much it is, right?

Let's consider that there was a time in the past when the East was better than the West.

But what matters is the present and the future. Do you know how violent China and Japan are right now, which can be said to be the strong countries of the East?

historic Eastern and Western commerce

 This book, titled Orient, sheds new light on Orient (the world history of the East), as can be seen in the subtitle "Global Economy of the Asian Era." At the same time of publication, it really turned Western intellectual society upside down and caused a great sensation in non-European regions, especially China and Japan. It raises significance to existing historical narratives and social theories, and calls for revising the views implied by European centralism and completely re-establishing the framework of thinking about the modern economy. This is because it is relentlessly breaking down the historical description and social science theory of modern Western studies, which have been like an iron fortress for the past 150 years. The main theme is that the East is returning to the center of world history, correcting the wrong view of history centered on the West. It provides opportunities for fundamental re-recognition of the rise of the West and the origins of the world system, while also inviting them with innovative and exciting stories.Frank points out that the world history we know and learn today was written from a Eurocentric perspective that did not exist before the 19th century, and that the universal social science we pursue was also newly created as a Eurocentric invention. In other words, the ideology invented by European historians and social theorists to increase European interests is Eurocentrism. This has not only served as a political, economic, and cultural support for reproducing European or Western hegemony since the late 19th century, but has also spread around the world through colonial rule. Frank, who has sought the roots of this Eurocentrism, finds it in the perspective of social scientists representing modern Europe. They are all convinced that the inherent characteristics of Europe have brought about exceptional European development different from those of the rest of the world. Marx argued that only Europe had a capitalist infant who could transition from feudalism to capitalism, and that Asia, represented by the "Asian mode of production," had its identity fixed, so it should benefit from progress from Europe to break away from it. Weber says Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism are the blood and flesh of capitalism, explaining that religions outside Europe all had mythical, mysterious, magical, and, in short, anti-rational elements. According to this, it is concluded that the "Western" with the yeast of a rational mind emerged, and the "remaining world" that lacked it did not. Even a European historian like Fernand Brodel, who has an exceptionally wide field of view, said, "China has fallen behind because of its less developed economic structure than Islam and the West. Chinese entrepreneurs were not enthusiastic about making profits. Compared to the spirit of Western capitalists, they were clumsy." As mentioned earlier, Frank also criticizes himself and Wallastin, who was an academic comrade. " Both Wallastin and I focused on theoretically analyzing and modeling the structure and process of the modern 'world' economy/'world' system. Wallastin still thinks so, but I believed at the time that the center of this system was Europe, and that the rest of the world was integrated into a European-based "world" economy as it expanded. That was the limitation of Wallastin/Frank's theory." That's not all. The Europeans also invented geography. This is because the word "Eurasia" itself is European-centered. In fact, Europe is just a frontier peninsula far from the vast Eurasian continent. Nevertheless, Europeans have expressed the "progress of history" on the map centered on Europe. For example, in Mercator's way, Britain, a small island country, is depicted as large as India. In addition, contrary to geographical facts, India, which has a much larger population, is only a subcontinent, and China is just a "country." Frank's argument is that in order to crush such deep-rooted prejudice, it is necessary to analyze and grasp the reality of a single global economic system from a global perspective. This is because it is not possible to properly explain what parts have developed, including the part of Europe, without analyzing the whole that is more than the sum of parts. From a global perspective, Frank of the Asian world economy argues that European domination is only a temporary phenomenon that has lasted for more than 200 years since 1800. "Europe's economic growth in modern Europe was not achieved by itself, nor was it achieved by rationality, institution, entrepreneurship, technology, warm climate, or the European 'exceptionism' of a European race, and Europe before 1800 was neither more important nor more advanced than the rest of the world economy. If there had been a region that dominated the world economy before 1800, it was Asia. If there was a 'central' position and role in the world economy at that time and there was a ranking among the 'central', it should be considered that China was at its peak." Europe has long been eyeing Asia's abundant products and quality products. European countries were eager to explore ocean routes to ensure safe access to Asian goods such as cotton, ceramics, spices and tea. However, silver rolled into Europe through the discovery of the New World. Until then, Europe lacked money and had no decent goods to sell to the Asian market, so it could not buy as many Asian goods as it wanted. Silver quenched this European thirst. Europe "bought a ticket to the train called the Asian Economy with the silver of the New World." Europe has been running a chronic deficit in trade with Asia, but it has made up for the deficit with silver. Most of the silver that Europe brought from the Americas flowed into China. Without silver, Europe would not have been able to offer business cards to the world economy. Britain later cultivated opium in India and exported it to China because there was nothing to sell. European products were less competitive than Asian products, so they did not work well outside the colony. China and India overwhelmed Europe in terms of technology, productivity and quality. According to Frank, it is only a myth that Europe eventually won the industrial competitiveness through the scientific revolution that took place in modern Europe thanks to the inherent nature of European rationality. The level of science and technology in Asia represented by China and India did not lag behind Europe until at least 1800, but rather outperformed Europe. Ironically, the biggest reason why the situation reversed in 1800 was that Asia was highly competitive until then. Asia had abundant goods and high-quality agricultural technology, and because of its abundant population, labor costs were naturally low. This was directly linked to the competitiveness of the product. Inventions were steadily made in Asia by engineers working in the production field, but it was more economical and reasonable to input additional labor than technological innovation in developing labor-saving machines. On the other hand, Europe had a small population and continued to outflow due to the expansion of colonies, resulting in a much lower population/land resource ratio than Asia, which led to a high-wage/high-cost production structure. Europe had an urgent reason to build a labor-saving machine. In Europe, however, it was not scientists who invented machines, but mainly field engineers. They raised the curtain on the Industrial Revolution, and Europe began to gain an edge in competitiveness from this time on. However, Eurocentrists have not seen history from this global perspective, but have evaluated rationality, entrepreneurship, and technological innovation as exceptional phenomena that can only be found in Europe and argued that Europe has created the world. Frank strongly criticizes this. Europe did not create the world, but "the world created Europe." Europe's rise is not only explained by its internal factors, but has also benefited Europe much more economically, technologically, and culturally than Europe, which has remained around for most of its world history. Frank has an interesting metaphor for this. "Europe took a ticket to the third-largest train called the Asian Economy, but soon rented a car, and in the 19th century, it drove Asians out of trains and succeeded in becoming the owner." However, the same phenomenon is happening in East Asia today. Frank was born in Berlin, Germany in 1929, introduced by Andre Gunder Frank, the author of the "Provided by Yes24" in the economic war between China and the United States, although Asia suffered a financial crisis in the "Preface to the Korean version." In 1941, he moved to the United States with his parents to escape the Nazi regime and received a doctorate in economics from the University of Chicago in 1957. He then served as an instructor and assistant professor at the University of Michigan until 1962. In 1926, he went to Latin America as an assistant professor at the University of Brasilia and taught anthropology theory. In 1965, he became a special professor at the National School of Economics at the National University of Mexico. From 1966 to 1968, he served as a visiting professor of economics and history at George Williams University in Montreal, Canada. In 1968, he was a professor of economics and sociology at the University of Chile in Santiago, Chile, and was involved in the reform of the Allende government. He fled to Europe after a military coup in Chile in 1973, and worked as a visiting research professor at Max-Planck Laboratory in Starnberg, Germany, from the following year to 1978. In 1978, he left Germany again to Norwich, England, where he became a professor at the School of Development and Research at the University of East Anglia. Since 1981, he has been a professor of developmental economics and social science at the University of Amsterdam. After retiring as an economics professor at the University of Amsterdam in 1994, at the age of 65, he worked as a visiting professor at several universities, and is now a raw material professor at the World History Center at Boston University. In 1999, he was awarded the Best Writings Award by the World Society of History, and Orient was awarded the Book of the Year award by the American Society of Sociology in 2000.

He published numerous studies and papers, of which the most well-known is the "Development of Low Power" (1969), which is called the beginning of the "subjugation theory." Preface to the Korean version of the table of contents Chapter 1 Competition between real world history and European social theory The holistic methodology and purpose of this book is not Europeanism, but globalism Smith: Marx.Weber's contemporary Eurocentrism, its critics, economic historians, Western social theory, Chapter 2 Introduction to World Trade, 13th to 14th centuries, Columbus's exchange of world economy, map the global division of labor and trade balance.The World's Currency: Its Production and Exchange: Global Casino's Big and Small Attractiveness Global Casino Number Game How Did the Silver/Gold/Credit Winners Spend Their Money? In the theory of reserve-theme inflation or money supply, the production currency expands the boundaries between settlements and production. Chapter 4 Global Economy-Comparison and Quantitative Issues in Asia: Population.production, productivity, incomeTrade Population, Production, Income Productivity and Competitiveness World Trade 1400-1800 Qualitative Issues: Technology Technology Asia Science. Technology and Eurocentric Guns/Ships/Prints/ Textiles/Metallurgy. Coal.Mechanism of Technological Development in the Power/Transport World: Economic.Comparison between the Asian and European systems of the financial system and the European system: India/China Chapter 5 is not a coincidence, but rather a cross-integrated macro-demographic demographic. Structural analysis of the 17th century 1740 silver crisis Kondratiev "B" phase: crisis and recession? CHAPTER VI Why did the West (temporarily) win? Were there long-cycle roller coasters? Did the decline of the East precede the rise of the West? India's decline and other decline in Asia How did the West rise? Asia on the shoulders of a giant, the demand for technological change, the supply and source of capital supply, the global economy, demographic explanation, demographic.Settlement Model Higher Balance Trap Evidence: Transformation of India, China, Europe, and the World from 1500 to 1750 Transition India/China/Western Europe/The rest of the world, Chapter 7 Conclusions of History and Theoretical Conclusions: Eurocentrism was a naked king. Asian Production Style European Exceptionist European World-Organization? Is it a global economy? 1500 Years: Continuous?The rise of the West and the hollow categories of the Industrial Revolution and Procrustes' bed theoretical implications: holistic-partial commonality/similarity/specificity/discontinuous cross-sectional cycle vs. single-line Europe. When Europe discovered the Roman Empire, they said... "Finally, Europe has discovered a civilization comparable to the Orient". In fact, the Roman Empire...Contrary to popular belief... There are many things that have been evaluated by future generations. Westerners...While "discovering" the Roman Empire, the West also...I thought the Orient was second to none... The traditional perception of Westerners is... I'm second to the Orient.That's what I mean.

However, considering the selfish savagery of Japan and China, the East cannot be said to be better than the West. When these Eastern gangsters seized hegemony, they robbed, bullied, and arrogant a weak country.

Personal opinion of historical club members - Hitler's "My Struggle" - German version of Baekbeom's Journal

 Hitler had three deadly enemies, the Jews, the Slavs, and Maximism, in the German version of "My Struggle" (Source: YES24, Sinabrlo = 2005-01-09). Hitler's father died at the age of 13 and his mother at the age of 18. Having dreamed of becoming a painter, he eventually failed to achieve his dream and jumped into the livelihood front. After World War I broke out, Hitler enlisted as a volunteer and served for six years. Fighting on the front line, he was taken to the rear for treatment due to several injuries, but when he came to the rear supplementary battalion, the secretariat was all occupied by Jews and the secretaries were almost Jewish. They were rolling a pen in the back. The Jewish-controlled media began to criticize the war day after day, and as the war came to an end, the munitions factories went on strike, and the workers who led the strike were reddened by the Marxism advocated by the Jews. What did Hitler think when he retreated without bullets and watched his comrades die? Although it has emerged as an emerging power, the world has already decided on landowners, and the war has been fought to prevent the Slavicization of neighboring Austria from becoming a Slavic country. The Russian Revolution, which happened just in time, had to focus only on the western front, and even though 1 million people were killed and 4 million injured, they lost the war. In a war fought for Germanic pride, Jews sent Germanic youth to the rear, instead of holding guns, and Jews who took control of the media benefited from the military business. It is concluded that these parasitic opportunists, who are only interested in their own interests, lost the war. After the war, Hitler became the seventh member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. His speech, which benchmarked the merits of communism's propaganda style and devoted himself to the state enough to receive the first-degree Iron Cross award for martial arts, was not harsh. After becoming the party's supreme leader with excellent speech skills and his German Workers' Party became the first party, Hitler became president in 1933. In addition, Jews and Slav Bolsheviks, the enemies of the iron world of Buldaecheon Stream, will start the task of drying seeds on Earth, respectively. It is very affectionate to see through the eyes of Hitler, a young man who loved his country, how much he loved his people and hated Jews, Russia, and Communists. What is really surprising is that the reality we are facing is not much different from this. Stock exchanges mired in international finance and the national economy in the midst of it. Opportunists scratch dirty money with money and land games, and the media defend their friends they used to eat together and make the people fight on their own. This is exactly what young Hitler, who was the only thing he could do for his country to carry a gun for his country, was on the other side of the globe 80 years ago. In this chaotic situation, Hitler establishes a firm belief for the German people, shaken enough to carry out all the things he had written 20 years ago. The result was very terrible, but it gives many implications to us who are confused about what to do and how to live for the country and the people. The part about propaganda and the media is so gemlike that the entire text should be underlined. A Germanic young man who thought only of his people wrote the German version of Baekbeom's diary in prison.

Kim Gu and Hitler have different definitions, although they are far-fetched.

Western scholars never think that the West has fallen behind the East. From ancient times to modern times, the East has always lagged behind the West, and Chinese science and technology is also looking for its origins in the West.

 Western scholars never think that the West has fallen behind the East. From ancient times to modern times, the East has always lagged behind the West, and Chinese science and technology is also looking for its origins in the West. In order to prove this proposition, the following steps will be required. First, we need a definition of "Western scholars." Therefore, we need to define the West first. Narrowly, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Northern Europe, Northern Europe, Small Asia, Middle East, North Africa, and then the definition of "students" is needed. Did you get a bachelor's degree, a master's degree, or a PhD? Should self-taught people be admitted? Should only historians acknowledge this? Or should it include scholars who study science, politics, society, economy, etc.? We also need a definition of what "Oriental" is. The East is a narrow region of Asia Minor+Palestinian+Mesopotamia+Arabia+Egypt, and if it expands a little, China/India/Central Asia will be added, and Northeast/Southeast Asia will be added. And we have to think about when ancient times begin and when modern times are, and whether we can put "ancient East" and "modern East" in the same category... (can we put the Middle East, China, and India into one world...) It's the same thing.) We have to think about what can be defined as the origin of science and technology... You have to think about what it means to be behind and ahead... Finally, if you write all of that specifically on the questionnaire and then ask "all Western scholars" to see if it really is, you will be able to determine black and white.

In the West, there are karma from the imperialist era, but the Japanese and Chinese tyranny is too hideous.

Victor David Henson's "Murder and Civilization" (Western scientific civilization has always overwhelmed the non-Western world?)

 This book talks about how the West was able to overwhelm and win the non-Western militarily. We are looking for other fundamental causes besides the superiority of military strategies and the superiority of gunpowder weapons, for the victory of the West in nine battles in which it could have won the world. The author's answer is a more democratic political system than the non-Western countries (the Battle of Salamis...) and strict discipline and rationality (the Battle of Rocks drift). I'm looking for openness to make WMDs when necessary. Also, the conventional wisdom...In other words, they also refuted claims that the West was able to overwhelm the non-Western world only after the introduction of gunpowder weapons, or that the fundamental cause of Western development was found in natural conditions: large amounts of iron ore and coal. However, although the main theme of this book is military consideration and presupposes that Western science and technology are superior to what is known, there was no mention that the West always overwhelms the non-Western. After reading this book, a person who claimed that Western science and technology always overwhelmed the non-Western world said that he had only read the preface, so I looked for articles about it in the preface. Prologue - Why did the West win? Is Western dominance the work of future generations?There is a sub-title that comes out from pages 48 to 51.The content, as the title suggests, is a rebuttal to the fact that Western military superiority began in later generations, that is, after the 13th century. The main content was that from 497 BC to 500 AD, military technology - Greek fire - existed that could overwhelm non-Western forces under unfavorable conditions even in the dark and military superiority of the West. But even the author who was making that argument says this in the middle of page 49...According to the present view, even after the fall of the Roman Empire, the West lagged far behind the cultures of China and the Islamic world, but the military's power was considerably stronger than its population and territorial size. Even the author, who argued that the West was never at a disadvantage compared to the non-Western countries despite the unfavorable conditions of the Dark Ages, admitted that the West was lagging behind the Chinese and Islamic forces in other areas. Of course, there may be questions about whether science is included in that "culture," but the next paragraph on page 51 - the Western way of war - also mentions this in a subheading article...Moreover, it is not necessarily true that the West monopolized excellent technology and science. The Tririm of Temistocles, who won Salamis, was no better than the battleship of Xerxes..." Victor David Henson, author of this book, rebelled against the conventional wisdom that Western military superiority began in modern times, but did not see Western civilization, science and technology, as always precede the non-Western. If Josephine Dame and other scholars argue that the West has always overwhelmed non-Western science, Henson, on the contrary, says that the West lags behind the non-Western except for military superiority, clearly nailing science and technology, and so on. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I found this after looking at another book. The Arab sciences that the West took through the Iberian Peninsula's restoration and the Crusades. Abacus, the so-called Arabic numerals, including the concept of astrolabe, algebra, trigonometry, zero, which are navigation instruments using the positions of stars.In addition, he learned alcohol distillation techniques and sugar production methods. Among them, the Arabic numbers, including the concept of zero, were first used by Hindus in India, and I understand that the papermaking technique was handed down by a Tang prisoner caught at the Battle of Talas. Therefore, even if a Western scholar said that the West overwhelmed the non-Western world in all areas, Sohae's judgment is that it should be considered not true.

Let's redraw the map. -Cho Dong Il.

 While giving a lecture to teachers in Jeju Island, he said that the map on the classroom wall was wrong and ruined education. Let's look at the future of Korea. Jeju Island is said to be a remote border. In order to reduce the area of the map, Jeju Island is not placed in place, and gold is drawn in one corner to be confined. Block all sides, preventing them from going outside. He said, "It's a big mistake to have students grow up looking at such maps, so we need to correct them right away." Let's redraw the map. Let's draw a circular map, not a square, with Jeju Island at the center. Let's draw a circle around the length of all of Korea to the north and make a map that goes into a considerable part of Japan and a part of China. Let's make a concentric circle of distant and near distances. It is possible to widen the radius and draw most of Asia and half of the world. In Busan and Daegu, draw a concentric map centered on your hometown in the same way and hang it in the classroom, so that students can think of new things day by day.The two maps differ in principle. The future of the Republic of Korea says that the country is great alone, and ignores local governments and the world. That was the ideology of an era. The redrawn map of the concentric circle tells us that regions, countries, and the world are precious together. It is said that the road from one's hometown to the world beyond the boundaries of the country is open in all directions. This is an indicator of a new era. It can most clearly indicate on the map that ideology is modified and indicators change.It is not to say that the two are reasonable. The earth is round and has no center. I'm at the center of my life. You have to throw away the square map and draw a circular map to get closer to reality. It is wrong to think that one's own province is biased toward one side. It is necessary to correct the mindset that in order to expand the stage of activities, we must advance to Seoul and go outside. Redrawing a map does not change the world. It is not unknown that there are numerous restrictions on trying to keep the provinces tied to Seoul. I admit that what I have said so far is an idealism that is difficult to implement immediately. That's why education should be changed first. We must develop our ideals by looking at the map drawn again by the next generation to create a different future. Not only elementary and secondary education but also university education should change. The university's mission is to conduct and educate the research necessary to design and construct the future desirably. The theory and knowledge that corrects the conservatism of department education in the existing framework should be manufactured in a separate laboratory, and a new form of integrated and open interdisciplinary system should be prepared and distributed.  There are many research institutes in universities in Daegu and Busan, but they are not famous. There was no long-term plan and no manpower to study. We must admit our mistakes and try to change course. Efforts should be made to examine the past, present, and future of the relationship patterns of local, national, and world. It is necessary to gather necessary talents and conduct in-depth research to publicize the results obtained.         In modern times, before the state took an absolute position, the region was important, and the homogeneity of civilizations beyond the state was of great significance. The current situation is that European countries, which led the process of creating a modern state, are returning to the direction of progress and re-integrating civilizations and reviving the significance of local governments. We need to find the direction we should go by comparing its history with that of Asia. In East Asia or other countries in wider Asia, it is desirable to visit Daegu or Busan and conduct joint research with their universities.While grasping new trends in Europe, attention should be paid to cooperation between regions. Baden Wurtemberg in Germany, Cataronia in Spain, Lombardy in Italy, and Ronne-Alps in France contribute actively to creating a new Europe by local governments' own judgment. Stuttgart, Barcelona, Milan, and Lyon, the central cities of the four provinces, develop the economy and culture while making good-faith competition successful with Berlin, Madrid, Rome, and Paris, the capitals of each country. Let's clarify the indicators of the era of localization. Let us develop our own home, diversify our nation's capabilities, and inherit the legacy of civilization, and make mankind happier. A small task of drawing a concentric circle map that focuses on my hometown and moves far away is the starting point of a huge transition.     Professor Cho Dong Il whom I respect.