With the Industrial Revolution, I thought we started a large-scale conquest after equipped with various science and technology equipment, such as measuring equipment, machine guns, battleships, etc., but before that, it was quite a lot. I'm just going to write it down. . . . .to point out the mistakes. 1) the Americas The Aztec and Inca conquest of Cortes and Pisa in Spain in the early 16th century after the "discovery or arrival" of Columbus in the late 15th century. Portugal also acquired Brazil because of the world dividing line between Spain and Portugal (which was divided by longitude and recognized by the Pope of Rome). Latin America was the main target in the 16th century... ...but in the 17th century, British and French immigration began in North America. In the 18th century, these two became independent of the United Kingdom after the Seven Years' War. Russia moved northward to Alaska, Spain to protect Mexico, California, New Mexico and Texas. 2) The Philippines and Indonesia. In the 16th century, the Philippines was in the hands of Spain after the opening of the Asian route of Vasco Dagama and the tour of the world of Magellan. The Indonesian island of Java fell into the hands of Portugal at first The next century will be the Netherlands. The Netherlands, which occupied Java Island only, expanded to all of Indonesia only after it gained strength from the industrial revolution in the 19th century. We made it to Taiwan Jung Sung-gong's Chinese army immediately chased him away. 3) Russia, which had always been miserablely slaughtered by Siberian nomadic peoples, especially Mongolia, fought back and began to advance into Asia beyond the Ural Mountains when it acquired guns in the 16th century. A group of private conquerors crossed the mountain range to conquer the Sibir Principality, the Ivan Brain Festival. Of course, the nomadic tribes of Tatar attacked Moscow, killed hundreds of thousands of people, and burned down the Ivan Brain Islands, but Russia, based in Asia, is known as Siberia and the Pacific Peninsula in the 17th century. We also received the Baikal Lake, the birthplace of our people. At that time, Russia was an ugly country in Europe, but it was invincible to Siberian Eskimos (Pyotr the Great overcame in the next century. At the end of the 17th century, the Chinese-Russian border was first formed by the signing of the Treaty of Nerchinsk, when the Western territories were close to the Philippines in the south and Siberia in the north. In fact, Russia threatened to eat Yeonju in 1860. by the power of the Industrial Revolution 3) India (cough...) India was the birthplace of civilization and was a great agricultural power in the 18th century with China and a great agricultural power, but it was a playground in England and France. In the 17th century, the Mughals were able to unify India for the first time under the Emperor Aurangzeb, which was the first time that the North had taken over the South. The Taj Mahal Cemetery was also built, and the prosperity of Choe O. 700,000 troops in possession. However, North India may not have been able to eat South India, but it will split right away in the next century. That is, the result of a herd. The Islamic Mughal Empire turns into a small state in central Delhi, independence of Hindu provinces, a struggle between two religions... ...and the British take the lead in exploitation by East India, eventually fighting the Seven Years' War in the middle of the 18th century. There's a person called the First World War, but at the same time. With the victory of the war, Britain took over Canada and India. The Indians split up and broke into these two ssamples... ...after the war, Britain took over Bengal, East India, which is now Bangladesh, and gradually expanded to take over all of India in the middle of the 19th century. In other words, in the 18th century, Britain did not immediately accept all of India. It's called two hundred years of colonial rule, but about a hundred years in western India In the 1850s, the Sepoy Rebellion was suppressed and the Indian Empire was established in 1877 (until then, the remaining scarecrow, Emperor Mughal), and Queen Victoria served as Emperor. 4) In the 18th century, Captain Cook of England first "discovered or arrived?" colonized and began to use it as a prisoner's exile. From the 19th century on, full-scale colonial van. the extermination of the natives And so on, and so on, the coast of Africa... ...and so on. From the 15th century, Portugal, Spain, England, France, and the Netherlands built their base, limited to the coast, and slave hunting roasted black rulers... ...after the Berlin Conference in 1878. Adder, with a new invention machine gun in his hand, took over Africa in just 20 years. Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain and Portugal took over the rest of the scraps. Newsweek criticized barbarism during this period, but colonial rule was so short that it was anti-German because Newsweek was a Jewish magazine. It was in the middle of the 19th century that Russia took over Central Asia, famous for the Caucasus and Silk Road. America, Siberia, Java, the Philippines, India, Australia... ...where Europeans were able to map, modernize, and conquer at the same time. (World maps start to come out in the 16th century, and they're completed by the discovery of Antarctica in the early 19th century. Modernization also progressed during the same period, under the Industrial Revolution and the Democratic Revolution of the 19th Century (Jackpot). As you can see in the Spanish sesame seeds related to Japan... the Europeans' dominance over Asia was not great yet. rather inferior It's so overwhelming after the 19th century. And yet you've taken over a vast area... ...that's... ...a terrible sheep. The chiefs, Ugauga... ...are mainly targeted in one area, but not Java... ...unexpected. There was an Islamic kingdom. Moreover, the 18th century's entry into India by England and France is a shock. Isn't India the greatest country along with China before the Industrial Revolution... ...how helplessly. Still, the main target is the savage areas, which have been much smaller in Japan and China over the same period. After the 17th and 8th centuries, Japan took over Okinawa on the North Sea, and China took over Manchuria and Taiwan. Immigrant initiation in this area (although Manchuria, of course, had conquered China and the Okinawan Old Kingdom) was broadened by "Japaneseization" and "Chineseization"...that is, easy to conquer. Although it is much smaller than the West, it is similar that the early phenomenon of imperialism appeared. It's because of population growth... ...Germany, Italy, Poland, Korea, etc., which are geographically disadvantageous... ...are bound to be disadvantageous. We were just about to make it to Gando when we collided with China. Damn..............there are so many great men around.............anyway even before the Industrial Revolution the sheep were steadily expanding their land.
2022년 4월 5일 화요일
the invention of a submarine
Looking at the history of submarines, it was in 1620 that submarines (not strictly 'submarines' but were unified as 'submarines' for convenience) first conducted underwater navigation. It was in 1900 that the Navy first adopted it. After that, development was remarkably active, and 50 years later, it developed mainly on underwater performance and reached today. The first submarine was reportedly sailed in 1624 by Dutch physicist Van Dravel, diving five meters from the Thames. It is said that there were more than 114 patents for submarines in the UK alone until 1927, and it is presumed that there were many patents after that. The free-to-submarine submarine was the "Turtle" built by Bushnell in 1775 during the American War of Independence, and the first submarine to sink enemy ships in the American Civil War was Hunley. After the Swedish 'Nordenfeld' loaded the torpedo into a submarine in 1885, the torpedo was recognized as the submarine's weapon. Early submarines were submerged and injured by hanging blocks of stone from the bottom of the ship. During the incubation period, glass windows were installed at the projections of the hull to view the water, which is the beginning of the periscope, and today's periscope is called the Spanish Navy submarine "Peral" in 1888. For the first 250 years, submarine propulsion was man-made. It was only in 1863 that the French Navy sailed four knots using a compressed air-powered engine. Subsequently, a steam propulsion engine appeared and promoted it as an oil engine. The current diesel engine was completed in France in the 1900s. In 1888, France adopted the world's first submarine "Zimnot" to the Navy. Nine years later, in 1897, the United States recruited a submarine "Holland" from the Navy, and later from the Italian, British, Russian, Japanese and German navies. At the end of roughly the experimental stages of submarines, World War I broke out, and through World War I and II, submarines developed a lot. The largest submarine in World War I was the French 'Gustaf Discharge' with a displacement of 800 tons. During World War I, submarines were loaded with torpedoes or ships. The range of action was also expanded to reach 2,000 tons. During the war, submarines equipped with water planes, submarine interceptors, transport submarines, and mine-bearing submarines were built. After World War I, German submarines were distributed to several victorious countries. Britain, the United States, France, and Japan have referred to them a lot in submarine construction. Since the 1930s, high-tension steel has been used on the hull to build a submerged depth of more than 100 meters. In World War II, supply submarines appeared, and German submarines initially made war records, but eventually.In 1943, the development of beauty electronic equipment and anti-submarine weapons reinforced underwater performance by mounting snorkel equipment on submarines. With the development of detection equipment after World War II, improvement of submarine underwater performance has emerged as an urgent problem. Then in 1953, the teardrop-type submarine 'Albacore', suitable for underwater high-speed navigation, was born in the United States. In 1954, the world's first nuclear submarine "Nautilus" was completed in the United States. The name "Nautilus" was also a name that suddenly became famous in 1870 when it was used for submarines in the novel "Two Seaside" by French novelist Zulverne. The ship passed through the North Pole while underwater, demonstrating the power of the nuclear submarine. In December 1959, the United States created the world's first ballistic missile-mounted nuclear submarine "George Washington" (6,700 tons) with 16 Polaris nuclear missiles. In the early 1960s, the Soviet Union built a guided-missile nuclear submarine to intercept the invading U.S. aircraft carrier task force, and in 1968 a ballistic-missile submarine was in service, delaying the U.S. ballistic-missile nuclear submarine by about 10 years. As of 2000, the U.S., Russia, the U.K., France and China had 220 nuclear submarines.
Why doesn't the Korean War have the same meaning or popularity as the Vietnam War?
An indispensable event in Korean history occurred on June 25, 1950. The "Korean War" broke out to mark the beginning of the Cold War. Although my writing skills are poor, I take courage and upload it to exchange opinions. Back to the subject, why is the Korean War so much less compressed, marginalized and unknown than other wars? From a global perspective. According to a book by Cambridge, the Korean War was a pretty dangerous war that almost started World War III. One of the reasons why the Kuomintang of China was completely destroyed by Mao Zedong's Communist Party and fled to Taiwan was that the United States did not fully support him. The U.S. judged that Mao's great patriotism was rather a factor that prevented Stalin from uniting with the Soviet Union. So he thought that there would be no big loss whether Mao Zedong won or Changga Ishek won, so he left the situation as it was. But it's a miscalculation in the United States... The Korean War proved that. Even though the U.S. originally had a strategy to compete with the Soviet Union... (don't remember what it was) They said the Korean War was a factor that completely changed that strategy. (The new strategy is the Cold War) When the first war broke out in Korea, the United States didn't think it was important. On the contrary, he was relieved to hear that Syngman Rhee didn't start the war. At that time, U.S. military experts underestimated the strategic location of the Korean Peninsula and did not raise much objections. However, other experts believe that if Korea is handed over to the communist bloc, it could turn red everywhere like dominoes. We decided that it was more important to promote the anti-communist will of the United States to the whole world, and that only then would we be able to reassure our European friends. In other words, it was more important to maintain and strengthen the credibility of our European allies than to secure and strategically position the Korean Peninsula. In addition, McArthur, who was the first American soldier to taste power comparable to that of a commander-in-chief, was determined to launch a battle. The U.S. initially participated in the war just to restore the South's position, but knowing that there was no movement of the Soviet Union, the U.S. judged that the Soviet Union was afraid of the U.S. They continue to march north to show off the power of the United States to the communist states and their allies, and Mao's China accepts it as a declaration of war and enters the war. The background of this is that before the outbreak of the Korean War, the United States deployed a number of warships and fighter jets to Taiwan, as well as threatening the coast of China. So even though the American diplomat tried to convince Mao that the U.S. had no intention of invading China, Mao did not listen at all. But this is kind of a gamble for China. And by that time, China wasn't ready for a modern war, and it knew it wasn't going to have the power to go all-out with the world's superpower, the United States. So you have the Soviet Union, which is strangely not directly involved in the war. The United States was most afraid of direct Soviet intervention. If the Soviet Union launched military operations based in Eastern Europe while the United States was struggling in the Korean War, Western Europe had no power at all and this forced the United States to start an all-out scale war. If it had gone back like this, American hegemony wouldn't have existed in the first place... ...and China's unexpected achievement in the Korean War surprised the United States. At that time, the U.S. thought the Soviet Union was the only enemy, but then it realized that China's momentum was also formidable. This leaves the U.S. strategy completely in ruins... Eventually, they kept negotiating to get the status quo back into place and this ended up with a ceasefire with the 38th parallel on the border again. This war kills four million of the Korean Peninsula's 30 million population and kills tens of thousands of Chinese and American soldiers. The end result is that the United States is in a war and to make up for it, you fire Commander McArthur for some kind of domestic political reason. In other words, they put the blame for the defeat on him. The tension at the beginning of the war was so much like World War III that it almost devastated a country. So why doesn't this war have much weight? (ex. Vietnam) PS. The United States hated Syngman Rhee... I don't know if he was thinking about reunifying Korea by force, ousting Syngman Rhee, and establishing a more democratic regime... Syngman Rhee was rather tarnishing America's "democratic reputation"... Besides, I don't know what Syngman Rhee believes in, but he's so belligerent that America is in trouble. And Koreans should really have a lot of pride in their country right now. At the end of the Korean War, U.S. soldiers and experts said that the country (South Korea) was completely "devastated" and could not be created. Some said that the Korean Peninsula has become a slaughterhouse, destroying 90 percent of all villages and making it hard to find a civilization. But now that Korea has become the world's 10th largest economy despite this devastation... It's really a wonderful thing.
Ignoring and overlooking the maritime forces, which are one of the main roles in our history
I'm very interested in our historical perspective. Among them, the questionable thing about the view of the sun is why they are not interested in marine forces. To list the maritime forces, Buyeo, Goguryeo, Gaya, Baekje, Silla, Balhae, Goryeo, and Joseon are always notable and important parts of our history. It is believed that Goguryeo was a one-dimensional nation with continental military power, but it had a strong national identity, superior culture, and a strong naval power, such as maritime trade, naval power, and naval power As the original story suggests, Gaya existed through the combination of Empress Heo and marine forces, and it is a nation that has lost its power in the East Asian Sea through its combination of advanced maritime forces such as ironware, excellent navigation, ships and commercial networksAfter the annexation of the Gaya forces and securing the Han River basin, the maritime power of Baekje failed to achieve great military and diplomatic achievements in the pastThe naval forces attacked the Shandong Peninsula during the reign of King Mu, and from the fact that they had a strong naval and maritime power and cultural exchange, they inherited Goguryeo's tradition of trade in the North Sea, the East Sea, the West Sea, and BalhaeJoseon, which was born through a kind of opposition to the Ming Dynasty, shows that Joseon's power to suppress maritime forces and to ban foreign exchange with the Joseon Dynasty, has weakened its naval power by reluctantly participating in the conquest of Jeju The excessive agricultural policy, which led to the loss of the Okinawa, Oki Islands, Tsushima, Kyushu, and China's coastal areas, caused the weakening of the military, science and technology, and decline, not the negative impact of the Japanese colonial rule I have described the view of the sun. In the next article, let's continue to look at the characteristics and aspects of marine forces.
the uniqueness of Korean culture that Koreans misunderstand
Many of you may have experienced foreign life, but especially in Canada, the proportion of Asians is quite high, and there are many South American, Anglo-American, Russian, Middle Eastern (Iran, Iraq), and Turkey. Naturally, I make a lot of foreign friends and discuss a lot, especially when I enter into ancient and traditional culture discussions, Korean people, especially between the early 20s and mid 20s, often act silly enough to make people from other countries frown. Especially, trainees who have just come here make a lot of mistakes. What's that mistake?The fact that our traditional culture, which we knew was unique, exists in other countries in quite similar forms (almost similar or similar), and the problem starts with Koreans refusing to admit it. For example, Koreans have some pride in spicy food, and it is true that it is spicy, but they do not want to admit that there is spicy food from other countries, or even if it is spicy? It's like this.Let me give you an example. There are more than 250 kinds of peppers in Mexico. Among the foods that I have tasted (you enjoy spicy food a lot) Red chili is spicier than any other green peppers in Korea. To tell you more about it, seaweed soup is a representative example. Most Koreans have never thought about this in other countries. In Japan, it is called wakame-guk, which is eaten at funerals in certain regions. Also, there are a lot of injeolmi, steamed rice cake, pumpkin rice cake that we like in Japan, and when his Turkish friend brought the rice cake made of walnut, he was surprised. Baekseolgi, except for walnut, was just like Korean rice cake. Let's stop talking about food. Let's get down to history. Although it seems to be a nuisance to Korean history and world history education, the definition of Korean traditional culture itself is ambiguous for us Koreans. The reason is that we know that everything we see, hear, and learn is a traditional culture. It's been 10 years since I graduated from Sohae High School, but I don't think there was anything in my memory that compared to other countries' cultures that are similar, have roots, or have different origins, but have similar results. When this perception goes out of the world, it makes Koreans feel unpleasant to foreigners (excessive overstate of their culture is enough to instill displeasure to other countries). We're not discussing the conclusions that we've come up with through logical and diverse comparisons, but we're only bringing out that dead knowledge in a limited category of knowledge that we believe and think about, so of course, the other person is making a [bitter] statement. I had the opportunity to explain the democratic uprising and dictatorship in the discussion club, and of course, I was a Korean university student like Cho Chin-gun. I learned that Yangban is a democracy movement that has no history in the world, so I confidently intercepted my explanation and interrupted in the middle to speak enthusiastically, but the feedback from the audience was cold. There were a lot of Latin American, especially Mexican audiences, and Mexico had two or more major revolutions in the early 1900s of peasant and middle-class intellectuals who wanted to oust the dictatorial Dias. Let's move on to traditional culture. For a Korean, who likes drinking and dancing? I got a chance to go to a bar with my friends. Of course, when Korean students go abroad, they enjoy tasting soju to their foreign friends. Why? I think soju is a traditional liquor.-_-;;; I was nervous, but I made an accident. A Taiwanese friend asked a Korean university student, "If you don't know the origin of soju and how to make it..." -_--; The university student confidently said, "They make it distillable in the countryside, but these days, they make it commercially by diluting additional alcohol in alcohol.Of course, there seems to be no problem with your answer.Taiwanese friends...How come you don't know the origin of traditional liquor when you said it? The sweaty, sweaty college student... ...clearly reveals the problems of our young people these days. Although there is no problem in recognizing traditional culture, it is not enough to study the traditional culture and understand its true meaning. During the Goryeo Dynasty, the distillation alcohol production method was introduced due to the invasion of Mongolia, and soju was born using the method, and the alcohol content was much higher. Although the method was borrowed, this alcohol was produced by mixing the existing manufacturing method in the process.I said it and hurried to finish it... Let's move on to the song. A month ago, I invited two Korean juniors, three Turkish people, one Japanese person, and two South American people to my house for a meal. Of course, we bought bulgogi, kimchi stew, sujebi, dongchimi and so on. They were also accompanied by alcohol, but they were told to pick a traditional song each because they were slightly drunk. Songs from all over the world went around. It's my turn in Korea. Two Korean juniors, including SoHae, sang Arirang. But I wish it had ended there... a few laps, and he said, "Oh, my God.I don't know traditional songs. Hummy... I'm ashamed of myself. I have learned Korean songs of Sowol lyricist before, but what about traditional songs? I learned a lot about Monggeumpotaryeong, but why did my mind go blank at that moment? Yes, I know the traditional culture, but it is not a daily life. So I can't help but play in my head with the lyrics and the tune. I'm glad I ran out of booze and asked everyone to go out to buy drinks on a whim, but I've had it for ten years.When I was in Korea, I was often told to know ourselves well before globalization, but that was not a lie...Now let's move on to something else, Sohae, but when Koreans think about culture and history, they try to understand our home base within the category of a continental-oriented peninsula state, but it seems to have broken the balance. I think it's a problem because of the geographical nature, our culture is inevitably introduced into various cultures. Of course, over time, it has changed into a traditional culture, but of course, there is also pure ancient culture, but we should not exclude the inflow and influence of many cultures. In particular, when comparing and analyzing Northeast Asian cultures, it should not be overlooked that the occurrence and development of similar cultures can be sufficiently stochastic, and that they are propagated or settled by various variables to become the culture of each country. I'm a biology major, so I can give you this example. The organs of living things are homologous organs and similar organs. Homologous organs have the same origin and have similar functions. For example, shark fins and mackerel fins have evolved from the same origin and have the same function, but commercial organs have different origins, and they have similar functions, so if you look at bat wings and bird wings, you'll understand quickly. The reason is that in an unexpected country, we can find a culture that is very similar to our traditional culture. When discussing and exchanging information about the culture of the two countries, the mind to understand and care about the origin and background of the culture is urgent. Generally speaking, Koreans lack advantages. Let me summarize. It is important to learn more about the culture defined as traditional culture and not only know superficial knowledge, but also to learn more about it (globalization of Korean culture) and to study it continuously. Second, it is good to pay attention to the culture of other countries. This is really important. Who would be interested in learning from someone who talks about our culture on the premise of one-way delivery? Isn't cultural exchange originally two-way or multi-way? I see as much as I know. You can feel as much as you see and teach your juniors as much as you feel. Lastly, let's not be intimidated when we encounter the good culture of other countries, let's accept it and compare it with our culture. There were many opportunities to experience various cultures while living abroad. There are times when I think that it's better than our country's. These days, I don't just have that feeling, but I try to know the system and mindset that can maintain that culture, so I think it's good to see and it's not wrong... Especially, to be honest, Korean culture is an undiscovered area in the West, and it is recognized as a culture that is confusing or almost identical to Chinese and Japanese culture. But the problem is that when I see people enthusiastic about Japanese and Western culture even though they don't know about us, I only laugh bitterly. Teckle is always welcome, but I've only written what I saw, heard, and felt. Have a good day Three-line summary 1. Need to understand traditional culture 2. Learn foreign culture with interest and compare it with ours 3. Take the conclusion and take it to the world
Aztec Wars of Flowers
The "Flower War" among the Aztecs refers to a way of fighting to capture as many prisoners as possible, not to kill enemies or occupy territory, but to use them as sacrifices for religious ceremonies. Sometimes the rulers of the city made their own people wage war to make sacrifices. Even after Astec occupied most of the licensed countries in Nahuatl, the Tlaxkala settlement was not occupied, but they always had to fall victim to Astec's war of flowers. Eventually, Tlaxkala becomes the first ally of Hernan Cortes to destroy Astec. For this reason, Astec fighters were trained to capture their enemies with wounds to their arms and legs rather than kill them instantly on the battlefield, and their ceremonial way of fighting against the Congestadors from Espanya across the sea was devastating. Unlike Astec warriors, who were trained to capture enemies rather than kill them, the Congestadors were trained and fought to kill as many enemies as possible rather than capture them on the battlefield. Astec's fighting style did not change easily, and at the end of the war they attempted to change their strategy, but the situation was already late. The ceremonial battle of the Flower War, with its poor weapon system, is one of the reasons why Astec rarely overpowered the Spanish army despite its enormous numerical superiority. The Astec warriors' weapons were wooden bodies and sharp-split obsidian blades with serrated rods, spears, and arrowheads fired using a spearhead. Although the blade is razor-sharp (some modern surgeons use a scalpel made of pyroxene, not metal).In the end, because it was only a piece of stone, it was broken like glass when it hit the helmet, armor, and shield of the Kongquistador made of steel. The prisoners to be sacrificed were well served and fed. There were 18 human sacrifices a year, but prisoners were not always used as offerings. Most prisoners of war were used as sacrifices for the annual Uichilopottlee festival, and the priest tore the prisoners' hearts out. The brave of the prisoners were used as a gladiatorial offering to fight a fully armed warrior, with one foot bound and a fake weapon (a feathered club instead of a black stone blade) at a festival serving Tescatlifoca. If the prisoner was alive against seven warriors, he had to fight the left-handed warrior again. And if the prisoner survives, he is released honorably. There is a legend about the valiant Tlakskalteka warrior named Tlahui Colera. He was captured, but thanks to his reputation as a warrior, he was released and given the opportunity to fight the Astecs. He was released honorably but chose to be sacrificed instead of returning to Tlaxkala. During the eight days of celebrating his honor, Tlaghui Kole killed eight warriors. He demanded that he be sacrificed and continued to fight, injuring more than 20 warriors before being defeated and sacrificed. This sacred war was founded by Emperor Tlaquel in the process of revising the Astec religion. Tlakael was the last Nauatlaka tribe to settle in the Anahuak Valley and was despised by other tribes in the early days of settlement. Astec wanted to instill a sense of purpose in the people to change this. He maintained the sacrificial rites consistently and gave honor and wealth to the warriors who captured many prisoners. To maintain this situation, continuous war was required, which had the effect of showing off Astec's military power. The new view of religion has become a means of political control. Emperor Tlacael combined the characteristics of Nowatl's god Teskatlifoka with Uichilopotli, the god of their region, to establish a new religious view away from the old Mesoamerican faith. Tlakael (1397-1487), nephew of Itzkoatl (1427-1440), brother of Montesuma I (1440-1469), was the first emperor of Mexico. Blood has a very important meaning in all Mesoamerican cultures. Blood is not only offered for human sacrifice, but also for God by wounding one's body. Tlacael established a religious view that human blood must be supplied continuously in order for the sun to win the battle against darkness and rise again every morning. Every 52 years, the world comes to an end. The Aztecs believed that human sacrifices could delay the sun's destruction. The Aztecs thought it was their duty to maintain the world in this way. For the Astec warriors, offering blood to God was a sacred duty and an important task. Flowers and feathers are the most important objects in Astec society, so 'flower' is used as a word to describe the dynamics of war. The blood flowing from the wound is described as the flower of war. The text below is part of the Astec War. Flowers of sacred wine. Flowers of fire. Only you can be our clothes. Flowers of war. Oh, my friends, noble friends. You vultures and jaguar warriors. Get dressed. God will cut up the enemies and put them in the flower bed of war. Artec shields of various patterns, quilted neck vests that Astec warriors wore in their clothing, feathered shields, and paintings depicting Astec warriors capturing gold and jade jewelry captives. Many of the Congestadors fought in these cotton vests instead of heavy, stuffy body armor. Captured by the commanders of the Astec army, the enemy soldiers wear wooden swords around their necks and are taken with the Astec army to the capital, Tenochtitlan. Jaguar and Eagle fighters are classified as special forces among the Astec forces. Jaguar warriors were the object of terror to their enemies on the battlefield. The warriors wore jaguar leather combat suits to give them a sense of fear. The name of the Jaguar was given to the fighters who captured four to five prisoners at a time in battle. Flesh prisoners were the most important medals that could be obtained in battle. In order to capture the prisoners, the soldiers used a method of neutralizing them by hitting their legs rather than killing them.
World War I, the invention of the tank.
The U.S. military retaliation against Saudi Arabian terrorist Osama bin Laden and the Taliban regime in Afghanistan began on October 8, 2001, after an aircraft attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon in New York on September 11, 2001. The bombing, which began with night air strikes using state-of-the-art weapons such as stealth bombers, continued for several days, and soon the war on terrorism with ground forces composed of a small number of elite special forces was underway. The attack on Afghanistan, which consists of rugged mountainous terrain, is being conducted with intelligence satellites, and ground warfare involving M1A2 tanks, which claimed that 2,000 U.S. Army tanks destroyed 2,000 Iraqi tanks for 100 hours during the Gulf War. How was the invincible tank invented and when was it used in the war? The first time armored tanks appeared in Britain was the idea of Ernest Swinton, a war correspondent who saw young men being brutally killed by machine guns on the battlefield during World War I. His proposal was initially ignored, but the possibility was accepted by then admiral Winston Churchill and went into development. There were many problems to be solved for the invention of the armored tank. The ground between pits or pits dug to prevent enemy attacks turned into swamps in winter. Falling shells punctured the ground with large pits and barbed wire, obstacles, everywhere. Armoured tanks should be able to run easily and quickly on the ground with these unfavorable conditions, equipped with weapons that would silence German machine guns, and covered with thick iron gloves to protect the armoured tank crew. The British government has set up a committee called the Land Shipping Commission to study the problem of manufacturing war machines. The Board of Land Navigation asked Willum Foster, an agricultural technology company in Linken, for help in making the first armored tank. Prior to the war, Foster Company built tractors with trackless trackways instead of wheels, which were designed to be used on land such as fields and rice paddies where tractors were too bumpy to move. In other words, the poster company had accumulated a lot of technology and experience to make war machines that could run on rough ground in uninhabited areas. Churchill, who was interested in planning to build an armored tank, ordered the government to spend 운드를70,000 on the state coffers to conduct the necessary experiments to build the tank, and worked hard to keep it secret until it appeared on the battlefield. The first armored tank was developed, disguised as carrying water tanks when deployed to the battlefield, so that information about the latest weapon could not be leaked to German spies. From here, it is said that today's armored tanks were called 'tanks'. The first tank built in Britain, nicknamed Little Willie, weighed only 14 tons, reaching only 5 kilometers per hour on flat ground, and was insignificant enough to pass through trenches dug by the Germans. Through trial and error, the performance of these armored tanks was improved by focusing on mobility and practicality, and in 1916, the tank called Mark I was developed. Soon it was time for the soldiers to train the use of this secret war weapon. In the first few weeks, soldiers knew nothing about the tanks, but after the secret war weapon was unveiled, the training camp was escorted more severely. After three months of training on secret weapons, soldiers and tanks went to France and were deployed to the battlefield. Needless to say, the attack using tanks was a great success.