In 2004, Halloween Day, the Yonsama craze, and Japan's complacent view of history.

 Don't talk about Halloween Day, the Yonsama craze, and Halloween Day in Korea, a complacent history museum in Japan. This is written at the corner of the pamphlet that apprentices at American universities receive before coming to Korea. That's true, so we have no room for opposition. How should we explain to foreigners the situation in which all those who enjoy Halloween are driven into a traitor? Is it really right to conclude that "people colored by foreign countries" enjoy studying abroad? Of course, most people who enjoy Halloween do not deny studying abroad. However, those who studied abroad are not only in Korea. But why is it a crime only in Korea? It actually doesn't mean much on Halloween Day. Not only is it meaningless, but even if it contains any national meaning, it does not include any meaning of considering the country more superior by doing it. Moreover, even if their consciousness includes the meaning that other countries are superior to Korea, it is not a crime. This is because Korea is a democratic country and a country that can take responsibility for and choose itself, regardless of state or religion. That's not a cliche because Korea is crushed by building castles and living from the beginning. China also lived by building castles, and Japan is also an indigenous people who built castles and lived. However, disputes over Halloween are raised every year only in Korea. The answer to the problem lies in a sense of inferiority. Yonsama's sensational popularity in Japan is seen as part of a great growth in Korea, and there are many people who are surprised and delighted (although not revealed). However, if a singer or lover from Japan becomes popular in Korea, will it be a hot issue that will continue to emerge in Japanese sports newspapers for several days or for a long time? That's not the case at all. For Japan, Korea does not have much meaning. This does not mean that Korea is insignificant, but that no matter how Denmark's economic power is ranked sixth in the world, there are not many people in Korea who recognize it.(except for those who are interested in Korea of course) However, Korea has suffered something from Japan, so Japan is concerned in many ways. The one who hit me is not very interested, but it can be seen that the one who was hit is similar to the situation where he keeps an eye on the one who was hit. If I continue to show interest in the other person, it is the same as the other person's meaningless behavior being taken in a great or distorted sense to me. Historians view this as an expression of victim consciousness. Historically, the psychology of retaliation, along with the psychology of self-protection against the damage that has been suffered so far, is acting unknowingly. In addition, since this country called Japan was originally an island country, it has been considering using Korea as its base for entering the continental region since it was a country that hated being taken away from others. Such an incorrect ethnicity eventually glorified the Japanese colonial era, further encouraging the backlash sentiment of the Republic of Korea. Shortly after Germany's defeat in World War II, it continued to pay apology and compensation to the families of victims of the country occupied by Germany as part of a national compensation program. The German government is aware of their own faults and apologizes to them through continuous policies. The Japanese psychology only needs to apologize once, but why should it apologize again? Is this really the right idea? Human emotions are the most insignificant and most important issue. Isn't human emotion eventually causing a war between countries? Korea has been subjected to numerous days by Japan, has been invaded, and has not been compensated for it. This can be seen as revealing Japan's disgrace in many ways, and it can be seen as the first and last expression of anger among Koreans. Is what the countless Japanese Military Sexual Slavery grandmothers who have been suffered by Japan really want the minimum settlement to help them live on a full stomach? Or is it a passport of a Japanese nationality that has already lost its value? Probably not. What they really wanted would have been a drop of sincere tears from the descendants of those who caused such a terrible disaster. If the Japanese prime minister had seen at least once the already old Japanese Military Sexual Slavery grandmothers in Korea hold a tearful protest on the street, would this ridiculous "blind and cry" style of complacent historical contradiction be repeated? At least if they are one of the pillars of a developed country that shares a minimal oriental culture of "friend" for their children and worry about the future, I think it is really necessary for them to come forward and show a sample of a developed country.