Personal opinion of members of the History Club - "I don't think it's right to unite all the people in this way."

 Times have changed now. It's changing. There is a formula that our old ones are now ours, but there is also a formula that it used to be ours in the past, but it is not ours now. The existence of humans on Earth uses their ancestors as their ancestors based on those who lived in the past in the land where they live now. They are not related to us just because African black races in the distance of our country have similar customs to our people, although they are now stipulating that way. Humans may have all started from one place, or they may have gradually moved from several places to spread their offspring and maintain their species. It's like that. I don't have much crumbles in that field, so it's hard to conclude with my own strength. Our ancestors started from one place and went to Africa and the Korean Peninsula, and those who went to Africa may have changed their skin color and values over thousands of years. I don't know the history. What's definitely unknown is history, so-called time machines for humans don't have such a means to predict the past, so you don't know, but you just think, study, and guess? But cultural redundancy? Should I call it that? Just because the culture and customs are similar, it's not like ancestors and ethnic groups. They're animals that are the same. Culture and customs may be similar even if ancestors are wrong. ------------------------ Up to Wiggle is the introduction to my argument. Since I wrote it according to my supervision, everything I wanted to convey may not be delivered to others. It is often mentioned in history that people of the same family are compatible. It means the same people of Dongnyeok-dong, Orangkai, and Gyoreh. It can be interpreted as an orangcae living in the east and a race living in the east. The Chinese characters have also developed a lot, and their meaning must have changed a lot over time. There is a Korean word "child." Should I call it a word? Anyway, this "young" used to mean foolish in the past, but now it's used to mean young. It's the same concept as this. This is how it is interpreted now, but it may have been interpreted differently in the past. I'm going to briefly explain about the same people. First of all, you need to know the concept of race clearly. It depends on how you interpret it. But it's history that doesn't get cursed at for changing the truth, because no one knows. No one dares to say, "Why do you want to change and distort this when it's true?" because you really don't know "truth." Chinese people have long believed that Lee Kang-to, where they live, is the center of all the world and a place where God takes care of him. It can also be explained that thinking that one's ancestors are from heaven stems from these values. So all other immigrants except themselves have defined and kept away from orangkara. Then who are they? It refers to the indigenous forces that built civilization in the Yellow River and lived there. The same people they talked about are several races. It can be said that not all orangcas living in the east are the same orangcas. There may have been races that were close to the "Chinese," and there may have been races that confronted and confronted them. These days, people who lived in the east, that is, people who lived in the land, tend to be united. For example, Korea is a descendant of the same family. Let's think about it. Are we the only descendants of the same family? Are our ancestors of the same family? Some of the ancestors of China's minorities or "Chinese" who now live on Chinese soil may also be compatriots. These days, people tend to think that the same people (although it may not have been intended) are all the same people in a single race and in the same family's river soil, and that all of the river soil was their own (here they mean our Republic of Korea). This is a wrong way of thinking. Of course, I'm proud of it, but when you learn about history, you have to look at it in a neutral way. Some of the races that belonged to the Dongi tribe and lived in the Dongi Gang Station have completely opposite customs to Korea. And there is something to know before you reveal this concept of kinship, of course there are people who know it. Yellow races live in many places on Earth. Then, are all the same people of the same race and their ancestors? Of course, that may be the case if you think of the ancestors of that time when humanity was formed a long time ago, but that's forced. Even if you're the same person, your ancestors are different. We can't be the same people. Even if my skin color is the same... This is where the formula that used to be ours, but now it's not ours is established. You can say, "In the past, several tribes in one country united in one river area to be seen as a community, but now they are all scattered and have become completely different people." Of course, it's a phenomenon that you encounter a lot when you're exploring history. It might be a wrong concept for the same. Some of the races that were called the same people may not be qualified to belong to the same group, and it's a wrong idea to unite all the people who lived on the eastern land as one race just because the Chinese called them the same people. All the Chinese would call it orangkae, but the races living in the east would have fought and confronted each other. For example, Gojoseon...Gojoseon was a country with a large river area where various races were gathered and turned into subordinates. Of course, it was in the east, but there must have been other countries in the east when it was opposed to Gojoseon. Therefore, I don't think the so-called Dongi people should consider the eastern river, Manchuria, the Korean Peninsula, and the people who lived here as one nation, and define the river where they lived as their own history and territory. Now, I can see some people trying to tie all of them into one culture as they are being brought up by the same people. On the one hand, I wrote down a few letters because I was worried that there would be a wrong "proof" on the other hand.