Why are we teaching Yuan as Chinese history? Isn't Mongolia a country too?

 In 612, China's Suyangje invaded Goguryeo with more than 1 million troops. However, the Su Dynasty army was defeated in Salsu by Goguryeo forces led by General Eulji Mundeok. The failure to conquer Goguryeo led to the collapse of the Su Dynasty. It goes without saying that the war between the Sui, Tang, and Goguryeo was a war between the countries where the national fortune was laid. However, China insists that these wars are civil wars. It is a war in which China's central government tried to suppress local governments. The main reason is that these things happened within China's current territory. At this point in time, it is a historical illusion that arbitrarily interprets the past. At that time, Manchuria was not Chinese territory. It was a land dominated and ruled by Goguryeo. In fact, the period when China ruled Manchuria as its own territory is not long. Rather, all or the northern part of China was ruled by the Manchurian forces, Yo and Geum, and Won and Cheong. - Foundation of past history voluntarily. - Caesar said, "Human beings only see what they want to see." I think it pointed out the limitations of human beings' 'frame of thought and perception' and 'fixed ideas'. What is "what China wants to see" in Manchuria, trying to erase the history and breath of the Korean people such as Goguryeo, Balhae, and Buyeo? China now emphasizes the 'unification multi-ethnic state theory'. Based on this, the history made within the current Chinese territory drew the theory that all of the history of Chinese history and the history of minorities living in the Chinese territory are also Chinese history. Goguryeo is said to be a Chinese history because its territory was in the current Chinese land, and it formed a subordinate relationship through tributes and book peaks, and after its collapse, many Goguryeo people were fused to the Han Chinese. Action and reaction are laws of nature. It is natural that various reactions follow the logic of northeast fairness. It is like "fitting the bed" to arbitrarily cut the past based on the current territory. Historically, territories have always been variable. It wasn't immutable. The movement of ethnic groups living on the ground was also frequent. The same goes for tributes and bookkeeping. This should be viewed as a form of diplomacy at the time, not subordination and speed. Criticism of the Northeast Process also comes from countries adjacent to China. "The Yuan Dynasty built by the Mongolians is not the history of China. It is a part of Mongolian history." "It is wrong to view the history of the palace as a periphery of China. Dolgwol (Turk), a proud independent country, is the history of Turkey." This is what Mongolian and Turkish scholars said at an international conference held in Seoul not long ago. Criticism has also been raised within China. Judakker, a renowned cultural critic, described the Chinese historical world as "a military officer dedicated to the emperor." This trend is that it has caused "cultural stuttering" by blocking the mouths of rational scholars. Former Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Eon-lai's remarks also reminded some historians of how much they have distorted ancient history, including "Since ancient times, Joseon is a subordinate country of China" and "Joseon is a descendant of journalists." - Like keeping pace with the bed. - EH Car, who wrote "What is history," defined "History is a dialogue between the present and the past." However, China's "present," which talks with the past, is imprinted by China's obsession that the basic framework of 55 minorities and current vast territories should not be shaken, and national pride that has grown into an economic powerhouse through past wounds and complexes. China, a country of Confucius, Laoza and Samacheon, should open its mind and broaden its view as a "country of culture." Zhou Eon-lai's words that history should not be distorted by great nationalism have skipped more than 40 years and still resonated with vitality. Lee Yeon-jae, editorial writer ======================================== "Is Yuan a Chinese history?" Is Yuan a Chinese dynasty? Kim Ho-dong, a professor of Oriental History at Seoul National University, criticizes, "Our history textbook that teaches the Yuan Dynasty as one of Chinese history has uncritically accepted the Chinese perspectives." The Mongolian Empire is a world-class country that has extended its power to Goryeo, Turk, Iran, India, and Russia on the stage of Central Asia. The perception that it was the Yuan Dynasty of the Chinese Dynasty assimilated into the Han Chinese culture is a deep misunderstanding of our historical community, which has relied only on Chinese historical sources. Written by Rashid Adin, a historian who was born in Hamadan, central Iran, which was ruled by the Mongolian Empire in the 13th century, and reached the top position as a civil official, "Butler" is of great significance to the domestic academic community in that it compiles Mongolian history seen in persia. Following "Tribalji," which is the first volume of "Butler" last year, Professor Kim's second volume, "Qingis Khangi," recently translated, contains the area of Genghis Khan, who built the Mongolian Empire. If the "tribal land" corresponds to the beginning of summarizing the tribe, identity, and activities of the leader who participated in the construction process of the Mongolian Empire, "Qingis Khangi" is a full-fledged Mongolian empire. It encompasses Genghis Khan's family tree and life history, empire system, conquest war, anecdotes, and quotes, providing decisive clues to understanding the nature of the Mongolian Empire. According to Chinese historical sources, Chinese generals and staff are described as playing a pivotal role in the Mongolian Empire. However, the performance of Chinese generals is not mentioned in the numerous conquest exhibitions in the "Tribal Zone." There is no Chinese name on the list of commanders owned by Genghis Khan. Given the composition of the ruling group, it is a distortion to see the Mongolian Empire as a Chinese dynasty. This fact becomes more evident by looking at the third volume of The Butler, The Successors. Professor Kim pointed out, "No Chinese people appear on the list of successors," adding, "Only when we review feed from Western Asia and Europe can we see the birth and development process of Mongolia, the world empire, in a holistic and balanced manner." In the Tribal Land, the magnificent Eurasian history as a full-fledged world history appears. Unlike Roman history, which has not surpassed the Mediterranean Sea and the Arab world, the "tribe" covers China, Central Asia, and Western Asia. For example, in the early 12th century, "Khitai's monarch Kaujun (the first emperor of Southern Song Gojong) fled to the finished kingdom and...""I survived," he wrote, "When Genghis Khan was born, Davaszo's calip was Mucthafi..."(In Egypt) Ismailpa's calif was Zafir and was killed in Muhammad that year, and he also wrote about earthquakes in Egypt, Syria, Sicily, and Cyprus from 1203 to 1204. This is why "butler" is considered the world's first world history.