A hostage sent by the Baekje Kingdom to the Japanese Empire.

 If you look at the Baekje period of the Three Kingdoms Period, you can find a part that sends a hostage to the Japanese in the 6th year of King Asin. I looked at the entire Baekje period, but there was no article about why before this article. Suddenly, I found out that there was an article saying that they had sent a hostage for friendship. And after that, articles about the traffic of envoys to each other appeared regularly. I feel the need to infer whether it is right to see this only as a result of Kim Bu-sik's selection or whether there are other reasons. for this is the article of 397. If you look at the History of the Three Kingdoms from 391, you can see that King Gwanggaeto's Namjeong takes place on a large scale. In particular, in the case of Baekje, it records that Goguryeo's southward movement resulted in enormous losses and numerous loss of life every year. Therefore, Baekje must have suffered a tremendous loss of national power. This is a part that shows that the power of the nation weakens even before the later King Gaero died by King Jangsu and Namcheon. For that reason, friendship with the Japanese was more necessary than anything else, and Baekje would have been more urgent than the Japanese across the sea. This is because Namharu of Goguryeo was Baekje territory. I think it's the hostage that represents this. In the History of the Three Kingdoms, there was no mention of why in the Baekje period earlier than this, and there was a good reason why why why suddenly appeared in the form of giving a hostage during this period. In this reasoning, it is highly questionable whether the Chiljido, which was dedicated to the Emperor Kusu in 230 years after the death of the Japanese scribe, is true. This is because it is possible only if the Samguk Sagi has told a lie. From Baekje's point of view, I wonder why the third century was important or threatening.