North Korea's Kim Il Sung's brutality - 6.25 Invasion from North Korea, invasion of North Korea theory summarized

 1. First of all, South Korea is the only country that insists on a "full-scale invasion of North Korea of the U.S. and Rhee Syngman torpedo." -_-;;; This isn't what happened yesterday or today. There were many words in the 70s that some activists and anti-Korean figures from abroad made new "events," but their "events" are so contradictory that even left-wing scholars do not mention them. 2. We often change the subject to "coming" ... In fact, the first American scholar to claim the Korean War conspiracy theory was the I.F. Stowoon in the 50s. If you've read Howard Jean's Opposition to War, it's a bit of a mention, but... As Kang Joon-man chews the Chosun Ilbo through text analysis, this person analyzes the "U.S. Data-Subject NYT" and digs up the "conspiracy" of South Korea-U.S.-Taiwan at the time of the Korean War. 3. It was the "Korea and Unfortunate Country" series introduced in Korea at the height of Comings. This doesn't even make sense in the United States - the author is French - Japanese came in after 6.29. It deals with the modern history of South Korea from 1945-1961, and this was also the logic that no one was important in the beginning of the 'Joseon War in the sense of civil war'. 4. And a very famous Dr. Cummings... My personal opinion of Dr. Cummings is a bit long, so here we're just talking about the war itself... According to volume 2 of "The Origin of the Korean War," which was published in the 1990s - and finally untranslated in Korea - Cummings argued for an extension of several local wars between 48-49 years rather than "North Korea's full Invasion from North Korea." Based on this... First of all, North Korea presented various public documents released at the beginning of the war, the inadequacy of the South's announcement, and geographical inquiry as evidence. (These materials are introduced as they are in Park Myung-rim's rebuttal paper, "The Beginning and Origin of the Korean War."_ Obviously, as much as South Korea's claim is suspicious, North Korea's claim of "full invasion of North Korea" is also unbelievable.I nailed it. In the recent "Korean Modern History," there is a tendency to reduce this part at all and retreat, saying "the beginning is not important." 5. War requires the strong will of the leadership. The reason why the Kim Shin-jo group of "Park Jeong-hee's mother-of-pearl" came in in 1968 or did not develop into an urgent situation of "war" during the Aungsan incident in the 1980s and the armistice line or the West Sea. This is because the two leaders of the South, the North, and the United States were not willing to "take the risk of war and cause it." The problem with Invasion from North Korea, invasion of North Korea theory is not only this "will" but also the practical planning with sufficient background, and the resulting decision-making... To be honest, there was "will" in both countries... Whether it's "North Korea unification" or "complete territorial integrity," the U.S. opposition to "preventing invasion of North Korea provocations" and "Taiwanization of South Korea" (although there was definitely a defense plan, the invasion of North Korea plan is actually... There is only one "Memoirs and Confessions of South Korean Intelligence Agents Who Returned to North Korea" with a strong smell of North Korea + two tables of intelligence -_-;;) and no evidence at all. In the case of North Korea, it adds evidence of the theory of Invasion from North Korea, not the invasion of North Korea, due to various evidences such as official will + strong military superiority + (comming was highly suspicious) operational orders. 6. The question is whether the theory of induction is correct... If you look at this in terms of the South Korean government shoveling and other things... It's not that reliable. Furthermore, if you look at North Korea's capture documents, the high side of North Korea at that time was the internal situation of South Korea - the privacy of female politicians -_-;;-, even if it was a demon plot, Kim Il-sung is not stupid enough to bite it. But... As Professor Kim Dong-chun suspects in "War and Society"... Even if D-Day was not known, it is possible that the U.S. intelligence department and some South Koreans expected some North Korean invasion. However, if you consider it as a "prevention war," it will become a big problem, but... As shown in South Korea's official records at the time, there was a widespread idea that "if North Korea Invasion from North Koreas, the United States will soon block it, and there will be an opportunity for unification." And I guess that could be the answer to some of the questions that ' Invasion from North Korea inductors' say. ps: All of these are published materials. Syngman Rhee's problem is not that he "leaved his citizens and ran away." He ran away so quickly that even the "U.S.-government bureaucracy-military command" did not know his location. At that time, the commanding officer of the Armed Forces was Syngman Rhee before the transfer of operational control. In that urgent situation, the fact that I went back and forth between Seoul-Daejeon-Daegu-Daejeon-Suwon-Mokpo-Masan-Busan without anyone knowing is not the king of shoveling itself. Most of the documents related to the Korean War have been released. As I'm on the cross counter, "Tank Support Ununun" is actually not a confidential document... I remember writing it... If the will to open war, solid background, and determination are combined with the madness of the leader, the problem grows. It's Kim Il Sung. He thought he would win, but... The problem is that Director Wo with permed hair isn't that rational... In addition, Bush, who has the right to decide, has almost given up his career as a human being... The problem is growing ============================ Actually, it was two years ago that I read this article, and I thought I would read all the related materials, but I still haven't because I'm busy living.