It is often said that the charge was under the full control of Hitler as a subviolent group of the Nazi Party, but in fact, the charge was a group with considerable autonomy from the start. Hitler's friend and superior, Ernström, was the leader of the squad, and the hard-headed people who served in the German Empire in the past made up the majority of executives, and the biggest problem was that they were extremely ignorant except for clubs and bullets flying around during the revolution. Sure enough, due to the massive increase in members of the Nazi Party's September 1930 general election victory, these seeds became spoiled and offered Hitler a Berlin march again, but Hitler ignored their demands with a legal strategy. Hitler's legal strategy is to take power through party politics and elections within the parliamentary state, which was also a lesson from the painful failure of the coup in November. But... Hitler regarded the legal strategy only as a one-step retreat for the second conservative. Hitler made it clear that the legal strategy was only a tool to crush the parliamentary party and parliamentary politics, and he had never had any respect for the law. He didn't even try to hide the fact, but rather even talked about it openly. "In principle, we are not political parties pursuing political party politics. It contradicts our overall perspective. We are just a political party that forcibly pursues mortgage politics. It's the Constitution that forces us... It's just that we got a new weapon for our fight from the victory we've just won." Then why did Hitler have no choice but to stick to such a legalization strategy and take several oaths to abide by the law against the government? For Hitler, the reason for the legalization strategy was entirely due to the defense forces. There is a record that he himself had no choice but to give up the concept of a violent revolution because of the defense forces, and he thought that the position of a defense force with weapons in the chaos of the violent revolution would be an absolute thing that could never be knocked down. Furthermore, the distance between the military and Rudendorf during the coup was what caused Hitler to be more cautious about his actions. Hitler gave a speech about him in March 29 with gestures of overall reconciliation and approach to the military. It was a speech that criticized soldiers' non-intervention in politics, meant that the soldiers' honor and role of officers when the left won would be nothing more than "rebellion butcher," and ended with respect for the greatness of the German people and the honor of the soldiers. The improvement in relations with the military, which began with this speech, worked, and Hitler appeared as a witness in a trial. Three officers were charged with violating the Ministry of National Defense's "no political intervention" principle and joining the Nazi Party and promoting the Nazi Party to their colleagues. He appeared here on September 25, 30 with a firm commitment to inform the military and citizens of his position, stating that he did not try to overthrow the state, had no intention of confronting the military, and only had the thought of fulfilling his sacred duty to make the German people great again and save the threat of national loss by internationalization. When asked about the legitimacy of the ensuing struggle, he declared that "the National Socialist Party does not need violence," saying that their illegal actions are only against the Treaty of Versailles and may appear to be "illegal" by criticizing the Treaty of Versailles. Of course, first of all, this disguised the concept of revolution for the democratic government of Germany as that of foreign countries. Hitler's testimony soon seemed to acknowledge respect and obedience to the military and the Constitution, which succeeded in reassuring the "legal opponents" a little and gaining favor with the military. They now thought that "Good Adolf" would not overturn the country, but... The declaration of legalization is a matter of the upper class of the party, and the charge was still fighting the Communist Party. Even when protests against the party leaders came in, the Nazi Party only repeated "the arbitrary actions of individual local units," which seemed far from the declaration of legalization. As a way to penetrate the completely disguised nature of the declaration of legalization, it has been confirmed that Nazi propaganda minister Josef Goebbels told Lieutenant Sheringer this. "I think this oath (declaration of legalization) is a genius organization, and then (after the declaration of legalization) what will brothers (opposition parties) do against us? They've been waiting for the chance to attack. Now we're strictly legal! ....You like the law."
피드 구독하기:
댓글 (Atom)
There is no Jesus in Israel
the relationship between Judaism and Jesus Kim Jong-chul, a documentary director, quotes from the book "There Is No Jesus in Israel,...
-
How did the people of Baekje use toilets more than 1,300 years ago? Recently, the "backdoor culture" of the Baekje period has bee...
-
1. In the 6th year of Queen Jinseong's reign (892) of Silla, a period of the establishment of costumes during the Goryeo Dynasty, Gyeon...
-
Goguryeo's generals have learned martial arts and learning in the Gyeongdang since they were young, and they are also strong at archery...
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기