The Decade of the Three Kingdoms is estimated to be the 10th anniversary.

 Let's estimate the decade of the Three Kingdoms. Of course, I suppose that I don't read inscriptions at all and that even the Japanese scribe doesn't know them. However, for those who are interested, I will refer to the contents of the Japanese scribe as a reference afterwards. In the 9th year of Yeongrak (399), the 8th year of King Asin of Baekje; in August, when the king ordered a large number of soldiers and horses to fight Goguryeo, many people fled to Silla to avoid the pain of military service, so the number of households decreased. The king's horse knelt in the stable and cried sadly in the 10th year of Yeongrak (400), the 45th year of Silla's Naemulsa Temple; winter October. 11 years (401);In the 12th year of Yeongrak (402), the 11th year of King Asin of Baekje; in May, a envoy was sent to the Japanese to save a large bead. In March, King Naemul's son Misahun became a hostage after forming friendship with the Japanese Empire. In the 13th year of Yeongrak (403), the 12th year of King Asin of Baekje; in February, the envoy in Japan, King Omae, specially treated him generously. ----------------------------------------------------- Between 399 and 402, Goguryeo did not have a conflict with Baekje. In other words, Goguryeo and Hanseong Baekje did not have a war during this period. In 399, a large number of Baekje people fled to Silla. Then Baekje refugees flock to Silla land, causing great confusion in the country. Therefore, the cause of King Naemul's sad words in 400 years may have something to do with the Baekje refugees in 399. The place where Goguryeo was previously overthrown was not the Hangang River basin, but the Geumgang River basin, but if there were this many refugees in the Hangang River basin, which was relatively less damaged, much more refugees would have occurred in the Geumgang River basin. However, there is no record of refugees flocking from Baekje according to Silla Bongi. If you have contact with Hanseong Baekje, you must come to the main period of Silla. In other words, it means that the refugees' mainstream came from somewhere other than the Hangang River basin. And the fact that the refugee issue has not been discussed gives the possibility that the refugee issue has been handled by forces other than Silla. If Silla had dealt with it, the king's words would not have cried sadly. Goguryeo is the only force that has such power that has provided the cause of the refugees. Our estimation is that Silla informed Goguryeo of the situation in 399, and it is possible that Goguryeo troops came down in about 400 years to drive out Baekje refugees. And if most of these refugees are from the Han River basin, it is right to come out of Goguryeo, and if they are from other regions, it is right not to come out of Goguryeo. The same goes for the Baekje period. If their refugees were attacked by the Goguryeo army, they should come out. If you don't come out, it means that the refugees are not from Baekjan. The same is true of the reason why it does not appear in Silla Bonbon. We don't have to open the Samguk Sagi to see if the construction of Pungnaptoseong Fortress will come out in the Baekje Period of the Samguk Sagi. If Hanseong Baekje (Baekjan) took the lead in the first and second centuries, it must come out, and if other small countries of the Baekje Union took the lead in building it, it should not be accurate. In the first and second centuries, Hanseong Baekje weakened and was only one country in the Baekje Union. Then one country cannot take the initiative in building a huge Pungnaptoseong. Therefore, Pungnaptoseong Fortress is accurate only when it is not in the Baekje period of the Three Kingdoms Period. The same is true of the 4th century Yoseobaekje. After Mahan in the 2nd century, the 4th century summary was not the domain of Hanseong Baekje. Therefore, it is accurate only when the 4th century Yoseobaekje is not operated in the Baekje period of the Three Kingdoms Period. It was after the 5th century when Hanseong Baekje took over the whole of Hanseong Baekje. If someone says that Yoseobaekje in the 4th century does not appear in the Baekje period of the Samguk Sagi, so there are many problems with the Samguk Sagi, this means that they do not understand the Samguk Sagi at all. You probably don't understand other parts of the Three Kingdoms Period. If Goguryeo troops came down to Silla-Kaya land, it is most likely in the winter of 400. In the fall of 399, the news of Silla would have arrived in Goguryeo, and in response, it takes time to prepare for the expeditionary forces, and if you want to go south by land rather than by sea, you have to choose winter when the river freezes. Therefore, it is reasonable in a timely manner that the king's horse cried in Winter October, which was published in Article 45 of the Silla Period. Also, it would have come down to Gangwon-do, not Gyeonggi-do, where Hanseong Baekje is guarding. This is because if you come down to Gyeonggi-do, you will collide with Hanseong Baekje, and then the conflict must come out in the History of the Three Kingdoms. From Prince Misahun's visit to Japan as a hostage in 402, it is possible that the Japanese demanded something from Silla. Assuming the situation at the time, it is most likely that it will guarantee the safe illustration of Baekje refugees.   --------------------------------------------- <<For your information, I'm going to look at the Japanese scribe. >> At that time, refugees filled with Silla-Kaya land came from the Yeongsangang River basin in addition to the Hangang River basin and the Geumgang River basin. When you look at the Japanese scriptures, Wangin also comes at this time. 400 A.D. is equivalent to 14 years and 15 years in response to the Japanese calligraphy.In February, Gungwol-gun returned from Baekje in the 14th year of Reply (400). He said, "God is trying to naturalize 120 prefectures from Baekje.

However, due to Silla's interference, all of them remain in Garakguk." Accordingly, he sent Galseongseup Jinseong to call the people of Gungwol-gun from Garakguk. In August, King Baekje still sent a flag and offered two good horses. Soon after, it was raised in a stable near the hillside of 아직, and it was still in charge of breeding. Therefore, the place where horses are raised is called Gupan. Since he had read the scriptures well, he made him the teacher of the prince, Todochirang. At this time, the Emperor asked yet Ki, "Is there another doctor who is better than you?" He replied, "There's a man named Wang Jin, and he's wonderful. Then, Hwang Jeon-byul and Mu-byeol, the ancestors of Sangmoya-gun, were sent to Baekje to call Wangjin. From the fact that 120 prefectures of Baekje have not yet come to Japan in February 400 years, it can be seen that Goguryeo's attack has not yet begun in February. In other words, it means that the time of the Goguryeo army's operation is not the winter of the beginning of 400 years, but the winter of the end of 400 years. It is consistent with the origin of Silla in the Three Kingdoms Period. Around 400 A.D., there were 120 prefectures of Baekje in Gungwol-gun and 17 prefectures of Baekje in Azizaju in Silla-Gaya. In order to ensure their safe guidance, it was Shingong's Silla conquest in Article 9 (173) that Reply dispatched troops at the request of Gungwol-gun and threatened King Silla. In the records received by the Japanese scribes, there must have been a record of the non-Mijo's tribute to Silla in 173 A.D., the 9th year of Jungae. At that time, there was a political situation in Japan, and Jung Ae died, and the non-Japanese took power, but there was a chaos and Silla's help was desperately needed. It was 179 years after the six-year civil war that the non-American ascended the throne in the form of a nomination. This is the first year of the New Year. However, most of the articles of the New Park Year from the 9th year of the Chinese zodiac are the records of the empress' response. Shin Chan-sung's Rock connects 120 prefectures in Gungwol-gun to the 나라 Dynasty, and 17 prefectures in Azizaju to the Han Dynasty, connecting about half of the ancestors to the Chinese Wangtong such as Qin Shi Huang and Han Go-jo. However, even if we use the surname of Chinese origin today, just as we are actually Koreans, most of the groups that originated from the Chinese surname of Shin Chan-sung are actually Baekje people. Since then, Japan has been created by 120 prefectures of Baekje who came over in 401 and 17 prefectures of Baekje who came over in 402. The Japanese Empire in the Japanese Book is led by a group of respondents who migrated after being attacked by the Goguryeo army in the 6th year of Yeongnak, and people who migrated after being attacked by the Goguryeo army in the 10th year of Yeongnak. They conquered the Japanese archipelago in the 5th century and built a nation. Most of the words "native Japanese islands" here are Gaya and Silla immigrants who immigrated in the 3rd and 4th centuries and their descendants. And in the sixth century, they fight among themselves. The establishment of a unified state in Japan was in the early seventh century, resulting in the end of Japan's ancient times. Gungwol-gun, who led the 120 prefectures of Baekje, disappeared afterwards and never appeared again. Instead, a fourth prince appeared, overcame the chaos of the prince of Todo, and ascended to the throne in 409, and this man was a virtuous man. When you look at the Japanese calligraphy and the ancient period, the virtue is older than the retribution. The following is the record of the throne of virtue. The Samguk Sagi and the Japanese Book of Records are less than a year apart.In the 5th year of King Jeon Ji (409), the Japanese sent a envoy to Yamyeongju, and the king entertained him as a special courtesy. There is only one person who can become a king in a country created by 120 prefectures of Baekje. From the back, you can hear the hoofs of 50,000 Goguryeo troops, and in front of you, you are a person who led them across the sea in an absolute crisis blocked by the blue sea. In principle, contact with the Japanese in-flight in the Silla period of the Three Kingdoms Period does not come as an extension of the history of Han (the Baekje Union excluding Hanseong Baekje). On the other hand, contact with Guju Japanese comes as an extension of Gayasa Temple. In principle, if Bi-mi-ho is from an in-flight Japanese country, it should not appear in Silla Bon-gi. Later, Kim Chun-chu will visit Japan, and if he visited Guju Japan, he should come to Silla Bongi in principle as an extension of Gayasa Temple, and if he visited In-flight Japan, he should not come out. Of course, at that time, it was the time when Japan was unified by the In-flight Japanese. The fact that Prince Misahun's records appear in the main Silla period gives the possibility that the place he went to was not in the airplane area of Baekje, but in the old area of Gaya. If it had been an on-board area, it would not have been easy to escape. According to the Japanese scribe, in February 403, he was killed by an arrow while conquering the attack. Therefore, the record of the Japanese envoy in February (403) in the 13th year of King Asin's reign is to announce the death of his retribution to Baekje. The death of the envoy in the same month shows that he died in early February. The History of the Three Kingdoms and the History of Japan are less than a month apart here. ----------------------------------------- The important thing here is that the land of Silla-Kaya is filled with Baekje refugees who were driven out by 50,000 Goguryeo Bogeys, Queen Gwanggaeto is called Why, and the Japanese secretary is called Baekje. In other words, Baekje in the western part of Japan is both the Japanese and the White Cups of King Gwanggaeto's Secretariat. The Japanese sword in the New Myo period is also Baekje in the western part of Japan. Therefore, if Baekje comes out from the Japanese scribe, it has both the possibility of Bomunwae and the possibility of Baekjan. The Japanese scribe did not distinguish it from Baekje, but how to distinguish the two is divided into the Samguk Sagi, where only a hundred cups come out. At the end of the 4th and 5th seconds, Bimun Wai collapsed, but there was one before that, so I would like to visit Baekje with the Japanese scribe before the end of the 4th and 5th seconds. And after judging the importance of whether it is enough to appear in a librarian book, we check whether Baekje is also included in the Baekje Book of the Three Kingdoms. So, if you come out, Baekje is a hundred cups of the Hangang River basin, and if not, Baekje, or Bimunwae, which was in another area. Let's take a look at the seven maps, for example. It appears in the Japanese Book of Records, but it does not appear in the Baekje period, which was four to five seconds ago. Then, the Chiljido was not sent by Baekjan in the Hangang River basin, but by Baekje in other regions, that is, Bimun Japanese. The Chogo King, who is said to have sent Chiljido to the Japanese Book of Records, cannot be the Chogo King of the 3rd century, or the Chogo King of the 4th century. The original historical materials received by the scribes of Japan must have originally been the king of Bomunwae (the king of the Three Kingdoms of KEPCO). According to the History of the Three Kingdoms, Baekje integrated the Yeongsangang River basin in 498 at the end of the 5th century. This is archaeologically accurate. The Yeongsangang River basin was not much until the 4th century, but hundreds of royal tombs were built from the beginning of the 5th century, marking its heyday in the late 5th century. And in the early 6th century, large tombs also disappeared and were transformed into Baekje-style stone chamber tombs. In other words, the Yeongsangang River basin fell under Baekje's rule at the end of the 5th and 6th seconds. Therefore, if King Geunchogo conquered the Yeongsangang River basin at the end of the 4th century, this would be an archaeological contradiction as well as the History of the Three Kingdoms.