The obvious reason why Dokdo is Korean territory.

 The obvious reason why Dokdo is Korean territory.

- Hello, I've organized data on Dokdo Island in my own way, so I'm posting like this. Dokdo Island is clearly Korean land. Even if records such as Sejong Annals Geography and the Three Kingdoms Fraud are told, I think the International Court of Justice will eventually make judgments based on modern data, not on historical grounds. After the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Dokdo Island was the first to be burned in our territory. This is something to lament. However, when I ask the current students why Dokdo Island is our land, most of them talk a lot about historical grounds.

* Why is Dokdo Korean territory?

1. San Francisco Treaty of Strengthening Japan.

- The San Francisco Treaty of Strengthening Japan began in 1951 and was signed on September 16, 1952, and was signed in San Francisco, USA to discuss the issue of post-war treatment with Japan. The reason Japan of this treaty is slowing down is because of the territorial option of "Article 2, Paragraph A.

" All claims and territories, including Geomundo Island, Ulleungdo Island, and Jeju Island, are returned to Korea.

This option is an option in Article 2A because "Dokdo" was not mentioned in this section.

* Why didn't you mention Dokdo?

- There were a total of 12 drafts of the San Francisco Treaty on Strengthening Japan, and there are drafts of two countries, the United States and the United Kingdom, and the criteria for this treaty follow the draft of the United States.

The problem is that the U.S. changed to Japanese territory in the 6th draft. At that time, the U.S. Ambassador to Japan, William Sivolt, as a military hub, asks to incorporate Dokdo into Japanese territory, which was directly purchased by the Japanese Foreign Ministry. Also, Dean Rusk, the U.S. Vice Foreign Secretary of the Far East, wrote a letter, where the U.S. recognizes it as a Japanese territory in the sixth draft. However, U.S. Ambassador to Korea Yang Yoo-chan protested violently and had to accept the demands of South Korea from the perspective of the U.S. military stationed on the Korean Peninsula, so he went back and forth between the 6th and 11th rounds to Korea and Japan.Then, in the 12th draft, you commit atrocities that make Dokdo a neutral area.

2. Our clear evidence.

- San Francisco Treaty of Japan booklet 88p "The Japanese section too.

This Japanese territory map was directly written by the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and was prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs when the San Francisco Treaty on Japan was signed in 1952, and this map was not included in the Japanese territory. Japan clearly recognizes that this is our territory.

- The order of Taejeonggwan in 1877.

In 1877, Taejeonggwan, the top administrative agency of the Japanese government, concluded that Dokdo had nothing to do with Japan after a thorough investigation in the process of compiling criticisms across Japan. The Taejeonggwan document, which had been hidden for 110 years and only appeared in 1987, is clear evidence that the Japanese government officially confirmed that Dokdo is not Japanese territory. Then Japan changed its words and forced Dokdo to be Japan's own territory."

Before discussing the Taejeonggwan order, compare Korea's claim that Japan is being forced to do so with the claim of the Daily as of November 2015 on the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs site. 

The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs explains the reasons for the incorporation of Dokdo as follows. 

Questions arise as to why names such as "Umbrella Island," which Korea claims to be the old name of Takeshima, were not used. In any case, even if the question is resolved, it is believed that Korea's Takeshima sovereignty has not been established because Korea has not effectively controlled Takeshima before and after the promulgation of the above decree.

This part argues that "Korea did not territorialize Dokdo." It is demanding that Korea bring the evidence if it was occupied. Among the evidences held by the Korean side, only the Korean Empire Decree No. 41 can exert effect. If Korea has to prove that Seokdo Island in it is Dokdo Island, Korea has no way to prove it. Korea can only say, "Prove that Seokdo is not Dokdo Island." Here, the question of who is responsible for the proof is raised. Neither Japan nor Korea has yet discussed the responsibility of proof. 

The clear basis for supporting this Taejeonggwan's order is "Gijuk leap forward." This map clearly shows Japan's fatal mistake. This map clearly talks about our territory and was released by a Japanese pastor in 2006.

Discovered the text of the Taejeonggwan Order (corresponding to the Prime Minister's Directive) in 1987.

 In 2006, the attached map, Gijukdo (Iso Takeshima), was discovered and disclosed. 

            "Takeshima外一嶋 本邦 關係無"에서"Takeshima外一嶋"가 

            It proves more clearly that it is Ulleungdo Island and Dokdo Island.

                                        ▽

 "Ulleungdo Island and Dokdo Island in Takeshima一嶋 " "" are not Japanese lands.

    "Don't post comments about Shimane Prefecture".

                                                             Japanese Prime Minister in 1877

- Report on Dokdo Island by Ulleung-gun Governor Shim Heung-taek.

A report posted by Ulleung-gun Governor Shim Heung-taek to the king in 1906 after hearing that Dokdo became Japanese territory.

On March 28, 1906, Ulleung-gun Governor Shim Heung-taek, who was notified that Dokdo Island was incorporated into Japanese territory, reported it to the Gangwon-do Observatory the next day, and its contents are included in the Report Extraordinary posted by Seo-ri, Chuncheon-gun Governor Lee Myung-rae, on April 29, 1906. Shim Heung-taek reported to the Gangwon-do Observatory and at the same time sent the same report to the central government directly internally, fearing that the report would be delayed to the central government. This fact can be seen through an article titled Japbo in Daehan Maeil Shinbo on May 1, 1906. Park Je-soon, who received the report, denied Dokdo's incorporation into the Japanese territory, that is, Dokdo Island, through Directive No. 3 on May 20, making it clear that it is the territory of the Korean Empire.

The Korean Empire government knew through this report that Japan had annexed Dokdo Island, but could not protest against Japan. At that time, Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905 was established and the outside world was abolished, and diplomatic rights were already deprived and governed by the Ministry of the Interior and Safety. For the Korean Empire, which is in an emergency situation where the entire territory is merged into Japan, there was no time to take care of the minor withdrawal of Japanese police and Japanese people on Ulleungdo Island or Dokdo Island.

However, the Korean Empire government did not condone Japan's annexation of Dokdo Island. It can be seen from the fact that the Korean Empire government recognized Dokdo as a territory in Uljin-jo, Jeungbo Munheonbigo, compiled and published under King Gojong's order, "Umbodo Island and Ulleungdo Island are now Uldo-gun as of 1908.

The production and issuance process.

Japan dispatched a large-scale investigation team consisting of 45 government officials in charge of Yutaro Kaminishi to Jukdo Island to investigate Dokdo Island, and the investigation team landed on Ulleungdo Island on March 28 and visited Shim Heung-taek, the county governor. They informed Shim Heung-taek that Dokdo had been incorporated into Japanese territory, and Shim Heung-taek, who received the notification, reported this fact to the Gangwon-do Observatory.

Composition/Content

According to this document, Shim Heung-taek's report said that (1) Dokdo Island belonging to Ulleung-gun, that is, Seokdo Island, is located in about 100 ri, Ulleungdo Island, (2) Oki, Shimane Prefecture (March 28th, solar calendar), and Yutaro Kaminishi, visited Guna, making Dokdo a Japanese territory (3).

Although the date of Shim Heung-taek's report is not specified in this document, it can be seen that it was March 29, 1906 through the copy of the Shim Heung-taek Report. The reason why Shim Heung-taek and Lee Myung-rae's reporting date show a one-month gap seems to be due to inconvenient traffic conditions between Ulleungdo Island and inland.

[Naver Encyclopedia of Knowledge] "Report of Ulleung-gun Governor Shim Heung-taek" []郡守守 [ [ [] (Korea Folk Culture Electronics Exhibition, Korea Research Institute)

The reason why this data is important is whether Korea recognized Dokdo as its own territory or not, and according to this document, Shim Heung-taek clearly recognized it as our territory.

" Dokdo, a member of our military," is clearly stated, so it is considered an important resource to win the Dokdo debate with Japan.

- Korean Empire Decree No. 41.

The Korean Empire designated the jurisdiction by giving the new name Uldo-gun in the Ulleungdo area, and "Korean Empire Decree No. 41" is an expression of Emperor Gojong's "Ulleungdo Islands Theory" as an edict. Emperor Gojong named the Ulleungdo Islands as Uldo-gun through "Korean Empire Ordinance No. 41."

In the Enforcement Decree of the Korean Empire No. 41, the name of Dokdo Island is marked as Seokdo Island.

Accepting what Lee Gyu-won said, that is, the old name of Ulleungdo Island, King Gojong once referred to Dokdo as Songdo, the Japanese name, in 1882. However, Songdo is the Korean pronunciation of Matsushima, which the Japanese historically called Dokdo, and in the 1880s, the name of the island became confusing in Japan, so Emperor Gojong abandoned Songdo, the Japanese name, and marked Dokdo as Seokdo.

 The name Songdo, mentioned by King Gojong, refers to Dokdo Island because it is believed to have originated from phrases from Dongguk Literature Bibigo (1770) or Maturity Curam (1808), that is, "Umbrella was called by the Japanese at the time, and is now Dokdo Island in Korea." It has the main meaning of changing the name and promoting territorial sovereignty.

There are many notices, but if you argue with the most important data, you can surely persuade Japan.

Japan should emulate Germany. Without reflection on the past, the country is difficult to be respected and will collapse in the future.