The biggest problem in the Korean history education community is that we ourselves reduce and disparage the history of our people by the idea of the Chinese Great Enlightenment and pro-Japanese colonialism, helping the history distortion of China and Japan, and failing to instill national pride in our youth. Rather than inspiring patriotism by being swept away by the national defeatist view that it was the history of a slave nation who had been colonized by the invasion of immigrants, it makes me feel ashamed that I was born as a Korean. The current institutional historical community in Korea, obsessed with the idea of Chinese history and pro-Japanese colonial history, denies that Korean history was older, more colorful, and grander than Chinese and Japanese history, but rather recognizes it as a historical study suitable for empirical history. Therefore, it highlights the history of Silla, the late Goryeo, and Joseon periods, which have degenerated into subordinates of the Jungwon Dynasty, rather than the ancient history of Korea, which was relatively larger and more colorful than China and Japan. The empirical history emphasized so much by institutional historical circles is actually a form of recording the history of our people more shabby and unappealing than those of China and Japan, so no country in the world reduces or disparages their own history in this way. China and Japan create and manipulate history that does not exist, but we are denying even the history that exists. The Chinese Embassy, which began to take root in Confucian logic from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty, and the pro-Japanese colonial history established during the Japanese colonial era period made considerable efforts to cut down and dispose of the Korean people's history, and the efforts have been completely successful. Since the Japanese imperialist forces created the Korean Peninsula to prevent the colonized Korean people from recognizing the legitimacy of independence and promote defeatism and inferiority toward their own people, the historical activity of our people has been poorly reduced from the east of the Middle East to Manchuria to the Korean Peninsula. Traditional historians such as Lee Byung-do and Shin Seok-ho, who worked at the Joseon History Compilation Association organized by Japan, survived the Rhee Syngman regime's pro-Japanese group protection policy after August 15 liberation and distorted Korean history more shabby and poorly than Chinese and Japanese history. Currently, all institutional historical academia is filled with disciples of patriotic historians, so it is truly lamentable. Since ancient times, our people have been actively engaged in historical activities in the Korean Peninsula, Manchuria, Shandong Peninsula, and East Mongolia. At some point, however, a long time ago, the perception began to take place that the historical activity area of our people was only the Korean Peninsula, and that history outside the Korean Peninsula was not related to our people at all. Who in the world are the humans who made such semiconductor views a norm? For what purpose did they create this semiconductor view and solidify it into our narrow-minded way of thinking? Those who promoted defeatism in our country's history are inside, not outside. The transfer of patriotic historians, which began with Lee Byung-do and Shin Seok-ho, should end here. In order to deny that Korea's ancient history is older than that of China and Japan, hawk historians hypothesized that the Bronze Age culture of the Korean people began in the 10th century BC and imprinted this as a formal theory. In order to brainwash their perception that Korea's history is shorter than that of China and Japan, they denied the reality of Dangun Joseon, which was founded in 2333 B.C., and nailed that Dangun Joseon is a mythical processing country and only Giza Joseon and Wiman Joseon are authentic in Korean history. It cannot but be said that it is a historical recognition that supports the logic of Northeast Gongjeong, which defines Gojoseon, Goguryeo, and Balhae as the history of China's history. If Dangun Joseon is regarded as a mythical processing country, only Giza Joseon and Wiman Joseon are recognized for their historical reality, and then Gojoseon was founded and ruled by Chinese reporters and Wiman, so we have nothing to say even if Gojoseon is Chinese history. In addition, there have been discoveries that archaeologically prove that it is a mistake for institutional historical circles to seize Korean Bronze Age culture after the 10th century BC. Dolmen ruins measured around the 20th century BC were discovered during Jangchun, Jilin Province. Dolmen are found only in Manchuria and the Korean Peninsula and are representative relics that inform Korea's Bronze Age culture. In addition, in the central and southern parts of the Korean Peninsula, Bronze Age residential relics measured around the 14th century BC were excavated. As such, the reality of Dangun Joseon is to be proved archaeologically, so it is time for the existing historical community, which established the 10th century BC theory of Korean Bronze Age culture to make Korean ancient history shorter than that of China and Japan, to acknowledge their mistakes. It is only a sigh before anger that strong historians in this country maintain an academic attitude that does not distinguish whether they are Koreans, Chinese or Japanese. Hansagun, which was established by the Chinese Han Dynasty after destroying Wimanjoseon, is becoming an essential memorization course in studying history in Korea. What is the reason why Korean historians and educators emphasize and highlight the fact that a colony called Hansagun was established due to the invasion of China and that the Korean people, called the Dongi people, were ruled by China at the time? What do you want to teach growing youth studying the history of our people by emphasizing Hansagun? There are no historical books that record that Nakrang-gun and Daebang-gun of Hansa-gun were installed in the current Pyeongan-do Pyongyang and Hwanghae-do areas, respectively. According to Doksabang Yeogiyo, there is a record that Nakrang-gun was in Yeongju, Seo Yo-ha. China, which is pushing for the Northeast Command, developed from the previous Ilsa Yangyong to the North Korean Peninsula, claiming that "Guguryo history before Pyongyang is Chinese history, and Goguryeo history after Pyongyang was Korean history after 427 domesticity." We can see that Goguryeo's power reached the east of Sanseoseong through the Samguksagi, Chinese librarians such as the autonomous governor, and the inscription of the ancient graveyard of Hanamseong. However, foolish institutional historians stipulate that the western boundary of Goguryeo did not cross Yoha without any basis. Can it be said that Korean scholars are the ones who arbitrarily reduce Goguryeo's territory? According to the historical books of the Northern and Southern Dynasties period of China, it is recorded that Baekje built colonies in Shandong Province, Habuk Province, and Gangsoseong Province. In librarians such as Namjeseo, Songseo, and Yangseo, you can see the status of Baekje, which spread its power on the east coast of China. However, domestic strong historians, who define Baekje as a weak country limited to the southwestern part of the Korean Peninsula, say that the records of Baekje in the Middle East appear only in the history of the Southern Dynasty and do not appear in the history of the Northern Dynasty. Songseo's record that Baekje had autonomous Baekje forces in two places, Yoseo and Jinpyeong, also dismisses that Baekje did not expand its political influence by establishing colonies in Yoseo area, but simply expanded its trade activity area to the east coast of China. The terrible desire of the patriotic historians to deny the history of the Korean people in the Middle East is revealed. In Samguksagi and Namjeseo, there is a record of war in which the Northern Wei, a strong force in the Hwabuk region of China, invaded Baekje five times but lost. If Baekje's power has not expanded to the east coast of China, a decade-long war between Baekje and the Northern Wei is absolutely impossible. However, institutional historical circles argue that Goguryeo's Ogi is the northern position that invaded Baekje and was defeated. There is also a scholar who claims that the North Korean military attacked Baekje with naval forces. Do they not see the literature that 100,000 cavalry from the north fought with Baekje's equestrian corps and were annihilated to form Gangshidanya? Materials such as Goryeo Dogyeong and Chinese ancient maps Woojeokdo and Wonsajiji come with solid evidence that the northern territory of Goryeo was in the southern Manchuria area. However, Korean history textbooks distort that the northern boundary of Goryeo did not even reach the Yalu River. The location of the Great Wall of China is also incorrect. It is lying that Hamgyeongdo Island was the territory of the Yeojin people during the Goryeo Dynasty at that time. It is a tragedy created by the idea of the Chinese archipelago and the pro-Japanese colonial view to confine Korean history only into the Korean Peninsula. Someone says this. Korea's 5,000-year history has been shouted more than 900 times. A crazy hawk historian argues that he has been shouted more than 1,000 times, saying that Korean history is only 2,000 years, not 5,000 years. A peaceful nation that has never invaded another country and survived persistently despite constant cries? What's the point of this kind of history education? What do we need to study the history of our people? Who can feel national pride by emphasizing the defeatism of a nation with such a poor and ugly history? The area of historical activity of our people is not limited to the Korean Peninsula. There was clearly a history in which our people invaded other countries, took away territory, violated the sovereignty of other peoples, and colonized them. But what can we gain from it if we ignore such history and emphasize only the colonial rule of China's subordinate country and Japanese colonial rule? This is not national supremacy. It does not mean that we should overpackage history that does not exist like China or Japan. In other words, why can't we keep our own history and dispose of it on our own? Why is Korean history smaller than Chinese and Japanese history, and is it normal when it is shabby and unappealing?
Do you hope that this country, Korea, will continue to be a puppet that moves as China and Japan want? Why is it that only Korea is doing historical research and historical records that lack national identity? It's such a pity.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기