Han Dynasty of China vs. Roman Empire

 The actual number of Huns that destroyed the Roman Empire was less than 10,000 (the rest of the Germanic tribes) The Huns who were defeated by Han, over 100,000...If there was a great deal of Western chaos for less than 10,000 Huns... More than 100,000 Huns...Even though I've been defeated for a long time...It's the last thing I've ever done.Can Korea's national power be compared? And... some people...You said the Roman Empire was in decline at the time. So, in the heyday of the Roman Empire, would they be able to win a war against the Huns 10 times more than the Huns? In addition, the prairie areas of Eastern Europe are more than the prairie rule of northern China.There's a difference in the environment where mounted people grow up. Even if it's the same 10,000...10,000 mounted people in Mongolia...It's stronger than 10,000 mounted people in Eastern Europe. And... if you look at the history of the mounted people...Most of the mounted people in other regions besides Mongolia were defeated in Mongolia.It's a force created by the declining and moving forces. That's...The various mounted peoples in Mongolia...It is not comparable to other regions. For example...The "Avar" forces that threatened medieval Europe...Originally, it doesn't mean the Mongols in northern China, famous for Genghis Khan.For example, the flexibility of northern China during the Northern and Southern Dynasties is also classified as the Mongolian system.The Mongols. That's what they're talking about. They're moving westward. One of them is the Huns.There are many other forces like that. For your information, the picture above...It's a distortion in the minds of Westerners.This is the palace of Attila, the leader of the Huns. I want to flip the minds of Westerners. And the first picture is the size of the empire that the very few Huns have achieved, which is less than 10,000!