Japan's history distortion to glorify the victory of the Russo-Japanese War

 Japan's history distortion to glorify the victory of the Russo-Japanese War 2004/05/24 17:56 http://blog.naver.com/loose/140002728874 Japan, without reflection on various crimes, such as the invasion war, exploitation of neighboring countries, and slaughter of civilians, has justified it and lied about the greatest moment in its history. And this year, 2004, has been designated as the 100th anniversary of the victory of the Russo-Japanese War, and has repeatedly said and done extraordinary things that seem to hope for a re-invasion of neighboring countries while dreaming of a revival of militarism. It is an undeniable historical fact that the Russo-Japanese War ended in Japan's victory. However, there is a questionable part in this part. It was the Battle of Tsushima. Japanese historians say 24 Japanese fleets led by Lieutenant General Heihachiro Togo were defeated by 38 Russian Baltic fleets led by Admiral Rosestvenski off Tsushima Island in May 1905. However, no detailed records of the naval battle have been found in Japan. In addition, Japan claims that Admiral Rosestvenski, commander of the Baltic fleet, was wounded and captured in the battle, but there is no record in the Russian Navy report that Admiral Rosestvenski was taken prisoner by the Japanese navy. The Russian Navy report stated, "On 24 May 1905, we confronted the enemy fleet in the Tsushima Strait, but immediately returned after receiving orders from the Minister of Defense." In addition, there is a record that "the enemy's destroyer washing chased and shelled one cruiser while recovering, but the Japanese destroyer washing was buried with gunfire." In other words, the great victory of the Battle of Tsushima, which Japan says, is not seen in the Russian Navy report at all. If Russia's Baltic fleet has suffered a crushing defeat, as Japan claims, the report should clearly contain detailed descriptions of the damage. No matter how much it is human nature to hide defeat, if the battleship is almost sunk, it has no choice but to record it in detail in the report. Furthermore, the commander should have been recorded in more detail to the extent that he was captured by the enemy. However, there is no record of the damage in the Russian Navy report, and furthermore, there is no mention of Admiral Rosestvensky being taken prisoner. If Rosestvenski was injured and taken prisoner, there must be a record in the Japanese military report that he was transported to the hospital. No matter how hostile the enemy is, it is a principle to treat a captain-level prisoner of the fleet as appropriate, and if he is injured, the wounded soldier should be treated. However, given that Japanese data did not mention any records of hospital transportation or treatment for Admiral Rosestvenski, it is clear that the Battle of Tsushima was a fabrication. It is clear that Japan won the Russo-Japanese War. However, judging from the records and circumstances at that time, the Battle of Tsushima did not exist in history. The decisive factor in ending the Russo-Japanese War was the victory of 250,000 Japanese troops led by General Iwao Oyama in March 1905, defeating 300,000 Russian troops led by General Kropatking in the Great Battle of Pyeongtian. As part of the Anglo-Japanese alliance, the Royal Navy Association presented the Nelson Award to Heihachiro Togo in a ceremonial way to celebrate Japan's victory in the Russo-Japanese War, which distorted the Tsushima battle as if it were historical. At that time, the Royal Navy Association did not even conduct a detailed on-site investigation into the actual existence of the Battle of Tsushima. Japanese netizens who read this thread may be very angry, but from the distorted view of the Japanese, who deny the records of the Korean Independence Movement and the Shanghai Shinmun, which are described in scientific common sense and detailed field surveys, only trust the fabricated data of Japan's lies seem true. After all, the Battle of Tsushima is nothing more than a lie from Japan to glorify the victory of the Russo-Japanese War, and Togo Heihachiro is by no means a hero of the sea. For your information, the Russo-Japanese War is a kind of ceasefire negotiation rather than a victory for Japan. Just like the current relationship between the two Koreas. Japan fought like mercenaries with money and weapons from British and other powers, but there were few proper battles with Russia, including the expansion of the front line. And yet, in fact, it was Japan that was on the verge of extinction. After the Battle of Sushima, they managed to get peace, but because of the information manipulation in Japan, they even staged a demonstration saying, "Why are the Japanese suggesting peace when they are winning?" Japan has not been able to open its eyes to the truth of history.