0. Prologue – Honne, Tatemae, and Japanese Power
When people talk about Japan, one pair of words comes up over and over:
-
honne – what you really think
-
tatemae – what you say and show on the surface
It usually describes everyday life: the polite phrase you say out loud vs. the blunt truth you only tell close friends.
But if you zoom out to centuries of Japanese history, a similar split appears at the level of power itself.
Officially, there is the Emperor – the sacred sovereign.
In practice, there is the bakufu (shogunate) that runs the country.
Even inside the court you often get double layers: a reigning emperor on the throne, and a retired emperor turned monk who quietly calls the shots from behind the scenes. (위키백과)
This essay takes a quick tour through those “two faces” of power – emperor and shogun, emperor and regent, emperor and retired emperor – and asks:
-
Why did this double structure keep coming back?
-
How is it similar to honne / tatemae – and how is it different?
1. The Era When “The Emperor = The State” Was Surprisingly Short
In theory, early Japan tried to build a straightforward system:
-
From the Yamato polity through the Nara and early Heian periods, the court imported the Chinese-style ritsuryō code:
a centralized bureaucratic state with the emperor at the top.
On paper, the emperor had it all. In practice, power slipped very quickly into the hands of great aristocratic families – above all the Fujiwara clan.
The Fujiwara strategy was simple and brutally effective:
-
Marry their daughters into the imperial family.
-
Become the emperor’s maternal relatives.
-
Monopolize the posts of sesshō (regent for a child emperor) and kanpaku (chief advisor to an adult emperor). (Cambridge Core)
Outwardly: “Imperial rule.”
Behind the curtain: “Fujiwara rule in the emperor’s name.”
So even in this supposedly “pure” imperial age, Japan was already running on a dual system:
Emperor as sacred symbol on top,
Fujiwara regents and chancellors as the operating system underneath.
2. When the Retired Emperor Was Stronger Than the Reigning One – Insei
From the 11th century, the system twists again.
Some emperors found it impossible to rule freely while surrounded by Fujiwara in-laws. So they tried something clever:
-
Abdicate early.
-
Take monk’s vows, move into a separate palace (the in).
-
Rule from “retirement” as a cloistered emperor.
This is the famous system of insei, often translated as “cloistered rule.” (위키백과)
The setup looked like this:
-
The reigning emperor in the main palace: performs rituals, receives ambassadors, appears in official records.
-
The retired emperor (often called a Hōō, or “Dharma Emperor”) in his own residence:
decides appointments, land grants, and big policy choices.
In other words, even within a single person’s life you could get something like:
-
tatemae: the emperor on the throne
-
honne: the retired emperor pulling strings from behind a screen
It’s one of the clearest moments where Japan’s layered, almost theatrical style of power becomes visible.
3. The Age of Warriors – Emperor and Shogun as a Built-In Double State
3.1 Kamakura – Dual Capitals, Dual Authorities
By the late 12th century, civil war between great warrior houses (the Genpei War) brings a new class to the front: the samurai.
In 1192, Minamoto no Yoritomo is appointed shōgun (“barbarian-subduing generalissimo”) and sets up the Kamakura bakufu. (Fiveable)
From this point, Japan is structurally a two-center country:
-
Kyoto – the emperor and aristocratic court: keeper of ritual, culture, and legitimacy.
-
Kamakura – the shogun’s government: in charge of military affairs, law, and provincial administration.
Formally, the shogun governs on behalf of the emperor. In reality, the bakufu controls the warrior class, the provinces, and most practical politics.
So again we get:
Emperor = face of the state
Shogun = hand that actually moves it
3.2 Muromachi and Edo – Layer upon layer
The pattern repeats under:
-
The Ashikaga (Muromachi) bakufu, and later
-
The Tokugawa (Edo) bakufu.
The labels change, the basic geometry does not:
-
The emperor in Kyoto remains the source of sacred authority.
-
The shogun’s government, first in Muromachi then in Edo, runs the bureaucracy, taxation, and military.
By the Edo period, the layering gets even more intricate:
-
Nominally, the Tokugawa shogun holds supreme authority.
-
In practice, the powerful rōjū (“elders”) and senior councilors often steer major decisions, especially in foreign policy and crisis management. (egyankosh.ac.in)
So we now have a double structure sitting on top of another double structure:
-
Emperor (symbol) / shogun (ruler)
-
Shogun (symbolic head) / rōjū (day-to-day operators)
If you like political nesting dolls, Edo Japan is a paradise.
4. After the Meiji Restoration – New Costume, Same Logic
The Meiji Restoration (late 1860s) outwardly “restores” direct imperial rule.
The shogunate is abolished; the emperor returns to center stage.
Under the Meiji Constitution of 1889, the emperor is defined as the sovereign who holds ultimate authority over the military, diplomacy, and legislation. (EBSCO)
On paper, this looks like a return to a single-center system. But once again, real power lives elsewhere:
-
A small group of elder statesmen (the genrō),
-
The high military command, and
-
Senior bureaucrats and business magnates (zaibatsu)
dominate policy behind the imperial façade. (EBSCO)
After World War II, the U.S.-drafted constitution transforms the emperor into a purely symbolic head of state. Political authority is entrusted to:
-
The Cabinet and Prime Minister
-
The Diet (parliament)
-
The bureaucracy, and
-
For most of the postwar era, a single dominant party: the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has governed Japan for the vast majority of years since its founding in 1955. (The Washington Post)
So even today, you can roughly draw the same diagram:
Emperor = symbol of national unity
Elected government + permanent bureaucracy = actual machinery of power
The faces change, the structure survives.
5. Is This Really Unique to Japan?
It would be easy – and lazy – to say, “This double structure exists because Japanese people are ‘naturally’ two-faced.”
History is messier.
Other societies have had similar splits between legitimacy and control:
-
Early medieval Frankish kingdoms:
Merovingian kings as nominal rulers; powerful “mayors of the palace” running the show. -
Modern constitutional monarchies like the UK:
monarch as figurehead; parliament and cabinet governing day to day. -
Late Joseon Korea:
a formally absolute king hemmed in by powerful aristocratic factions and in-law clans.
So the basic idea—one person as sacred symbol, another actor as practical ruler—is not uniquely Japanese.
What is distinctive about Japan is how stubbornly long this pattern lasted:
-
The imperial line was never abolished.
-
Even warrior regimes needed imperial titles, court ranks, and formal appointments to legitimize themselves. (Fiveable)
-
Shogunates almost never tried to erase the emperor; they used him as a source of symbolic capital.
For roughly a thousand years, Japan kept some version of:
“Legitimate sacred center + practical governing center”
in place at the same time.
That endurance is remarkable.
6. Honne / Tatemae and Double Power – A Useful Metaphor, Not a Curse
Strictly speaking, honne and tatemae are concepts about personal behavior:
-
What you really feel vs. what you are expected to say.
-
The flexible line between honesty, politeness, and social survival.
Using those words to explain institutions can slip into cultural determinism very quickly:
“Japanese are like this, therefore their politics must be like that.”
That kind of claim doesn’t hold up.
A more careful way to put it:
-
Japanese political history happens to contain many layered arrangements where public image and private control are separated.
-
The honne / tatemae vocabulary gives modern readers a helpful metaphor for understanding those layers – as long as we don’t mistake metaphor for cause.
So rather than:
“Because of honne / tatemae, Japan produced double power structures,”
it’s more accurate to say:
“When we look at emperors, shoguns, cloistered rulers, and elder councils,
the honne / tatemae lens helps us visualize how roles and realities diverged.”
7. Why This Matters for Readers Today
For readers in any country, this story suggests a few useful habits of mind.
-
Always ask: who really holds power here?
-
Written constitutions, formal titles, and televised ceremonies show one layer.
-
Money, bureaucracy, media ownership, security institutions may show another.
-
-
Symbols can stabilize – and destabilize.
-
Separating the “face” (symbolic authority) from the “hand” (executive power) can create long-term stability:
people rally around the symbol while elites argue over policy. -
But in moments of crisis, that same symbol can be used to blow up the existing order, as in the Meiji Restoration, when imperial prestige became a revolutionary tool.
-
-
Avoid easy explanations based on “national character.”
-
Instead of saying “this nation is naturally X,”
it’s more fruitful to ask:-
What historical bargains produced these institutions?
-
How did legitimacy, geography, and foreign pressure shape them?
-
Who benefits from keeping the “face” and the “hand” separate?
-
-
Japanese history’s long experiment with emperors, shoguns, retired emperors, and party machines is, in that sense, not just a story about Japan.
It’s a reminder that power loves masks—and that understanding politics often starts with asking what, and who, is hiding behind the nicest one.
No comments:
Post a Comment