People often say history is “a record of the past.”
But in some states, history is less a record than a machine—a tool that manufactures legitimacy, organizes loyalty, and tells citizens what kind of world they live in.
North Korea’s historiography sits near the far end of that spectrum. It has long been shaped not only by academic debates, but by the regime’s practical need to justify power, discipline society, and anchor identity. Scholars of North Korea’s history writing often note its early Marxist-Leninist framing and later ideological shifts that re-center agency and legitimacy in the state’s preferred narrative.
1) Phase One: “Materialist History” as a Blueprint for State-Building
In the years after liberation, North Korean historical writing wore a familiar uniform: Soviet-style Marxism-Leninism.
Society was explained through staged development—primitive → ancient → feudal → modern—like a staircase you could climb with the “right” politics. That ladder wasn’t just theory. It was also a counterattack against colonial-era claims that Korea was stagnant or incapable of self-driven development: North Korea needed a chronology of progress to prove the opposite.
On the surface, this period could resemble “academic language.” But the purpose was never neutral. History had to show the people as creators and fighters—and the conclusion had to point back toward the state as the rightful outcome of that struggle. In other words, history was already functioning as mobilization technology, not merely scholarship.
2) Phase Two: When “Juche” Arrives, the Center of Gravity Moves
From the late 1960s onward, the engine shifts.
The driving force of history—once framed in abstract terms like “productive forces” and “class struggle”—slides toward a different logic: correct leadership. The people remain “the subject” in rhetoric, but the story increasingly implies that the people can only move correctly when guided by the right center.
That’s the moment historiography begins to transform into a leader-centered timetable:
less “this structure changed, therefore this era began,”
more “this leader emerged, therefore history opened.”
Analysts of North Korean ideology often emphasize how “Juche” functions not as simple peace-loving humanism, but as a system that justifies authority, hierarchy, and control—especially when translated into institutions of education and propaganda. (KCI)
3) Phase Three: “Our Nation-First” and the Pull of a Pyongyang Origin Story
The 1990s bring a new mutation—arguably the most fascinating one.
When a system is under pressure, it looks for stronger glue. “Class” can be a glue, but nation is often stickier. North Korea’s rhetoric increasingly emphasizes “Our Nation-First” (a nationalist framing) as a way to hold identity together in an era of crisis.
And when nationalism intensifies, origin stories become weapons.
This is where the narrative often begins to converge on Pyongyang as more than a capital—Pyongyang as a symbolic “starting point,” the place where legitimacy feels inevitable because it feels ancient.
A famous example is the regime’s claim in the early 1990s that it had confirmed or “discovered” Dangun’s tomb, a move widely discussed as part of an effort to pin Korea’s mythical-national origins to a location that strengthens a Pyongyang-centered legitimacy story. The key issue isn’t whether readers “believe” the claim; it’s how the claim functions as narrative infrastructure. (nomos-elibrary.de)
In this phase, ancient history becomes less “a research topic” and more a ranking system—a way to argue that the present state deserves its status because the deep past has been edited to point toward it.
4) Even the Calendar Changes: Who Controls Time Controls the Story
Here the system stops being subtle.
North Korea’s Juche calendar counts Year 1 as 1912, the birth year of Kim Il-sung, and it was officially adopted in 1997. A calendar is not just timekeeping; it’s a declaration of where history truly begins. (Korea Times)
Then something interesting happens. In 2024, multiple reports noted that some North Korean state outlets appeared to reduce or abruptly drop Juche-year dating in favor of Gregorian-only dates—small on the surface, but symbolically loud. This has been interpreted as a possible adjustment in how the regime manages legacy symbolism and present-day authority. (가디언)
You don’t have to read it as “reform.” But you can read it as proof of a deeper rule:
Power can edit its own memory tools when it needs to.
Not history changing—the way history is spoken changing.
5) The Takeaway: This Isn’t Only About North Korea
So what does your reader gain from this?
Not a simple “true vs false” checklist. Something more useful:
North Korean historiography shows what happens when the past becomes a state resource.
Marxist “stages” offered a framework for “a developing, rightful state.”
Juche-centered narration re-weights history toward the necessity of “correct leadership.” (KCI)
Nation-first mythmaking supplies stronger identity glue under pressure—often by anchoring origins to Pyongyang through claims like Dangun’s tomb. (nomos-elibrary.de)
Even the calendar can be turned into a lever of legitimacy—and later adjusted when the regime wants different symbolic emphasis. (가디언)
Understanding this isn’t “about judging North Korea.”
It’s about seeing a general truth: any society can turn history into a frontline—a battlefield of vocabulary, education, archives, maps, dates, and stories.
Media & “Story Fuel” (for expanding into blog content)
Books in the middle zone (popular + analytic): Andrei Lankov for system logic; B. R. Myers for nationalism/propaganda framing. (KCI)
Angle for a follow-up post: “Why origin myths become stronger when a regime feels weaker.” Use the Dangun episode as the case study. (nomos-elibrary.de)
A sharp modern hook: calendars as political technology (Juche → Gregorian-only reporting shift). (가디언)
Game / Modding Hooks (surprisingly strong with this topic)
Even if no game “directly” models North Korean historiography, the mechanics map well:
Civilization-style Wonder (conceptual, low real-world baggage)
“Archive of Memory” (Industrial → Modern era)
A wonder that boosts Culture/Tourism and domestic Stability/Loyalty, but introduces diplomatic friction—because exporting a narrative is never neutral.
One-time National Project
“Calendar Reform”
A project that temporarily boosts unity/legitimacy and policy efficiency, but risks international trust and internal backlash events. (Because changing timekeeping is never “just admin.”) (가디언)
Paradox-style Event Chain
“The Edit of Legitimacy”
Choices like:
keep scholarly language (slow, durable benefits)
intensify ethnic-national narrative (fast cohesion, external friction)
intensify leader myth (short-term surge, long-term succession risk)
No comments:
Post a Comment