Korea-Japan War-Economic Necessity

 In discussing a nation-to-state war, it is important to compare the power difference between the two countries, but first of all, it seems in order to discuss the "reasons for the war" underlying it. In other words, there should be a discussion about "why are you going to war?" first. The United States did not go to war with small African countries, but during World War II, it fought direct wars with Germany and Japan, and fought proxy wars with the former Soviet Union in Afghanistan and Vietnam. This is because war does not occur when there is a difference in power, but occurs when the answer to the question "Why are you fighting a war?" is given. Historically, most wars have occurred because they are "economic" of the "strong." In other words, the answer to "Why are you going to war?" is "Because the strong are hungry." In the 1980s, the Japanese economy was in a happy dilemma over whether to overtake the U.S. or not. Among the world's top 10 companies, Japanese companies accounted for seven to eight, and Japanese companies ranked first to fourth in terms of sales. (Now, only Toyota Motor Corporation ranks 10th.) In the early 1990s, Japan was shocked by the collapse of the bubble and has since passed the "lost decade" and is now passing the "lost fifteen." The economic bubble is closely related to overheating. In the 1980s, Japan invested in real estate and stocks with huge dollars earned from all over the world. As with most goods, in particular real estate, "value recognized by others" becomes the price. Even apartments made of the same cement and rebar differ greatly in prices between apartments built in Tokyo and those built in rural areas. One day, all of a sudden, the value of real estate in Tokyo disappeared. There was neither an earthquake nor a war, but real estate prices in Tokyo plunged by up to 1/20. Most companies or individuals engaged in economic activities by taking out loans as collateral for the real estate. The fall in collateral value quickly left the bank with huge bad assets. He lent 1 billion won as collateral for 2 billion won in real estate, but the real estate he held as collateral fell to 100 million won overnight. As the valuation of real estate, which accounts for a significant portion of the asset value of companies' books, plunged, the accounting asset value of companies also became a "bubble." Naturally, the aftermath was bound to spread to the stock market. (This is out of the question, but the reason why we are forced to suffer a long-term recession is that the Korean economy is also based on real estate. Since the days of "Eo-yeong-O?" people have bought and bought land at random if they earn dollars and distribute them to the people. We're... What?Most of the dollars earned from the sound of Gongdol and Gongsoon in the days are melted into the ground of the city. A large circle was drawn on the land of the city of Seoul, and the rule was set, "From now on, the land of this original plan is gold." People have believed in the rule and traded the "gold" at a high price. One day, when the rule is broken, the precious values that we earned from selling blood and that we wanted to keep until we sold our pride are also blown away. The rule is neither a law nor its common "custom." It's not compulsory to protect.) China is growing at such a terrifying pace that it is said that it will soon overtake the United States after the Cold War. We also feel a sense of crisis over China's overtaking, but it is nothing compared to Japan's sense of crisis. Japan's feelings have already gone beyond the stage of "a sense of crisis." (On top of that, the tsunami of Samsung Electronics is hitting Japan.) With the collapse of Japan's bubble economy, the world is now at the center of a recession. This global recession was caused by a global oversupply. In other words, it should be said that the global oversupply phenomenon accumulated, causing the bubble collapse in Japan. In other words, technology that makes fast and a lot develops day by day, but demand cannot keep up with the pace. Until just a few decades ago, goods were sold as long as companies made them, but from some point on, companies risked their lives in competition, and creating a trend to promote and encourage consumption was the only way to survive. Now, it has reached an era where consumers want to buy automatic cleaning robots by pouring huge amounts of money into automatic cleaning robots that used to appear in science fiction. Looking at the PDP market, there is not much demand for 40 inches, but factories are producing 102 inches. Products produced by companies were not sold, piled up in inventory, and disposed of. In terms of added value, the world has burned down enormous added value for decades. They burn expensive oil to make things that are not for sale. On a global scale, for decades... The current global recession is caused by the accumulation of this phenomenon for decades. Therefore, any stimulus policy at the national level is useless. Venture boom and Internet boom in the late 1990s are all optical illusions. In the future, there will be many optical illusions that seem to revive the global economy. (Bio-related to stem cells, robots, etc.) But they are all bubbles. Companies have to keep going back, so they have to make things, and they have to spend a lot more on technology development than they do on things they don't sell today to make things of the future. However, if future predictions are wrong, expensive oil will be burned again to make things that are not sold. In the midst of this, Japan is the world's No. 1 foreign exchange holder, and its reserves are increasing. Rather than having a large net added value held by Japan, there is a problem with the wrong (distorted) tendency of the dollar flow to flow only to Japan. Japan's leading companies seem to have declined more than in the past, but Japan's potential remains in the world. In other words, the competitiveness of small and medium-sized Japanese companies is world-class. During the recession, only competitive products survive, and Japanese products do. This creates an abnormal flow of dollars into Japan. The problem is that the dollar (value-added) will flow into Japan, but it will not flow out. Even if Japan wants to release dollars, it cannot. If there is demand, we will release dollars and import raw materials to make more goods. Unless there is demand, there is no way for the dollar to be released. More precisely, it does not provide an opportunity for the dollar flowing into Japan to flow out normally. What are these Japanese companies doing?Just like that, American companies' "What are you doing?"In other words, the part that American companies are worried about is the same as that of Japanese companies, and the intensity of their worries is greater. Global due to this oversupply?Methods to overcome the recession are largely divided into ways to increase demand and reduce supply. The method of increasing demand has already reached its limit worldwide. It hit huge commercials, seduced consumers, and made them drink two or three bottles of Coca-Cola, which had been drinking a bottle, and shortened the cell phone exchange cycle to several months. It has reached the stage of seducing and persuading consumers that it is time to buy an automatic cleaning robot from science fiction. As you can see from the household debt rates of major countries, consumers around the world have already consumed several years' worth of consumption earlier. The only thing left is to reduce supply. There is no choice but to forcibly remove the supply capacity of countries that supply a certain amount to the global economy through the method of war. War reduces the supply capacity of the affected country and creates large-scale demand that the provoking country needs right now, not future demand such as automatic cleaning robots. As explained above, the requirement for a war that will become a "global recession breakthrough" must first be the "war of Japan." - Dollar exhaustion and dollar distortion in the No. 1 foreign exchange holder. Second, Japan's war target must be a country with a certain supply capacity to the world economy. - To effectively eliminate supply capacity to the global economy. Third, Japan's target of war should be a country that cannot hurt Japan. Fourth, Japan's war target must be a country with a certain scale or more and that can withstand it for a certain period of time. - It should not be an aspect of elimination of supply capacity, but a country where the Japanese dollar can be added value and effectively permeated into Japan. Japan cannot release its own dollars and make other countries do good things. The United States is the only country that can take the initiative in implementing and managing these "global recession breakthrough measures," and Korea is the only country subject to war. Only Korea is a country that meets all four of the above conditions. The third important of the four conditions is the ability to hit Japan. This is achievable depending on the efforts of the war-torn countries and occupies the largest proportion of the requirements for war execution. Therefore, for the United States, which needs a "global recession breakthrough" as much as Japan, it should prevent Korea from cultivating its ability to hit Japan. In fact, the U.S. is effectively preventing South Korea from cultivating its ability to hit Japan. This is the war between South Korea and Japan from our point of view. We think that if the Korean Peninsula is invaded, the surrounding powers will rush in like dog days. It's not at all wrong. It is correct if Russia, China, and North Korea invade South Korea, or the United States, Japan, and South Korea invade North Korea. However, Japan's invasion of South Korea or China's invasion of North Korea is simply a "conflict between them." It is not included in the "sensitive Korean Peninsula issue" we know. For Russia and China, it is strategically advantageous for Japan, which is weaker than the world's strongest U.S., to be stationed in South Korea. In other words, the "strategic danger" that the world's strongest U.S. has never been stationed in South Korea for 50 years is unlikely to occur because Japan is stationed in South Korea. The same is true of China's invasion of North Korea. For example, even if a million Chinese troops gather near the armistice line, the United States cannot attack North Korea or China first. China pushes the ceasefire line?Only then can the United States enter South Korea's territory can the United States enter the war, and the fact that a million Chinese troops have gathered on the armistice line cannot lead to war. Also, suppose that Russian troops have been stationed in North Korea for the past 50 years.

Now suppose that the Russian army will step down and the Chinese army will take its place. Is this a serious case for us? For Japan and the United States, is the "replacement act" of changing from Russian troops to Chinese troops in North Korea not something to stand by? In addition, the Korea-Japan war brings war specials to China and Russia. (Japan laid the foundation for today's war as a special feature of the Korean War.) The logic that China and Russia are forces capable of preventing the expansion of the United States has already faded. If the logic is correct, China and Russia should have prevented the expansion of the United States in Iraq, a repository of oil, worth dozens of times as much as South Korea. In addition, what we can put forward is the size of our economy. In short, Korea's economy is considerable in the global economy, so we're doomed?What's the world economy like?Logic. Currently, Korea is a country that contributes 250 billion dollars in exports and 200 billion dollars in imports to the global economy. Exports may be important from our point of view, but in a world of oversupply, some countries' exports are visible to others. In terms of imports, most of the goods Korea imports are raw materials or intermediate goods. In other words, most of the goods imported by Korea are imported to be processed and exported from Korea. If Korea fails, other countries import and produce as much as Korea imported. In a world of oversupply, there are many factory lines resting. If Samsung Electronics fails, Sony and Motorola's resting production line will run. What is left now is purely what Korea consumes, and the final consumer goods to eat and use. To put it a little exaggeratedly, 1.3 billion Chinese people can consume more than a year's worth of food in Korea if they starve for just one meal. The effect of creating demand for the global economy caused by the removal of Korea is more than offsetting such net imports of Korea. Now, from Japan's point of view, war does not happen suddenly one day. It happens gradually. The Japanese people's tendency to move to the right is the most basic requirement for war. Now, Japan just needs to keep pace with the speed of power growth. War is similar in nature to fire. Flints, flints, and firewood are needed to make a fire. Japan's act of touching Dokdo is like turning on a flint. But you can't start a fire just by lighting a flint. Therefore, it is necessary to ignite the fire. The spark can be provided by South Korea or by Japan. If South Korea is "outraged" by Japan's invasion of Dokdo and sinks a Japanese warship, the spark will be provided by South Korea. In fact, Korea and Japan have similar historical experiences related to "Fireworks," such as the "Unyangho Incident." If the U.S. were able to invade Iraq without the September 11 terrorist attacks, Japan would have given 72 hours to demand the return of Dokdo and forcefully occupy Dokdo within the deadline. If South Korea does not take any action in this process, that is, if it does not provide a torch, it must take the trouble that Japan has to provide. Therefore, after Japan's occupation of Dokdo, large-scale terrorist attacks against Japanese, such as the September 11 attacks, will occur in Korea, and Korea will be pointed out as the culprit. The 120 million Japanese, now known for their strong unity, cannot be controlled. The bow has already left the demonstration, and there is only one way to proceed. At this time, the ability to strike Japan other than nuclear weapons is useless. Even if a few missiles are dropped on the mainland of Japan, it will only fuel hostility among Japanese people. Japan overcame the Great Kobe Earthquake and survived the ruins of World War II, becoming the world's second-largest economy. The current economic situation in Japan is the same as having been in several wars. The Japanese can be "fully prepared" for war. I haven't eaten for that long. What the Japanese need right now is neither a golden fishing ground around Dokdo, nor a hydrecht (fish, hydrecht, enough in Japan's sea, which is 100 times larger than ours). What the Japanese need right now is a "decisive" opportunity to stop China from chasing and break the cycle of a recession that has been holding Japan back for 15 years. Now even South Korea is attacking Japan with the "Samsung Electronics tsunami." It's crazy and crazy for Japan.) Japan has used all the "peaceful" methods for 15 years to revive its economy. All that remains is a "non-peaceful" approach. Now, from the perspective of the United States, we are also arguing, but South Korea is a strategic point of the United States. Conversely, the United States only needs the "land" of South Korea. I don't need the smelly yellow people living in it. For the United States, there is no reason to spend the same money as the Cold War era on South Korea, which has no oil. For the United States, South Korea is just a necessary land to protect Japan. Therefore, it is effective for the United States to let Japan dominate South Korea. In fact, the U.S. is reducing the number of U.S. troops stationed in Korea and strengthening U.S. forces in Japan. Japan itself is in a hurry to revise the law to support the reinforcement of U.S. forces in Japan. In other words, instead of leaving South Korea to Japan, the U.S. forces in Japan will be strengthened to prevent Japan from betraying South Korea, and Japan will be allowed to point a knife at its neck. In other words, the U.S. should transfer its control over South Korea to Japan. In other words, South Korea is at the forefront of security in Northeast Asia for the United States, but it is unimaginable that Japan will not hand over South Korea while entrusting Japan with security in Northeast Asia. What the United States wants is to hand over its current status in South Korea to Japan. For example, the status of the USFK, which is guaranteed by wartime operational rights and SOFA, will be inherited to Japan. In other words, Japan has South Korea's wartime operational control, and the Japanese military occupies the U.S. military base in Korea. However, the United States is well aware that such succession is "absolutely impossible" to be "peaceful." In addition, South Korea expresses its willingness to self-defense and take back wartime operational control from the United States within 10 years. This will of Korea means the same to the United States as "loss of control at strategic points." Therefore, using the conflict (Dokdo) between Korea and Japan, the "Korea-Japan War" is induced, and according to the result, the status of the USFK is transferred to the Japanese military through a "legal(?) procedure. In this process, the U.S. can break the will to independence (i.e., attempts to lose U.S. control) rising from its strategic point of "colonial Korea," which is a very important issue for South Korea. Since Korea has not had wartime operational rights since the Korean War, it seems that it does not know the purpose of wartime operational rights, but in fact, wartime operational rights play a more effective role in peacetime than wartime. The Korea-Japan war, premised on this article, is a territorial dispute triggered by the Dokdo issue. Therefore, in addition to the reasons described above, it is difficult for China and Russia to intervene in the Korea-Japan war. It's not like the Japanese government's slogan or ideology, as it was during the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. There is no justification to intervene. However, if China or Russia has signed a mutual defense treaty with South Korea, the story will be different. However, wartime operational rights are essential to signing this mutual defense treaty. In other words, the mutual defense treaty between countries is a treaty concluded based on "war." Therefore, governments without wartime operational rights cannot conclude mutual defense treaties with foreign countries. In a 1:1 war between South Korea and Japan without the U.S., the U.S. wartime command itself is meaningless if a war breaks out. In other words, once the Korea-Japan War breaks out without the United States, there is no South Korean soldier who will not listen to the order of the president, who is the commander-in-chief. However, before the war, Korea could not suddenly sign a mutual defense treaty independently with China or Russia as if it had noticed something and made a surprise OO. Even if China and Russia want to accept such a proposal, they cannot accept it. (The Mutual Defense Treaty concluded with the government without full authority at the beginning of the war is invalid and has no legal effect. Therefore, if the Korean War is imminent, South Korea must regain its wartime operational control before the war breaks out, and the U.S. and Japan must not return it. Some argue that if the United States allows Japan to dominate South Korea, Japan will grow further and threaten the United States. If the U.S. had not let Japan grow, it would not have allowed it to grow as it does today, nor would it have condoned Japan's ongoing rearmament. Did the U.S. allow Japan, the world's second-largest powerhouse, to rearm itself in the name of not knowing that Japan is scarier than North Korea and preparing for a handful of North Korea? Also, while China and Russia are still alive, can Japan grow up and betray the United States after taking South Korea with the approval of the United States? In other words, Japan should fight China, Russia and the United States. In other words, even if the United States gives up South Korea to Japan, Japan cannot "betray." If Japan betrays the United States, it will be after Japan kneels on China and Russia with the U.S. on its back. Rather, the U.S. wants such a victory. China and Russia were handled by Japan, and the United States only had to deal with Japan... Lee Kun-hee controls Samsung Electronics with a small stake and controls the entire Samsung Group. Lee Kun-hee controls only the parent company and the parent company controls the entire Samsung Group.

This governance structure is "essential" for large organizations. The United States is now big enough to feel the need for such indirect control. What the U.S. should do is to control South Korea's ability to strike against Japan until Japan is ready for war. In order to bring Japan into the ring, the U.S. must tie South Korea's hands and feet and break its Achilles' heel. Only then will Japan come up to the ring with confidence. (It's something to do as a promotor.) The United States will take a neutral stance in the event of a war between South Korea and Japan, and the USFK will be converted to a UN peacekeeping force with the approval of the United Nations. During the war, the United States pretended to be a dove peacekeeping force, and after the war, as always, became a kind-hearted Uncle Tom, supporting South Korea and practically dominating South Korea. In Northeast Asia, including South Korea, anti-Japanese sentiment increases and anti-American sentiment decreases. After handing over South Korea to Japan, the influence of the United States in South Korea does not decrease, but rather increases. The time when the United States began planning the "Korea-Japan War" as a single idea is estimated to be the time when the regime was transferred from Chun Doo-hwan to Roh Tae-woo. Until Chun Doo-hwan, the United States had the "right to appoint" to the president of the Republic of Korea. Until then, the president of the Republic of Korea was able to "maintain the presidency" only after being nominated by the United States or approved by the United States. However, with the June Democratic Uprising and Roh Tae-woo's June 9 declaration, the president of the Republic of Korea was decided by direct election of the people. For the United States, not only did it lose the right to select the highest power in Korea, but the introduction of the direct presidential system in South Korea raised the possibility that the United States could lose control in South Korea, a strategic hub in Northeast Asia. The United States would have needed countermeasures against the risk of losing control of South Korea. So how can we eliminate the danger? In similar cases, the method that the United States enjoyed using was to support anti-government forces to overthrow the regime. However, it was difficult for South Korea to have armed anti-government forces in South Korea. However, it was impossible to overthrow the South Korean government using North Korea. In the end, there would have been only a way to overthrow the South Korean government by using Japan as a way of war. In order for this method to work, South Korea should not have nuclear weapons. Protecting India and Pakistan's cases and efforts to develop nuclear weapons, TOOTOOTOOTOOTOOO?The United States had to block all possibilities for South Korea to develop nuclear weapons. Eventually, in 1991, Roh Tae-woo made a "declaration of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" under pressure from the United States. For the United States, the risk of losing control in strategic positions defending North Korea, China and Russia is greater than that of the North Korean nuclear issue. Japan's invasion of South Korea is a war that brings only losses to the United States and Japan. In other words, the U.S. and Japan will lose money without such a war. Finally, from North Korea's point of view, North Korea's nuclear weapons, to be exact, were needed for the justification for Japan to develop the power to invade South Korea. In fact, North Korea's nuclear weapons contributed decisively to Japan's rearmament and constitutional amendments (future-type but almost certain), and China and Russia provided an unstoppable justification for Japan's armament. North Korea risked its life as a means of self-defense to maintain its "state." Just because South Korea is invaded by Japan, North Korea cannot try to use its nuclear power or participate in the war. The most important reason is that North Korea knows that the South-North alliance cannot beat Japan (Japan with more power than it is now), and that action undermines the cause of its own nuclear possession as a means of self-defense. Above all, North Korea has no ability to carry out war. In other words, one's own nose is three. When most Koreans thought there would be no Japanese invasion, Yi Sun-shin accepted it as a fait accompli, and was so afraid of Japan that he jumped up with a cold sweat while sleeping. Crucially, Yi Sun-shin was afraid of Japan, so he was able to strengthen the navy by enduring so much opposition and pain. Because I was afraid of Japan, I was able to endure any pain that I had to prepare for the Japanese invasion. As can be seen from Yi Sun-shin's case, in order to win, at least not to lose, you must first fear the enemy in the preparatory stage. Do we have a "heart that is not afraid of Japan"? Is "feeling afraid of Japan" "pro-Japanese, anti-ethnic"? True courage is a flower that overcomes the fear of death and blooms.

In any way, Korean politicians and leaders should not be wary of and believe in Japan. In order for the Republic of Korea to become a strong leader in the future, it is necessary to prepare for war against the Japanese for the sake of world peace by being wary of the Japanese radioactive monkeys who are violent.

The last splendid and majestic palace of the Joseon Dynasty that disappeared.Ingyeonggung Palace...

 The founding history of Ingyeonggung Palace began in the 9th year of Gwanghaegun (1617), and most of the pavilion was completed in the 15th year of Gwanghaegun after about 6 years of public service. Ingyeonggung Palace is described in some literature as being confused with Gyeonghuigung Palace, but Ingyeonggung Palace and Gyeonghuigung Palace are separate palaces and were grand palaces that were much larger than Gyeonghuigung Palace. "The road was blocked because the southern wall of the new palace was connected to the wall of Sajik, according to the provincial governor. (In the middle) He was forced to build another fence in the north wall and enter the village to break through the road.In other words, there was a preceptor's book that said that Sajik Bukjang should be made a lieutenant general because the male general of Ingyeonggung Palace was connected to the manor of Sajik, so the Seoraji-ro did not work. What can be seen here is the fact that the manor of Sajik and the south of Ingyeonggung Palace were in contact. Subsequently, in the Annals, there is an article showing that if the male attire of Ingyeonggung Palace is degraded, the rear of the main temple will be narrowed, so it is presumed that the north market of Ingyeonggung Palace, which is adjacent to Sajikbukjang, was right behind the palace. The history of Ingyeonggung Palace originated from the work of selecting the site of the palace under Inwangsan Mountain in the 8th year of Gwanghaegun, and in April and May of Gwanghaegun the following year, there was a construction of a shaft. It is a general view that Gwanghaegun followed the theory of feng shui and yang, avoided Changdeokgung Palace as a chest palace, and tried to build a shrine under Inwangsan Mountain.Gwanghaejo was a time when Changdeokgung Palace was restored in the first year of Gwanghaegun and Changgyeonggung Palace was restored in the seventh year of Gwanghaegun, putting more pressure on the devastated national finances after the Imjin War. However, Gwanghae-gun has been reluctant to continue Changdeokgung Palace because it is unlucky because this palace has Jeunggyeongnaebyeon. Jeunggyeongnaebyeon refers to the fact that King Danjong and King Yeonsan were abolished at Changdeokgung Palace. In addition, Gwanghae-gun was fascinated by the words of the Sulgwan that it would be better to transfer to Gyoha because the spirit of Hanyang declined, and was pushed for Cheondo, but failed to realize it due to opposition from ministers. Then, in the 8th year of King Gwanghaegun, a monk named Seongji said that it was very strange that Inwangsan Mountain had a stone stone, and the second letter of King Inwang was Gilcham, that is, if the prince lived here, Yeoksu was said to be Gayeon and Taepyeong was said. Construction began in the 9th year of Gwanghaegun, and first of all, there was the construction of the palace and the movement of private houses in the palace. In May, the construction of the pavilion was completed and the construction of the pavilion began, and the main hall, the Sisajeon Hall, and the annex were started. However, while the construction of Ingyeonggung Palace was underway, the construction of a new palace in addition to this palace began again. It was called Saemundonggung Palace or Seobyeolgung Palace, but later called Gyeongdeokgung Palace, and it was said that there was a royal flag in Saemundong, so the construction of the palace began in July, the 9th year of Gwanghae-gun to suppress it. The airspace of Gyeongdeokgung Palace did not end until the 12th year of Gwanghaegun, and during this period, the history of Ingyeonggung Palace was reduced to a small scale. The pavilion built between 9 and 12 years of Gwanghae-gun was only a Donggung precipitation, the main gate, and a surrounding wallang. At the end of the official service of Gyeongdeokgung Palace, the history of Ingyeonggung Palace proceeded in earnest again in the beginning of the 13th year of Gwanghaegun, and in June of that year, the Daenaejeon Hall was usually completed, leaving the creation of Naeinipjeogu 8 and each gate. However, the airspace continued in the 14th year of Gwanghaegun, and in December of the 14th year of Gwanghaegun, there was an article ordering Ingyeonggung Palace to build a pavilion under the Gyeonghoeru system, and some other construction was scheduled to continue in the 15th year of Gwanghaegun. However, in March of the 15th year of King Gwanghaegun, when King Gwanghaegun resigned from the throne, the history of the construction of the palace was abolished, and the construction of Ingyeonggung Palace was stopped without completion. Then, when Changgyeonggung Palace, which was destroyed in the 11th year of King Injo's reign, some of the sediments of Ingyeonggung Palace were demolished and moved to Changgyeonggung Palace. In the 25th year of King Injo's reign, important halls and inner halls were demolished. In the following year, in the 26th year of King Injo's reign, the Jeoseungjeon Hall, the place of Donggung Palace, was built in Changgyeonggung Palace, removing the Ingyeonggung Palace Hall, and Hongjewon was also built as the Ingyeonggung Palace Hall. As a result, most of the halls of Ingyeonggung Palace were demolished, leaving only a few buildings, and in the 18th century, even traces of the palace disappeared, and private houses were built on the palace site. "However, I think Ingyeonggung Palace was built at the suggestion of a mad monk during the Honjo period, so there is no time to discuss the good fortune of feng shui, and the system of the house is so luxurious and splendid that it is truly a so-called bath." Therefore, from the beginning, it was not suitable for the king to live, but...… Changdeokgung Palace was originally rebuilt in the last years of King Jeongjo's reign, but unfortunately, it is also regrettable that it has become ashes now. If you build this large palace by moving timber and roof tiles from a couple of halls around Ingyeonggung Palace, there will be a difference in difficulty compared to the repair of Ingyeonggung Palace, but it will not be much different. At that time, Changgyeonggung Palace and Changdeokgung Palace were both buried, and some suggested that the king should not rebuild the two palaces, but lead them to Ingyeonggung Palace. The names and sizes of the buildings that were demolished and transferred to Changgyeonggung Palace and Changdeokgung Palace have been revealed earlier. In addition, in the 26th year of King Ingyeong's reign, 45 bays of sublimation hall, 79.5 bays of Haenggak·Wallang, 13 bays of Junghwidang East Wolang, 50 bays, and Gyemyeongdang. "God has recorded that the site of Dongpyeongwi's house is the old site of Ingyeonggung Palace." At this time, Ingyeonggung Palace was already called Gugi, and it is said that the house of Buma Dongpyeongwi was built on the site, indicating that the palace disappeared. And in November of King Yeongjo's 45th year, the king ordered Seungji to look at the ball because Ingyeonggung Palace was the place where Queen Inmok passed away, but the Seungji who went there seemed to be under Inwangsan Mountain and near the left side of Sajik, so it was completely destroyed in the 18th century. If you look for only one trace of Ingyeonggung Palace pavilion, it seems that there was a partial Byeongae, but you can only find the Gwangjeongjeon Hall of Wangsi in the Seonjeongjeon Hall of Changdeokgung Palace.

In the early days of the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, the issue of naval command and "convenience worker"

 Even battalion commanders and company commanders said, "I know the scene better...Can I say that I ignore the orders of the division commander and the regiment commander?" Of course, in the case of naval thieves, although they are at the rank of division commander in these days, they were not in a position to "comfort women" under the command system of Joseon at the time. In the early days of Imran, there was a chain of command that led to a conductor-prosecutor-observer (patrolman) with non-byunsa as the highest organization, and there were two more above the field commander alone. Even if convenient work is done according to unwritten rules, the "privilege" can be exercised only when there is at least a patrolman or observer. Joseon's defense system, Jingwanje and Victory Strategy, are concepts of self-defense and joint defense, but...This was an angular unit, not a matter of overthrowing. That's why Kim Soo, a Gyeongsang auditor, sent Janggye to the court shortly after the war broke out to ask for support from Jeolla Jwasu-gun, and Yi Sun-shin also asked his direct supervisor, Lee Gwang, about how to act. If there was no principle of "self-reliance" and "convenience worker" was applied indefinitely, Kim Soo, a current audit who had a day to regret, would not have to send a long line to mediation and wait for the answer. Pre-action reports are used only when small Japanese invasions occur, when local commanders conduct emergency defense operations, not when a large-scale war breaks out, as in Imran. As you can see in the DMZ's iron fence defense...In the same context, when we find enemy spies infiltrating or special forces crossing the ceasefire line, we take action beforehand and report candidates. Even though North Korean commandos are crossing the fence, if they report to the division and wait for orders to take action, they will be destroyed by the commandos. In the early days of the war, when only the naval forces of Gyeongsang-do could not stop the enemy, an official request for support was received from Gyeongsang-do, and according to the order system, Yi Sun-shin inquired about what to do with this request. That's because the situation at the time is a matter that should be discussed at a strategic level, not at a tactical level. This is because it is difficult to move the military at the discretion of the local naval commander at a time when the Gyeongsang naval forces have collapsed and the Japanese naval forces may attack Jeolla-do immediately. After receiving official letters from Jeolla-do and Gyeongsang-do, the naval forces decided that disturbing the rear area could affect the speed of Japanese troops advancing northward from the land. However, Admiral Yi Sun-shin revealed to the general that "it is difficult to handle at will because he is a single master, so he informed all of the circumstances of the war to Jeolla auditor Lee Kwang, defender Kwak Young, and (Jeolla) Byeongmajeoldosa Choi Won." In fact, the second dispatch after that was not the independent dispatch of Admiral Yi Sun-shin, but the purpose of keeping up with the pace as his superior, Jeolla auditor Lee Gwang, led Geunwang soldiers north to Hanyang. In addition, the third dispatch was also carried out as part of Jeolla-do's defense strategy as part of the Jeolla-do audit's defense strategy, showing that Admiral Yi Sun-shin is keeping pace with his direct superior, Jeolla-do's command. All of this series of processes remains in the official record. However, even this amount of discretion is gradually limited by the Joseon Dynasty, which has somewhat resolved the confusion of the initial consecutive losses. The Joseon Dynasty established a temporary position called Samdo Naval Controller to increase the efficiency of naval command by placing naval forces in Chungcheong, Jeolla, and Gyeongsang provinces under a single command system. As a result, the strategic differences between the naval controller, the non-debate, and the Dowon-su have led to the defeat of 7,000 ryang.

Dongmyeonggwan, the most beautiful guesthouse in Joseon.

 One of the guesthouses in the Seongcheon area of the Joseon Dynasty. Currently, most of the buildings have been burned down during the Korean War, and only stone pillars and foundations remain. This guesthouse was placed in a plane on a scenic spot facing the Daedong River, and there were Dongmyeonggwan, the main building, Tongseongwan, Yuseonggwan on the left and right, and Gangseonru, one of the eight scenic views of Gwanseo, to the north. Dongmyeonggwan, the central building, is said to have been named after the legend of King Dongmyeong, the founder of Goguryeo, as it was a magnificent, splendid place where envoys were greeted and held ceremonies. Gangseonru Pavilion is a pavilion, and it is worth representing Korea's pavilion in terms of delicate architectural style, colorful dancheong, structural members, skillful treatment of roofs and spaces, and harmony with the entire building. The Bangseonmun Gate has a double eaves, and the pillars are made of 10 outer pillars and both inner pillars, and floors are laid on the second floor. Sculptures such as lotus patterns, ear patterns, and flowerboards of Bangseonmun, the main gate of Dongmyeonggwan, are very excellent. The overall characteristics of Dongmyeonggwan include the dignified-looking gate and the small accommodation, which are properly structured according to the characteristics of each building. The article below is an excerpt from the Unification Information Newspaper, Seongcheon Guesthouse, located in Seongcheon-eup, Seongsan-gun, Pyeongannam-do, is the largest among the Risogi Guesthouse and has excellent architectural skills. Chairman Kim Il-sung, who has visited this place several times, taught that the Dongmyeonggwan in Seongcheon is the pride of our people and a famous cultural heritage that shows the long history and brilliant culture of our people. In this guesthouse in Risosigi, feudal officials and foreign envoys who came out on business trips to this local town stayed, and sometimes various ceremonies were held. It is written that this guesthouse was first built in 1343, rebuilt in 1613, and then repaired in 1766, which was burned again in 1766. Seongcheon Guesthouse was a large architectural group consisting of about 10 large and small buildings with 337 buildings, including Tongseon-gwan, Ryuseon-gwan, and Gangseon-ru, Bongnae-gak, Twelve-ru, and Concentrator built at the foot of the Biryu River, centering on Dongmyeonggwan, the main building. This guesthouse was often called Dongmyeonggwan after the main building, and as the main pavilion said, it was also called Gangseonru. The names of Dongmyeonggwan and Biryu River were all derived from the Goguryeo Dongmyeongwangjeonseong Fortress. Dongmyeonggwan is the largest and most colorful building of Seongcheon Guesthouse, where foreign envoys were greeted or sent. It is a three-winged cabae house with a verandah between the front three bays and the side five bays standing on a low axis. From beams to rafters of liquid rooms, the interior and exterior of the building were decorated with silk patterns, and dragons, birds, and flowers were also drawn in the attached drawings. Gangseonnu Pavilion was used as a banquet hall for envoys. It is a two-story pavilion with 7 bays in front space and 5 bays in side space (west) and has a wide width to form a T-shaped plane for convenience for many people to gather. A stone pillar was supported on the lower floor, a wooden pillar was erected on the upper floor, and a three-winged Gongdugong was placed on top of it and a Hapgak roof was covered. Gangseonnu Pavilion is representative of Korea's Rujeong architecture at that time with its colorful dancheong decoration, delicate architectural sculptures, and skillful treatment of various architectural elements. In particular, the appearance of casting a shadow on the river in harmony with the clear blue Biryu River flowing under the feet is more beautiful, and Gangseonru has long been regarded as one of the eight scenic spots of Gwanseo. Seongcheon Guesthouse was severely damaged by the failure to manufacture equipment for the last National Liberation War, but it was restored by the Republican government's policy of preserving relics for reasons of force. Below are the pictures of Dongmyeonggwan that were beautiful...  The building on the left is Gangseonru, and the building on the right is the 12th floor.  It's the part of Gangseonnu Pavilion in Gangseo Palgyeongdochop.  It is believed to have been restored in North Korea. To be honest, I doubt this picture is correct. The story of restoration in North Korea went viral on the web. I have some doubts about this picture. Even if it's not Gangseonnu Pavilion, there's a possibility that it's an annex to Dongmyeonggwan.

humanism for a combative national spirit

 humanism for a combative national spirit 

1. If you really want to accomplish something, you must be more sincere than anything else. To be true means to know exactly what you are doing and what you mean, not to deceive yourself, and to be thoroughly wary of these things, whether they are white lies, myths, or any delusions that are out of reality, and to love only the truth. Many people say they know what they are doing. However, most of them are actually not sure what they mean by what they do. For example, when you hear environmental protection propaganda saying, "Don't throw trash recklessly on the street, make sure to put it in a trash can, it nods that it is a good thing, but when you turn around, you throw away your snacks or food waste recklessly. When they point out something like this, they don't care about it and say it like it's annoying. Why, then, did they not act in accordance with their actions, considering that environmental propaganda was right? The first reason is that they themselves do not know the real reason for accepting environmental propaganda. They don't see it as a matter of urgency to themselves in that bottom of their hearts. It's bad to destroy the environment. You can only understand this information in your head, but you can protect the environment in many places! He cries out for environmental protection, but it is because he has not experienced the harmful effects of environmental protection himself. The second reason, the reason why I feel that the argument is certain even though I have not experienced it, is that I think I don't need to know such things in detail in my mind, and at the same time, I think I do, too. If you think it's not the case, it means that you're out of the group because of a sense of alienation. In the end, if everyone thinks so, of course, the group's argument is right in order not to deviate from the group. Their characteristics like this can never find the truth. Because, as you know, they have a strong collective nature, and if they act with different thoughts, they stand out and there is a kind of repression that necessarily leads to repression. Therefore, they have no choice but to be swayed by groups with a small number of powers. A small number of power groups, who are aware of their characteristics of not being able to create their own creative expressions because they try to belong to a group, make them more foolish, create things they like to achieve their own interests, and instill false concepts. It is the so-called popular culture, media, and religion that created this. Don't be swayed by them. They are not interested in making a society more combative than it is now, even if they think about leading the public. In particular, even though our national spirit is almost devastated and the future is so unstable. All of these causes came from the public themselves. Until now, the public has created, supported, and swayed leaders to realize their desires, but the future must create a society of people who are collective and have the nature of expressing individual creative thinking. In order to create such a society, we need a hero who can break down the false concepts created by influential groups and leaders, be prepared to break away from the group, and deliver the truth to the public. This hero is an unprecedented human being who deviates from the dichotomous structural concept of good and evil, God and religion. 2. (1) Distribute historical books to libraries across the country. (2) An organization will be established and the organization will carry out a movement to protect historical sites. (3) Promote the importance of history and the importance of national spirit.

Battle for the initiative of Buddhist leadership and non-Buddhist leadership caused by Syngman

 The "talk" suddenly announced by President Rhee Syng-man one day drove the Buddhist world into a state of turmoil. In Buddhist terms, it was a mess. On May 20, 1954, more than a year after the Korean War stopped, President Lee issued a speech that was like a bolt out of the blue to Thatcherites through the Public Information Service. It was about "Many monks currently have wives, so these monks should step down." On November 4, the second discourse was also announced, saying, "Let's abandon the Japanese-style Buddhist hall and use the tradition of Korean Buddhism to repair and retain the hallways of each ruined temple." As if waiting for President Lee's statement to come out, non-old monks all agreed. In a statement, "The Korean Buddhist community should clean up the corrupt current state and return to the original position of Buddhism," he criticizing Thatcher. At that time, the so-called Japanese-style Buddhist view was deeply rooted in the Buddhist world that monks could cope with it, have children, and devote themselves to Buddhism even while living. Most monks were so immersed in secularization that it was considered common for them to have a wife, a child, and sometimes a hobby of meat and drinking. For the few non-gusheng monks who had left the world and devoted themselves to the capital while protecting celibacy in the barren mountains, the Thatcher monks seemed nothing but an act of apostasy that forgot the truth of Pagyeyo Buddha. During the Japanese colonial period, the Japanese Government-General of Korea recommended the tendency of coping to monks so that they did not have a spirit of resistance such as national consciousness as they were immersed in secularization. Therefore, during the Japanese colonial period, the Thatcherite side took the lead in the Buddhist world. Thatcher Seungdan, who actively cooperated with the Japanese Government-General, quickly changed to a signboard called the Korean Buddhist General Staff along with liberation and still exercised his right to speak in the process of founding the country as a leading force in the Korean Buddhist community. In South Korea, more than 90% of temples were in the hands of Thatcher monks, and most of the executives participating in the organization and operation of Buddhist-related organizations were also Thatcher monks. Specifically, there were about 3,000 Thatcher monks and 300 Buddhist monks, leading the Buddhist world with a 10-fold advantage. Following the Japanese colonial era, Buddhist monks were still overwhelmed by the power of Thatcher monks in the liberation space, and only memorized Buddhist purification like a Buddhist prayer. In this situation, President Lee's discourse on purification of Buddhism was like meeting Buddha in purgatory for non-gusung monks. The non-old monks immediately took action. On Nov. 14, about 100 non-gusung representatives held the Thatcher Victory Land Competition at Taego Temple in Seoul. They defined Thatcher as a "mangdong that goes against the truth of Buddhism," and came to a strong resolution to expel Thatcher monks from the Buddhist purification movement if they did not respond to the Buddhist purification movement. A week later, Minister of Culture and Education Lee Sun-geun said, "Buddhism purification will be rational, but the government will not force it," and added, "But Thatcher's bad customs are a remnant of Japanese colonial rule, so it would be better to clean up the Buddhist world." Following President Lee's statement, Thatcher's side showed no response. The strong provocation of the non-ball team was also a misrepresentation. President Lee announced his third statement on Nov. 19. "The purification of Buddhism will be resolved if it is resolved in a reasonable manner, and when Japanese-style people are trying to rebel and argue, the government will abandon the policy of rational resolution and implement it in principle." As the coping monks did not respond to the government's repeated statements, non-old monks took action. First of all, the name of Taegosa Temple located in Susong-dong, Seoul, was changed to a sign called Jogyesa Temple. Then the Thatcher monks put up the Taegosa sign again. In this way, both sides repeatedly took off the signboard and hung it again several times. It was like a kind of "four-bar fight" ahead of the fierce battle. ◇ A collective scuffle between Thatcher and non-old monks ◇ Finally, a fierce battle took place. On the morning of Dec. 25, when the Thatcher monks were holding a rally at Taegosa Temple to discuss pending issues and reorganization of executives, the impatient non-religious monks stormed into the conference hall, demanding that "Daecheos step down from Taegosa Temple immediately and hand over all Buddhist affairs to non- After liberation, the Buddhist community's first scuffle. A married Buddhist priest as a disturbance, Seven people were injured and taken to hospital. Is a Buddhist priest had finally subsided by the to a married Buddhist priest offered dialogue and compromise. Rev both sides and sandals on December 7 representatives gathered together broke up without any progress with representative government to try to find a solution, but representatives of the problem. A Buddhist monk when talks broke down both sides to convene a group of Rev, but coping with their third national championship to the fur fly by interfering with it, and a Buddhist monk is not Buddhism will happen after that way, the group came to a vote of his convictions to martyrdom. Things went from bad to worse when the two education, the Home Office Minister Thatcher, a Buddhist monk held a joint conference with adjustments to the arguments on both sides at odds with each other was jumping to conclusions. The president's fourth statement said. The point is “are working on a peaceful settlement of the Buddhist community cleanup for the nomination or not, and each inspection to be penitent for one´s wife and concubine and to the vote that were before and during, and Away with you!”. The president was heavily tilted in to a Buddhist priest. As the president's repeated statement, government conflicts between the two sides in the coordination of day went off. Not a single day passes quietly in a fight to the Buddha than Buddha Scathing criticism of the people were not heeded. This time, came in strong position to cope with. On January 5, a married Buddhist priest, 1955, Anam-dong Gaeun missionary work, occupying the Seoul contest. In the main competition to have a place as the siege of a Buddhist monk is what they had not been changed. Earlier, a Buddhist monk shingle is enshrined at Taegosa Temple in central source of the Jogye Order and occupied the temple. Main occupation over both sides of the fall to smart fisticuffs and chianguk a Buddhist monk also deposed. ◇The leaders of both sides filed a lawsuit against Kim Beop-rin and Choi Bum-sul, the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, asking the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency to punish them for embezzlement. In response, Thatcher filed a lawsuit with the Seoul District Prosecutors' Office on charges of illegally invading non-Gu Seung CEO Lee Chung-dam Yoon Wol-ha in the Taegosa Office. On January 26, the Ministry of Education called in representatives from both sides to form a Buddhist purification committee to present six provisions prepared by the government, but the meeting became a "Doroamitabha" due to more intense confrontation and personal attacks. The probationary proposal proposed by the Ministry of Education was to form a Buddhist purification countermeasure committee by selecting 10 monks, each of whom was in a relatively neutral position, who had not been at the forefront due to the Buddhist purification problem. The two sides failed to reach a compromise due to abusive language and scuffle. At that time, about 40 non-gooseungs gathered at Seonhakwon in Jongno, Seoul, flocked to the Minister of Education's office on Jan. 29 and protested, saying that the Ministry of Education was turning a blind eye to the president's spirit of youth. Recognizing that endless confrontation and physical force could not solve the problem, the two sides submitted a list of probation members. The Thatcher side was Lim Seok-jin, Jeong Bong, Kim Sang-ho, Park Seo-gak, and the non-gu side was Lee Chung-dam, Yoon Wol-ha, Lee Hyo-bong, and Son Kyung-san. While submitting the list, Thatcher stated that they are the legitimacy of Buddhism, saying, "Even if the body manages tax, it is a monk who thinks of illegality with his heart." This counterattacked the orthodox theory of non-gu that "only those who are single and practiced in monasteries can become monks." On February 4, the representatives of the two sides discussed the qualifications of Buddhist purification at the Minister's Office, and stipulated that those who shave their heads as single monks, wear yam, are not disabled, and live in groups of three or more. However, the agreement caused a great deal of confusion in the process of executing front-line inspections. A collision between the two sides occurred at Dorisa Temple in Seonsan, Gyeongsangbuk-do, injuring nine non-gooseung, about 300 non-gooseung entered the fast at Jogyesa Temple in Seoul, and clashes between the two sides also broke out at Gaeunsa Temple. By the end of June, the Security Bureau ordered all the monks to leave the temple, and the government finally ruled in favor of the non-governmental district. In his fifth statement on June 16, President Lee ordered "Daechoseung to step down from the temple." In the early days of the founding of the country, the fierce battle between President Rhee Syng-man and Thatcher and Non-Gusung over the qualifications of monks and the liquidation of the remnants of pro-Japanese Buddhism developed like this way. It was an opportunity for Korean Buddhism to revisit the tradition of Buddhist monks. <Religious Newspaper>

I don't think the Japanese Warring States period was such a difficult time.

 Over the past 100 years during the Warring States period, the population has grown from about 6.5 million to 12.2 million.I thought it would be a little different from Joseon's peaceful times...I think it was a period of unexpected improvement. The opening of the Warring States Period - The Rebellion of the Middle Ages in Japan ended the politics of the Emperor and nobles, and samurai held the shogunate to rule. The Muromachi Shogunate of the Ashikaga family, the second shogunate in Japan, has already begun to lose power due to terminal symptoms. Nevertheless, politics celebrated the national treasury and announced the Deokjeongryeong several times, but it did not have much effect. First of all, among the three families of the Shogunate, the Hatakeyama and Shiba families, which are considered the prime ministers of the Shogunate, had internal strife and weakened their power. Only the Hosogawa family among the three government-controlled families became normal. On the other hand, among the four families of Akamatsu, Itshiki, Yamana, and Kyokoku, who took turns in criminal duties and security in Kyoto and abroad, Yamana became stronger, resulting in the appeal of the family and feud. (The Akamatsu family killed the Shogun, and the Yamanaga clan took over the Akamatsu family's territory.) In this situation, an inheritance fight broke out in the Hatakeyama family, one of the government officials, and Hosokawa and Yamana became completely estranged by supporting others. And this time, there was a battle of inheritance between the shogun's family. Yoshimi, the younger brother of Yoshimasa, the eighth shogun, and Yoshihisa, the late son of Tomiko Hino, the wife of Shogun, clashed, and Yoshihisa tried to kill Yoshimi. In response, influential defenders (local presidents) opposed it and brought troops to Seoul to fight against it. Eventually, the killing failed, but Kyoto still had troops. In January 1467, Hatakeyama's inheritance dispute broke out in Kyoto in an all-out war. This led to the beginning of Onin's In May, this expanded to a fight between Hosokawa and Yamanabe. 160,000 people from 24 countries in the East and 110,000 people from 20 countries in the West fought in Kyoto, turning Kyoto into ashes... The fight spread to the countryside during a series of ups and downs. In 1473, when Hosokawa Mochitoyo and Yamana Katsumoto, the leaders of both armies, died, the war became boring. When Yoshihisa's mother and son, who were in the Western Army, joined the Eastern Army, Yoshihimi, who was in the Eastern Army, was uncomfortable, and the purpose of the war became ambiguous, such as moving to the Western Army. The following year, Hosokawa and Yamana reconciled, and the remaining daimyo in 1477 also returned home in peace. This is how the 11-year war ends. The war was over, but the shogunate's power was extinguished. The Shogunate became a common daimyo that occupied only the Yamashiro Kingdom in Kyoto. The dissolution of shogunate power also affected the fate of the daimyo who were devastated by the war. It often happened that the guards who ruled England became the masters of England, and the guardians who were its agents or influential people in England became the masters of England. This marks the beginning of the Warring States Period.