Gyeongju is the capital of Silla? Who said that?

 Currently, Gyeongju, Gyeongsang-do, is called Seoul of Silla. As evidence, there are numerous royal tombs in Gyeongju, Bulguksa Temple, Tohamsan Mountain, and various relics. Referring to the Silla royal tomb, it is said whose royal tomb it is, but there are no dolmens or monuments that tell us whose tomb it is. There is a record that Taejo Wang Geon designated Silla as Gyeongju, but there is no record that Silla's Seoul was Gyeongju. Nevertheless, we know that Seoul in Silla has become Gyeongju.        In Gyeongju, Gyeongsang-do, the royal tomb of Silla has no stone at all. What we know about Cheonmachong Tomb and Geumgwanchong Tomb is that there is a picture of a thousand horses in Geumgwanchong Tomb and a horse belly ring, and Cheonmachong Tomb. How come there is no earthly stone that tells the owner of the tomb? In the past (after 1911 by the Japanese colonial rule), the elderly in the region said that it was a fake tomb (fake tomb) not to be dug. However, after excavation, relics are found, but...So, it is the current Gyeongju that they made by raising the burial mound again. That's because it was unimaginable until the Joseon Dynasty, or even to this day, to damage the tomb.       Some of the royal tombs in Gyeongju can be stolen, and there are many that have not been stolen, but even if they are stolen, they don't take gold or stone monuments that cost less money. It's because it's heavy and easy to get caught while carrying it.It is a strange relic that the thieves in Gyeongju took all the stone-shaped stones and left the gold-paste intact. Strangely enough, there is no groundwork that informs the status of the tomb owner.      Also, at that time, the tombs of the gods, princesses, and princes of the time were built around the royal tomb, but there was no tomb in Gyeongju, and the royal tomb was right next to the royal tomb. Academia claims that the shipgun next to it was probably stolen and disappeared. However, compared to the royal tomb, there is something worthwhile in the royal tomb. How much would it be in the shipgun? The explanation that the royal tomb, which is money-making, was not robbed, but only Jangsang's tomb seems clumsy.      It is said that Tohamsan Mountain is in Gyeongju, and as mentioned in astronomical evidence earlier, Tohamsan Mountain has a record of volcanic eruptions during King Muyeol's reign, but now Tohamsan Mountain is made of granite and basalt is not visible. Also, there is no record that Tohamsan Mountain is in Silla or Gyeongju. If it were in Seoul, Silla, when Tohamsan Mountain exploded, quite a few people would have been damaged.      The Samguksa Temple, where we learn to be the Bando Academy in the center of Silla, records the location of the Silla royal tomb, but strangely, we can't find all the royal tombs with the location recorded. Queen Seondeok records that the tomb is located on the mountain behind Cheonrimsa Temple at the top of Nangsan Mountain, but we don't know which mountain it is, and the Sanggosa Society found Cheonrimsa Temple, which still remains on the continent, and took a photo proving that there was an ancient tomb at the top of Nangsan Mountain behind it. However, the tomb was dug up by the authorities and now only the remains remain. Where was Silla? (Refer to Lee Jung-jae's book titled Rediscovery of Sanggosa Temple) It is said that there is the tomb of General Kim Yu-sin of Silla in Gyeongju, so where did the tombs of numerous other generals go? General Kim Yu-shin wasn't the only one.Where did the numerous royal tombs go?      Most importantly, if the capital of Silla is Gyeongju, of course, the royal palace site should be found. It is said that Hwangnyongsa Temple was located in the south of Gyeongju's royal palace, which was Seoul for a thousand years in Silla. Hwangnyongsa Temple Site has been excavated. The reason is that Gyeongju is Seoul of Silla, and that is Hwangnyongsa Temple Site because we found a large temple site in Gyeongju. If so, just north of that, there was the royal palace of Silla, the thousand-year-old king, but there is no news that it has been excavated. Of course, it may have been destroyed by countless wars, but there is no such record. Also, even if it is destroyed, the foundation stone should remain, but there is no foundation stone left. Although Silla believed in Buddhism at the time, was Hwangnyongsa Temple larger than the imperial palace? Of course, it could have been big, but what's important is where the palace has been for 1,000 years? Even if the building is destroyed, it doesn't take all the foundation stones, right? However, it is also clumsy to say that the place where no foundation stone came out was the place where the royal palace of Silla was located.  Is it really the capital of Silla or does he want it to be? Just because it's an excavation, it's a stone knife or jar on the air, not an object used in the royal palace.       The same goes for neither Baekje's Seoul nor Goguryeo's Seoul. How come all of our ancient capital were built without foundation stones? Are you really grateful to the Japanese who said Gyeongju is Silla's Seoul?