If you're Korean, you should watch it. "See China properly"

 China's own history is very complicated and has a lot of ethnicity mixed in. There is a tradition (Confucianism's "Spring and Autumn Writing Act") that has historically pursued the Chinese people's first principle of "Mohwa ideology" and does not hesitate to distort history if necessary. Therefore, if you try to confront China's view of history only logically and physically, you will fall into chaos. China was originally a country created by the fusion of more than 6,500 ethnic groups or tribes. Moreover, among the history of China, No. 5, 16 countries, Gold, Yo, Won, and Qing, were created by the conquest of the Han Chinese, the original ethnic group of China. Rather than being colonized like Korea, it was completely destroyed and absorbed, but it is argued that it has absorbed other peoples through the absorption of a large population and "cultural" to this day. In fact, Yo was able to destroy Songyi, a Han Chinese state, after a struggle, and gold and silver were destroyed by Won, and Won was also withdrawn by the Han Chinese state because of its excessively expanded territory. However, the problem is 'Cheong'. Cheong, a descendant of gold and founded by the Yeojin people, is a dynasty that has expanded the landscape of the territory that is currently a map of China to the fullest. The Chinese Han Chinese have no history of taking over the northern part. I just repeatedly lost. For example, Han Go-jo lost to the northern Sunwoo people and sent the princess as a hostage, or Myeongjo Civilogbo Byeon (the Great Emperor was killed and the emperor was taken prisoner), and it was the Manchurian Palgi Army of the Qing and Manchurians that created the current Chinese territory. For the first time, Palgi-gun occupied Mongolia's mainland, pioneered northwest areas such as the Singang and Cheonghae, and was originally Manchuria, so Manchuria was incorporated into Chinese territory for the first time. In other words, China currently has a large land as a fisherman by the Manchurians who despised orangkara. It is no exaggeration to say that among the large lands in China, the land originally owned by the Chinese was only one-third of the territory now, and the rest were mostly obtained by immigrants. Moreover, the Han Chinese are the country that took the lead in suppressing minorities. Thirty years after the Chinese Cultural Revolution, 3,000 ethnic minorities were wiped out and 2,000 independent languages were killed. Of course, we use minority harmonization measures now, but we only insist on the theory of absorption by the Han Chinese. (especially in the 50s, they invaded Tibet, which had no force at all, and forcibly occupied it.) That's why the Dalai Lama is still wandering abroad and appealing.) China's view of history should be grasped under this stance. China is currently too wide and too many ethnic minorities live in a mixture. If they advocate nationalism or voice independence under the stimulus of divided Russia, China will be torn apart. To this end, China has to create a view of history or values that can unite and think of various ethnic groups by accepting the Spring and Autumn Pillegic idea of "fixing history if it is advantageous to us." First of all, it is a concept of a homeland, but in short, the Chinese military view is a sham that has no origin. Their concept is, "All the countries that were in the current Chinese land are China." Their basis, that is, "China is a mixed country with a large number of ethnic groups." Therefore, no matter what land a tribe has lived in since ancient times, it is now mixed with our China. Therefore, the person who lived there before can be regarded as Chinese, and the country was a subordinate country of China. In one word, it's ridiculous, right? But Chinese scholars push this as a pledge. Logical persuasion rarely works. Because we firmly grasp the concept, we only stop talking about useless principles, and it is impossible to persuade with a normal logical method. It is a yard that fundamentally sets the fundamental concept differently, so other measures are needed. This concept is currently the owner of Israel (2000), driving out the person who came to Palestine after wandering around, right? It's the same thing as the disgusting people:) It's a barbaric way of thinking that can only be found in the book. Currently, the problematic Northeast process is based on this foundation. There are two troublesome ethnic groups on the Chinese side, one in Mongolia and one in Korea. Why? It was only the Mongolians who remained independent of gold, yo, won, and Cheong, which had been a problem in their history. And Manchuria (a very important land) they occupy now. Although China is wide, Manchuria is the most economically important and valuable land in the past.) It was our people who were not absorbed by the Han Chinese, but still live with their own country. This could be a fatal blow to the pride of Asia's best, and even the world's best, which they use as a basis and proudly boast, and unintentionally play a role in making it to divide China. "Everyone is Chinese, everyone is Chinese history," and we are trying to absorb, integrate, and maintain many races as one, but like a thorn stuck in our throat, our country lives in its own way and has a historical consciousness, which makes us feel frustrated. That's why China is trying to exterminate ancient history altogether. It's no different from Japan's attempt to exterminate history, which honestly only doesn't bleed, but it's like a declaration of war. In addition, China, which is occupying Tibet with force, needs an excuse to justify this. Therefore, he may be planning a hideous scheme with the Russian occupation in mind, which is splitting further with the Tibetan issue in mind. The level of our historical scholars who are memorizing the pathetic public fire must have greatly supported this. I know that China is difficult and difficult, but can't it make our history? Nevertheless, the sound "Koguryo cannot be seen as our national history" or the sea is a world where humans are raised as professors, and those people put strength on their necks. China clearly puts forward the Northeast process based on necessity, which is not only related to Goguryeo, but also part of a hegemony policy aimed at absorbing and integrating Asia. Although relations with China have improved recently, we should never let our guard down, and we should recognize that this is almost a declaration of war. If left untouched, not only will the history fall, but also the nature of the nation will be buried and suffocated by China, and China will be the only one in Asia. If talented scholars can't do it, it is essential to recognize and strive for these things even in the public good. China's false view of history first and clumsy "integrationism" are directly rejected by global trends, and are extremely dangerous and aggressive views. Moreover, it is a cleverly manipulated cadastral view that confuses the basic concept itself and makes it impossible to proceed logically and peacefully. It is important to keep in mind that applying academic conscience or its techniques is a logical trap that has been manipulated from the beginning, causing you to complain about public offering and then fail to reach a conclusion. In order to accurately recognize and prevent this, I think it is absolutely impossible at the level of historians (living in the right taste). Fortunately, there are many movements, and it seems that there is only a way to deal with this greatly and deal with it with the power of the people. I hope this article will be widely spread all over the place, and if possible, China's black thoughts will be known all over the place. I hope that everyone will live peacefully and get rid of the state's claim that they will live only as a companion living in modern times, not China. - Hyuk - I have to focus on writing 8 books on August 28, 2004, but I wrote a lot of answers today (about 80...) What do you mean bang-tong or courtroom? Come to think of it, Chinese people... ^^) It's a little bitter because it feels a little damaged. These days, you can feel that anti-China sentiment is deteriorating as much as anti-Japanese and anti-American sentiment due to soccer and Northeast processes. By the way, there's a story that one of my juniors told me before. He said he heard this while studying in the U.S., and an American friend said it. "You Koreans, you're amazing. You have a lot of pride while being sandwiched between powerhouses such as China, the United States, Japan, and Russia. It seems that everyone but the people in your country doesn't even treat them as people. Chinese are swarms or shanks, Japanese are Japanese are Japanese, Americans are Yankees, Yangnoms, and blacks are black. There seems to be no people treated properly at all. Korean pride is really great." It may not have been literally translated because it's an old story, and the person involved in the story is also a person who returns to Korea and lectures at a university, so I'm embarrassed if it's wrong, but it's clear that it's similar. I sometimes talk about this with my wife. When I talk about the pride of our people, my wife talks about "first-classism" that prevails throughout Korea. And then we talk about this. I don't think I can. He said he couldn't have lived at all except for the first place to live around the strongest people, so he naturally tried to be strong and good-looking regardless of who comes first, and he seems to have gone beyond a system or something like that. It seemed like something that I could relate to a lot. The beginning was long, but I posted a brief article about the Northeast Process last time, so I'm going to talk about China that I know. It's comfortable, but in many ways. First of all, historically, I think China is our potential No. 1. There seems to be a lot of buffering because North Korea is stuck in the middle, and there are many people who think that China is very close because it is open and people come and go and do business. I don't think that's the case. Of course, I have feelings for the Chinese. I'm not trying to sell all of China. There is nothing to go far and discuss the heroes of the Three Kingdoms or scriptures, and I can't hate all of them just by the appearance of Chinese young people who simply give up their lives and shout during the Tiananmen crisis. The problem is, as always, the political system and the group on it. In particular, China has a large population and is a group that is difficult to control.