Individual opinions of members of the History Club - What is important in ancient national politics is not land, but dominance.

 Is it better if the land is bigger? Because it's convenient for military conscription? Because it's too many numbers? Unconditionally, tactics? The basis for claiming the three continental countries is based on a little bit on the basis of "a rich country only when the territory is large." What is important in ancient social politics is not land, but the power or influence of the country. In Asian countries, China (referring to the Chinese river) Whether the immigrants, Manchurians, or Han Chinese, or the world, they were called "emperor" with a developed culture, and all other races other than themselves were called orancae and despised (in the case of Han Chinese).Regardless of who the Manchurians are, the thoughts that they are the center of the world are all the same)China's meaning (which means a dynasty that blossomed in the Chinese continent no matter what ethnicity was founded) was the most influential in Asia. The northern people also admired and envied China, south of the Great Wall of China, so they invaded the continent and tried to establish a dynasty there. The Baekje Kingdom is weaker than China, but the land, which is the basis of the national power of ancient society, is inferior to China, so why would it bloom a maritime power and splendid culture? This is because they used ships well because they were along the sea and exerted influence on countries in the south and east (Japan). Their culture grew from just an ordinary "culture" to a country where their influence grew, and so did the culture.For example... Just as monster hunting becomes easier as you listen to games, culture grows and develops as the country's influence and national power grow)That's why it's praised as "a splendid Baekje culture." Many people seem to have the idea that it is unconditionally the best when the territory is large and the population is large. In that sense, no matter how wide Goguryeo's territory is, it would be as much as the territory of the Middle East.Please refrain from it) Many ethnic groups have long been pushing and sitting down, being chased again, chasing, and sitting down to become themselves to occupy the vast Jungwon continent. In conclusion, if the land is wide, sweet potatoes and Gojoseon are not very proud of our history with the elementary school-style mindset of Jangdan. Because they were all destroyed by the Chinese Dynasty and the river area was less than that of the Chinese Dynasty. Here, the Chinese Dynasty is the Chinese Dynasty with a unified social system.For example, su, su... Some of the people who only expect the hypothesis of continental Baekje to be proved may have the wrong way of thinking that "the vast land is a strong country." What's important is control and influence.It's not the floor area. Why are various nomadic peoples or settlement peoples in Manchuria, Siberia, or Mongolian grasslands afraid of Goguryeo or would you like to take them? Why would Balhae quickly occupy the vast territory of Manchuria and become a "Haedongseongguk"? Although it is said that Balhae grew up without much interference because the Tang Dynasty couldn't pay attention to Balhae due to the fight between the stone palace and Uigur (although it inherited the stone palace), gave up Andong Dohobu and gave up Balhae. It inherited Goguryeo and has many images of Goguryeo. Several countries that obeyed Goguryeo again served Balhae-guk, and eventually, it was possible to expand their territory in an instant. Goguryeo's influence and control over Northeast Asia and Mongolia was quite strong. It's possible. You don't have to draw a border and build a castle here, even if you don't insist that this is Goguryeo, this is our land. By making an expedition or sending troops to show off their dominance or influence to them, the land is naturally Goguryeo land. It's recognized. It's just that he doesn't show it. This is the fear of the influence of ancient society. There is no evidence (such as family name), so it will be marked as "omitted" in the record. If continental Baekje exists, it means that Baekje's influence and control on the land are crazy, not enough to draw a line and argue. No matter how hard you try to get out of the way of thinking, you can't completely get out of the theory of Gangdan History. However, no ancient country, including the Baekje Kingdom, would have drawn a line and this would not be our land. But... It's just an event of "Impact".