Is it a conspiracy to kill Mrs. Yuk Youngsoo?

 In 1974, Moon Se-kwang, a Korean-American in Japan, entered Korea disguisedly as a tourist. On August 15, entering the Liberation Day ceremony held at the National Theater, he failed to kill the gourd with a pistol, killing Mrs. Yuk Young-soo and arrested. He is said to have been sentenced to death on December 17 of that year and was executed three days later.    Moon Se-kwang is said to have previously received an order from the North to assassinate Park Tong after brainwashing operations on the Mangyeongbong Ship, which operates between Japan and North Korea. He is said to have stolen a gun from a Japanese police box. It is said that the gun and live ammunition were disassembled, hidden in the radio, passed through the airport, and entered the country. Meanwhile, when it was revealed that the Japanese were involved in creating Moon Se-kwang's counterfeit passport, public anger arose. Anti-Japanese sentiment occurred, saying, "How did the Japanese police manage guns and immigration?" Accordingly, Japan also sent an apology envoy.    Mrs. Yuk's funeral was held magnificently. After that, Park Geun Hye took on the role of the first lady. ********************************************************************    This is the truth of the attempted shooting of the president on Liberation Day in 1974 and the murder of the first lady. However, there are dubious secrets and questionable corners here. One of the people who raised this question was Kim Hyung-wook, a former head of the Central Intelligence Agency (the early central government head of Park Tong, the third-term constitutional amendment, the Korea-Japan talks, the organization of the soccer team, and the Silmido unit. During the Yushin period, I was abandoned by Baktong and went to the United States in anger. And there, he was hated by the government for his anti-counterfeiting activities. After a mysterious disappearance while traveling to France in early October 1979, he is still in a state of mystery. He wrote a memoir exposing Park Tong's corruption.   As a former middleman, I will write Kim Hyung-wook's analysis, other figures' analysis, and each counterargument and re-argument (or re-argument) side by side. Question 1) North Korea is never a group to do such a ridiculous thing--No matter how belligerent North Korea is, they are not the ones to do anything that will lead to war. They have brains, too. Just in time, there was an inter-Korean Red Cross meeting at Panmunjom. Killing the president during peace talks? Suspicious. > Objection: North Korea is originally a two-sided tactic before the war. Terrorism is also carried out during the talks. And North Korean hard-liners, who are blinded by some performances, may have done whatever they want. Question 2) The process of Moon Se-kwang's acquisition of weapons--Moon Se-kwang is said to have stolen weapons from a police box in Japan. Japanese police security is world-class, is that possible?  The explanation of this direction, that is, the Japanese police's gun theft, is insufficient in many ways. Also, if North Korea brainwashed its agents, they would provide some pistols, why do they want us to steal them from the Japanese police? As a result of the on-site photo analysis at the time, some question whether Moon Se-kwang's gun model was a Japanese police gun (History Criticism, Summer Issue 1991) > Counterargument: There are times when global police make mistakes. The Japanese police's explanation for the loss of guns is insufficient because they are ashamed of the Japanese children and do not say the results of their own audits. But... I don't know why North Korea didn't provide handguns... (Even if it was part of the hard-line faction, it would be difficult to get some handguns) 3) Moon Se-kwang's entry process--In the Yushin era, the whole country passes through Gimpo Airport with weapons? What's more, it doesn't take from Japan Airport and Gimpo Airport? And no matter how much you disassemble the gun and hide it on the radio, it's detected with a rudimentary X-ray. And will all the gun parts go into the radio? Well, old radio shows can be done because they're big.   >Counterclaim: At that time, the search system at Gimpo Airport was surprisingly poor. In the past, there were cases in which workers dispatched to the Middle East or Powell soldiers secretly smuggled from the airport on their way home and succeeded.   >>Rebuttal: So, how did Japan's airport, which boasts the world's best security, pass? Question 4) After Moon Se-kwang entered the country, Moon Se-kwang stayed at the Chosun Hotel for nine days until the day of the crime (enjoying various tours at this time), and on that day, he wrote an article using a Ford rental car and went to the National Theater. He gave the driver 10,000 won (7,000 won for an island of rice at the time) as a tip. Where did you get all this money? In other words, what is the source of the crime funds? (And there was a witness to the Ford rental car and vehicle number that Moon Se-kwang took, so the police inquired and found that there was no number.) Forged license plate?......Monthly Bridge 89 Years Interview with Inspector Lee) > Objection: North Korean kids must have given the money. And at that time, there were illegal drivers around luxury hotels using rental cars.Probably a fake license plate >> Re-argument: Why was the investigation into this money line insufficient? If I investigate money, I can be a spy active in Korea-Japan. There is still a lack of explanation for the problem of giving money. Question 5) The process of Moon Se-kwang entering the National Theater-- Moon Se-kwang said in Japanese, "I came from the Japanese Embassy," when he bumped into a bodyguard in the lobby. Bodyguards can't understand this well and just pass. Then, I watched the president's position in the lobby. But this can't exist! No one should stand in the lobby area where the president will pass when the presidential car No. 1 arrives at the entrance of the theater. Why was he able to stand in the lobby? In other words, who was the bodyguard who allowed him to stand where he should not be approached? It is said that Moon Se-kwang initially tried to shoot when the president entered in the lobby, but quit and entered the room. Moon Se-kwang entered the theater in a vague way, speaking in Japanese when entering the room, saying, "There is someone who allowed access from inside" (in Japanese). He didn't even have a pass, but he went in. Also, the seats at the National Theater at the time were strictly designated for security reasons, but Moon Se-kwang, who was not invited, sat anywhere, but no one said anything?   >Counterclaim: As internal and external public opinion on Yushin at the time deteriorated, Park Tong said, "Tomorrow's Liberation Day security is a little spacious. Not authoritative. Especially in front of diplomats,' he ordered. Since Moon Se-kwang travels in a luxury foreign car while speaking Japanese, the bodyguards naturally knew him as a Japanese diplomat and did not touch him much. That's why I didn't care about the pass, and the bodyguards didn't know Japanese, so what's important to understand is that "there's someone inside who allowed me to enter."   >> Re-argument: Hey, but do you know this?" We don't invite Japanese diplomats on Liberation Day! "  Wouldn't that be obvious? But do security guards pass the Japanese speaker?   >>>> Re-rejection: So, the bodyguards would have thought of him as a special invited Korean-Japanese businessman or a second-generation Korean-Japanese teacher. Korean-Japanese businessmen were the main source of money for Park Chung-hee's development policy, and Park Tong had to thank them in his inaugural speech. Question 6) Moon Se-kwang's shooting technique--Park Tong's speech began shortly after, Moon Se-kwang tried to stand up by taking out the pistol he put in his pants pocket, but he fired with a pistol still in his pants pocket and hit his thigh. So I limped and ran forward and went wild. He's the killer with this silly shooting skill?   >Counterclaim: (Lack of explanation) Question 7) The police who stayed still--Police were sitting in the aisle seat, and Moon Se-kwang ran past at least seven police officers. In other words, there was no police officer who "captured" a gunman who stood up suddenly. Moon Se-kwang is an employee of a tax office who first attacked him.   >Counterclaim: This is the result of the public official's unique sense of insolvency and transfer of responsibility. When a joint operation between the Blue House security office and the police took place under Yushin's rule, the police were simply in a hurry. So it is no exaggeration to say that the police at the ceremony at the time were also for decoration. Most of the police seem to have had a consciousness that "the bodyguards will come forward if anything happens." Question 8) The criminal was executed three days after the judgment was finalized in the Supreme Court. Isn't it too fast?   >Counterclaim: That's possible. Question 9) Investigation--The empirical evidence in the investigation of this case is Moon Se-kwang's gun and his travel package. Most of the investigations were conducted only by Moon Se-kwang's confession. We need more evidence reinforcement, but there was no such thing. In addition, South Korea's top CSI expert, Superintendent Seoul Kyung Lee, went on an on-site inspection at the National Theater, but it was difficult to investigate the evidence (Monthly interview 89) > Argument: Moon Se-kwang's house in Japan. 10 Japanese police also searched for Moon Se-kwang's house. Oh, my. A killer who's leaving for big trouble leaves his own traces?   >Counterclaim: North Korea must have hired amateurs for some reason. Question 11) Moon Se-kwang's past -- whether Moon Se-kwang is really pro-North Korean seems to lack evidence except for his confession. However, Kim Hyung-wook says that he was a member of the Kim Dae Jung Life Movement Group during the Kim Dae Jung kidnapping incident in the past. In addition, Moon Se-kwang suddenly spent money on the theme of unemployment from about a year before the incident. Where did you get the money? Question 12) The government's attitude--Inter-Korean Red Cross talks continued. At the September meeting, the South protested recklessly to the North (the North, of course, pretending not to know) and was discussing a reunion plan for separated families in October, as if it had ever been... Can we talk smoothly with the forces that ordered the first lady to be killed? Question 13) Lack of empirical analysis--there is no confirmation that the bullet hit by Mrs. Yuk has really gone out of Moon Se-kwang's gun. I don't think I've done a ballistic test. If the CSI team sees it, it'll be sad. In addition, some said that Mrs. Yuk's through-sang was the opposite of the bullet direction. In addition, when Lee Gyeong-gam visited doctors at Seoul National University Hospital, everyone avoided answering when asked about the direction of ballistic.   >Counterclaim: At the time, of course, I would have thought that the bullet was Moon Se-kwang's, so I might have overlooked it. Question 14) Shooting 2--Did Moon Se-kwang, whose shooting skills are a mess, accurately fit Mrs. Yuk's head? With a pistol with a low hit rate?   >Counterclaim: Bullet has no eyes. Who knows if you shoot at yourself? Question 15) Park Geun-he visited Pyongyang in 2001... Did he go to the enemy country that killed his mother comfortably? That's weird. #Let's close the suspicions and look at the hypothesis next time #There are some possible deductions at the moment, and they are as follows. 1. The theory of intervention of North Korean owners: The theory currently recognized by history and official.

>Counterclaim: However, as seen in Part 1, there are many doubts. 2. Kim Dae Jung Revenge: The kidnapping of Kim Dae Jung took place in 1973, the year before the incident. At that time, the Kim Dae Jung Life Movement took place in Japan, and Moon Se-kwang also participated in it. Moon Se-kwang tried to kill Park Tong to revenge Kim Dae Jung. Here, I am not sure whether Moon Se-kwang's behavior is organized or personal.     Organizational, there are two possibilities: the Kim Dae Jung life organization's own help, the car Moon Se-kwang was vengeful, and the North approached and simply brainwashed. On the other hand, Moon Se-kwang said in his will, "I was deceived (by North Korea?), so there is a possibility that he is not a pro-North Korean in bone marrow, but simply a person who was deceived by North Korea.   Personally, it is explained that Moon Se-kwang prepared for the incident by stealing a gun from a Japanese police box and did insufficient things as a killer. However, if he did something personally, it is difficult to explain his "money line" problem.   In the theory of Kim Dae Jung revenge, it is peculiar that Kim Dae Jung did not know this inner story. In other words, the North-South Red Cross talks were held in Korea in 1974 when the subordinates took care of the lord's revenge without the lord knowing it. The heat at that time was great, so everyone was mistaken for unification. Therefore, some Japanese forces jealous of Korea becoming a power of unification infiltrated Moon Se-kwang. He committed the crime and made him confess to North Korea's fortune teller...   >Objection: The hope for unification at the time was only the illusion of ordinary people. If you are a proper politician, you will not think hastily that the Red Cross talks will be reunified immediately. Wouldn't Japanese far-right politicians have that much judgment?  And Park Jung-kwon was a regime with a "Korea-Japan connection" (see "Now I can say it") If he is the far-right of Japan, would he do such a thing? 4. Theory of self-cultivation (1): Relations between Korea and Japan cooled down when the Kim Dae Jung abduction occurred in 1973. In Japan, "How can Korean middlemen do such a thing by beating Japanese police officers with the best security power?" How can a sovereign state exercise public power in other countries without even realizing it? Violation of Japanese sovereignty!The public opinion of ' was infested. Korea is in a position where it can't say anything to Japan. However, when this incident broke out in 1974, the position was reversed. In other words, it is a self-made play by the Korean side to reverse Korea-Japan relations.   In fact, when anti-Japanese sentiment soared at the time, a demonstration took place in front of the Japanese Embassy, which had a similar atmosphere to the control demonstration. Cut your fingers and write a letter of blood, and a car owned by the Japanese Embassy burns... Think about it. In the days of Yushin, when the whole country became Byeonggukga, a demonstration in front of a foreign embassy (strict security)? It's not easy even these days. 5. Self-dramatic theory (2): There was this humor in the days of Park Tong. It is said that the main cause of the close-up match was the women's problem, that is, the affair of Baktong, not the fight with bare hands. In other words, Park Tong, who was annoyed by his wife, officially removed her to cheat on her in the future... Kim Hyung-wook's memoir suggests everywhere that Park Tong may have cheated on him. Park Tong's aides, who negotiated with Kim Hyung-wook to block the publication of Kim Hyung-wook's memoirs, also said, "Write a memoir if you will." However, Baktong Private Life was put forward as the last condition....6. Self-made drama (3): The kidnapping of Kim Dae Jung in 73 or the incident of Moon Se-kwang in 74 or the connection between Korea and Japan. The kidnapping of Kim Dae Jung in 73 sparked interest in democratization among ordinary people in Korea and Japan agreed and conducted by all high-ranking politicians and secret forces. Although it did not openly talk about democracy, interest has increased. In order to block this social atmosphere, he tried to create a public security bureau by causing this incident. Here, Park Tong decides to use Mrs. Yuk as a sacrifice hit. 8. Self-made drama theory (5): Note-- This is a witness story of Lee Gyeong-jang, who declared conscience in 1989, and a high-ranking official entered the theater with a recorder during an investigation at the National Theater. And to the prosecutor at the scene, "Have you seen such a rotten man?" Listen to this. NHK commentator said it was Hitler's arson of the National Assembly building (Hitler's self-made play to create a public security bureau) over this case! "It's just me," and the road was excited and ran wild. Within a few hours of the incident, how did NHK come up with such an explanation? And why was the high-ranking greeting so angry? 9. Self-made drama theory (6): It came out in the summer issue of 1991 when a police officer saw a strange person on the second floor of the National Theater at the time, and an old lady named "Cheong Wa Dae bodyguard's mother-in-law" said, "This person came to see a minister, so let him alone." Policeman...(It was possible because it was during the authoritarian regime...) Why aren't the police looking for this suspect? In addition, the 1991 Summer issue of Historical Criticism suggests that Jungjeong used and killed the unsavory Moon Se-gwang. 10. Self-made drama theory (7): After this incident, Japanese far-right politicians, who usually hate both second and third generations of Koreans, said, "Moon Se-kwang is a second-generation Korean-American, and he is practically"I'm sorry. I'm sorry." What is it????... A go-stop that the far-rightists of Korea and Japan who used the Korea-Japan connection all planned?   >Counterclaim: Then it becomes too big a conspiracy theory... Shouldn't the kidnapping of Kim Dae Jung in 73 be a conspiracy?    >Comprehensive counterargument of self-directed drama theory: (1) is also weak in persuasive when considering 'Korea-Japan connection'.    (2)Isn't that too much? No matter how bad you are, do you want to kill your wife?    (3)A huge conspiracy theory...(4) It seems plausible, but it is unreasonable that Park Tong decided to kill his wife himself. Park Geun Hye will make a fuss if he hears it. If this is true, all the children of Park Tong will commit suicide. Shocked. And the rumors of self-made drama are based on the regret of democratization activists. In other words, the public was raising interest in democracy by vaporizing the kidnapping of Kim Dae Jung at the time, and suddenly a public security bureau was created, raising rumors of self-composed drama with regret that the enthusiasm has subsided.   >>Re-Argument: In fact, the Yushin regime is a group of people who will carry out any kind of maneuvering or self-made plays, given that the people are a little interested in democratization. In addition, Park Tong is a villain who even his wife can bet on gambling.    On the other hand, First Lady was not the death penalty in the jajakkeuksseol and Korean CIA agents that he is alive somewhere and that the net it. First Lady was intelligence personnel that the reasoning he was safely got over the airport and the National Theatre and a big spender that persuasive support.      Living under the influence of drugs and bakjjiman the shocked to know the truth because ..... kulleok, and 'yuk, was exactly can you keep your hair? with a pistol a low accuracy rate' of the questions raised, that if this is carefully in the courtyard, connecting it to the case ...Mun Segwang rampage is not just people in Finned-Tube ceiling at the National Theatre, bullets and what actually kill Mrs. yuk siseonkkeul be hiding, but its Sniper rifle to shoot the noise a courtyard ...A gun is on the screen TV at the time that I have other at a time when it shifts it fall ... and Mrs. yuk ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- other -- May 1993, monthly to find a way of people in this case, and carried an article about a conspiracy theory. The families of the First Lady 'First Lady was not a criminal.' argue that but ...The haechan't read the original and I don't know. The book is not in the National Library ...But Naver search is being paid in academic papers, so I will never see huge back that there is a story According to my family, and, boy, First Lady was something more ...    Kim is 'I'm chief intelligence officer, that this is obviously something.' high emphasis on the memoir. Written on the actual churijung of democracy, while the rest of the reasoning of Kim Hyung-wook, the reasoning is 1, 2 and 3.   Bakssine children could learn something but it was unlikely and do know m very a roots and (father who killed my mom that ...) may keep mum. After all, the truth is nobody is unknown, historians and just have lots of questions to be recognized that 'North Korea sajuseol'.