Are the Huns Korean?

 Does the world recognize that the Huns are Korean? When I searched earlier, Atilla of the Huns was a Korean people.I was told. And it is said that the Huns are close to Gaya or Silla.And they said that they were one of the same people, including Goguryeo. But do you have any evidence? And is it recognized by Europe and the United States? I wonder if people around the world recognize it. Please reply in detail.^^ So far, it's someone's question and the best answer from the following article.It's a bit long. Hello, I'm a college student majoring in history. I happened to see this question, and I posted it because I felt sorry after reading the writings of other respondents. In fact, I recently made a presentation about the Huns. At that time, I had a lot of course. Nothing really has been revealed about the Huns. It hasn't been long since the study began. Not only historical materials, but also relics, ruins, tombs, and even materials about them were scarce or inaccurate, making it very difficult to study. I finished my presentation successfully by searching the Internet and various books, and through this presentation and study, I was able to see how much we had been tamed by Western perspectives and how prejudiced we were. I came to see the Huns from a new perspective. Of course, until I made this announcement, I didn't know anything about the Huns until I studied them, and I thought they were savages and really bad devils. However, as I read various books and collected materials, I realized how wrong I was. In fact, there are so many assignments and so many things to do that I tried not to answer them, but the prejudice brought by Western eyes is so angry that I want to write a few words down. It might be a bit long, but please read them all slowly.^-^;; First of all, the first thing you need to know is that there is no exact theory about the Huns. Since no exact evidence or evidence has been found in the numerous studies so far, we only speculate from the circumstances of the time, some artifacts discovered so far, and historical data described by Westerners. This is because, unfortunately, the Huns were a people without letters and could not record their history. We don't know their history from the eyes of the Huns. Please read the following sentences. "Dark skin color, two dark holes instead of eyes, a flat nose, and a face with a scar on its cheek were an unformed lump." -Joshimos, Greek historian, "Physically and mentally, they are disgusting." Their noses were shapeless, flat, and their cheekbones stood out. The eyelids of the two eyes are small, so that light can barely enter, but these penetrating eyes can see far away. Moreover, the faces of the baby swings made me shudder. The nostrils were wrapped around one string to fit the helmet's face. The mother deformed her son in this way for the war.……" - Sidonius Aporinaris, Bishop of Clermont, "He is small, but he has a very large, round head, and a wide face, with a wide cheekbone protruding out. All the hair was cut off and only the top of my head remained. The eyebrows are thick, the eyes are as intense as fire, and the eyes are slanted." - Samacheon (describing the scar) "The hearts of wild animals are beating in their hearts. Since ancient times, they have not been considered members of mankind." -One of the records of a court official in China is that of other countries against the Huns. Since the Huns had no written language, most of the people who left records of the Huns were invaded by the Huns. Therefore, it is highly likely that the remaining records are not fair and objective. They described the Huns from the cringing perspective of a very frightened man. The expression was exaggerated without restraint and tried to leave a bad impression on the enemy Huns. An example of Westerners' prejudice against the Huns based on these records is an animation called Mulan produced by Walt Disney in 1998. Did the questioner watch this movie? The Huns appear as Chinese enemies, the protagonists and good forces, and the Huns invade China simply because the Huns invade China. Throughout the screening time, the Huns torment, invade and destroy people for no reason, just like the cursed demons. They are also rough, violent, and even dark in color, even though they are Asian like China. Even to us, Asians, the Huns were perceived as having an abhorrent appearance and a wicked appearance. It can be seen that such Western prejudice against the Huns clearly symbolizes the mistakes of the history of settled civilization over the past thousand years. Western historians don't know much about the Huns, who had thrown the strongest nations of Asia and Europe into a state of fear. The biggest factor that made the nomadic identity uncertain was the religion of the Europeans, when the Romans were obsessed with apocalypse. He believed that Magok (a race that would bring an end to the world) in the Old Testament was a Hun people. The Romans believed that the Huns were an army sent by demons, so they considered the Huns as a nation without hometown, culture, or custom, so there was no need to study the origins of the Huns. Rome's most important source for the Huns is a Greek Roman historian named Ammyanus Markelinus, who wrote based solely on his own experience, and his writings appear to be an expression of fear for the ethnic group that destroyed his hometown of Antioch. For this reason, 1,500 years after the fall of the Huns, they have not been properly evaluated. However, they were not such anarchic and savage races as Westerners thought, but rather organized peoples with developed independent cultures. Many minorities formed a strictly hierarchical division of labor, and strict discipline dominated the courts of individual tribes where the empress independently exercised absolute control. The Huns were not just livestock or horse-riding diseases, and there were various jobs in their society. In addition, excavations of tombs that never fall apart compared to Orient's works of art in the ancient Persian Empire of a highly civilized country prove that they had a tendency to prefer display walls and decorations. From the records of the Greek Priscus, who once stayed in Attila's court as a member of the Eastern Roman mission, we can see the custom of the Huns, who were friendly and caring to guests. Then, let me introduce the origin theory of the Huns, which the questioner is curious about. There are five theories about the origin of the Huns that have changed with the times. At first, Westerners did not consider the Huns, one of the causes of the destruction of Rome, to be Asians, who caused the "great migration of the Germanic tribes." It was too hurt to admit that Rome, the root of Western culture, was destroyed by the Asians they now ignore so much. Thus, early Western scholars speculated that they were European nomads, or Scitaians. Of course I'm white. The Huns are known to be a very cruel people. The Scythians were no match for the Scythians were no match. I thought that these Scythians served as breakwaters to protect Europe from the Asians coming west. It is said that it was a savage and cruel people. However, as various artifacts were discovered and historical materials were accumulated in the course of the study, the Huns were presented as an undeniable and powerful theory that the Huns were Asian Huns. Of course, the names of the Huns and Huns are different, but the descriptions of them are similar in the East and West at the same time. Therefore, the Huns and Huns are now regarded as the same people. However, it seems that the prideful Westerners, the absolute Huns, could not be recognized as Asians, that is, yellow races. It seems to admit that their history was once dominated by barbarian Asians. They eventually came up with an exquisite compromise: the Huns, although they were Huns, are Turkic. Western scholars view the Turk as white, separating only the Turk from the Mongolian lineage. Therefore, it has been recognized as the most influential theory to date. In fact, if you search the Huns in the Naver encyclopedia, the Huns are said to be the Turkic nomadic people who lived in the steppe region of Central Asia in the "summary" section at the top. However, two powerful theories have recently been suggested. The first theory that emerged earlier in time was that the Huns were Mongolian. It presented two conclusive grounds. One is that the appearance of ancient historians who have seen the Huns in person is not that of Westerners, but that of Asians. A more decisive reason is the funeral process. The traditional Turkic funeral method is cremation, while the Mongolian funeral method is burial. The second theory is that the Huns mentioned by the questioner are the "Korean people," and there are seven grounds for this. However, since no conclusive evidence has been found yet, this theory is not exactly correct. Anyway, I will explain these seven grounds in detail. I will extract these grounds from the report I wrote. The content isn't that hard, so you can easily understand if you just read it, and I have a photo of it, but I'm not good at tackling it.^^;If you give me a note, I will send you all the photo materials via e-mail. Anyway, this is an excerpt. <The Huns share their roots with the Korean people> In a book titled "The Secret of History" compiled by Hans Christian Hoop, the Huns' hometown is mentioned as the easternmost part of the Asian continent, that is, Korea. As a basis, a clay statue excavated as a burial object in a tomb near Gyeongju is cited. The clay statue is a horse-riding statue with an unusual-looking pot behind a horse rider. The pot is a bronze pot used by the Huns, and this horseback riding statue is said to be found only in the Gyeongju area of the Korean Peninsula and the Huns' movement route.

In addition, several shapes of shaped leaves and mushrooms are attached side by side to the edge of the bronze pot, and it is mentioned once again that the Huns are from the Korean Peninsula based on the existence of the same shape in the decorated headband of the Hun noble lady and the gold crown of Silla. However, this does not mean that the Korean people are the Huns. The Han Chinese, who were already living on the Korean Peninsula at that time, could not have attacked Europe. The most likely theory about this is that due to the constant division within the Huns, one of the ruling classes of the Huns originally descended to the southeast and settled on the Korean Peninsula, and the other moved westward and grew into the Huns. Research on this has been active in recent years, and I would like to present some evidence that the Han and Huns share their roots, as well as historical materials and relics studied so far. The first is Mongolian spot. Mongolian spots are found in descendants of Huns living in Western Europe such as France. Mongolian spots are not a feature that appears only in the Korean people, but considering that descendants of the Huns are born with Mongolian spots, it can be said that the Korean people and the Huns are related to relatives. Second, the Huns used their own bow. This unique bow takes five years to make and 10 years to learn to shoot properly, but it is known to be able to shoot more than 15 shots in a minute. The frescoes of the Church of Creifda Afresh in Aquilea, northern Italy, indicate that the Huns used this unusual bow. In this painting, there is a scene where the Huns on horseback shoot arrows at the Roman cavalry chasing. However, it is the same as Goguryeo warriors who hunt animals with bows on horseback in the mural of Goguryeo's dance gun. The arrowhead in the tomb mural is an ax blade arrowhead, which rotates as it flies, so the impact of the moment it is inserted into the target is very great. The Huns also used this very axe arrowhead. Third, it is the custom of "pickled head." A migraine is a hair style in which a newborn baby is laid flat and pressed with a stone-like forehead to flatten the forehead and back of the head, but the top of the head is raised. It can be seen as a kind of plastic surgery. If you look at the bones of the Hun people, the forehead and back of the head are pressed, and the top of the head is protruding. However, a migraine skull was also found in Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, where Gaya Kingdom was located. It is said that the kings of Silla, including King Beopheung, were also migraines. It is said that there is also a record of "all the rich people are migraines" in "The Three Kingdoms" as well. Migraine has been a custom that has been handed down among the Korean people for quite a long time, distinguished from China. However, one thing to note here is that the Huns had a migraine custom, but the Huns could not find it. Through this, it can be seen that the Huns are a special people with migraine customs and are related to Gaya and Silla in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. Fourth, on the other hand, a unique pot-shaped bronze pot is found in the Huns' movement path. This pot, dedicated to nomadic tribal chiefs, was used to sacrifice meat at the purification ceremony. These bronze pots are also found in the ruins of Daeseong-dong and Yangdong-ri in Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, which are tombs from the Gaya period. Bronze pots have often been mentioned as evidence that the origins of Gaya countries are horse-riding peoples in the north. The Hun carried the winter uniform on the horse's back, and it is also found that the horse's back is carrying bronze pots on the horse's back in the pottery of the horse's back excavated from Geumryeongchong Tomb in Nodong-dong, Gyeongju-si. In addition, all the main characters of this horseback riding award are migraines. Fifth, the patterns found in the bronze pots of the Huns are similar to those of the Korean people, such as gold crowns. Gold crowns excavated from Korea have many wooden shapes (extra-shaped decorations) and green shapes (deer horn decorations). This is a custom that also appears in the northern people, indicating that the northern people moved to the Korean Peninsula and settled down. Sixth, the burial, a typical custom of the northern nomadic people, is also proven through ancient tombs in the Gaya region. In particular, in Tomb No. 1 in Daeseong-dong, the remains of Geumgwan Gaya, a wooden block with the heads of cows and horses cut off and placed on top of the box was found, which is completely consistent with the animal sacrifices of the northern nomadic peoples, including the Huns. Seventh, the records that the Huns hung a red cloth on the tree to keep evil spirits away and worshipped bears as peace totem are very similar to the fact that our people built a Jangseung or a Sotdae at the entrance of the village totem. Most nomadic peoples worship animals other than bears. I told you about the reasons that the questioner was curious about, but I wonder if it helped ^-^ And you asked if the Huns were recognized by the people of the world as Korean people around the world. As I mentioned above, there is no established theory. However, the powerful theory that has been recognized so far is that it is Turkic. Also, ordinary people don't know that the Korean people share their roots with the Huns. The people involved in this theory (?) are not only not familiar with the theory, but also have a strong prejudice against the Huns. But even Westerners who instilled that prejudice are interested in them? To them, the Huns are still savages and savages. I don't even want to know more about them. It may also be because this theory is the latest to be presented. Anyway, for these reasons, more research on the Huns is needed. And personally, the part of other people's answers that I want to correct is ^^; The ZDF TV history documentary aired in Germany is not a sham. The book "The Secret of History," which I mentioned above, is a collection of several of these historical documents that present facts or theories different from those known so far. This book is a recognized book. My professor told me that it was a book that I could refer to. There are countless history-related books on the market, but not all of them are referenced when studying. There are a lot of weird books, too.^^; That's why I asked the professor about this book before the presentation. Anyway, I can't tell you that this is an authoritative book, but I hope you know that it is at least not a sham, but a book that has been recognized in the academic world. The reason why I answered this question so hard does not mean that I acknowledge the theory that the Huns are really Korean, the question raised by the questioner. Research on the Huns still has a long way to go. As I said above, there is no really accurate theory yet. Then, I wanted to answer what I knew about your question, but I also intended not to evaluate history recklessly with the wrong standards of prejudice planted in us. We still live in many prejudices, stereotypes, and prejudices. Of course, without knowing which is prejudice or stereotype. But wouldn't it be too unfair to live in such a state of tradition and in the West? At least if there's anything wrong, you have to correct it. Rather than just accepting it as it is, it will take an effort to approach it from a variety of perspectives. Especially for people like me who study history. By the way, I would like to recommend a movie called Attila the gladiator, which was made in 2001. This movie is relatively well-tested and interesting. The reason why this movie is valuable is because it presents a different perspective on the Huns. It is the hands of Westerners who have created false prejudices against the Huns. Also, I would recommend you to read the book "The Secret of History."