About the credibility of the Japanese scribe

 1. The ancient history of Japan, especially the records before the 5th century, is not very reliable in Japan.The fact that the age of a librarian officially compiled by the government is 120 years old does not support the argument that the rest of the librarian's records are partially true, no matter what excuse he makes... 2. In particular, in the records of Empress Singong's conquest of Silla, the name of the Silla king is recorded as Pasa Isageum.Of course, Yeon Gaesumun's name was recorded as Irisumi, but Yeon Gaesumun's bloody coup was recorded in Goguryeo headquarters and Chinese librarians, but only in Japanese librarians, and not in Silla or Baekje.Therefore, the only record is not completely reliable because there is a decisive error in Empress Sinkong's record of conquering Silla. Therefore, if you trust the ancient history part of the Japanese Book, you need to clarify the above part.The fact that other records are correct is not conclusive evidence that this fact is true.If necessary, I have a lot of data to inform you of the inaccuracy of the Japanese scribe. 3. Regarding the inscription of King Gwanggaeto... In the 10th year after year...50,000 infantry and cavalry were sent to save Silla.From Namgeoseong Fortress to Silla Fortress, why? was in it, but when the government army reached it, the Japanese enemy retreated............................................................................................................................................................................................. In the 14th year of the reign of King Yeongnak, he broke into the boundaries of the Great Wall because he did not obey the law. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... First of all, if you look at the article of the 10th year of Yeongrak, they chased after the Japanese, took the castle in Imnagaya, and recaptured it.That's what's being said.There is no such thing as "I've reached it" in either version or interpretation.So I've reached or stayed...I think the rest of the story should come out after telling you the full text of the interpretation and the name of the interpreter. The 14-year-old article also only tells us about the invasion of Japan, but does not support the story that the Japanese are based in Imnagaya.Rather, it is a more reasonable interpretation to interpret it as ousting the power... In addition...Yesterday, I found something very interesting while looking for articles related to the Japanese scribe ^^ I laughed a lot while reading it because it was a different issue from when the king's survival year was over 150 years old.Someone who says something about credibility with a book like this...I wish I was really pathetic.