The personal opinion of members of the historical club - The personal opinion of Imra Japan.

 I don't think I can question why the country was on par with Silla.Everyone knows that Silla was originally a weak country. (In the case of Baekje, we need another discussion, so I'll give up.) However, the claim that the Japanese ruled Gaya is unreliable. If Lalala Haet's claim that "I don't think the Imlail headquarters of the Japanese secretary is the same as the government office in the Japanese residential area in Gaya, Sohai can agree. It can also be admitted in its own way that the Japanese government had a certain level of influence on the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time. However, it is difficult to accept if the influence at this time is said to be taken from a superior position, that is, influence through direct or indirect rule. The reason for this is that the remains of Japanese relics currently found were proved to refer to the residence of Japanese, especially quite high-ranking people at the time, but it is thought to be far from the sovereignty of the southern end of the Korean Peninsula claimed by the far right. If the Japanese controlled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time, there should be appropriate archaeological excavations (e.g., relics found in heavy rain guns), but there is no such thing.   Therefore, I think the substance of what is called "Imlail Headquarters" was similar to the Silla Dynasty established in Tang Dynasty Tang. Of course, it doesn't mean that the relationship between the party and Silla is a relationship between Gaya and why. Personally, I don't think it's right for Korea to deny itself and for Japan to flow into a confrontation of claims that Japan had dominated Korea since ancient times. As Lalala also mentioned, the Japanese scribe is a librarian mixed with exaggeration and distortion. I think that correcting the distorted perception of Japan and the distorted perception of Korea by Koreans is the core of Imlail's discussion. The perspective of ancient Japan that Koreans generally think of would be correct if it were expressed as "civilized." But I don't think it's a very easy country to see through ancient librarians. I mean, the word "civilization" doesn't fit in. There may be some differences in the degree of development, but I think it is difficult to say that there are many differences. Of course, I think the situation is a little different in the case of the Silla Dynasty. Since Silla began to dominate the maritime trade zone, why have you had some difficulties, and I think Silla developed a little faster in that situation. However, I think it is a country that has no difference from Silla in the 4th to 6th centuries. In some ways, there are many aspects of Silla's weakness. And I think some Japanese claim that Korea has been a popular land since ancient times is also unreliable. The colonial claims that appeared only in the Japanese colonial era are too much to prove. I think it is right to interpret this in terms of maintaining close relations with the Gaya region. This interpretation is possible, and if this is accepted as true through other studies, the confrontation of who was better will disappear as it is now. Rather, it will be possible to recognize that Korea and Japan have formed a close relationship since ancient times through Imra Japan. War was a common thing at the time.