China's Northeast Process is trying to occupy North Korean land.

 "The North-East process will take over North Korean land." "Chinese political scientist Professor Liang Chen's remarks."The article that China's distortion of Goguryeo history is a preparatory procedure to occupy North Korean land after reunification of the Korean Peninsula is causing a great sensation on the Internet. The article, believed to have been posted from an Internet cafe at a university in Seoul, is known to have been posted on the Internet based on what a netizen reported while studying abroad at Beijing University in China last year. However, so far, it has not been known exactly whether a professor named Liang Chen actually exists at Beijing University and the original source of this article. The author of this article states in his article that renowned Chinese political scientist Liang Chen said in the subject of Modern Political History in Northeast Asia, "The incorporation of Manchuria history is a political act in preparation for the reunification of the Korean Peninsula." Professor Chen also said, "North Korea will not last more than 10 years, and it is almost certain that a military coup will take place by military leaders, most of whom are pro-Chinese," and explained, "No matter who the rebels are, they have no choice but to rely on China's military power to maintain power." Professor Chen then introduced, "The Chinese government is seriously considering the possibility of turning the North Korean region into China's local government while acknowledging the revolutionary regime and providing military support in this situation (cudetta)." Professor Chen said, "However, territorial disputes with South Korea are inevitable, but the historical identity of the two Koreas is too great to expect international public opinion on territorial disputes, and if they are referred to an international trial, China will lose." Professor Chen also said, "To win the territorial dispute, the factual possession of territory, the historical possession of territory, the continuation and justification of territorial possession must be proven," adding, "China is trying to incorporate Korean-Chinese countries established in Manchuria into its history because it has never occupied North Korea historically." Introducing Professor Chen's last word, "If you pay attention and work hard, Chinese land will be wider just above South Korea in 30 years," the netizen said, "I thought Professor Chen was crazy at the time, but I can't doubt what he said at that time he said." Meanwhile, the U.S. weekly magazine Time also reported in its latest issue on the 17th that China's distortion of Goguryeo history is aimed at preventing possible separation movements in northeastern China after reunification of the Korean Peninsula. Time said in an article that China is interested in Goguryeo because of nearly 2 million Korean-Chinese living in the northeastern part of China, which used to be Goguryeo territory in the past, adding, "China is concerned about the possibility that Korean-Chinese will demand part of Korea if they try to separate it from China."

Last year, before China's distortion of Goguryeo's history drew attention from the domestic media, I took a course called <Northeast Asian Modern Political History> by Professor Liang Chen. Although it was a bachelor's course, I became interested in China's Manchuria history view, which was completely different from Korea when I was studying abroad, and Beijing University was actually the center of China's political history and the most conservative and absolutely influenced the direction of central government's academic support. Liang Qin is a renowned political advisor to the government, and has a master's degree in history and is currently leading the distortion of Goguryeo history in Chinese academia. At that time, the number of students enrolled in the subject was about 30, but Koreans were alone. Maybe in the middle of the semester? While dealing with the Japanese colonial government's construction of Manchuria, there was a talk about the difference in perspective between the Korean and Chinese governments on Manchuria. Professor Liang Chen talked about the difference in the view of Manchuria history between South Korea and China at the time and said, "This is a matter of the future, not the past, and it is a matter of North Korea, not Manchuria." And told a very shocking story. Perhaps he didn't think that I, a Korean, was taking the course. In fact, no matter what country there was in Manchuria in the past, it is indisputable that Manchuria is currently China's territory. As China, it can be said that there is no practical benefit in incorporating the history of Manchuria into its own history, and the massive re-regulation of the Manchurian History Museum currently seen in Chinese academia was caused by the government's intervention in consideration of the future sovereignty of North Korean territory. Liang Qin said North Korea will not last more than 10 years at the longest, and it seems almost certain that a coup within the military will take place. In addition, regardless of who is at the center of the coup except for the current Kim Jong-il line, the rebel leaders have no choice but to rely on China's military power to maintain a navigational independent regime against South Korea's military movements. In this situation, the Chinese government is seriously considering the possibility of military federalization of the North with northern autonomous provinces and localization of the North in the long run. At this time, the most burdensome thing for the Chinese government is the territorial dispute with South Korea. In the event of a situation, territorial disputes with South Korea are almost inevitable, and the historical identity between North Korea and South Korea is too great to expect international public opinion on territorial disputes, and China will almost certainly lose if referred to an international trial. Therefore, the Chinese government is planning a long-term strategy that will lead to possible factual military control over North Korea to victory in international trials in the future. In order to recognize territory in international trials, the state claiming to be territory must prove the following three things. 1. Realistic possession of territory 2. Historical possession of territory 3. Continuity and legitimacy of territorial occupation 1. After the coup, China's factual possession of North Korea can be satisfied through military aid and military federalization. In addition, if the federal government is physically maintained for about 30 years before the International Court, the factual occupation of the territory is established as a requirement that can be recognized under international law. In the case of No. 3, justification can be satisfied by taking over North Korean territory through the North Korean revolutionary government. What is problematic is the historical occupation of territory 2 and the continuity of territorial occupation of territory 3. China has never occupied the North Korean region historically, and therefore, of course, cannot claim the continuity of territorial occupation. Then, how can China claim that North Korea is its territory? Yes. By incorporating Korean-Chinese countries established in Manchuria into their own history, it satisfies the historical occupation of the territory and even meets the continuous occupation by linking it to de facto occupation. Liang Chen said the central government is currently providing support to academia with such a long-term perspective. And he said, "Manju history is not a matter of past facts, but of future interests. You don't have to approach it academically, and you shouldn't be involved in logical discussions with Korea. Keep in mind that this is a matter of politics and that you are learning politics." Professor Chen's last word cannot be forgotten. If you are interested and work hard, the land of China will be wider just above South Korea in 30 years. At that time, I thought Professor Chen was crazy, but looking at the current movement of Chinese academia, I can't doubt what he said then was true. It is really disturbing to watch the news these days as to why such stories are not covered in the domestic media, whether I accidentally listened to Chinese state secrets under a government academic advisor, a professor.