King Gwanggaeto vs Alexander.

 First of all, So Hae-hae knows very well that there is a difference in the military capabilities and achievements of King Gwanggaeto and Alexander.However, the height of military achievements does not necessarily guarantee victory in the confrontation. The three requirements for victory in a war roughly judged by Sohae are approximately 1. the firm will and strategy of the supreme commander... 2. The will and weapons of the soldiers participating in the battle... 3. The existence of a hinterland where goods and personnel entering the war can be produced and placed where necessary, and the ability of the political competency to carry out the war... About this much.However, if we put it this way, even if we argue all night, we can't reach a conclusion, so we'll put it on the same condition and compare it. First of all, let's assume that Goguryeo and Macedonian forces, led by commanders with the same number of troops and the same capabilities, are engaged in a showdown except for strategic factors such as surprise or detour. The answer will come out soon.If the Macedonian army is lucky to be defeated or annihilated, it will be able to retreat while maintaining its organization. First, mid- to long-term disease...The Macedonian Heterotai were cavalry without a back, and they didn't put armor on the horse.Perhaps the first head-on collision with Goguryeo's iron, which is completely defended with gloves on a window over 5 meters long, will result in a huge loss of power. Next mid- to long-term disease...Macedonia's mid- to long-term soldier, called Pecetairo, was a heavy and long-term infantry armed with a spear called Sarisa, which is up to six meters long, and was a skillful soldier in fierce batting battles.Unfortunately, there were some flaws.First of all, he was weak in the attack from the side due to his weak mobility, and he did not have a proper launch weapon. On the other hand, Goguryeo troops had a powerful launch weapon called Macgung, so even if they did not collide head-on, they would be able to send the Peccetairoes to the underworld. In fact, even during the Peloponnesian War, Spartan heavy-duty infantry were defeated by the fighting attack thrown by Athens' chief infantry.I'll put down the nonsense that it can't be. I am well aware of Alexander's military capabilities and achievements. However, just because King Gwanggaeto's military achievements are lagging behind, Goguryeo, which appeared hundreds of years later, is not considered to be the food of the Macedonian army. The hammer and anvil or central breakthrough method that Alexander was able to win were commonly used or used higher-order tactics in East Asia as well as Goguryeo at that time. However, thanks to thousands of years of repeated shoveling to find the victory or defeat of the battle in the morality or personality of the commander without leaving a detailed record like the West, I think it would be better to study more when you have time. And clearly, from a world historical point of view, it is clear that Alexander had more influence on later generations than King Gwanggaetto, and Alexander himself can put himself in the ranks of great strategists. However, I think it would be criticized in itself to reveal a clear ignorance and understanding of King Gwanggaeto while attracting King Gwanggaeto, who does not need comparison itself to praise Alexander. It goes without saying that Alexander is a great person, and I know him well even if he doesn't say anything bad, so if you don't want to be humiliated anymore, why don't you stop here?