2022년 3월 6일 일요일

Weeseo and Jinseo.

 I'm going to scribble because the story of Gyuwon came out for a while yesterday. First of all, there are areas where the distinction between oath and consolation can be clear, and there are areas where it is not clear.Samguksagi, which is recognized as an accurate record, can also find the part that is thought to be a small harm error if it is considered with words or phrases. In the case of the Japanese Clerk, there are few people in Japan who believe in the early royal power and foreign relations, but at that time, there are relatively accurate records, especially articles related to Hallyukdo Island, which are not recorded in the Samguk Sagi or Chinese librarians. The problem is that some librarians on the Jaeya side are using text.I read some of these books when I was young, and I still read a few pages when I sometimes stop by the bookstore's ancient history section. It was also thanks to the book that insisted on the continental trilateral theory that made So Hae-he decisive to turn his back on some of the Jaeya sides. I think Hae-ja, who has been in Yeokgal for a long time, will know well about the rejection of seeing Sohae-i Jae-ya from a bad perspective and having prejudice. History cannot be defined in a single word, nor can it be cut into words. There are even people who see this as necessary, and there are people who don't. But sometimes, when I look at people who advocate extreme nationalism, I can find a common figure... "I believe it! I believe it unconditionally! Don't you believe it? Then you're a traitor!" To prove your hypothesis, you're driving people who refute librarians' records by falsely translating them or making them weirdly. There are about two ways to determine whether the books in question are conscripted or written. One can be divided into indirect methods of viewing and grasping the contents of the book through the compilation and traditional process of the book, the authenticity of the books reported and referenced by the author, and the direct method of viewing and grasping the contents of the book. I think there is a quite problem with the view that the books in question are unconditionally pushed from the other side. There's a lot of evidence that the hwidan meat is reflected in the stomach.There's a lot that's full. The fact that a place name from a later generation will appear...The fact that the ancient population came out too much...And the fact that countless words of the concept from modern times appear will be a problem that can be compressed. Among the books I saw at Sohae-i Bookstore, I've seen a book that analyzes the various reasons for judging the books in question as considered considering them (I remember the title is "Consideration that shook Korea?") I think it should be done in a book that recognizes them. As I said last time, it is a principle that a person who has newly expressed an opinion should solve any objections and questions about a new theory or hypothesis. Situational or conspiracy stories can attract people's attention, but I don't think they can be the key to solving all problems. And whatever view of history an individual has, it's his or her freedom.Thoughts and ideas may or may not change over time and environment. The view of history held by Sohae is also made as a result of long time and learning in its own way, and I think most other people will do the same. If you suddenly push evidence that is not even clear to those people (people who argue for the Continental Triad have made too many mistakes inside the reverse gal alone), there will be nothing but ridicule and criticism. Whether you believe the books in question are real or fake, they belong to individual freedom.Believing in those books does not mean that Korea's national luck will flourish or the country will stand right away, and if Korea does not believe in the book, it will not fail tomorrow. If you want to believe that the books are Jinseo, I don't think Sohae is a problem that you can say anything about.However, if you want to persuade others, I think you need a reasonable theory and argument. As always said, "Jesus Heaven!!!," forcing people to believe unconditionally without supporting it. I don't think it's any different from "Hell of Unbelief!" First, if you judge the value of the books through systematic research and argumentation and show objective data, there will be people to trust without doing other missionary activities. And... Please...Please, if you want to jump over the platform and exterminate the platform, show us your ability to jump over the platform. I don't like strong teams that are boring and rambling, but I don't want to criticize them just because they have the title of "strong." It was Kang Dan-Histor who gave some strength to the book with astronomical observational records, and a scholar close to Jaeya (Kim Sang), who likes the book.Personally, I don't think anyone can argue even half of this person) is strictly a person who belongs to the platform. I think the debate over the books in question will continue as long as there is reverse conflict anyway.Also, I don't think I can unconditionally reject their theory just because I believe it. However, if you want to talk about this in the future, I personally hope that there will be at least enough explanation and persuasion to persuade those who have doubts. Personally, I recommend books by Professor Roh Tae-don or Professor Lim Ki-hwan.If you don't like it, it doesn't matter if it's Professor Yoon Myungchul or Professor Lee Hyunggu's book.I hope you read some books and seriously think about how to persuade others.Especially on the internet, anyone wants to be free...Likewise, talking about hard stories such as trusting Jesus on the subway or broadcasting propaganda against South Korea will not gather people, but will evict them or evoke antipathy. (The typical thing was Gamohae). Sohae is still strongly suspicious of whether this person is a counterattacker) Again, but I don't want to be violated by anyone if I look at the books in question from a certain perspective. If you want to change your negative perspective on those books, you can do as Sohae said.Then at least you won't be able to hear the counterattack...

댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기

There is no Jesus in Israel

 the relationship between Judaism and Jesus Kim Jong-chul, a documentary director, quotes from the book "There Is No Jesus in Israel,...