"I was a dog" It is a matter for Confucian society (1527-1602). The pen name is Tak-oh. The Ming figure. At the age of 26, he became a local poet and served as a government official for 28 years. He was "the one who misled people on the wrong road" for 22 years until he committed suicide in prison at the age of 76. One day, when he was 62 years old, he was itching his head, so it was cumbersome to scratch it, and he cut his hair when the smell of sweat and dandruff flew away. The scandal that "a former government official of the four-room museum has become a monk" is a matter of course. It was a protest and challenge to a society dominated by Confucianism. In a society that makes people choose between walking meat or hypocrites, it was "great performance" to put weight on individual freedom, rights, or happiness. His confession, "I was a dog before 50," was a poo at himself and the Confucian society. By abandoning his office at fifty-four, he released the intolerable bondage of the bureaucracy, and by pushing his head away at sixty-two, he broke up with the sectarian society. He is a heretic who has crossed Yang Myung-hak and Buddhism. He downplayed the kind of public-spirited people and insisted on being faithful to natural intelligence. He refuted the views that "women ruin the country" and "women have short insights," defended "gannung" by saying that 200% of courage and knowledge were required, criticizing fake Taoism, and criticized the bureaucratic society before and after the death of Jang Geo-jeong. A decade-long letter with Gyeongjeonghyang is the axis of controversy. They are tied up to form works such as Bunseo, Jangseo, and Seolseo. His book spreads quite widely. Considering the printing situation at the time, it is a proof of the controversy of the writing. Countless people who are hit by the stones he randomly throws put him in jail. The scandal with young bhikkhuni Mae Dam-yeon also played a part. The razor that cut his hair was a tool to cut his own throat. "It is humanity to dress and eat, and it is the reason of all things." "Children are innocent and innocent, but they lose their purity as society's knowledge and unspoken hints are injected." "There is no such thing as a born. It's the difference between being a saint and a robber and meeting an opportunity." His revolutionary perception is compared to enlightenment ideas such as Voltaire and Montesquieu. What's his temper? I shook so clean that I couldn't handle the worn broom. The clothes had no blemishes, and I often wiped my face and brushed my body. I didn't like the smell of people's noses, so I let them sit far away and kicked them out, and if I didn't think I could communicate, I stayed quiet without saying a word. In Joseon, Choi Se-jin's "Hunmongja" came out in the year he was born, and he suffered the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592. He met Matteo Ricci three times between 1599 and 1600, and three years later, Lee Kwang-jung and Kwon-hee of Joseon brought Matteo Ricci's "Gonyeoman National Exhibition." "A Taoist is like a dog or a pig." "Before I was 50 years old, I was only one dog." When the dog in front of him barked at his shadow, he followed him. If someone asks me why I barked, I have no choice but to shut my mouth and smile shyly like a mute...." Yi Ji (1527-1602) was one of the leading heretical thinkers of the Ming and Qing Dynasties. His pen name is Tak-oh. Lee Tak-oh freely criticized the ideological world at the time when he did not recognize other studies other than Gong Maeng's intention. "He who deceives heaven and man must weigh Taoism. This is because Taoism is good for selling the trick." There are many things that have been threatened with life thanks to the attack on Taoists that their behavior is no different from that of dogs and pigs. He, who pursued freedom of thought, argued that the heart of a young child was the true heart of man. They say that children's clear and clean minds that have not been stained with reading or knowledge should be preserved as they are, and human desires should be acknowledged without pretense. However, Lee Tak-oh himself seemed to have thought that his thoughts were an unacceptable radical argument at the time. His book was named "Bunseo," which means "a book to be burned down," or "a book to be hidden." He said, "No one recognizes me enough to give my life. I have prophesied that in the future I will vent my anger by death for those who do not recognize me." As he said, Lee Tak-oh committed suicide in prison at the age of 76 when he was impeached for being too sensitive. It was the end of a heretic who fought against the world. Lee Tak-oh, author of "Bunseo" and the largest heretic in Chinese history, is more philosophically and humanely attractive than any other Chinese philosopher who sought absolute freedom of mind in the ideological world of the late Ming Dynasty, which recognized no academic or thought except dogmatized Zhu Zi. In this book, Lee Tak-oh's thoughts and tragic life, which overthrew the knowledge of the past and revealed the hypocrisy of the intellectual, will be a scene to reflect on our fears, cowardice, and self-defense in the 21st century, when social oppression mechanisms continue to be accepted without reflection. "Before I was 50 years old, I was only one dog!" - "Bunseo" [I have learned the teachings of the saints since I was young, but I don't know what the teachings of the saints are. I respect Confucius, but I don't know where Confucius is admirable. This is just a rhythm that a dwarf follows the sound of others' good performance while watching a play among people. Before I was 50 years old, I was just one dog. When the dog in front of him barked at his shadow, he followed him. If someone asks me why I barked, I have no choice but to shut my mouth and smile shyly like a mute....] Lee Tak-oh's desperate remark, "I was a dog," is a penitentiary of a thinker and a painful reminder to scholars of this era. After the Song Dynasty, the Confucian scripture, which was fixed as Juhee's tin, was the only academic system recognized by the state. It was shocking at the time to criticize Confucius or deny the absolute truth of the scriptures. No one in the Middle Ages of the East could doubt the truth of Confucius and the Confucian scriptures themselves. No, I couldn't verbalize a meeting. Even Wang Su-in (Wang Yang-myeong), the founder of Yang Myeong-hak, did not dare to publicly correct Joo-hee's errors and built the "Juju Manmanjeong Theory" after much consideration and used it as a shield for his "Chiyangji" studies, but was criticized for providing people with pods. However, Lee Tak-oh did not criticize Confucius himself. Despite the fact that there could be free interpretation and ideas of Confucius, they rebelled against the behavior of the Taoists at the time, who made only Joo-hee's. [Adults don't blame people for having everything perfectly] So each person can become an adult. Therefore, Yangmyeong said, "Everything full of streets is a saint," and the Buddha also said, "The heart is a Buddha, and everyone is a Buddha." Since each person is an adult, there is no other way that adults can't stop showing people. If there is nothing that cannot be done by the plowing, planting rice, grilling bowls, and fishing, then shall we not take the good of the other ten million saints and wise men? How can it be said that I had to learn Confucius only to succeed in the right vein?] In the article "Praise for Harm," Lee Tak-oh fundamentally denied the divine authority granted to the Do of Gongmeng through the character of the remains, and Confucius was also an ordinary group that could be called "brother" rather than "intelligent Zen master." A Taoist wore high-heeled shoes with a wide band on his long sleeve, a hat called Samgang Osang, and a robe called humanity, and took a word or two from the old scripture, stole three or four words from Confucius's words, and boasted that he was a true disciple of Jungni. Then I met the remains. The remains are intelligent people, and they laughed at it and said, "This man doesn't know my brother yet." The man spoke with a gust of anger and a flush of red. "If heaven hadn't brought Jungni to this world, the history of all ages would have been like a long night. What kind of man do you dare to call Zhongni brother?" the remains said. "Then perhaps Bok-hee before Jung-ni was born or the saints before that would have walked on the road by lighting candles every day!"] "If heaven had not made Jung-ni born, the history of all time would have been a long night," said Joo-hee. In a word, Lee Tak-oh ridiculed the absurdity and gasiness of deifying Jungni (Confucius). Later, based on this article, Lee Tak-oh was accused of criticizing adults and belittling the law. As a person, as an ancient thinker and educator, Lee Tak-oh respected Confucius. Confucius' morality and learning certainly had something that made people happy with their hearts and truly admire. However, it is abominable to use him as a magic spell to cover the mouths of 10 million living people while supporting him as an icon of sacredness, and to use him as a step to tighten and kill the Holy Spirit of all people. As Lee Tak-oh, he could not accept this behavior even if his head was broken and bleeding. Confucius attacked by Lee Tak-oh was not Confucius during the Spring and Autumn period, but a later Confucius who "rejected the hundred families and respected only Confucian scholars." Outspoken remarks and writings that subvert the existing order have sparked numerous debates with outspoken remarks and writings. A case in point is the 10-year debate with Gyeongjeonghyang, who claimed to be the best Taoist at the time. To Gyeongjeonghyang, who rebukes Gongmeng's road, Lee Tak-oh wrote as soon as he picked up the brush without hesitation or hesitation. "People in the world talk in their sleep in broad daylight, but it is worth saying that they are always awake because only Gong is talking in broad daylight alone in their dreams." For Kyung Jung-hyang, it was really a disgrace and anger. Lee Tak-oh's outspoken attitude caused serious social repercussions and led to countless threats of life. He who loves fame in the world must weigh Taoism. This is because Taoism is good for creating fame. He who has not been appointed must be educated in Taoism. This is because Taoism is good for opening the way to appointment. He who deceives heaven and man must weigh Taoism. This is because Taoism is good to sell the trick.
To this day, the act of combining Taoism on the outside, pursuing wealth inside, and dressing up in deep and elegant clothes is no different from that of a dog pig.] Lee Tak-oh presented his ideas to the world through Bunseo, Jangseo, Seolseo, and numerous works. Lee Tak-oh knew. If these books come out, the anger that will drive you crazy doesn't just stop at the level of criticism so far. Therefore, the name of the book was named "Book to Burn" (Bunseo) and "Book to Hide" (Jangseo), but his book was not burned or could not be hidden. Chinese culture with Confucian culture as its main subject has always emphasized social order, and 'individual' was only one screw of a huge machine called society. Living within the ethical relationship of Samgang Five-sang, maintaining and protecting the rules of this relationship was the job of a person who fits the nature. However, Lee Tak-oh proudly suggested one principle. "People value what they do for themselves, and they strive for their way." This was an outrageous remark from the perspective of Chinese society at the time. If you don't go your own way, and if you do your homework, it will be the same eccentric wall, and if you don't know how to do it for yourself and work only for others, even if it's Yosun, it will be fine dust.] Lee Tak-oh's ideas were heresy, far more destructive than Buddha and Laozi, in the Confucian state of ethics and "social orientation." From the perspective of Taoists, it was obvious that if Lee Tak-oh's ideas were allowed to spread, the 2,000-year-old tradition of thought style and value standards would be broken. However, Lee Tak-oh's admonition was something that many people did not dare to say even if they wanted to say it, and encouraged those who were dissatisfied with fake righteousness and with manners that bound people, certainly instigating and bewitching many people. Thus, the impact of Lee Tak-oh on the fence of Myeonggyo and the collision between Taoists to protect the tradition of Myeonggyo became inevitable. Respect the human mind as it is, Lee Tak-oh's idea of pursuing freedom of thought is well revealed in his "concentration theory". He says that the heart of a child is the true heart of a human being, and no adult can be true if he loses it. [Childhood innocence is a true heart] If you say you shouldn't have a child's heart, it's the same as saying you shouldn't have a true. Childhood innocence is pure and true, and it is the true intention of the first determination. If you lose your innocence, you lose your true heart; if you lose your true heart, you lose your true person. If a person is not true, the original intention no longer exists at all.] Lee Tak-oh argues that the clear and clean mind of children who are not infected with reading books is the most valuable thing, and that the natural human mind, which is the Taoist, should be respected and human desire should be affirmed without pretense. Even if a child's innocence is blocked, the words do not come out from the bottom of his heart, and even if he participates in politics, there is no root in the political affairs that the person conducts, and even if he writes, the meaning is not conveyed properly.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기