The background of the Huns (Hangari) who entered the grasslands of the Danyu River (now Hangari) in Europe like the wind in 370 A.D., which invaded Europe from the Korean Peninsula, remains a mystery. That's because there's no record of exactly what race they are and where they started in Asia and moved to Europe. There was almost no research on them in Asia, and the study of the Huns began more than 300 years ago by Europeans, and the veil of Huns being Huns was beginning to come off. Many records of the Huns in Europe have been written by the Romans, who tell us that the Huns are a Mongolian nomadic people who are clearly far from white Aryan people, whether they have square faces, flat noses, narrow eyes, and foreheads. They fought against the great empire of Rome, whether dominating Europe or the Middle East, and they won tributes from Rome, expanding their sphere of activity to Western Europe. Western Rome, which lost its national power through endless wars with them and tributes and continued wars, was eventually destroyed by the invading Germanic tribes. Two documentaries were produced in Germany and the U.S. that traced the origins of Roman children's departure to Europe, where the cruelty of going to war and killing all people and animals who moved alive could stop crying if the Huns came. German director Jens Petter Berendt and U.S. Cornell University professor Dr. Ike Schmidt, after examining many artifacts excavated from the Shin-Rago branch at the southern end of the Korean Peninsula, concluded that the Huns may have originated from the easternmost part of Asia. The King of the Babylon, a Hun documentary produced in the United States, forgot the names of the people who participated in the documentary production because the memo was missing, but they were Chinese and American historians. Comparing the two documentaries, Germany's ZDF documentaries thoroughly demonstrated that the Huns may have originated on the Korean Peninsula, while the 1997 U.S. documentary showed that the Huns had originated on the Korean Peninsula in Manchuria. The documentary was such a shock to me that after watching the documentary, I found the data of the Huns and collected them from books and the Internet until this time today. In order to understand the hypothesis that the Huns who settled in Silla and the Korean Peninsula may have advanced to Western Europe, we will first compare the relics of Huns who moved to Europe, starting with the history and culture of Sukitai people, rather than the superficial information we know. 1, Scythian and historical Scythian soldiers peeled off the dead enemy's scalp and rubbed it with both hands to soften it and used it as a towel whenever needed. Among them, those who had a lot of scalp were respected, and several pieces of scalp were enticed to make a large scalp towel. The head of the enemy soldier was cut off, the inside of the upper part of the skull was coated with a gold plate, and the outside was chewed with leather and used as a cup. The landlord showed off his bravery to the customer who came by displaying numerous skulls in the house with gold ornaments. The myth of the Scythian people has been said to be their ancestor, the son of Zeus, Targitaus, but it is not easy to estimate their history without letters. It is known that from around the 6th century B.C., the unique Scythian culture that we know began to develop. A.I. Melukiova estimates that the Scythians traveled several times between 2000 BC and the 7th century BC through the Volga-Ural Plains to the Black Sea coast. The first Scythians were known as allies against the Assyrians and the Cimerians in the 7th century BC, and as a result, the Khimers lost their territory and were driven south by the Scythians. In 674 BC, King Scythai Patatua married Princess Partatua of Acciraa, who established an alliance with the Assyrians and conquered the Medos region of the Caspian Sea with them. The Meadows later repelled the Scythians from the West Asian region, forcing them back into the Pontiac meadow. Linguists can trace the origins of the people of Skitai and their culture to the northern Indian province of Srubnaya, and find out exactly where the people of Skitai originated, including "pata" in Hardotus's language records, "spou" eyes, "arima" men. There is an inextricable connection between horses and Scythians. They were recorded as the first humans to design and wear pants to ride horses (European perspective), and they were believed to be the first people to domesticate horses in human history, and the scene of fighting without a stirrup on a horse with a cloth on its back was a terror to the enemy. In Europe and the Middle East, skitans were the people who spread the horse-riding technology to combat, and in Europe and the Middle East, horse-riding people began to use lanterns to keep their balance in Europe from the 6th century. It can be seen that the scene where Europeans fight on horses with stirrups in movies before the 6th century is a fiction that ignores history. An anecdote observed by Darius the Great, who went to war with the Scythians, is a scene that shows a cross-section of the Scythians. During the long war, Scythian soldiers began to steal earthenware grazing near the battlefield from time to time, and Scythian soldiers quickly escaped the battlefield and hunted rabbits.Just as Darius the Great cannot understand the actions of the Scythian warriors, it is hard to understand the actions of the Scythians in our eyes, who are modern civilizations. As numerous ancient tombs they left in the southern Soviet Union and Altai region were excavated, many new facts about them were revealed, showing their love of art and horses for animals left behind, whether they were active in the grasslands. We, civilized people, were taught pants and riding skills by unusual immigrants, whether ignored as barbarians. In 514 BC, Darius the Great of Persia crossed the Danube with a large army of 700,000 men and advanced to Soviet grasslands to conquer Scythai. And the Scythians, using their traditional tactics, avoided direct combat with the Persians, and when Darius the Great urged them to fight, they replied, "It's nothing new that we don't fight in retreat. We just follow the usual way of life in peace. We don't have villages with houses and property, and we don't have farmland to cultivate. We might fight against the Great's army against the fear that if we had those things we would lose them all to the war. But with nothing to lose, we don't have to go to war with the great king's army. But if you want to have a real battle with us immediately, touch the graves of our ancestors, and he will know whether we will fight or not. It was a strange war for Darius the Great. Come to think of it, there was nothing to gain from the enemy by fighting the Scythians, no cities to occupy, no buildings to plunder, there was only a meadow with endless horizon. Darius could not have any other family other than the withdrawal. The Scythian army tormented the king as they followed him to the Danube. After that, Darius the Great again crossed the Danube and abandoned the Scythian conquest of the northern meadow, eventually leading to victory for the Scythians. "The Mongolian meadow nomads' belief that those who build castles and cities will perish, and those who move endlessly from the meadow must have come from the Scythians." From the 7th to 3rd centuries BC, the Scythians occupied the Black Sea from the north to the Black Sea, and the Don River from the west to the Azov Sea. The highest position among the Scythai tribes was the dominant tribe, followed by nomadic tribes in the meadow and agricultural tribes in the lowest class, which were dominated by the dominant tribe and nomadic people. (Photo: Scythai region, yellow) The Scythai nationality was at the forefront of economic, political, social and cultural development in the 4th and early 3rd centuries BC. Scythians, many nomadic peoples, began to live in Kamenskoe Gorodishche on the Black Sea coast, a political, economic and commercial center. In 339 AD, King Atesas of Scythai consolidated the Scythai tribes and expanded their territory to reach the Danube River along the Tracian border. At the age of 90, he was killed in battle with Prince Philip of Macedon, but the Kingdom of Skitai remained a powerful state despite his death, and was swept away by the Celts and Tracians from the west and Samathians from the east by the end of the 3rd century BC. 2, The life and customs of the Scythian people The family composition of the Scythian was a male-dominated society with one polygamy. The Greeks believe that these were matriarchal societies, but archaeologists have discovered that these were found in the Southern Soviet Union. Their graves prove the Greeks' claims wrong. A person of social status had several wives, and after his death his brother or son could own his wife. Scythian women were just living at home taking care of their children without any special authority. Compared to the active lives of the Skitai neighbor, the Samatian women, who ride horses, stand shoulder to shoulder with men, and participate in war, it can be seen that the Skitai women were active enough to travel with their children in wagons. For those who are rich in fish and wild beasts, food has always been abundant.Their basic foods were fermented horse milk, cheese, green onion, garlic and beans, which are still important foods of Central Asian nomads. The Scythians, seen by Hardenotus, expressed passionately as follows. He had a bearded face and long eyes with dark eyes and long hair. 1,In the above photo, the rider was said to be Arab, but he was a Scythian described by Hardotus. The sitting person is meeting a shaman dressed as a man (a Korean male clapping shaman), not a woman.Gokok, which is attached to a horse, means fertility in the same form as the grain of Silla, and it can be seen that the Sukitai culture, which was transmitted from the Altai region and the Mongolian meadow to nomads in Greece, spread to Gyeongju, Silla. The confirmation that the person riding the horse is a Scythian is an important source of evidence that the bottom he is wearing is a skythian who has advanced to Altaiji. It confirms that Scythians designed and wore pants to ride horses for the first time in the world. 2, On the left, the pants worn by the dancers of the mural paintings of the Goguryeo Dance Gun can be said to be the influence of the Scythai culture. It is explained that the bearded figure seen in the figure on the right side of Goguryeo's Gakjeogong Ssireum Island is an Arab, but my opinion is that the Scythian people have advanced to Goguryeo. In 1947, it was discovered that they had tattoos along with soft boots with heels on their bodies excavated from a 2,000-year-old Scythian cemetery. Their faith was shamanistic, and they believed in superstitions and used amulets to drive away ghosts. The shaman, who expels ghosts and predicts good fortune, comes from a special family, and the best shaman is a male shaman called enarees. The male shaman, who was called the middle of a man and a woman, always lived in women's clothes, with the voice of a woman. The Scythians saw a long period of protesting mourning when the king died. All the tribes gathered and for 40 days the funeral was huge, expressing sadness. The king's immediate family members cut their hair or cut their ears, foreheads, nose, and arms with a knife to express their sorrow. At the king's funeral, after he buried his weapons and all his furniture together, the group in charge of the funeral strangled one of the king's wives, a drunkard, a servant and a messenger, and killed a horse and buried it around him. The tomb was made of a 60-whit-high burial mound. This is not the end of the king's funeral. A year after the king's death, up to 50 young people who served the king closely were strangled to death and buried around the king's tomb to serve the posthumous king. The part that Herrdo did not record is the powerful and lively artworks left by the Scythian warriors. Around the 6th century B.C., the Scythians began to create natural motif ornaments based on animals. Starting with the first deer, the preferred animals of the Scythians were horses, wild goats, wild pigs, bears, wolves, cats, and eagles. The Scythian culture had already spread to the nomads in northern China before 1,000 B.C. Over the past 200 years, the art of the Scythai people has begun to be known to the world as burial objects have been excavated from Altai Fajik and southern Siberia in Central Asia. Among the burial items excavated from the ancient tombs, many ornaments made of gold surprised the world. The reason why the Scythians assumed that they would have advanced to the Altai region during their prosperity and mined and used gold in the region, whether there were many gold mines, was because the Altai region produced a lot of gold. The fact that the Sukitai culture blossomed even at the southern end of the Korean Peninsula proves that Silla's culture was influenced by gold poles and ornaments, as well as numerous gold ornaments and gold crowns. The gold crowns of Silla, the gold crowns of Silla, and the gold crowns of Afghanistan, which were excavated in the valley of gold in Afghanistan around the 1st century, can be said to be the essence of Scythai culture. Korea and Afghanistan are the only countries on the planet that have produced gold crowns. Note 1. Herodotus Herodotus (c.480-c.429)The first Greek Saga of mankind to leave many librarians. Note 2 Darius III the Great of Persia in 331 BC, Greek conqueror Alexander the Great and furniture were killed by his family after being defeated in the Great Battle of Gaugamela. His death brought the Persian kingdom to an end, whether it had been a powerhouse in the ancient world for two centuries. Diodorus, a Greek historian born in Sicily on the southern tip of the Italian Peninsula who is believed to have lived in Alexandria and is known as a friend of Caesar's, the third, Hun's, and the direct cause of the migration to Western Europe was a natural disaster in central Asia and the Far East. This is because the temperature has fallen by 1 degree for 5 years since the early 4th century, and life-like grass and crops have not grown due to the cold sea for nomadic and agricultural peoples. To avoid natural disasters, the Huns (the Huns), who are nomads, started a great migration from the mainland deep on the Korean Peninsula along the Central Asian meadow through Manchuria, and moved northward along the meadow through Manchuria and westward. The K-Bul broadcaster The Learning Channel, which aired at Atilla, The King of the Babarian, wrote to confirm the evidence that the Hun movement originated on the Korean Peninsula, but when it was notified that it was integrated with Discovery, the two stations were still unable to find thousands of documentaries. Unlike the Hun documentary produced in the U.S., Berinto and Schmidt, who participated in the secret production of the Hun documentary produced by the German Broadcasting Corporation, are based on bronze relics excavated from Gaya at the southern end of the Korean Peninsula. In 1924, the Huns carried bronze sot on the horse's back like bronze sot carried on the horse's back at the National Treasure No. 91 (National Treasure No. 91), a national treasure excavated at Geumryeongchong Tomb in Rodong-dong, Gyeongju. I heard that the patterns found in bronze saws are often found in Korean headdress. About 30 winter uniforms were found on the Hun's path, and the height is 50-60 cm and the weight is over 50 kg. It should be noted that no winter uniforms other than the path of movement of the Huns are found. The Kimai Water Statue excavated from Gyeongju Basin is a typical nomadic person. Dongbok (bronze sot) carried on a triangular cap and a horse's back is the same form as Hun's. It is believed that the mounted figure had a migraine, and there is a strong theory that the reason why the diameter of the gold crown remaining like a mystery is small is that the Silla kings had a migraine. The horseman's feet are using stirrups. The same type of stirrup used by the Huns was a new weapon for Europeans. The stirrup was the most powerful weapon that the Huns could destroy Europe. The winter uniform is a symbolic relic of nomads, and there are two forms: the Scythian style and the Hunsman style. What distinguishes Hun's winter uniforms from the Scythian style is that Mongolian nomads inherited the culture of the Scythian people and developed into their own type of winter uniforms, unlike the Scythian style uniforms with little decoration, the shape of the handles is different. Winter uniforms found on the Korean Peninsula have been found in North Korea and China's Jilin region, as well as in northern China's grasslands, Inner Mongolia's Ordos region, the Southern Soviet Union, and Hungary. The Hunno-style Dongbok, found in Gyeongju, South Korea, and in Daeseong-dong, the Gaya tomb of Gimhae, is a relic directly related to Hunno, a northern tribe. The purpose of the bronze sot is to boil meat used in ritual ceremonies, whether used by nomadic chiefs. The main character may be the actual figure of the head of the clan, as the national treasure, a horse riding figure, carries a winter uniform on the horse's back.He claimed that the triangular hats and costumes worn by mounted figures were used by typical nomads, and that horse saddles and stirrups were the same as those used by the Huns. The Huns used stirrups, unknown to Europe. The stirrup was made like leather or shoe pouch so that the rider could hold the center of his body on the horse's saddle and connected to the saddle. The Huns were seen riding horses and shooting arrows and attacking Europeans in wonder and fear because the Huns used stirrups.
2022년 4월 17일 일요일
The International System of Nuclear Weapons and the Importance of the Current North Korean Nuclear Issue
In fact, India, Pakistan and North Korea are the only countries that have illegal possessions right now... and North Korea is the only country that has illegal possessions... and, as you all know, nuclear weapons, they start with the end of World War II in 1945. U.S. Manhattan Project and Japan Drop. After that, it was temporarily a U.S. monopoly, but in 1949, the Soviet Union also had nuclear weapons. From this time until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the nuclear war was fierce. Even now, the United States and Russia have 95 percent of the world's nuclear power. Fifteen thousand each... North Korea was able to start the Korean War: Soviet nuclear possession and Chinese communism. Invasion from North Korea the following year as soon as you wake up in 49. The U.K., France and China are intermediate nuclear powers, and the U.K. has been supported by the U.S. at the end of the Korean War in 1953. Nuclear weapons help foreign countries make important things... ...and from this point on, it's actually a beautiful body. In 1960 France and 64 China's nuclear arsenal was significant because of the diversification of nuclear arsenals. Out of the US (UK Annex) versus the USSR. President de Gaulle and President Mao Tse-dong's loud voices stemmed from nuclear missiles and ballistic submarines. Since then, the five largest holder countries have created a "nuclear club" to prevent other countries from having nuclear weapons. Because the victors of World War II. However, India, Pakistan and Israel have also been involved in nuclear possession since 1970, with China making excuses for India, Pakistan making excuses for Pakistan, and Israel making desperate Arab siege. India and Pakistan also develop long-range missiles, which only have five major countries (Germany, Japan, etc., which have limited writing technologies), namely China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea, which are committed to developing missiles and nuclear technologies. This is the best technology in the world. Other countries, such as the defeated countries, Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, and Argentina, have sufficient technology and economic power, but the U.S. imposed strong sanctions on them. Korea also surrendered after Park's death in 1979. South Africa temporarily possessed several nuclear weapons in the 1980s, but it was scrapped just before the birth of Nelson Mandela's black regime in the 1990s. In other words, when he was internationally isolated due to racism, he secretly made nuclear weapons and possessed them, and when black Adder came to power, he disposed of them before that. Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea are the countries that currently possess nuclear weapons illegally. But Israel is neither a poet nor a denier nor a nuclear test. Of course, the current state of the art does not need to be tested. So, it seems that the 1996 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed. And the U.S. unconditionally supports Israel... ...and India and Pakistan have been in possession since the '70s and have been pursuing policies similar to Israel, but officially declared them nuclear in the '90s and flew long-range missiles. In Pakistan, we conducted a nuclear test in 1998 and took a head-on challenge to the treaty, namely, the United States, India and Pakistan, which are head-on nuclear powers against the superpowers of the United States, who pretend to impose sanctions. In the case of Pakistan and Israel, the country itself is so small that it has no more meaning than national security, but in the case of India, it has definitely joined the military power. In the case of North Korea now...............................Bush started nuclear development in 2002 after designating the Axis of Evil, and since 2003, North Korean officials have hinted that "we have nuclear weapons" and finally declared ourselves an "official nuclear power" this year. Now there's some kind of movement whether we're preparing for a nuclear test or doing a show... ...and it's really shocking that India and Pakistan are the only countries that have nuclear weapons head on against the U.S. right now. Plus, they've been practically a possession country since the '70s. In India, they already tested an underground nuclear weapon in 1974. North Korea, on the other hand, has been developing nuclear weapons for 30 yearsHowever (Korea, India, Pakistan, Taiwan, Brazil, Germany, and Japan are all similar) I have had for the last two or three years. A totally fledgling state, so to speak. And official declarations and nuclear tests... ...India, Pakistan, the United States, the Soviet Union, China, and Samdari, but in form, British parliamentary democracy. North Korea, on the other hand, has been recognized as a post-Cold War, but North Korea has a head-to-head match with the superpower of the Cold War. I don't think this is unprecedented. What about the haters? It's shocking that North Korea has a secret nuclear program, Israel, or South Africa in the past, but the official declaration is that Iran has already been approved by Congress for its nuclear program. Nuclear dominoes? The way the U.S. and Jews are running around... ...the solution is to squeeze money, and the U.S. and Japan establish diplomatic ties with North Korea and sign a non-aggression pact. Nevertheless, North Korea is unlikely to completely dismantle its nuclear program. I think I'll have some if I die.
There is luck in war.
Sick death: Winning or losing is a common occurrence in wars, and the lower article is published by Shin Jae-ho, who wrote during the 1996 Hightel World War II Research Society. I deleted some parts of the small sun that I thought were unnecessary. However, I don't think the reliability of the lower text is poor because it doesn't mean that the content itself has deteriorated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ It was the tribute of the Kitan army that Kang Gam-chan destroyed by hand. It is a tribute or a yanggong, which was separately operated by the Khitan army to cover up the main construction, not the main unit. It is a huge strategic mistake for the Goryeo army to miss the main unit of the Kitan army in Samgyocheon Stream. I'm going to answer this question in 1996, a long time ago, when I was at the World War II Institute of Hytel. I didn't know when I just read Dongguk Syeonggam or Goryeo envoy without thinking, but when I saw the "Yeoyo War History" from the entire Ministry of National Defense, I felt a little disgusted. I heard that you killed all the Kitan troops by blocking Samgyocheon with leather and bursting it.Doesn't the war continue after that? I've been wondering since I was a kid, and it actually failed to capture the main force of the Khitan army. The main unit of the Khitan army bypassed the Goryeo army and safely descended to the upper stream of the Cheongcheongang River, and Kang Gam-chan wiped out the main force by hand at Samgyocheon Stream. In other words, the main force of the Goryeo army of about 200,000 troops was deployed in the north of the Cheongcheongang River, and the main force of the Kitan army of the small back pressure bypassed it and advanced deep to the southward. At that time, all the main forces of the Goryeo army were dispatched to the northern part of the Cheongcheongang River, and there was no decent Goryeo army in the rear part of Kaesong. In a hurry, some Goryeo troops trace the small abdominal pressure and follow it south. It was a crisis, but ``The Quran outposts have been intercepted by a small number of allies in the northern part of Gaeseong, and the Quran troops will return to their posts.'' Rather, if the Xiaobae pressure had gone straight to Gaeseong, the attack might have been successful. Wouldn't it have been more advantageous if the capital was occupied (although there was a center of consideration for the king rather than the system, the king, but if the king were to flee?) If it was close to Kaesong anyway, it would have been better to attack Kaesong with a small backpressure. Given the fact that there was no clear chance of victory, fighting in Kaesong would have been a huge burden on the withdrawal of the Goryeo army, but in fact, the Goryeo army did not have any real reserve forces near Kaesong. In other words, there would have been no difference between occupying Kaesong and regaining troops, or just regaining troops, or preserving the power of the Khitan army. I mean, the small back pressure was also a problem. Of course, 1,000 years later, it's easy to argue on a desk like, "I wouldn't have done it," but in fact, small backpressure would have been a lot of trouble. Let's also look at the Battle of Guizhou, the Battle of Guizhou. If you look at the history of the Yeoyo War from the Ministry of National Defense, you can see a map, and the Goryeo army spreads three sides. The Y-shaped river runs along the river, and the access road is also Y-shaped. The Goryeo army is blocking the top two places of the Y-shape and approaching from the bottom (actually, slightly tilted to the left) as the small back pressure recedes. Immediately after that small back-pressure force, the Goryeo army pursues and continues to attack the rear of the small back-pressure unit. Isn't it amazing?At the center of the Y-shape, the Goryeo army besieges and attacks the Kitan army on three sides. The elite Yonara armies of the Uppisil Army, the Left-Pisil Army, etc. of the reversal are destroyed. It's a really exhilarating moment. In fact, it is rare in our history to determine the victory or defeat by making a great turn among the main forces in the field, not based on a certain castle. Machiavelli distinguishes between countries that can fight in the field and countries that can fight defense in the castle, and evaluates them as different nationalities. Now, in this three-sided siege, some of the Kitan army breaks through the siege. Escape to the upper right of Y. This is actually a problem. To miss the leadership of the enemy in a siege of this level... Anyway, Kang Gam-chan makes two mistakes. First of all, he was deceived by the enemy's attack and failed to capture the main force. It didn't really matter the result, but it was a really dangerous mistake. the escape of the enemy's command from a second exquisitely formed encircle The enemy was a cavalryman and could not escape from this state to the mountains. There was only a narrow passage along the river, but it's a problem that you missed it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The second clip shows the famous Battle of Guizhou: (Shin Jae-ho says) A three-sided siege was formed by the Goryeo army, which was originally stationed in Guizhou Province, and the Goryeo army, which was chasing in Taeju and Jeongju-myeon. It's a pleasant battle where you didn't just wait in the castle, but you came out of the castle and blocked and annihilated the Khitan army, which was retreating. But it's a bit of a waste to miss bovine pressure. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What if the Gitan army saw through or ignored the reality of the raid and continued to advance? The disgrace of Samjeondo may have happened earlier... Well, 'if' in history is useless. Conclusion: 1. War has its own luck. 2. Battle of Guizhou, it's exhilarating. 3. Luck skills.
Europe's Strongest Cavalry Cataphract
The Byzantine army, of course, inherited the Roman army in the early days, but as time goes by, it's heavily influenced by the Avars. Of course, the Byzantines have a 4:1 bogey ratio, but the core of tactics and strategies on the battlefield was cavalry. This is even evident in the Byzantine guerrilla style of defense. From the 5th to the 8th centuries, I prefer heavy infantry because there are many Roman traditions left. But hiring a large number of Tutons and Huns realized the usefulness of cavalry, and after Emperor Maurice and Heraclius, who carried out military reforms often mentioned in this bulletin, introduced a unified agricultural system called the pronoia in the 6th and 7th centuries, the Byzantine army was able to provide essential farmland for cavalry. (The farmland, by the way, was not inheritable.) Later, this becomes a social problem.) And as we get into the 9th century, the cavalry, which starts to increase dramatically in the military from the beginning of the 8th century, becomes the main force. By the 9th century, archers had fallen in position within the Byzantine army. The reason is that mid- to long-term soldiers were easier to train than archers. For this reason, the stereotypical form of the Byzantine army, which we call established in the 9th century and written in the 10th and 11th centuries, extends to providing a prototype of medieval history in Western Europe. Of course, it's hard to say that the Byzantine mid- to long-term disease is all due to Islam, but at least some of the armaments and their strategic use taxes are imported from the Islamic world. The tradition of mid- to long-term Islamic disease can be found in Iran before the spread of Islam. (To help you understand the game, in Rome Total War, the ultimate cavalryman of Parthia is Ketuckficto. It's in Iran. Anyway, you need to know the history of games these days^^) By the 9th century, the Byzantines were operating separately between mid- to long-term soldiers and archers. Mid- to long-term soldiers are trained by themselves based on the farmland provided, and archer soldiers hire mercenaries. The reason was that, as I said above, it was harder to train archers. Then, with the help of the compound recurbed bow, which was introduced in the 9th century, you were able to self-cultivate the archers. So what came out is Kettlefrector. Usually, mid- to long-term soldiers think that they only charge, but they were not Kettlefreeters. The Byzantine Kettlefreeters were armed with bows, spears, swords, daggers, chain armors, thin iron plates on top of them, iron helmets, and wooden shields with iron frames around their waist. Of course, the horse's head and chest were also covered in ironclad. He's got a bow^^ Of course, it didn't work as a result. Kettlefrector was never active alone. There were always three or four mid- to long-term soldiers (whether mercenaries or their own forces) in one Keterfrector unit. These mid- to long-term soldiers were uniquely called the Imperial Guard. (This is one of the most mysterious parts of Byzantine history to me.) --^ The Emperor's SS called the Vanguard Elite and the mid- to long-term soldiers of the Tuton Knights who chased Kettlefrector called the Imperial Guard. No one knows if it's like this or if it's actually like this when it's translated into English. I don't think there's a problem with the transmission of meaning in Latin --^) The main role of the Kettlefighter was a shockable charge, so just because they carried a bow doesn't mean that the mercenary archers hired by the staff disappeared. When you talk about Kettlefrector, you have to compare it with the article. There's a difference between Kettlefrector and his Western-made copy. First of all, Kettlefrector's armament is about 20% to 30%. This was because the horses' armor was heavier, and Kettlefreighters carried standby weapons such as Hubbard and Pike. And the horses of the Kettlefreeters were distributed crossbreeding by the state from Arabia. And by contrast, the words of the Western European knights were actually taken from anywhere. Kettlefreacher's horses are trained from an early age in weight-bearing education and skills needed in battlefields (e.g., foot soldiers stepping on foot). In the case of Western knights, they didn't raise horses very carefully. This is due to the differences in tactics between the two sides, and although Western European knights put more importance on individual battles, training was very important because Kettlefreighter went around the battlefield in a camp. Both Kettlefreeters and knights were, of course, the elite of society. Both sides were trained to fight when they were young. That's why Ketterfreacher also escorted the Vanguard elite when they were unable to protect the Imperial family on the battlefield. And of course, so did the article. The speed of the Kettlefrector was the equivalent of a medium-armed knight, even though it weighed much more. The speed of the two was not much different. Of course, Kettlefreeters were much faster than the bizarrely armed Western European knights from the mid-14th century. The reason for this is... the difference in the quality of the words and the number of people doing it was much higher. Kettlefrector's basic strategy was to rush. If they met an archer or an infantryman on the battlefield, they just charged head on and crushed him. What if you meet other cavalry? If the enemy is a mid- to long-term soldier who is more armed than they are (you may not believe it, but Islam actually operated a mid- to long-term soldier, which is about Ketterfrector, or even more armed). The problem is, there wasn't a lot. --^) Usually, the Keterpreter was more mobile, so it turned to the side and made it impossible to fight, and the mid- to long-term soldiers were similar in speed, and there was no mid- to long-term soldiers at the same time, so they were able to win without any problems. Even this ridiculously powerful unit had a natural enemy. It was called a light soldier. Now, let me point out... Usually, mid- to long-term soldiers are natural enemies of infantry. a heavy infantryman armed with a standby force It wasn't for Kettlefrector. They were trained groups, not individually fighting groups like knights and samurai, so they knew when and how to attack heavy infantry. If you're armed and you're more mobile... In other words, heavy infantry can be much easier enemies if they attack in groups. But they were really troublesome. In fact, Islamic heavy infantry (Ghaznavid, Nubia, and Syrian heavy infantry are famous) were often beaten in front of Ketterfreeters. It was never a strange scene to see a heavy infantryman being slaughtered by Kettlefrector in the Byzantine War against Persia or the Islamic War. Perhaps the Knights of the Holy Roman Empire should have learned to write to the Swiss spearmen. --^ (FYI, the Swiss spearmen and the bootmen who were natural enemies of cavalry in the 15th century were fundamentally different from the existing heavy spearmen. The existing heavy cavalry were literally like the Greek Falancs and could not be stopped unless they were on a head-on charge.) Well, their armament, their horsemanship, their training were all one of the best mid- to long-term soldiers of the time, but what really made them the best was their fighting spirit. Once again, for example, in the Medival Total War, there's only one unit that's able to fight properly after being flanked by more than one person. The Royal Knights, the best unit in France, also run away with a white flag^^ Of course, games are games --^ By the way, whether you look at the Arab's or the Byzantine's, Kettlefreighter always fought in the lead in the losing war, in the winning war. There's a lot of talk about fighting spirit that the Arabs admired.
If Alternative History - Ideal History
Of course it should have been feasible. For example, human nature should not suddenly become endlessly good and help each other. The most desirable scenario is the long-standing rule of the Hungu faction of the Joseon Dynasty. The story goes back to the time of King Sejong. King Sejong embodied the order of Joseon created by Jeong Do-jeon. King Sejong's reign was the best thing to emerge from under Confucianism. If King Sejong's son Munjong lives long, the story ends. Prince Suyang had a desire for power, but there was also a cause of his rebellion in his endless doubts about his nephew's political power. If King Munjong had lived a long time, Prince Suyang would not have easily passed the throne. If King Munjong had lived a long life, many scholars would not have been reclusive and dissident due to King Sejo's rule. These scholars would not have entered the provinces and become powerful and became private. The Hungu faction was practical. If the Hungu faction remained in power, Joseon's idealistic politics would have been repeated and its eyes on the world would have always been open. Busan would have been open to the West at least by the time Japan opened its port in Okinawa. Yang Myung-hak and Silhak would have been accepted by the Hungu faction from a practical point of view, so technology and commerce would have developed to some extent. Although the Hungu faction was a Neo-Confucianist, it was not immersed in the fundamentalism of Neo-Confucianism. There would have been no Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, as the eyes for the world were always open, and the army would have been endlessly nurtured. Or the Japanese army would not have been able to cross the Hyeonhaetan because a general like Yi Sun-shin was a left-handed warrior in Gyeongsang Province. After spending time without war, Joseon became an open country that constantly absorbs and studies Western culture through the opening of ports and exchanges with China. After that, they open their ports and shudder at the reality of terrifying imperialism. After safely going through the civil revolution, it would have become a constitutional monarchy, and it would have been independent of Japan, a close country that had not fought for 500 years. Of course, he would have joined hands with Japan, played a match with Russia, and intervened in China, which was mired in civil war and cries, to save some money. Japan, China, and Korea could have been friendly victors of World War I. Thus, by the 1950s, the world's national ranking would have been China's second, Japan's third, and Korea's fourth. A good relationship would have led to the birth of a coalition of Northeast Asian countries. Of course, the U.S. ranks first in the world.
My favorite Nobel Peace Prize winner is
Among the Nobel Peace Prize winners, I like Mother Teresa the best. She contributed to the social, economic and cultural development of Africa through the 2004 Wangari Maathai (Kenya) Greenbelt Movement. Kofi Annan, Ghana's Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2000 Kim Dae Jung, South Korea, helped clean up mutual distrust and hostility during the Cold War on the Korean PeninsulaInternational Campaign to Ban Landmines (LCBL) for the purpose of prohibiting the production, use, stockpiling, and transport of anti-personnel mines and contributing to the settlement of the 1996 Carlos Felipe Ximen Belo, East Timor, East Timor, East Timor, 1995Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Declaration of Palestinian Principles of Self-Governing Palestine 1993 Frederick Willem de Klerk, South Africa's apartheid policy Nelson Roderbergho 1992 and South Africa's Racial Discrimination, contributes to the Oslo Accord The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenjin Gyatso), the first Russian president of the United Nations Peace-Keeking Association of Myanmar (Soviet Union), dispatched to the International Peacekeeping Forces of the United Nations (Oscars) for peacekeeping operationsl, The International Physicians For The Prevention Of Nuclear War 1985 (IPPNW) for its efforts to eliminate racism and promote human rights, an international organization established to exercise professional influence by medical professionals, 1984 Desmond M. Tutu, Sweden, 1982Alfonso G. contributes to promulgating the Declaration of Abandonment. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For Refugees (UNHCR), established the 1980 Adolfo P. Eskiebel (Adolfo Pervez) Missionary Service for Human Rights at the Peace and Peace of Argentina, 1978Mohamed Anwar el Sadat, Egypt, visits Israel and strives for Middle East peace 1977 Amnesty International's efforts to rescue political prisoners punished and oppressed by state power in the 1976 Mairead Corrigan Margui, Northern Ireland , Soviet Commission on Human Rights 1974 Eisaku Sato, Japan, signed the return agreement to Okinawa, recognizing efforts to promote human rights in Ireland, 1973 Henry A. Kissinger, United States, signed a peace agreement with North Vietnam, and signed a special agreement1969 International Labor Organization (I.L.O.) Technical Support for Social Policy, Administrative and Human Resources Training and Utilization, Labor Statistics Collection, Employment and Labor Relations 1968 René Cassin (France) World Human Rights 1966 No winners 1965 United Nations Children's Fund, Uniting, 1964 The International Committee of the Red Cross led a campaign against atomic bombs by Linus C. Pauling, an emergency committee of atomic scientists of the world's 150-nation Red Cross. 1961 Dag Hjalmar Agne Carl Hammarskjold, Sweden, credited with nonviolent resistance to the 1960 Albert J. Lutuli (South Africa) apartheid for his efforts to resolve the Hungarian turmoil and Middle East conflicts. 1959 Philip J. Noel-Baker (Belgium) contributed to the establishment of peace and disarmament policies by the League of Nations and the United Nations. 1958 Dominique Georges Pire (Belgium), a European refugee relief effort. 1957 Lester Bowles Pearson (Canada) Resolved the Suez Crisis with the dispatch of United Nations surveillance forces. Office Of The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Switzerland) 1954, for his efforts to protect refugees politically and legally, 1953, George C. George Catlett Marshall, 1952, Albert Schweitzer, Germany, France, French trade union leader, founder of the International Labor Organization 1950 Ralph Bunch, First Secretary-General of the American Colonial Trustees, the 1949 United StatesThe Quakers, The United Kingdom Service Commission, founded in 1917 by Quakers in the United States and Canada, held the 1946 Emily Greene Balch, a religious and volunteer organization founded by George Fox in 1647, to the International Women's FederationNo winners of the 1938 Nansen International Office for Refugees (Switzerland) 1937 No winners of the International Red Cross Organization for Life and War Victims Activities under the Geneva Convention No winners 1937 Edgar A. R. Edgar Algernon Robert Cecil, chief delegate to the Geneva Conference on Disarmament, 1935 Carl von Ossietzky, Germany, 1932, who presided over the 1936 Buenos Aires Conference in Buenos AiresNicholas Murray Butler, American educator, current affairs critic, politician Nathan Soderblom, Swedish Lutheran superintendent, comparative religious studies 1929 Frank B. Frank Billings Kellogg, American lawyer and politician, 1927 Ferdinand Buisson, French politician, who served as chairman of the German Federation for Peace and Charity, was a French politician who worked on education, peace and charity. Gustav Stresemann, German Chancellor, contributed to the conclusion of the Locarno Agreement. Sir Austin Chamberlain (UK) was a British politician who contributed to the conclusion of the Locarno Agreement. Charles Gates Dawes, chairman of the War Compensation Committee, contributed to stabilizing postwar Germany's finances. Norwegian arctic explorer, zoologist and politician Karl Hjalmar Branting, Swedish politician, Christian Lousange, French judge of social justice, Vicerro Wilson, 1920, who founded the Social Democratic PartyHenry La Fontaine, Belgium, Belgium, Belgium, Belgium, Belgium, Belgium, Belgium, and Belgian law and political pioneer of the Netherlands, as a member of the 1915 International Committee of the Red Cross, under the Geneva Convention, 1917A,Alfred Hermann Fried, Austrian pacifist, German Peace Bureau, 1910, who served mainly as a bridge between government and non-governmental organizations for negotiations on the independence and peace movementSwedish politician and peace activist Fredrik Bajer of Denmark, who founded the Swedish Association for Peace and International Reconciliation, and Theodore Roosevelt, 1907th President of the United States, Italy Sir William Randall Cremer, British trade union leader, 1902 Eli Ducomong, Swiss federalist, Charles Dewcomong, Switzerland, 1902, founded the 1904 Institute of International Law, BelgiumFrench economist, politician, pacifist, and founder of the International Peace Federation.
Slaughter of Sand Creek
The Cheyenne tribe, led by the first black kettle, mounted on Sand Creek according to the U.S. military's words.Major Wincoup took care of them (although it's absurd to protect them in the first place).However, senior commanders who hated Winkup's treatment replaced their commanders.New commander Entery confiscates weapons and reduces food rations.On 27 November 1864, the Upper Sivington and Anthony "plan to collect Indian head skins and turn the village into a bloodbath." Of course, there were officers against it, but the opposition was completely ignored. At 8 p.m. on November 28, the Sivington Expeditionary Force was divided into four divisions (more than 700 men).Farm owner as guide on a farm near Spring Bottom during the march.The owner of this farm was William Bent's eldest son, Robert Bent, and his two younger brothers were living with the Cheyenne. The attack on Cheyenne Village begins at dawn.According to Edmund Guerrier, who had been through that time, "A large battalion of U.S. troops was running toward our village along the stream.More soldiers were seen flocking to the barn with horses in the south.The village was in a state of chaos.Women and children screamed when they saw the U.S. troops coming in, and the men ran back into the tent to get their weapons...Looking toward the chief's tent, I could see a black kettle holding a large American flag at the end of a long tent and holding a pillar of a flag flying in the dusk of winter."-FYI, the American flag was given by the U.S. military, saying no soldier could fire at them. He showed no hostility by mobilizing the American and White flags, but was completely ignored.In the meantime, the left bone and white antelope, who tried to stop shooting with their bare hands, were shot.Left bone survived, but white antelope died.Before death, white antelope leaves a few words of song - nothing survives long. This land and mountains only Robert Bent describes this disastrous situation as follows. "There were five women crouching under the bank.As the U.S. soldiers approached, they showed up and begged for help to let them know they were women.But the U.S. military shot and killed all the women.-Extremely -Indiscriminate slaughter was taking place in front of everyone's eyes, regardless of men, women, and children.All the dead people I saw had their heads skinned, and one pregnant woman had a split stomach, which I thought was a fetus lying on her side.Captain Sol said the fetus is right behind him.The body of the white antelope was dismembered.I've heard a U.S. soldier say he's going to make a cigarette wrap with it." Before the massacre, Sivington openly advocated killing all Indians, children, and skinning their heads, as well as Lieutenant James Connor's description, "The next day I went there, everyone was skinned and terribly mutilated. To the best of my knowledge, I cannot think that this atrocity was committed without Sivington's knowledge.Here's a little cruel. Fortunately, a lot of Indians have fled, but this carnage is devastating.105 women and children, 28 men died.In contrast, nine people were killed and 38 wounded in the Sivington unit, but the casualties were caused by shooting at each other. Seven people, including Robert Bent's younger brother Charlie Bent, were taken prisoner, and Charlie Bent was lucky to be reunited with Robert to survive.The other brother, George Bent, fortunately fled to Smokey Hill. Afterwards, the three Bent brothers decided to turn their backs on the white people forever and joined the Cheyenne.Plan to avenge Cheyenne and the Suu Kyi alliance, but ultimately fail and hand Colorado over to the white man forever. Bury my heart at Wounded Knee