Russia's valiant minority, the Kosak.

 Kazak is also known as Kosak. The Russian word "Kasak, Kazak" was changed to "Kazak," which originated from the word that means "free man" in Turkish. In addition, the Russian word for Kazak as a group is Kazacestbo. They elected their heads by election and carried out democratic autonomy to settle all important issues by consensus, jointly fighting the feudal emperors of Russia, Poland, Lithuania, and neighboring Turkic nomadic tribes to expand their land was expanded. Threatened by the 16th and 17th centuries of Tatar and Turkic invasion, Russia, Poland, and Lithuania gave Kazak weapons, ammunition, food, and funds to defend their borders. Along with the strengthening of the Russian government, the government tried to reduce Kazak's autonomy by conferring various privileges to the upper part of Kazak, but the peasant war led by S. Rajin in the late 17th century and Fugachev in the late 18th century was against it. In the 18th century, influential heads of state obtained the government's government's government posts and became landlords, and Kazak was reorganized into a fighting group as a non-regular Russian army under the terms of exchange for vast land. In the early 20th century, 11 Kazak legions belonged to each local military district across the country. In 1912, the total population of Kazak was about 4 million, of which about 450,000 were military personnel, mainly the 150th regiment of cavalry. After the October Revolution, most Kazak remained neutral in the domestic war, but the poorest supported the new Soviet regime, while the rich and poor turned to the White Army. With the establishment of the Soviet system, the Kazak group as a privileged class was disbanded, and the rich peasant eradication movement and agricultural collectivization proceeded. In 1936, restrictions on Kazak's participation in enemy forces were abolished, and the newly organized Kazak Division gained a reputation in the war between Germany and Russia. But I think I heard that the Kosak people harmed Hamgyeong-do at the end of the Joseon Dynasty.

Nikolai II, the world's largest empire in the early 20th century, was the Russian emperor.

 Among the attachments of Nicolai II, the emperor of the world's largest country (Russia) in the early 20th century, the painting is similar to what was felt in paintings of the "Vizantium" culture. Nikolai II (Nikolai II, Aleksandrovich, 1868.5.18-1918.7.17) The son of Alexander III, the last Russian emperor. In 1891, while visiting the Far East as the Crown Prince, he was injured in the so-called Otsu Incident in Japan. His character was good and cultured, but he was ineligible as an emperor. She was under the influence of Alexandra, a German princess and granddaughter of Queen Victoria of England, and caused the domination of G.E. Rasputin due to hemophilia of the crown prince. Politically, he opposed the introduction of Western European constitutional politics and insisted on conservative despotism. The aggressive advancement of the Far East, including the three-state interference and the construction of the Dongcheong Railway, led to the Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905), and the defeat in the war was linked to the domestic situation, attacked by revolutionary forces and liberal camps, and caused the revolution in 1905. As a result, on October 17, 1905, the creation of the National Assembly called "Duma" and the guarantee of democratic freedom were promised. During World War I, he left the capital and became the supreme commander of the Russian army to command the entire army, but failed to escape his passive position by entrusting his internal affairs to the empress and his aides. He was declared abdicated on March 15, 1917, imprisoned, and transferred to Siberia after the October Revolution, when he was killed with his family on July 16, 1918 by local Soviet authorities in Ural Province.

Private Opinion of History Club Members - Reasons for Germany's defeat

 Above all, the biggest reason for Germany's defeat in World War II was the rigid command system, and all matters were handled only through Hitler.   Even with the new weapon, Hitler didn't refer to the expert's opinion and handled it at his disposal. By the way, I could have just used it as a fighter, but he asked me to replace it with a bomber. It's crazy. Honestly, how fast will the initial jet come? But if you put a heavy bomb on top of that, the speed is no different from that of a regular propeller.   It was during the Normandy landings, and even then, the command system delayed time.   If they had recognized the situation a little faster and moved, they might have been able to end the Allies on the coast. It's a little similar, but the German scientific community was far ahead of the Allies at the time, but it wasn't organized. It was a complete mess.   The rigid command system created a fantastic combination. And one factor was the huge lag in intelligence and intelligence, and it was unreasonable to force the expansion of the front. I put it up here because I thought something historical would be closer.

Alexander Gwanggaeto Ho-tae of Northeast Asia 1. Wind on the western border. (1)

 In June (385 A.D.), the 40,000th generation of Goguryeo troops advanced toward future generations. Huyeon was also gathering troops on the front line as if he had captured Goguryeo's movements. Jeonyeon was a country that became enemies with Goguryeo. However, as the front edge collapsed and the rear edge appeared on the western border of Goguryeo, it was a great threat. Since ancient times, the forces that threaten the safety of Goguryeo have mainly been in the west, where there have been Han and Seonbi. Dangun Joseon has been ruling over a large area of the Yoha basin since the Korean Peninsula. However, after Wiman Joseon collapsed due to the attack of Donghan, the Yoha basin became an area where the Dongi Baedal Minjok, Hanjok, and Seonbi fought. They fought a fierce war to incorporate this place into their own territories. Goguryeo, which continued the Dangun Joseon Dynasty, fought against the Han Chinese, which was a fight against the invasion and domination of the Han Chinese and a fight to regain the strong land of the Dongi Baedal people. Goguryeo was gradually driving the Han people out of the territory of the Dongi Baedal people through persistent struggles. As the power of the Han people weakened, the scholars emerged as the main force threatening Goguryeo. Goguryeo was hit hard in 342 in a fight against Jeon Yeon, founded by the clan of the scholars of the Moyong Clan. Mo Yong-hwang, the first king of Jeon Yeon, attacked Goguryeo himself, captured Hwandoseong, the national capital of Goguryeo at the time, captured the Empress, and committed atrocities by digging into the tomb of King Micheon, the predecessor of Goguryeo. Goguryeo pledged revenge for its pride. However, when the body of King Micheon was at the front and the Empress was held prisoner, she could not do anything. Goguryeo endured humiliation and humiliation and sent envoys to the front, offered tribute to the front, received the body and Empress of King Micheon, and sharpened the blade of revenge against the front. Finally, revenge was carried out in 370. Goguryeo launched a general attack on Jeonyeon in October of that year, when Jeonyeon mobilized troops from Liaodong and Yoseo regions to fight against Jinjeon, and the defense of this area was weakened. Less than a month after the attack, Goguryeo took control of Liaodong and Yoseo and crossed the boundary of the Great Wall to the central region of Yuju, Beomyangguk in the south of Beijing, and the northeastern part of Sanseoseong. In the south, Jeonjin entered the capital fortress of Jeonyeon, and Mo Yong-wi, the king of Jeonyeon, fled toward Yongseong Fortress, but was captured by soldiers led by Kwak Gyeong, the general of Jeonjin, and sent to the fortress. General Gojin of Goguryeo took advantage of the opportunity to take control of Yuju to thoroughly wipe out the remaining forces of the war who opposed and invaded Goguryeo, and the warring forces were busy running away without daring to confront the bravery of the Goguryeo army. Goguryeo was able to secure the safety of the western border by punishing Jeon Yeon, who invaded Goguryeo through the 370 operation, and to restore most of Dangun Joseon's territory. However, Goguryeo voluntarily withdrew from Yuju in early 376 after establishing a peace relationship with Junjin. At the end of 383, there was a great change in the situation on the Jungwon continent. This is because Mo Yong-soo betrayed Junjin and established a rear edge in the land of the old Jeonyeon, taking advantage of the time when Junjin was defeated in the war with Dongjin. Mo Yong-soo was originally the west son of Mo Yong-hwang, the first king of Jeon Yeon, but he was persecuted by Jeon Yeon and fled to Jun Jin. The emergence of Huyeon meant that aggressors entered the west of Goguryeo. During this period, Goguryeo continued to make a series of "Iljin and Iljin" and captured the eight villages of Goguryeo in 378 years at the northwest border, including King Gookwon's death in a battle with Baekje, which borders the southern border in 371. In this situation, the emergence of Huyeon was not just a war cloud in the west, but a situation in which Goguryeo had to fight against enemies on all sides, pushing it into a more difficult situation. However, generations of Duso's state did not take this seriously. The Duso group, which holds Goguryeo's central government, was more interested in preserving their position than in the national crisis, so they felt it was a national crisis and tried to establish a peaceful relationship with Huyeon rather than actively taking measures to overcome it. General Jwa, Gojin, who had taken control of Yuju by punishing Jeon Yeon in the past, closely observed the situation in the west and insisted on punishment for the latter. However, this position faced opposition from a group of high-ranking officials, including Duso and his country. The late King Gogukyang gathered ministers of the court and asked for their opinions to take measures against the emergence of Huyeon. "As you know, Mo Yong-soo founded a new post-establishment and put up the banner of entrepreneurship. This is a great hindrance to the nation. I'd like to hear what you think about what to do." "Your Majesty, God Gojin." "Oh, General Gojin is a bad man." Go ahead and say it." It was the bright voice of King Koguryang. General Gojin was a well-known soldier of Goguryeo who was respected by the people as he heroically carried out a retaliatory war against Jeon Yeon, Goguryeo's long-cherished desire, and strengthened the defense of the western border. "Mo Yong-soo is the child of Mo Yong-hwang, the enemy who humiliated King Go Guk-won, the predecessor, and he took over the national name of Yeon set by his father and started a business, so he can plan provocations against our Goguryeo as much as he wants. Therefore, it should be considered as the right line to block the attempt to invade the country in advance." "No." It is said that the latter was caused by the inheritance of the former, but the king, Mo Yong-soo, has not yet taken a hostile policy against Goguryeo, his country. However, it is believed that there is no need to stimulate the future generation first." Duso refuted General Ko Jin's remark. Then General Kojin went out again. "No, sir," It is a matter of caution for us that Mo Yong-soo inherited the national code of Yeon, a country founded by his father. Later, after reorganizing the national system, they will invade our country sooner or later." "We cannot jump to conclusions on their foreign policy just by the name of the country." It's said that we're going to subdue them beforehand, but it's not a country where the "Since the founding of the country has not been long ago, the national system has not yet been well maintained. And the internal resistance forces control the Yoseo area of Yuju. If you take advantage of this opportunity, you'll be able to take the lead." "I hope so, but if you can't do that, you'll have a hostile relationship with the latter." In a difficult situation, the fight against Baekje and Khitan will create a difficult situation to make another enemy, so you should think carefully." General Ko Jin and Duso did not back down from each other. As opinions were sharply divided, King Goguk and Yang looked at it sadly. "Both of your opinions seem to be right, so I don't know which words to listen to..." "Your Majesty the Holy Spirit, God Janghyup, I tell you." Sosa Janghyup was neutral in the relationship between the royal family and Duso, but closer to the royal family. "Tell me." "I'm afraid both of your opinions have merits and demerits." So I think it's better to gather your opinions." "To gather your opinions..." "Send troops to the western border, but make a final decision after seeing the movements of the latter." "That's a good idea." Let's do that. "Listen, General Jwa." "Yes, Your Majesty!" "As the general of the Later Expeditionary Force, let him sail to the western border." And let's figure out the situation there and decide." "The castle is ruined." Goguryeo's court agreed to send an expeditionary force after controversy. It was said that no reconciliation could be possible unless the latter was a country that inherited the enemy country, Jeonyeon. However, rather than sending expeditionary forces to attack the rear unconditionally, the government decided to reach a final conclusion after grasping the situation of the western border. It was an expedition whose position was unclear, but many people agreed with the position of building the spirit of the country to achieve peace rather than begging for peace. Moreover, many people believed that he would win if he participated because he knew General Kojin's tactics and bravery well. The expeditionary forces gathered in Yodongseong Fortress, but the judgment was still flexible. However, General Kojin's determination to suppress the younger generation in advance was firm. Now, Goguryeo and its later armies were confronting each other with tense tension over the border. 

Source: Jeong Il-ho, Heavenly Kingdom, and Daeguryeo.

Are the Huns Korean?

 Does the world recognize that the Huns are Korean? When I searched earlier, Atilla of the Huns was a Korean people.I was told. And it is said that the Huns are close to Gaya or Silla.And they said that they were one of the same people, including Goguryeo. But do you have any evidence? And is it recognized by Europe and the United States? I wonder if people around the world recognize it. Please reply in detail.^^ So far, it's someone's question and the best answer from the following article.It's a bit long. Hello, I'm a college student majoring in history. I happened to see this question, and I posted it because I felt sorry after reading the writings of other respondents. In fact, I recently made a presentation about the Huns. At that time, I had a lot of course. Nothing really has been revealed about the Huns. It hasn't been long since the study began. Not only historical materials, but also relics, ruins, tombs, and even materials about them were scarce or inaccurate, making it very difficult to study. I finished my presentation successfully by searching the Internet and various books, and through this presentation and study, I was able to see how much we had been tamed by Western perspectives and how prejudiced we were. I came to see the Huns from a new perspective. Of course, until I made this announcement, I didn't know anything about the Huns until I studied them, and I thought they were savages and really bad devils. However, as I read various books and collected materials, I realized how wrong I was. In fact, there are so many assignments and so many things to do that I tried not to answer them, but the prejudice brought by Western eyes is so angry that I want to write a few words down. It might be a bit long, but please read them all slowly.^-^;; First of all, the first thing you need to know is that there is no exact theory about the Huns. Since no exact evidence or evidence has been found in the numerous studies so far, we only speculate from the circumstances of the time, some artifacts discovered so far, and historical data described by Westerners. This is because, unfortunately, the Huns were a people without letters and could not record their history. We don't know their history from the eyes of the Huns. Please read the following sentences. "Dark skin color, two dark holes instead of eyes, a flat nose, and a face with a scar on its cheek were an unformed lump." -Joshimos, Greek historian, "Physically and mentally, they are disgusting." Their noses were shapeless, flat, and their cheekbones stood out. The eyelids of the two eyes are small, so that light can barely enter, but these penetrating eyes can see far away. Moreover, the faces of the baby swings made me shudder. The nostrils were wrapped around one string to fit the helmet's face. The mother deformed her son in this way for the war.……" - Sidonius Aporinaris, Bishop of Clermont, "He is small, but he has a very large, round head, and a wide face, with a wide cheekbone protruding out. All the hair was cut off and only the top of my head remained. The eyebrows are thick, the eyes are as intense as fire, and the eyes are slanted." - Samacheon (describing the scar) "The hearts of wild animals are beating in their hearts. Since ancient times, they have not been considered members of mankind." -One of the records of a court official in China is that of other countries against the Huns. Since the Huns had no written language, most of the people who left records of the Huns were invaded by the Huns. Therefore, it is highly likely that the remaining records are not fair and objective. They described the Huns from the cringing perspective of a very frightened man. The expression was exaggerated without restraint and tried to leave a bad impression on the enemy Huns. An example of Westerners' prejudice against the Huns based on these records is an animation called Mulan produced by Walt Disney in 1998. Did the questioner watch this movie? The Huns appear as Chinese enemies, the protagonists and good forces, and the Huns invade China simply because the Huns invade China. Throughout the screening time, the Huns torment, invade and destroy people for no reason, just like the cursed demons. They are also rough, violent, and even dark in color, even though they are Asian like China. Even to us, Asians, the Huns were perceived as having an abhorrent appearance and a wicked appearance. It can be seen that such Western prejudice against the Huns clearly symbolizes the mistakes of the history of settled civilization over the past thousand years. Western historians don't know much about the Huns, who had thrown the strongest nations of Asia and Europe into a state of fear. The biggest factor that made the nomadic identity uncertain was the religion of the Europeans, when the Romans were obsessed with apocalypse. He believed that Magok (a race that would bring an end to the world) in the Old Testament was a Hun people. The Romans believed that the Huns were an army sent by demons, so they considered the Huns as a nation without hometown, culture, or custom, so there was no need to study the origins of the Huns. Rome's most important source for the Huns is a Greek Roman historian named Ammyanus Markelinus, who wrote based solely on his own experience, and his writings appear to be an expression of fear for the ethnic group that destroyed his hometown of Antioch. For this reason, 1,500 years after the fall of the Huns, they have not been properly evaluated. However, they were not such anarchic and savage races as Westerners thought, but rather organized peoples with developed independent cultures. Many minorities formed a strictly hierarchical division of labor, and strict discipline dominated the courts of individual tribes where the empress independently exercised absolute control. The Huns were not just livestock or horse-riding diseases, and there were various jobs in their society. In addition, excavations of tombs that never fall apart compared to Orient's works of art in the ancient Persian Empire of a highly civilized country prove that they had a tendency to prefer display walls and decorations. From the records of the Greek Priscus, who once stayed in Attila's court as a member of the Eastern Roman mission, we can see the custom of the Huns, who were friendly and caring to guests. Then, let me introduce the origin theory of the Huns, which the questioner is curious about. There are five theories about the origin of the Huns that have changed with the times. At first, Westerners did not consider the Huns, one of the causes of the destruction of Rome, to be Asians, who caused the "great migration of the Germanic tribes." It was too hurt to admit that Rome, the root of Western culture, was destroyed by the Asians they now ignore so much. Thus, early Western scholars speculated that they were European nomads, or Scitaians. Of course I'm white. The Huns are known to be a very cruel people. The Scythians were no match for the Scythians were no match. I thought that these Scythians served as breakwaters to protect Europe from the Asians coming west. It is said that it was a savage and cruel people. However, as various artifacts were discovered and historical materials were accumulated in the course of the study, the Huns were presented as an undeniable and powerful theory that the Huns were Asian Huns. Of course, the names of the Huns and Huns are different, but the descriptions of them are similar in the East and West at the same time. Therefore, the Huns and Huns are now regarded as the same people. However, it seems that the prideful Westerners, the absolute Huns, could not be recognized as Asians, that is, yellow races. It seems to admit that their history was once dominated by barbarian Asians. They eventually came up with an exquisite compromise: the Huns, although they were Huns, are Turkic. Western scholars view the Turk as white, separating only the Turk from the Mongolian lineage. Therefore, it has been recognized as the most influential theory to date. In fact, if you search the Huns in the Naver encyclopedia, the Huns are said to be the Turkic nomadic people who lived in the steppe region of Central Asia in the "summary" section at the top. However, two powerful theories have recently been suggested. The first theory that emerged earlier in time was that the Huns were Mongolian. It presented two conclusive grounds. One is that the appearance of ancient historians who have seen the Huns in person is not that of Westerners, but that of Asians. A more decisive reason is the funeral process. The traditional Turkic funeral method is cremation, while the Mongolian funeral method is burial. The second theory is that the Huns mentioned by the questioner are the "Korean people," and there are seven grounds for this. However, since no conclusive evidence has been found yet, this theory is not exactly correct. Anyway, I will explain these seven grounds in detail. I will extract these grounds from the report I wrote. The content isn't that hard, so you can easily understand if you just read it, and I have a photo of it, but I'm not good at tackling it.^^;If you give me a note, I will send you all the photo materials via e-mail. Anyway, this is an excerpt. <The Huns share their roots with the Korean people> In a book titled "The Secret of History" compiled by Hans Christian Hoop, the Huns' hometown is mentioned as the easternmost part of the Asian continent, that is, Korea. As a basis, a clay statue excavated as a burial object in a tomb near Gyeongju is cited. The clay statue is a horse-riding statue with an unusual-looking pot behind a horse rider. The pot is a bronze pot used by the Huns, and this horseback riding statue is said to be found only in the Gyeongju area of the Korean Peninsula and the Huns' movement route.

In addition, several shapes of shaped leaves and mushrooms are attached side by side to the edge of the bronze pot, and it is mentioned once again that the Huns are from the Korean Peninsula based on the existence of the same shape in the decorated headband of the Hun noble lady and the gold crown of Silla. However, this does not mean that the Korean people are the Huns. The Han Chinese, who were already living on the Korean Peninsula at that time, could not have attacked Europe. The most likely theory about this is that due to the constant division within the Huns, one of the ruling classes of the Huns originally descended to the southeast and settled on the Korean Peninsula, and the other moved westward and grew into the Huns. Research on this has been active in recent years, and I would like to present some evidence that the Han and Huns share their roots, as well as historical materials and relics studied so far. The first is Mongolian spot. Mongolian spots are found in descendants of Huns living in Western Europe such as France. Mongolian spots are not a feature that appears only in the Korean people, but considering that descendants of the Huns are born with Mongolian spots, it can be said that the Korean people and the Huns are related to relatives. Second, the Huns used their own bow. This unique bow takes five years to make and 10 years to learn to shoot properly, but it is known to be able to shoot more than 15 shots in a minute. The frescoes of the Church of Creifda Afresh in Aquilea, northern Italy, indicate that the Huns used this unusual bow. In this painting, there is a scene where the Huns on horseback shoot arrows at the Roman cavalry chasing. However, it is the same as Goguryeo warriors who hunt animals with bows on horseback in the mural of Goguryeo's dance gun. The arrowhead in the tomb mural is an ax blade arrowhead, which rotates as it flies, so the impact of the moment it is inserted into the target is very great. The Huns also used this very axe arrowhead. Third, it is the custom of "pickled head." A migraine is a hair style in which a newborn baby is laid flat and pressed with a stone-like forehead to flatten the forehead and back of the head, but the top of the head is raised. It can be seen as a kind of plastic surgery. If you look at the bones of the Hun people, the forehead and back of the head are pressed, and the top of the head is protruding. However, a migraine skull was also found in Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, where Gaya Kingdom was located. It is said that the kings of Silla, including King Beopheung, were also migraines. It is said that there is also a record of "all the rich people are migraines" in "The Three Kingdoms" as well. Migraine has been a custom that has been handed down among the Korean people for quite a long time, distinguished from China. However, one thing to note here is that the Huns had a migraine custom, but the Huns could not find it. Through this, it can be seen that the Huns are a special people with migraine customs and are related to Gaya and Silla in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. Fourth, on the other hand, a unique pot-shaped bronze pot is found in the Huns' movement path. This pot, dedicated to nomadic tribal chiefs, was used to sacrifice meat at the purification ceremony. These bronze pots are also found in the ruins of Daeseong-dong and Yangdong-ri in Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, which are tombs from the Gaya period. Bronze pots have often been mentioned as evidence that the origins of Gaya countries are horse-riding peoples in the north. The Hun carried the winter uniform on the horse's back, and it is also found that the horse's back is carrying bronze pots on the horse's back in the pottery of the horse's back excavated from Geumryeongchong Tomb in Nodong-dong, Gyeongju-si. In addition, all the main characters of this horseback riding award are migraines. Fifth, the patterns found in the bronze pots of the Huns are similar to those of the Korean people, such as gold crowns. Gold crowns excavated from Korea have many wooden shapes (extra-shaped decorations) and green shapes (deer horn decorations). This is a custom that also appears in the northern people, indicating that the northern people moved to the Korean Peninsula and settled down. Sixth, the burial, a typical custom of the northern nomadic people, is also proven through ancient tombs in the Gaya region. In particular, in Tomb No. 1 in Daeseong-dong, the remains of Geumgwan Gaya, a wooden block with the heads of cows and horses cut off and placed on top of the box was found, which is completely consistent with the animal sacrifices of the northern nomadic peoples, including the Huns. Seventh, the records that the Huns hung a red cloth on the tree to keep evil spirits away and worshipped bears as peace totem are very similar to the fact that our people built a Jangseung or a Sotdae at the entrance of the village totem. Most nomadic peoples worship animals other than bears. I told you about the reasons that the questioner was curious about, but I wonder if it helped ^-^ And you asked if the Huns were recognized by the people of the world as Korean people around the world. As I mentioned above, there is no established theory. However, the powerful theory that has been recognized so far is that it is Turkic. Also, ordinary people don't know that the Korean people share their roots with the Huns. The people involved in this theory (?) are not only not familiar with the theory, but also have a strong prejudice against the Huns. But even Westerners who instilled that prejudice are interested in them? To them, the Huns are still savages and savages. I don't even want to know more about them. It may also be because this theory is the latest to be presented. Anyway, for these reasons, more research on the Huns is needed. And personally, the part of other people's answers that I want to correct is ^^; The ZDF TV history documentary aired in Germany is not a sham. The book "The Secret of History," which I mentioned above, is a collection of several of these historical documents that present facts or theories different from those known so far. This book is a recognized book. My professor told me that it was a book that I could refer to. There are countless history-related books on the market, but not all of them are referenced when studying. There are a lot of weird books, too.^^; That's why I asked the professor about this book before the presentation. Anyway, I can't tell you that this is an authoritative book, but I hope you know that it is at least not a sham, but a book that has been recognized in the academic world. The reason why I answered this question so hard does not mean that I acknowledge the theory that the Huns are really Korean, the question raised by the questioner. Research on the Huns still has a long way to go. As I said above, there is no really accurate theory yet. Then, I wanted to answer what I knew about your question, but I also intended not to evaluate history recklessly with the wrong standards of prejudice planted in us. We still live in many prejudices, stereotypes, and prejudices. Of course, without knowing which is prejudice or stereotype. But wouldn't it be too unfair to live in such a state of tradition and in the West? At least if there's anything wrong, you have to correct it. Rather than just accepting it as it is, it will take an effort to approach it from a variety of perspectives. Especially for people like me who study history. By the way, I would like to recommend a movie called Attila the gladiator, which was made in 2001. This movie is relatively well-tested and interesting. The reason why this movie is valuable is because it presents a different perspective on the Huns. It is the hands of Westerners who have created false prejudices against the Huns. Also, I would recommend you to read the book "The Secret of History."

About the credibility of the Japanese scribe

 1. The ancient history of Japan, especially the records before the 5th century, is not very reliable in Japan.The fact that the age of a librarian officially compiled by the government is 120 years old does not support the argument that the rest of the librarian's records are partially true, no matter what excuse he makes... 2. In particular, in the records of Empress Singong's conquest of Silla, the name of the Silla king is recorded as Pasa Isageum.Of course, Yeon Gaesumun's name was recorded as Irisumi, but Yeon Gaesumun's bloody coup was recorded in Goguryeo headquarters and Chinese librarians, but only in Japanese librarians, and not in Silla or Baekje.Therefore, the only record is not completely reliable because there is a decisive error in Empress Sinkong's record of conquering Silla. Therefore, if you trust the ancient history part of the Japanese Book, you need to clarify the above part.The fact that other records are correct is not conclusive evidence that this fact is true.If necessary, I have a lot of data to inform you of the inaccuracy of the Japanese scribe. 3. Regarding the inscription of King Gwanggaeto... In the 10th year after year...50,000 infantry and cavalry were sent to save Silla.From Namgeoseong Fortress to Silla Fortress, why? was in it, but when the government army reached it, the Japanese enemy retreated............................................................................................................................................................................................. In the 14th year of the reign of King Yeongnak, he broke into the boundaries of the Great Wall because he did not obey the law. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... First of all, if you look at the article of the 10th year of Yeongrak, they chased after the Japanese, took the castle in Imnagaya, and recaptured it.That's what's being said.There is no such thing as "I've reached it" in either version or interpretation.So I've reached or stayed...I think the rest of the story should come out after telling you the full text of the interpretation and the name of the interpreter. The 14-year-old article also only tells us about the invasion of Japan, but does not support the story that the Japanese are based in Imnagaya.Rather, it is a more reasonable interpretation to interpret it as ousting the power... In addition...Yesterday, I found something very interesting while looking for articles related to the Japanese scribe ^^ I laughed a lot while reading it because it was a different issue from when the king's survival year was over 150 years old.Someone who says something about credibility with a book like this...I wish I was really pathetic.

The personal opinion of members of the historical club - The personal opinion of Imra Japan.

 I don't think I can question why the country was on par with Silla.Everyone knows that Silla was originally a weak country. (In the case of Baekje, we need another discussion, so I'll give up.) However, the claim that the Japanese ruled Gaya is unreliable. If Lalala Haet's claim that "I don't think the Imlail headquarters of the Japanese secretary is the same as the government office in the Japanese residential area in Gaya, Sohai can agree. It can also be admitted in its own way that the Japanese government had a certain level of influence on the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time. However, it is difficult to accept if the influence at this time is said to be taken from a superior position, that is, influence through direct or indirect rule. The reason for this is that the remains of Japanese relics currently found were proved to refer to the residence of Japanese, especially quite high-ranking people at the time, but it is thought to be far from the sovereignty of the southern end of the Korean Peninsula claimed by the far right. If the Japanese controlled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula at that time, there should be appropriate archaeological excavations (e.g., relics found in heavy rain guns), but there is no such thing.   Therefore, I think the substance of what is called "Imlail Headquarters" was similar to the Silla Dynasty established in Tang Dynasty Tang. Of course, it doesn't mean that the relationship between the party and Silla is a relationship between Gaya and why. Personally, I don't think it's right for Korea to deny itself and for Japan to flow into a confrontation of claims that Japan had dominated Korea since ancient times. As Lalala also mentioned, the Japanese scribe is a librarian mixed with exaggeration and distortion. I think that correcting the distorted perception of Japan and the distorted perception of Korea by Koreans is the core of Imlail's discussion. The perspective of ancient Japan that Koreans generally think of would be correct if it were expressed as "civilized." But I don't think it's a very easy country to see through ancient librarians. I mean, the word "civilization" doesn't fit in. There may be some differences in the degree of development, but I think it is difficult to say that there are many differences. Of course, I think the situation is a little different in the case of the Silla Dynasty. Since Silla began to dominate the maritime trade zone, why have you had some difficulties, and I think Silla developed a little faster in that situation. However, I think it is a country that has no difference from Silla in the 4th to 6th centuries. In some ways, there are many aspects of Silla's weakness. And I think some Japanese claim that Korea has been a popular land since ancient times is also unreliable. The colonial claims that appeared only in the Japanese colonial era are too much to prove. I think it is right to interpret this in terms of maintaining close relations with the Gaya region. This interpretation is possible, and if this is accepted as true through other studies, the confrontation of who was better will disappear as it is now. Rather, it will be possible to recognize that Korea and Japan have formed a close relationship since ancient times through Imra Japan. War was a common thing at the time.